Standard Classification for Determination of Articulation Class

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each weighting factor given in Table 1 represents the fraction of overall speech intelligence contained within the associated one-third octave frequency band.  
4.2 The weighting factors in Table 1 are obtained by multiplying each individual one-third octave band weighting factor of ANSI S3.5-1969 by 300. Articulation class (AC) values are thus related to but distinctly different from articulation index (AI) values. In particular, the AC considers only the effect of signal attenuation; while the AI considers such additional factors as speech level and spectrum and background sound level and spectrum.
Note 2: The AC is similar to the DAI rating proposed by Warnock6 and has been shown to correlate with AI values derived from ANSI S3.5, except where the AI approaches 1 or 0 (AI values range between 1 and 0 and approach 0 with increasing privacy and nonintelligibility). Articulation class values give the reverse. They usually exceed 100 and increase with increasing privacy and nonintelligibility. Extensive comparison between AC ratings and subjective judgments of open-plan speech privacy has not yet been accomplished.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification provides a single figure rating that can be used for comparing building systems and subsystems for speech privacy purposes. The rating is designed to correlate with transmitted speech intelligence between office spaces.  
1.2 Excluded from the scope of this classification are applications involving female speakers or children,2 languages other than English, and sound spectra other than speech. Thus excluded, for example, would be comparisons of building systems or subsystems for their effectiveness in reducing transmitted noise from machinery, industrial processes, bowling alleys, music rooms, places of entertainment, and the like.  
Note 1: Published work by Pearsons, et al, may eventually permit the restriction on female speakers to be relaxed.3  
1.3 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
31-Mar-2019
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM E1110-06(2019) - Standard Classification for Determination of Articulation Class
English language
2 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation:E1110 −06 (Reapproved 2019)
Standard Classification for
Determination of Articulation Class
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E1110; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 3. Summary of Classification
1.1 This classification provides a single figure rating that 3.1 Articulationclass(AC)isthesumoftheweightedsound
can be used for comparing building systems and subsystems attenuations in a series of 15 test bands. It is calculated as
for speech privacy purposes.The rating is designed to correlate follows:
with transmitted speech intelligence between office spaces.
AC 5 A f w f (1)
~ ! ~ !
( i i
f
i
1.2 Excluded from the scope of this classification are
applications involving female speakers or children, languages
where:
other than English, and sound spectra other than speech. Thus
f = the center frequency of the bands from 200 to 5000
i
excluded, for example, would be comparisons of building
Hz,
systems or subsystems for their effectiveness in reducing
A(f) = the measured attenuation in decibels in the one-third
i
transmitted noise from machinery, industrial processes, bowl-
octave band with center frequency f, and
i
ing alleys, music rooms, places of entertainment, and the like.
w(f) = the weighting for that band, from Table 1.
i
NOTE 1—Published work by Pearsons, et al, may eventually permit the 3.2 The sound attenuation for each band is determined in
restriction on female speakers to be relaxed.
accordance with Test Method E1111. In Test Method E1111
1.3 This international standard was developed in accor- interzone attenuation is substituted for sound attenuation.
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
4. Significance and Use
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
4.1 Each weighting factor given in Table 1 represents the
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
fraction of overall speech intelligence contained within the
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
associated one-third octave frequency band.
4.2 The weighting factors in Table 1 are obtained by
2. Referenced Documents
multiplying each individual one-third octave band weighting
2.1 ASTM Standards:
factor of ANSI S3.5-1969 by 300. Articulation class (AC)
E1111 Test Method for Measuring the InterzoneAttenuation
values are thus related to but distinctly different from articu-
of Open Office Components
lation index (AI) values. In particular, the AC considers only
2.2 ANSI Standard:
the effect of signal attenuation; while the AI considers such
S3.5 –1969 Methods for the Calculation of the Articulation
additional factors as speech level and spectrum and back-
Index
ground sound level and spectrum.
NOTE 2—The AC is similar to the DAI rating proposed by Warnock
This classification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E33 on
and has been shown to correlate with AI values derived from ANSI S3.5,
Building and Environmental Acoustics and is the direct responsibility of Subcom-
except where the AI approaches 1 or 0 (AI values range between 1 and 0
mittee
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.