iTeh StandardsiTeh Standards
EURUSD
Your shopping cart is empty.
ASTM

ASTM E1692-95a(1999)

(Classification)

Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Change and Churn by Occupants

Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Change and Churn by Occupants

SCOPE
1.1 This classification contains pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements to accommodate changes in working method, and frequent relocations of staff, and realignment of workstations.  
1.2 Each pair of scales shown in Figs. 1 through 5, printed side by side on a page, are for classifying one topic of serviceability within that aspect of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1 through 5) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic that occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1 through 5) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility that, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1 through 5) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning, to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, and evaluating how an office facility is performing.  
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.  
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability, but it does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating or how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E1334. The scales in this classification are complementary to and compatible with Practice E1334. Each requires the other.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
09-Oct-1999
ICS
35.260 - Office machines
Technical Committee
E06 - Performance of Buildings
Drafting Committee
E06.25 - Whole Buildings and Facilities
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Replaced By
ASTM E1692-95a(2005) - Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Change and Churn by Occupants
Effective Date
01-May-2005
Referred By
ASTM E1765-16(2023) - Standard Practice for Applying Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Multiattribute Decision Analysis of Investments Related to Projects, Products, and Processes
Effective Date
10-Oct-1999

Buy Standard

ASTM E1692-95a(1999) - Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Change and Churn by OccupantsASTM E1692-95a(1999) - Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Change and Churn by Occupants
PreviousNext
Standard
ASTM E1692-95a(1999) - Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Change and Churn by Occupants
English language
12 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
An American National Standard
Designation: E 1692 – 95a (Reapproved 1999)
Standard Classification for
Serviceability of an Office Facility for Change and Churn by
1,2
Occupants
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E 1692; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 2. Referenced Documents
1.1 This classification contains pairs of scales for classify- 2.1 ASTM Standards:
ing an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, E 631 Terminology of Building Constructions
the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible E 1334 Practice for Rating Serviceability of a Building or
requirements to accommodate changes in working method, and Building-Related Facility
frequent relocations of staff, and realignment of workstations. E 1679 Practice for Setting Requirements for Serviceability
1.2 Each pair of scales shown in Figs. 1-5, printed side by of a Building or Building-Related Facility
side on a page, are for classifying one topic of serviceability 2.2 ISO Documents:
within that aspect of serviceability. Each paragraph in an ISO 6240 International Standard, PerformancemStandards
Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-5) summarizes one in Building—Contents and Presentation
level of serviceability on that topic that occupants might ISO/DIS 7162 Draft International Standard, Performance
require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see) Standards in Building—Contents and Format of Standards
is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain for Evaluation of Performance
features of a facility that, taken in combination, indicate that ISO/DIS 7164 Draft International Standard, Performance
the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability. Standards in Building—Definitions and Means of Expres-
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-5) sion for the Performance of a Whole Building
are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick
3. Terminology
scanning, to estimate approximately, quickly, and economi-
3.1 Definitions—For standard definitions of additional
cally how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of
terms applicable to this classification, see Terminology E 631.
one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries
are not for measuring, knowing, and evaluating how an office 3.1.1 facility, n—physical setting used to serve a specific
purpose.
facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of 3.1.1.1 Discussion—A facility may be within a building, or
a whole building, or a building with its site and surrounding
serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to
estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned environment; or it may be a construction that is not a building.
The term encompasses both the physical object and its use.
but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings
and outline specifications have been prepared. (E 631)
3.1.2 facility serviceability—the capability of a facility to
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility
to be rated at a certain level of serviceability, but it does not perform the function(s) for which it is designed, used, or
required to be used.
state how to conduct a serviceability rating or how to assign a
serviceability score. That information is found in Practice 3.1.2.1 Discussion—The scope of this performance is of the
facility as a system, including its subsystems, components, and
E 1334. The scales in this classification are complementary to
and compatible with Practice E 1334. Each requires the other. materials and their interactions, such as acoustical, hydrother-
mal, air purity, and economic; and of the relative importance of
each performance requirement. (E 631)
3.1.3 offıce—a place, such as a room, suite, or building, in
This classification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E-6 on
which business, clerical, or professional activities are con-
Performance of Buildings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E06.25
ducted. (E 631)
on Whole Buildings and Facilities.
Current edition approved March 15 and April 15, 1995. Published August 1995.
Portions of this document are based on material originally prepared by the
International Centre for Facilities (ICF) and r 1993 by ICF and Minister of Public Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 04.11.
Works and Government Services Canada. Their cooperation in the development of
Available from American National Standards Institute, 11 W. 42nd St., 13th
this standard is acknowledged.
Floor, New York, NY 10036.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
E 1692
3.2 Descriptions of Terms Specific to This Standard: or facility for one topic of serviceability, and for comparing
3.2.1 churn rate—the rate at which changes in the layout or that level against the level of any other building or facility.
location of individual workstations occur in an organization,
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well
calculated as the number of occasions during the year in which
different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement
the location at which an individual works is changed, or a
for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as
workstation was relocated, including realignments or moves
location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building
within the building, and moves in or out of the facility, with the
shape.
total being divided by the total number of occupants at the end
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of
of the year a
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

This May Also Interest You

ASTM
ASTM E1663-22(Classification)
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Typical Office Information Technology

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-18) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.  
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape. Further information may be found in ISO 19208.  
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.  
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:  
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.  
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.  
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.  
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.  
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)  
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers matched sets of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for performance to support typical office equipment for information technology.  
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each matched set of scales, shown in Figs. 1-18, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each topic is typically broken down into two more demand functions and supply features. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-18) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-18) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Demand Scale A.5.1 for Density of Office Computers and Equipment
FIG. 2 Supply Scale A.5.1 for Density of Office Computers and Equipment
FIG. 3 Demand Scale A.5.2.1 for Location of Available Power
FIG. 4 Supply Scale A.5.2.1 for Power Distribution
FIG. 5 Demand Scale A.5.2.2 for Plug-in Points at Workstation
FIG. 6 Supply Scale A.5.2.2 for Plug-in Points per Workstation
FIG. 7 Demand Scale A.5.3 for Reliability and Quality of Supply
FIG. 8 Supply Scale A.5.3 for Reliability and Quality of Supply
FIG. 9 Demand Scale A.5.4.1 for Horizontal Distribution
FIG. 10 Supply Scale A.5.4.1 for Horizontal Distribution
FIG. 11 Demand Scale A.5.4.2 for Risers
FIG. 12 Supply Scale A.5.4.2 for Risers
FIG. 13 Demand Scale A.5.4.3 for Entrance Facility
FIG. 14 Supply Scale A.5.4.3 for Entrance Facility
FIG. 15 Demand Scale A.5.4.4 for Service to the Site
FIG. 16 Supply Scale A.5.4.4 for Service to the Site
FIG. 17 Demand Scale A.5.5 for Cable Plant
FIG. 18 Supply Scale A.5.5 for Cable Plant  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-18) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well ...

  • Standard
    20 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    20 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1694-22(Classification)
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Special Facilities and Technologies

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale in this classification provides a means for estimating the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability, and for comparing that level against the level of any other building or facility.  
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.  
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.  
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following: (1) serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use; (2) the serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built; and (3) the serviceability (potential) of a facility for which a remodelling has been planned.  
4.5 The use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.  
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)  
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for special facilities and technologies.  
1.2 Each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-4, is for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (DEMAND Scale see Figs. 1-4) summarizes one level of requirement for serviceability on which occupants might require. The matching paragraph in the Facility Rating Scale (SUPPLY Scale see Figs. 1-4) is an interpretation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Demand Scale A.13.1 for Group or Shared Conference Center  
FIG. 1 Supply Scale A.13.1 for Group or Shared Conference Center (continued)
FIG. 2 Demand Scale A.13.2 for Video Conferencing Provision  
FIG. 2 Supply Scale A.13.2 for Video Conferencing Provision (continued)
FIG. 3 Demand Scale A.13.3 for Simultaneous Interpretation  
FIG. 3 Supply Scale A.13.3 for Simultaneous Interpretation (continued)
FIG. 4 Demand Scale A.13.4 for Satellite and Microwave Links  
FIG. 4 Supply Scale A.13.4 for Satellite and Microwave Links (continued)
FIG. 5 Demand and Supply Scales A.13.5 for Telecommunications Center  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (See Figs. 1-4) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning, to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, and evaluating how an office facility is performing.  
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.  
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of service...

  • Standard
    10 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    10 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1664-19(Classification)
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Layout and Building Factors

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-12) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.  
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.  
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility or within a group of office facilities.  
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:  
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.  
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.  
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.  
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.  
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)  
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers matched sets of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for layout and building factors.  
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each matched set of scales, shown in Figs. 1-12, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each topic is typically broken down into two or more demand functions or supply features. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-12) summarizes one level of serviceability on that function, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-12) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Demand Scale A.7.1.1 for Constraints on Layout  
FIG. 2 Demand Scale A.7.1.2 for Constraints of Population Density  
FIG. 3 Demand Scale A.7.1.3 for Cost of Upgrade  
FIG. 4 Supply Scale A.7.1.1 for Constraints on Layout  
FIG. 5 Supply Scale A.7.1.2 for Population Density Supported  
FIG. 6 Supply Scale A.7.1.3 for Cost of Upgrade  
FIG. 7 Demand Scale A.7.2.1 for Tolerance of Sound and Visual Conditions  
FIG. 8 Demand Scale A.7.2.2 Avoiding Glare on Monitors  
FIG. 9 Supply Scale A.7.2.1 Constraints on Layout  
FIG. 10 Supply Scale A.7.2.2 Avoiding Glare on Monitors  
FIG. 11 Demand Scale A.7.3 for Influence of Building Loss Features on Space Needs  
FIG. 12 Supply Scale A.7.3 Influence of Building Loss Features on Space Needs  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-12) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.  
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facil...

  • Standard
    15 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    15 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1667-95a(2018)(Classification)
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Image to the Public and Occupants

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-7) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.  
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.  
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement for a single office facility or within a group of office facilities.  
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:  
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.  
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.  
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.  
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.  
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)  
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for image to the public and occupants.  
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-7, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-7) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-7) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.  
FIG. 1 Scale A.11.1 for Exterior Appearance  
FIG. 1 Scale A.11.1 for Exterior Appearance (continued)  
FIG. 2 Scale A.11.2 for Public Lobby of Building  
FIG. 2 Scale A.11.2 for Public Lobby of Building (continued)  
FIG. 3 Scale A.11.3 for Public Spaces Within the Building  
FIG. 3 Scale A.11.3 for Public Spaces Within the Building (continued)  
FIG. 4 Scale A.11.4 for Appearance and Spaciousness of Office Spaces  
FIG. 5 Scale A.11.5 for Finishes and Materials in Office Spaces  
FIG. 6 Scale A.11.6 for Identity Outside the Building  
FIG. 6 Scale A.11.6 for Identity Outside the Building (continued)  
FIG. 7 Scale A.11.7 for Neighborhood and Site  
FIG. 7 Scale A.11.7 for Neighborhood and Site (continued)  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-7) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.  
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.  ...

  • Standard
    14 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1692-95a(2018)(Classification)
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Change and Churn by Occupants

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale in this classification provides a means for estimating the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability, and for comparing that level against the level of any other building or facility.  
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.  
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement for a single office facility or within a group of office facilities.  
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following: (1) the serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use; (2) the serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built; and (3) the serviceability (potential) of a facility for which a remodelling has been planned.  
4.5 The use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.  
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)  
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment or fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements to accommodate changes in working method, and frequent relocations of staff, and realignment of workstations.  
1.2 Each pair of scales shown in Figs. 1-5, printed side by side on a page, are for classifying one topic of serviceability within that aspect of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-5) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic that occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility that, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Scale A.6.1 for Disruption Due to Physical Change  
FIG. 1 Scale A.6.1 for Disruption Due to Physical Change (continued)  
FIG. 2 Scale A.6.2 for Illumination, HVAC, and Sprinklers  
FIG. 2 Scale A.6.2 for Illumination, HVAC, and Sprinklers (continued)  
FIG. 3 Scale A.6.3 for Minor Changes to Layout  
FIG. 3 Scale A.6.3 for Minor Changes to Layout (continued)  
FIG. 4 Scale A.6.4 for Partition Wall Relocations  
FIG. 4 Scale A.6.4 for Partition Wall Relocations (continued)  
FIG. 5 Scale A.6.5 for Lead Time for Facilities Group  
FIG. 5 Scale A.6.5 for Lead Time for Facilities Group (continued)  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-5) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning, to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, and evaluating how an office facility is performing.  
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.  
1.5 This classification indi...

  • Standard
    11 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1669-95a(2018)(Classification)
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Location, Access and Wayfinding

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.  
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.  
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.  
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:  
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.  
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.  
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.  
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.  
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)  
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification contains pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for locating the building and finding the way inside the building.  
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-6, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-6) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Scale A.14.1 for Public Transportation (Urban Sites)  
FIG. 2 Scale A.14.2 for Staff Visits to Other Offices  
FIG. 3 Scale A.14.3 for Vehicular Entry and Parking  
FIG. 3 Scale A.14.3 for Vehicular Entry and Parking  (continued)  
FIG. 4 Scale A.14.4 for Wayfinding to Building and Lobby  
FIG. 4 Scale A.14.4 for Wayfinding to Building and Lobby (continued)  
FIG. 5 Scale A.14.5 for Capacity of Internal Movement Systems  
FIG. 5 Scale A.14.5 for Capacity of Internal Movement Systems  (continued)  
FIG. 6 Scale A.14.6 for Public Circulation and Wayfinding in Building  
FIG. 6 Scale A.14.6 for Public Circulation and Wayfinding in Building (continued)  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.  
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.  
1.5 This classificatio...

  • Standard
    12 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1671-95a(2018)(Classification)
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Cleanliness

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-5) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.  
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.  
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the following:  
4.3.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.  
4.3.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.  
4.3.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.  
4.4 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.  
4.5 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)  
4.6 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for cleanliness.  
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-5, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-5) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-5) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Scale B.4.1 for Exterior and Public Areas  
FIG. 1 Scale B.4.1 for Exterior and Public Areas (continued)  
FIG. 2 Scale B.4.2 for Office Areas (Interior)  
FIG. 3 Scale B.4.3 for Toilets and Washrooms  
FIG. 4 Scale B.4.4 for Special Cleaning  
FIG. 5 Scale B.4.5 for Waste Disposal for Building  
FIG. 5 Scale B.4.5 for Waste Disposal for Building (continued)  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-5) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning and rating a facility and not for evaluating or diagnosing it.  
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.  
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E1334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to and compatible with Practice E1334. Each requires the other.  
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    8 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1668-95a(2018)(Classification)
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Amenities to Attract and Retain Staff

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.  
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.  
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.  
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:  
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.  
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.  
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.  
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.  
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)  
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements in support of recruiting and keeping quality employees.  
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-6, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-6) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Scale A.12.1 for Food  
FIG. 1 Scale A.12.1 for Food (continued)  
FIG. 2 Scale A.12.2 for Shops  
FIG. 3 Scale A.12.3 for Daycare  
FIG. 4 Scale A.12.4 for Exercise Room  
FIG. 5 Scale A.12.5 for Bicycle Racks for Staff  
FIG. 6 Scale A.12.6 for Seating Away from Work Areas  
FIG. 6 Scale A.12.6 for Seating Away from Work Areas (continued)  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.  
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.  
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E1334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to and compatible with Practice E1334. Each...

  • Standard
    9 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1670-95a(2018)(Classification)
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Management of Operations and Maintenance

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-4) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.  
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.  
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the following:  
4.3.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.  
4.3.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.  
4.3.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.  
4.4 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.  
4.5 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)  
4.6 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for operations and maintenance.  
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-4, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-4) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-4) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.  
FIG. 1 Scale B.3.1 for Strategy and Program for Operations and Maintenance  
FIG. 1 Scale B.3.1 for Strategy and Program for Operations and Maintenance (continued)  
FIG. 2 Scale B.3.2 for Competences of In-house Staff  
FIG. 2 Scale B.3.2 for Competences of In-house Staff (continued)  
FIG. 3 Scale B.3.3 for Occupant Satisfaction  
FIG. 3 Scale B.3.3 for Occupant Satisfaction (continued)  
FIG. 4 Scale B.3.4 for Information on Unit Costs and Consumption  
FIG. 4 Scale B.3.4 for Information on Unit Costs and Consumption (continued)  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-4) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning and rating a facility and not for evaluating or diagnosing it.  
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.  
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E1334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to and compatible with Practice E1334. Each requires the other.  
1.6 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance wit...

  • Standard
    10 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1661-95a(2018)(Classification)
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Meetings and Group Effectiveness

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-4) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.  
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.  
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.  
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:  
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.  
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.  
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which a remodeling has been planned.  
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.  
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)  
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements to enable work groups or project groups to function effectively and productively.  
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-4, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-4) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-4) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Scale A.2.1 for Meeting and Conference Rooms
FIG. 1 Scale A.2.1 for Meeting and Conference Rooms (continued)
FIG. 1 Scale A.2.1 for Meeting and Conference Rooms (continued)
FIG. 2 Scale A.2.2 for Informal Meetings and Interaction
FIG. 2 Scale A.2.2 for Informal Meetings and Interaction (continued)
FIG. 3 Scale A.2.3 for Group Layout and Territory
FIG. 3 Scale A.2.3 for Group Layout and Territory (continued)
FIG. 4 Scale A.2.4 for Group Workrooms
FIG. 4 Scale A.2.4 for Group Workrooms (continued)  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-4) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.  
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.  
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to conduct a serviceabi...

  • Standard
    12 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off