ASTM E1665-95a(2012)
(Classification)Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Facility Protection
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Facility Protection
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 2-7) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.
This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.
This classification can be used to estimate the following:
Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.
Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.
Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.
Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for protection of a building or site.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 2-7, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 2-7) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 2-7) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 2-7) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E1334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to and compatible with Practice E1334. Each requires the other.
FIG. 1 Zones of Physical Security
FIG. 2 Scale A.9.1 for Protection Around Building
FIG. 2Scale A.9.1 for Protection Around Building (continued)
FIG. 3 Scale A.9.2 for Protection from Unauthorized Access to Site and Parking
FIG. 3Scale A.9.2 for Protection from Unauthorized Access to Site and Parking (continued)
FIG. 4 Scale A.9.3 for Protective Surveillance of Site
FIG. 4Scale A.9.3 for Protective Surv...
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation:E1665 −95a (Reapproved 2012) An American National Standard
Standard Classification for
1,2
Serviceability of an Office Facility for Facility Protection
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E1665; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 2. Referenced Documents
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying 2.1 ASTM Standards:
an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the E631 Terminology of Building Constructions
E1334 Practice for Rating the Serviceability of a Building or
capability of an office facility to meet certain possible require-
ments for protection of a building or site. Building-Related Facility (Withdrawn 2013)
E1679 Practice for Setting the Requirements for the Service-
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales,
ability of a Building or Building-Related Facility, and for
shown in Figs. 2-7, are for classifying one topic of serviceabil-
Determining What Serviceability is Provided or Proposed
ity. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see
2.2 ISO Document:
Figs. 2-7) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic,
ISO 6240 International Standard, Performance Standards in
which occupants might require. The matching entry in the
Building—Contents and Presentation
Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 2-7) is a translation of the
requirement into a description of certain features of a facility
3. Terminology
which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely
to meet that level of required serviceability.
3.1 Definitions:
3.1.1 facility—a physical setting used to serve a specific
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 2-7)
purpose. E631
are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick
3.1.1.1 Discussion—A facility may be within a building, a
scanningtoestimateapproximately,quickly,andeconomically,
whole building, or a building with its site and surrounding
how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or
environment; or it may be a construction that is not a building.
another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not
The term encompasses both the physical object and its use.
for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is
performing. 3.1.2 facility serviceability—the capability of a facility to
perform the function(s) for which it is designed, used, or
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of
required to be used.
serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to
3.1.2.1 Discussion—The scope of this performance is of the
estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned
facility as a system, including its subsystems, components and
but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings
materials and their interactions, such as acoustical,
and outline specifications have been prepared.
hydrothermal, air purity, and economic; and of the relative
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility
importance of each performance requirement. E631
to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state
3.1.3 offıce—a place, such as a room, suite, or building, in
how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a
which business, clerical or professional activities are con-
serviceability score. That information is found in Practice
ducted.
E1334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to
3.1.4 For standard definitions of additional terms applicable
and compatible with Practice E1334. Each requires the other.
to this classification, see Terminology E631.
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
This classification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E06 on
Performance of Buildings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E06.25
on Whole Buildings and Facilities. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Current edition approved April 1, 2012. Published May 2012. Originally contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
approved in 1995. Last previous edition approved in 2005 as E1665 – 95a (2005). Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
DOI: 10.1520/E1665-95AR12. the ASTM website.
2 4
Portions of this document are based on material originally prepared by the The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on
International Centre for Facilities (ICF) and © 1993 by ICF and Minister of Public www.astm.org.
Works and Government Services Canada. Their cooperation in the development of Available from American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St.,
this standard is acknowledged. 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, http://www.ansi.org.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E1665−95a (2012)
FIG. 1 Zones of Physical Security
3.2.1 easement—a right held by one person in the land of 3.2.4.4 public access zone—that area to which the public
another, such as the right to cross one parcel of land to get to has free access. Normally, these are the grounds of a facility,
another parcel of land; or to use the land, as for installation and and the public corridors in multi-tenant buildings.
maintenance of public utilities. (See Fig. 1.)
3.2.4.5 reception zone—an area to which the general pub-
lic’s access can be limited.Access could be limited to specific
3.2.2 security functions:
times of day or for specific reasons.
3.2.2.1 detection—devices and methods such as guards,
3.2.4.6 secure zone—an area that is continuously monitored
alarms and access control, and monitoring systems designed to
and where access is controlled.
indicate, and possibly verify, attempted or actual unauthorized
access.
4. Significance and Use
3.2.2.2 protection—physical and psychological barriers that
will delay or deter someone attempting unauthorized access.
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 2-7) in this
3.2.2.3 response—reactionstoattemptedoractualunauthor-
classification provides a means to estimate the level of service-
ized access, such
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.