ISO/ASTM 51818:2020

Practice for dosimetry in an electron beam facility for radiation processing at energies between 80 and 300 keV

This practice covers dosimetric procedures to be followed in installation qualification, operational qualification and performance qualification (IQ, OQ, PQ), and routine processing at electron beam facilities to ensure that the product has been treated with an acceptable range of absorbed doses. Other procedures related to IQ, OQ, PQ, and routine product processing that may influence absorbed dose in the product are also discussed. The electron beam energy range covered in this practice is between 80 and 300 keV, generally referred to as low energy. Dosimetry is only one component of a total quality assurance program for an irradiation facility. Other measures may be required for specific applications such as medical device sterilization and food preservation. Other specific ISO and ASTM standards exist for the irradiation of food and the radiation sterilization of health care products. For the radiation sterilization of health care products, see ISO 11137-1. In those areas covered by ISO 11137-1, that standard takes precedence. For food irradiation, see ISO 14470. Information about effective or regulatory dose limits for food products is not within the scope of this practice (see ASTM F1355 and F1356). This document is one of a set of standards that provides recommendations for properly implementing dosimetry in radiation processing, and describes a means of achieving compliance with the requirements of ISO/ASTM 52628. It is intended to be read in conjunction with ISO/ASTM 52628. This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

Pratique de la dosimétrie dans une installation de traitement par irradiation utilisant un faisceau d'électrons d'énergies comprises entre 80 et 300 keV

General Information

• Status: Published
• Publication Date: 29-Jun-2020
• ICS: 17.240 - Radiation measurements
• Technical Committee: ISO/TC 85 - Nuclear energy, nuclear technologies, and radiological protection
• Drafting Committee: ISO/TC 85/WG 3 - Dosimetry for radiation processing
• Current Stage: 6060 - International Standard published
• Start Date: 30-Jun-2020
• Due Date: 03-Oct-2022
• Completion Date: 30-Jun-2020

Relations

• Revises: ISO/ASTM 51818:2013 - Practice for dosimetry in an electron beam facility for radiation processing at energies between 80 and 300 keV
• Effective Date: 23-Apr-2020

Standards Content (Sample)

INTERNATIONAL ISO/ASTM
STANDARD 51818
Fourth edition
2020-06
Practice for dosimetry in an electron
beam facility for radiation processing
at energies between 80 and 300 keV
Pratique de la dosimétrie dans une installation de traitement par
irradiation utilisant un faisceau d'électrons d'énergies comprises
entre 80 et 300 keV
Reference number
ISO/ASTM 51818:2020(E)
©
ISO/ASTM International 2020

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
ISO/ASTM 51818:2020(E)

COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT
© ISO/ASTM International 2020
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may be
reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on
the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below
or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester. In the United States, such requests should be sent to ASTM International.
ISO copyright office ASTM International
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, USA
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail]
Website: www.iso.org Website: www.astm.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO/ASTM International 2020 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
ISO/ASTM 51818:2020(E)
Contents Page
1 Scope. 1
2 Referenced documents. 2
3 Terminology. 2
4 Significance and use. 3
5 Selection and calibration of the dosimetry system. 3
6 Installation and operational qualification. 4
7 Performance qualification. 5
8 Routine process control. 5
9 Measurement uncertainty. 5
10 Documentation. 5
11 Keywords. 6
Annexes. 6
Figure A1.1 Example of measurement of dose as function of average beam currentI, conveying
speedV and beam widthW . Measured at an electron accelerator with beam energy 110 keV.
b
2
K = 216.57 (kGy · m ) / (A · s). 7
Figure A1.2 Example of beam width measurement (3 measurements and their average are
shown). Beam width was measured on a low-energy accelerator installed in an electron beam
tunnel for an aseptic filling line (3). 7
Figure A1.3 Exampleofbeamwidthmeasurementatalow-energyelectronacceleratorfacilityfor
curing purpose. 8
-3
Figure A1.4 Calculated depth-dose distribution in water (specific density1gcm ). 8
-3
Figure A1.5 Calculated depth-dose distribution in water (specific density1gcm ). 9
Figure A1.6 Methods for measurement of depth-dose distribution. 9
Figure A1.7 Examples of measurements of depth-dose distributions at the same electron beam
facility, but at different beam energies. 10
Figure A2.1 Apparent dose measured with three dosimeters (18 µm RCD film dosimeter (1.12 g
-3 -3 -3
cm ); 50 µm RCD film dosimeter (1.15 g cm ); 130 µm alanine film dosimeter (1.36 g cm ) all
calibrated by irradiation at a 10 MeV electron accelerator, and now irradiated at a 116 keV
electron accelerator. . 11
© ISO/ASTM International 2020 – All rights reserved iii

---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
ISO/ASTM 51818:2020(E)
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national
standards bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally
carried out through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a
technical committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee.
International organizations, governmental and non‐governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in
the work. ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all
matters of electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted (see www.iso.org/directives).
ASTM International is one of the world’s largest voluntary standards development organizations with
global participation from affected stakeholders. ASTM technical committees follow rigorous due
process balloting procedures.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO and ASTM International shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such
patent rights. Details of any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in
the Introduction and/or on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and
expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to the
World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT),
see www.iso.org/iso/foreword.html.
This document was prepared by ASTM Committee E61, Radiation processing (as ASTM E1818‐96), and
drafted in accordance with its editorial rules. It was assigned to Technical Committee ISO/TC 85,
Nuclear energy, nuclear technologies and radiation protection, and adopted under the “fast‐track
procedure”.
This fourth edition cancels and replaces the third edition (ISO/ASTM 51818:2013), which has been
technically revised.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www.iso.org/members.html.

iv © ISO/ASTM International 2020 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
ISO/ASTM 51818:2020(E)
Standard Practice for
Dosimetry in an Electron Beam Facility for Radiation
1
Processing at Energies Between 80 and 300 keV
This standard is issued under the fixed designation ISO/ASTM 51818; the number immediately following the designation indicates the
year of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.
INTRODUCTION
Low energy electron beams, typically 80 – 300 keV, are used in several industrial processes, from
curing of prints and crosslinking of plastic foils to surface sterilization of containers for pharmaceu-
ticals and medical devices.These different applications are addressed through IQ, OQ, PQ and routine
dose monitoring, although radiation curing and crosslinking might only require that reproducibility of
dose delivery during execution of the process can be demonstrated.
This standard practice describes the dose measurements that might be required for full documen-
tation of a low energy electron beam sterilization process. The dose measurement requirements for
sterilization using low energy electron beams are derived from the international standard for radiation
sterilization ISO 11137-1.
Not all low energy e-beam applications require dose measurement documentation with traceability
to national standards. For radiation curing or crosslinking processes, for example, it might not be a
requirement that calibration of the dosimetry system is established and maintained with traceability to
national or international standards. The user must decide whether or not measurement traceability is
required for the specific irradiation process, and it is the user who therefore accepts responsibility for
reproducibility and documentation of the process.
1. Scope 1.4 Other specific ISO and ASTM standards exist for the
irradiation of food and the radiation sterilization of health care
1.1 This practice covers dosimetric procedures to be fol-
products. For the radiation sterilization of health care products,
lowedininstallationqualification,operationalqualificationand
see ISO 11137-1. In those areas covered by ISO 11137-1, that
performance qualification (IQ, OQ, PQ), and routine process-
standard takes precedence. For food irradiation, see ISO
ing at electron beam facilities to ensure that the product has
14470.Informationabouteffectiveorregulatorydoselimitsfor
been treated with an acceptable range of absorbed doses. Other
food products is not within the scope of this practice (see
procedures related to IQ, OQ, PQ, and routine product pro-
cessing that may influence absorbed dose in the product are ASTM F1355 and F1356).
also discussed.
This document is one of a set of standards that provides
1.5
1.2 The electron beam energy range covered in this practice
recommendations for properly implementing dosimetry in
is between 80 and 300 keV, generally referred to as low energy.
radiation processing, and describes a means of achieving
1.3 Dosimetry is only one component of a total quality
compliance with the requirements of ISO/ASTM 52628.Itis
assurance program for an irradiation facility. Other measures
intended to be read in conjunction with ISO/ASTM 52628.
may be required for specific applications such as medical
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the
device sterilization and food preservation.
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
1
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E61 on Radiation
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
Processing and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E61.03 on Dosimetry
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
Application, and is also under the jurisdiction of ISO/TC 85/WG 3.
Current edition approved March 2020. Published June 2020. Originally pub-
1.7 This international standard was developed in accor-
lished as ASTM E1818–96. The present Fourth Edition of International Standard
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
ISO/ASTM 51818:2020(E) is a major revision of the Third Edition of ISO/ASTM
51818:2013(E). ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
© ISO/ASTM International 2020 – All rights reserved
1

---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
ISO/ASTM 51818:2020(E)
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom- 17025:2017 General requirements for the competence of
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical testing and calibration laboratories
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. 12749-4 Nuclear energy, nuclear technologies, and radio-
logical protection – Vocabulary – Part 4: Dosimetry for
2. Referenced documents
radiation processing
2
2.5 Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM)
2.1 ASTM Standards:
E2232 Guide for Selection and Use of Mathematical Meth- Reports:
JCGM 100:2008, GUM 1995, with minor corrections,
ods for Calculating Absorbed Dose in Radiation Process-
ing Applications Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression
5
of uncertainty in measurement
E3083 Terminology Relating to Radiation Processing: Do-
simetry and Applications JCGM 200:2012, VIM International vocabulary of metrol-
6
ogy – Basic and general concepts and associated terms
F1355 GuideforIrradiationofFreshAgriculturalProduceas
a Phytosanitary Treatment
3. Terminology
F1356 Guide for Irradiation of Fresh, Frozen or Processed
Meat and Poultry to Control Pathogens and Other Micro- 3.1 Definitions:
organisms
3.1.1 absorbed dose (D)—quotient of dε¯ by dm, where dε¯ is
2
2.2 ISO/ASTM Standards: the mean energy imparted by ionizing radiation to matter of
51261 Practice for Calibration of Routine Dosimetry Sys- incremental mass dm (ICRU-85a), thus
tems for Radiation Processing
D 5 dε¯⁄dm
51275 Practice for Use of a Radiochromic Film Dosimetry
3.1.1.1 Discussion—TheSIunitofabsorbeddoseisthegray
System
(Gy),where1grayisequivalenttotheabsorptionof1jouleper
51607 Practice for Use of an Alanine-EPR Dosimetry Sys-
kilogram of the specified material (1 Gy=1J/ kg).
tem
3.1.1.2 Discussion—Throughout this practice, “absorbed
51649 Practice for Dosimetry in an Electron Beam Facility
dose” is referred to as “dose”.
forRadiationProcessingatEnergiesbetween300keVand
3.1.2 approved laboratory—laboratory that is a recognized
25 MeV
national metrology institute; or has been formally accredited to
51650 Practice for Use of a Cellulose Triacetate Dosimetry
ISO/IEC 17025; or has a quality system consistent with the
System
requirements of ISO/IEC 17025.
51707 Guide for Estimating Uncertainties in Dosimetry for
3.1.3 average beam current—time-averaged electron beam
Radiation Processing
current.
52303 Guide forAbsorbed-Dose Mapping in Radiation Pro-
cessing Facilities
3.1.4 beam width—dimension of the irradiation zone per-
52628 Practice for Dosimetry in Radiation Processing
pendicular to the direction of product movement, at a specified
52701 Guide for Performance Characterization of Dosim-
distance from the accelerator window.
eters and Dosimetry Systems for Use in Radiation Pro-
3.1.5 calibration curve—expression of the relation between
cessing
indication and corresponding measuredquantityvalue (VIM).
2.3 International Commission on Radiation Units and Mea-
3.1.5.1 Discussion—In radiation processing standards, the
3
surements (ICRU) Report:
term ‘dosimeter response’ is generally used for ‘indication.’
ICRU Report 80 Dosimetry Systems for Use in Radiation
3.1.6 depth-dose distribution—variation of absorbed dose
Processing
with depth from the incident surface of a material exposed to
ICRU Report 85a Fundamental Quantities and Units for
a given radiation.
Ionizing Radiation
4
3.1.7 dosimeter—device that, when irradiated, exhibits a
2.4 ISO Standards:
quantifiable change that can be related to absorbed dose in a
11137-1:2006 Sterilization of health care products – Radia-
given material using appropriate measurement instruments and
tion – Part 1: Requirements for development, validation
procedures.
and routine control of a sterilization process for medical
devices
3.1.8 dosimetry system—interrelatedelementsusedformea-
14470:2011 Food irradiation – Requirements for the suring absorbed dose, consisting of dosimeters, measurement
development, validation and routine control of the ioniz-
instruments and their associated reference standards, and
ing radiation used for the treatment of food
procedures for the system’s use.
3.1.9 electron beam energy—kinetic energy of the acceler-
2
ated electrons in the beam.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
contact ASTM Customer Service at [e-mail]. For Annual Book of ASTM
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
5
the ASTM website. Document produced by Working Group 1 of the Joint Committee for Guides in
3
Available from the International Commission on Radiation Units and Metrology (JCGM WG1), Available free of charge at the BIPM website (http://
Measurements, 7910 Woodmont Ave., Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20814, U.S.A. www.bipm.org).
4 6
Available from International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO Document produced by Working Group 2 of the Joint Committee for Guides in
Central Secretariat, BIBC II, Chemin de Blandonnet 8, CP 401, 1214 Vernier, Metrology (JCGM WG2), Available free of charge at the BIPM website (http://
Geneva, Switzerland, http://www.iso.org. www.bipm.org).
© ISO/ASTM International 2020 – All rights reserved
2

---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
ISO/ASTM 51818:2020(E)
3.1.10 measurement uncertainty—non-negative parameter oftenusedinconjunctionwithphysical,chemical,orbiological
characterizing the dispersion of the quantity values being testing of the product, to help verify specific treatment param-
attributed to a measurand, based on the information used eters.
NOTE 2—In many cases dosimetry results can be related to other
(VIM).
quantitative product properties; for example, gel fraction, melt flow,
3.1.11 metrological traceability—property of a measure-
elastic modulus, molecular weight distribution, or degree of cure.
ment result whereby the result can be related to a reference
4.2 Radiation processing specifications usually include a
through a documented unbroken chain of calibrations, each
minimum or maximum absorbed dose limit, or both. For a
contributing to the measurement uncertainty (VIM).
given application these limits may be set by government
3.1.12 referencematerial—homogeneousmaterialofknown
regulation or by limits inherent to the product itself.
radiation absorption and scattering properties used to establish
4.3 Critical operating parameters must be controlled to
characteristics of the irradiation process, such as scan
obtain reproducible dose distribution in processed materials.
uniformity, depth-dose distribution, and reproducibility of dose
The electron beam energy, beam current, beam width and
delivery.
process line speed (conveying speed) affect absorbed dose.
3.1.13 routine monitoring position—position where ab-
4.4 Before any electron beam facility can be routinely
sorbed dose is monitored during routine processing to ensure
utilized, it must be characterized to determine the relationship
that the product is receiving the absorbed dose specified for the
between dose to product and the main operating parameters.
process.
This involves testing of the process equipment, calibrating the
3.1.14 uncertainty budget—statement of a measurement
measuring instruments and the dosimetry system, and demon-
uncertainty, of the components of that measurement
strating the ability to consistently deliver the required dose
uncertainty, and of their calculation and combination (VIM).
within predetermined specifications.
3.1.14.1 Discussion—An uncertainty budget should include
4.5 In order to establish metrological traceability for a
the measurement model, estimates, and measurement uncer-
dosimetry system and to measure doses with a known level of
tainties associated with the quantities in the measurement
uncertainty, it is necessary to calibrate the dosimetry system
model, covariances, type of applied probability density
under irradiation conditions that are consistent with those
functions, degrees of freedom, type of evaluation of measure-
encountered in routine use. For example, a dosimetry system
ment uncertainty, and any coverage factor.
calibration conducted using penetrating gamma radiation or
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
high energy electrons may result in significant dose measure-
3.2.1 D —absorbed dose to water in the first micrometer of
µ
ment errors when the dosimetry system is used at low energy
7
water equivalent absorbing material (1).
electron beam facilities. Details of calibration are discussed in
3.2.1.1 Discussion—D is a term used by an approved
µ
Section 5.
laboratory to specify reported surface dose values of transfer
standard dosimeters based on adjustments made to account for
5. Selection and calibration of the dosimetry system
user site specific calibration irradiation conditions.
5.1 Selection of Dosimetry Systems:
3.2.2 linear process rate—product length irradiated per unit
5.1.1 ISO/ASTM 52628 identifies requirements for selec-
time to deliver a given dose.
tion of dosimetry systems. For dosimetry at low-energy elec-
3.2.3 mass process rate—product mass irradiated per unit
tron beam facilities consideration should specifically be given
time to deliver a given dose.
to the limited range of such electrons which might give rise to
3.2.4 area process rate—product area irradiated per unit
significant dose gradients through the thickness of the dosim-
time to deliver a given dose.
eter. By choosing thin film dosimeters this problem can be
minimized (1).
NOTE 1—Definitions of other terms used in this standard that pertain to
radiation measurement and dosimetry may be found in ISO/ASTM 52628, 5.1.2 When selecting a dosimetry system, consideration
ASTM Terminology E3083, and ISO 12749-4. Definitions in these
should be given to effects of influence quantities on the
documents are compatible with ICRU Report 85a, and therefore, may be
response of the dosimeter (see ISO/ASTM 52701). One such
used as alternative references. Where appropriate, definitions used in this
influence quantity might be irradiation atmosphere, and some
standard have been derived from, and are consistent with, general
low-energy accelerator applications involve irradiation in
metrological definitions given in the VIM.
oxygen-free conditions which might influence dosimeter re-
sponse.
4. Significance and use
5.2 Calibration of the Dosimetry System:
4.1 A variety of irradiation processes use low energy elec-
5.2.1 The dosimetry system shall be calibrated prior to use
tron beam facilities to modify product characteristics. Dosim-
and at intervals thereafter in accordance with the user’s
etry requirements, the number and frequency of measurements,
documented procedure that specifies details of the calibration
and record keeping requirements will vary depending on the
process and quality assurance requirements. General condi-
type and end use of the products being processed. Dosimetry is
tions for calibration methods are given in ISO/ASTM 51261.
NOTE 3—For some applications it might not be a requirement that
7
The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to the bibliography at the end of this calibration of the dosimetry system is established and maintained with
standard. traceability to national or international standards. The user must decide
© ISO/ASTM International 2020 – All rights reserved
3

---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
ISO/ASTM 51818:2020(E)
whether or not measurement traceability is required for the specific NOTE 8—Some applications may not require OQ dose measurements to
irradiation process, and it is the user who therefore accepts responsibility be traceable to a national standard (see Annex A4).
for reproducibility and documentation of the process. For more informa-
NOTE 9—Dose measurements for OQ may have to be carried out using
tion on relative dose measurements see Annex A4.
a dosimetry system calibration curve obtained by irradiation at another
facility. This calibration curve should be verified, and corrections applied
5.2.2 The calibration irradiation may be performed by
to the OQ dose measurements as needed.
irradiating the dosimeters at (a) an approved laboratory or (b)
NOTE 10—Distance between beam window and dosimeter should be
an irradiator where the normal irradiation conditions are used
specified for dose measurements carried out during OQ.
for calibration irradiation of routine dosimeters together with
6.2.1 The performance of the low-energy electron beam
transfer standard dosimeters issued and analyzed by an ap-
facility depends primarily on the electron beam energy. It
proved laboratory. In case of option (a), the resulting calibra-
might therefore be necessary to carry out separate OQ mea-
tion curve shall be verified for the actual conditions of use (see
surements for each energy selected for the operation of the
ISO/ASTM 51261). The same applies for option (b) if irradia-
facility.
tion conditions different from the actual production conditions
6.2.2 The relevant dosimetric OQ measurements are de-
have been used for the calibration irradiation.
scribed in more detail in AnnexA1. They typically include the
NOTE 4—While 5.2.2 is valid for most dosimeter calibration
following:
irradiations, it must be recognized that the irradiation of various dosim-
6.2.2.1 Dose as Function of Average Beam Current, Beam
eterswithlowenergyelectrons(lessthan300keV)willlikelyleadtodose
Width and Conveying Speed—Dose to the product irradiated in
gradients through the thickness of the dosimeter. When the dosimeter
an electron beam facility is proportional to average beam
response is measured, this will lead to a dose value (an apparent dose,
D ) that is based on the assumption that there are no dose gradients current (I), inversely proportional to conveying speed (V), and
app
within the dosimeter. However, if dose gradients exist within the
inversely proportional to beam width (W ). The last relation-
b
dosimeter, then for a given set of irradiation conditions, the apparent dose
ship is valid for product that is conveyed through the beam
will depend on the thickness of the dosimeter, i.e., dosimeters with
zone perpendicular to the beam width. This is expressed as:
different thickness will measure different apparent doses. One solution to
overcome this problem is that all dose measurements are specified as dose
D 5 ~K·I!/~V·W ! (1)
b
to water in the first micrometer of the water equivalent absorbing material.
This is given the symbol D and is independent of the dosimeter thickness
where:
µ
(1). Annex A2 describes the application of this principle for dose
D = absorbed dose (Gy),
measurements carried out during calibraton.
I = average beam current (A),
NOTE 5—Dose gradient within a dosimeter is most pronounced in
-1
V = conveying speed (m s ),
dosimeters with thicknesses that represent a significant fraction of the
W = beam width (m), and
electron range (see Fig. A2.1). Using thin dosimeters, e.g. in the order of
b
2
10 µm, will reduce the gradient and hence the difference between dose at K = slopeofthestraightlinerelationshipinEq1(Gy·m )
the front and the back of the dosimeter.
/ (A · s).
5.3 Measurement Instrument Calibration and Performance
This straight-line relationship shall be determined for each
Verification—For the calibration of the instruments, and for the
energy selected for the operation of the facility. In order to
verification of instrument performance between calibrations,
determine the relationship, dose shall be measured at a specific
ISO/ASTM 51261, the relevant ISO/ASTM orASTM standard
location using a number of selected parameter sets of beam
for the dosimetry system, and/or instrument-specific operating
current, conveying speed and beam width to cover the operat-
manuals should be consulted.
ing range of the facility.
NOTE 11—Deviations from the straight-line relationship should be
6. Installation and operational qualification
investigated.
6.1 Installation qualification (IQ) is carried out to demon-
6.2.2.2 Beam Width—The beam width is measured by irra-
strate that the irradiation equipment and any ancillary items
diating dosimeter strips or discrete dosimeters at selected
have been supplied and installed in accordance with their
intervals over the full beam width. Whenever possible, dosim-
specifications.
eters should be placed beyond the expected beam width to
6.1.1 IQ typically involves measurement of depth-dose
identify the limits of the full beam width.
distribution and dose uniformity that can be used to calculate
6.2.2.3 Depth-dose Distribution—The depth-dose distribu-
estimates of process throughput to verify the equipment
tion is measured using a stack of thin dosimeters or by placing
performance specifications.
a dosimeter strip under thin layers of plastic foils.
NOTE 6—The dosimetric measurements to be carried out during IQ
depend on the agreement between supplier and user of the facility. They
NOTE 12—Depth-dose distribution might be calculated using math-
might be similar to the ones carried out during Operational Qualification
ematical modeling (seeASTM E2232). Such calculations might be useful
(OQ).
in supporting and understanding measurements.
NOTE 7—A dosimetry system calibration curve obtained by dosimeter
6.2.2.4 Dose Distribution on Reference Material—The dis-
irradiation at another facility might be used for these dose measurements,
but in order to ensure that the d
...

DRAFT INTERNATIONAL STANDARD
ISO/ASTM DIS 51818
ISO/TC 85 Secretariat: AFNOR
Voting begins on: Voting terminates on:
2019-12-17 2020-03-10
Practice for dosimetry in an electron beam facility for
radiation processing at energies between 80 and 300 keV
Pratique de la dosimétrie dans une installation de traitement par irradiation utilisant un faisceau
d'électrons d'énergies comprises entre 80 et 300 keV
ICS: 17.240
THIS DOCUMENT IS A DRAFT CIRCULATED
FOR COMMENT AND APPROVAL. IT IS
THEREFORE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND MAY
NOT BE REFERRED TO AS AN INTERNATIONAL
STANDARD UNTIL PUBLISHED AS SUCH.
IN ADDITION TO THEIR EVALUATION AS
BEING ACCEPTABLE FOR INDUSTRIAL,
This document is circulated as received from the committee secretariat.
TECHNOLOGICAL, COMMERCIAL AND
USER PURPOSES, DRAFT INTERNATIONAL
STANDARDS MAY ON OCCASION HAVE TO
BE CONSIDERED IN THE LIGHT OF THEIR
POTENTIAL TO BECOME STANDARDS TO
WHICH REFERENCE MAY BE MADE IN
Reference number
NATIONAL REGULATIONS.
ISO/ASTM DIS 51818:2019(E)
RECIPIENTS OF THIS DRAFT ARE INVITED
TO SUBMIT, WITH THEIR COMMENTS,
NOTIFICATION OF ANY RELEVANT PATENT
RIGHTS OF WHICH THEY ARE AWARE AND TO
©
PROVIDE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION. ISO 2019

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
ISO/ASTM DIS 51818:2019(E)

COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT
© ISO/ASTM International 2019
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may be
reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on
the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below
or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester. In the United States, such requests should be sent to ASTM International.
ISO copyright office ASTM International
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, USA
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail]
Website: www.iso.org Website: www.astm.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO/ASTM International 2019 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
ISO/ASTM DIS 51818:2019(E)
Explanatory Material
This international standard is part of the project between ISO and ASTM International to develop and
maintain a group of ISO/ASTM dosimetry standards for radiation processing.
ISO/ASTM 51818 (Ed. 3), published in 2013, was balloted by ISO for the 5-year Systematic Review in
2018. Although the Systematic Review, which closed August 13, 2018 recommended confirmation, it was
decided at the Review Meeting held in Budapest in October 2018, that the standard required a major
revision to update and improve the standard. The standard is now being balloted as an ISO DIS.
© ISO/ASTM International 2019 – All rights reserved ii-2

---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
ISO/ASTM DIS 51818:2019(E)
ii-3 © ISO/ASTM International 2019 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
ISO/ASTM DIS 51818:2019(E)
Contents Page
1 Scope. 1
2 Referenced documents. 2
3 Terminology. 2
4 Significance and use. 3
5 Selection and calibration of the dosimetry system. 3
6 Installation and operational qualification. 4
7 Performance qualification. 5
8 Routine process control. 5
9 Measurement uncertainty. 5
10 Documentation. 5
11 Keywords. 6
Annexes. 6
Figure A1.1 Example of measurement of dose as function of average beam currentI, conveying
speedV and beam widthW . Measured at an electron accelerator with beam energy 110 keV.
b
2
K = 216.57 (kGy · m ) / (A · s). 7
Figure A1.2 Example of beam width measurement (3 measurements and their average are
shown). Beam width was measured on a low-energy accelerator installed in an electron beam
tunnel for an aseptic filling line (3). 7
Figure A1.3 Exampleofbeamwidthmeasurementatalow-energyelectronacceleratorfacilityfor
curing purpose. 8
-3
Figure A1.4 Calculated depth-dose distribution in water (specific density1gcm ). 8
-3
Figure A1.5 Calculated depth-dose distribution in water (specific density1gcm ). 9
Figure A1.6 Methods for measurement of depth-dose distribution. 9
Figure A1.7 Examples of measurements of depth-dose distributions at the same electron beam
facility, but at different beam energies. 10
Figure A2.1 Apparent dose measured with three dosimeters (18 µm RCD film dosimeter (1.12 g
-3 -3 -3
cm ); 50 µm RCD film dosimeter (1.15 g cm ); 130 µm alanine film dosimeter (1.36 g cm ) all
calibrated by irradiation at a 10 MeV electron accelerator, and now irradiated at a 116 keV
electron accelerator. 11
© ISO/ASTM International 2019 – All rights reserved iii

---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
ISO/ASTM DIS 51818:2019(E)
Foreword
ISO(theInternationalOrganizationforStandardization)isaworldwidefederationofnationalstandardsbodies
(ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO
technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been
established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and
non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are described
in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular the different approval criteria needed for the different types of
ISO documents should be noted. International Standards are drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of
ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
ASTM International is one of the world’s largest voluntary standards development organizations with global
participation from affected stakeholders. ASTM technical committees follow rigorous due process balloting
procedures.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent
rights. ISO and ASTM International shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
DetailsofanypatentrightsidentifiedduringthedevelopmentofthedocumentwillbeintheIntroductionand/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation on the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions
related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO’s adherence to the World trade
Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see the following URL: www.iso.org/
iso/foreword.html.
This document was prepared by ASTM Committee E61 Radiation Processing and by Technical Committee
ISO/TC 85, nuclear energy, nuclear technologies and radiological protection.
Thisfourtheditioncancelsandreplacesthethirdedition(ISO/ASTM51818:2013),whichhasbeentechnically
revised.
iv © ISO/ASTM International 2019 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
ISO/ASTM DIS 51818:2019(E)
Standard Practice for
Dosimetry in an Electron Beam Facility for Radiation
1
Processing at Energies Between 80 and 300 keV
This standard is issued under the fixed designation ISO/ASTM DIS 51818; the number immediately following the designation indicates
the year of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.
INTRODUCTION
Low energy electron beams, typically 80 – 300 keV, are used in several industrial processes, from
curing of prints and crosslinking of plastic foils to surface sterilization of containers for pharmaceu-
ticals and medical devices.These different applications are addressed through IQ, OQ, PQ and routine
dose monitoring, although radiation curing and crosslinking might only require that reproducibility of
dose delivery during execution of the process can be demonstrated.
This standard practice describes the dose measurements that might be required for full documen-
tation of a low energy electron beam sterilization process. The dose measurement requirements for
sterilization using low energy electron beams are derived from the international standard for radiation
sterilization ISO 11137-1.
Not all low energy e-beam applications require dose measurement documentation with traceability
to national standards. For radiation curing or crosslinking processes, for example, it might not be a
requirement that calibration of the dosimetry system is established and maintained with traceability to
national or international standards. The user must decide whether or not measurement traceability is
required for the specific irradiation process, and it is the user who therefore accepts responsibility for
reproducibility and documentation of the process.
1. Scope 1.4 Other specific ISO and ASTM standards exist for the
irradiation of food and the radiation sterilization of health care
1.1 This practice covers dosimetric procedures to be fol-
products. For the radiation sterilization of health care products,
lowedininstallationqualification,operationalqualificationand
see ISO 11137-1. In those areas covered by ISO 11137-1, that
performance qualification (IQ, OQ, PQ), and routine process-
standard takes precedence. For food irradiation, see ISO
ing at electron beam facilities to ensure that the product has
14470.Informationabouteffectiveorregulatorydoselimitsfor
been treated with an acceptable range of absorbed doses. Other
food products is not within the scope of this practice (see
procedures related to IQ, OQ, PQ, and routine product pro-
cessing that may influence absorbed dose in the product are ASTM F1355 and F1356).
also discussed.
1.5 This document is one of a set of standards that provides
1.2 The electron beam energy range covered in this practice
recommendations for properly implementing dosimetry in
is between 80 and 300 keV, generally referred to as low energy.
radiation processing, and describes a means of achieving
1.3 Dosimetry is only one component of a total quality
compliance with the requirements of ISO/ASTM 52628.Itis
assurance program for an irradiation facility. Other measures
intended to be read in conjunction with ISO/ASTM 52628.
may be required for specific applications such as medical
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the
device sterilization and food preservation.
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
1
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E61 on Radiation
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
Processing and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E61.03 on Dosimetry
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
Application, and is also under the jurisdiction of ISO/TC 85/WG 3.
Current edition approved byASTM April 1, 2019. Published XXXX. Originally
1.7 This international standard was developed in accor-
publishedasASTME1818–96.ThepresentFourthEditionofInternationalStandard
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
ISO/ASTM 51818:2019(E) is a major revision of the Third Edition of ISO/ASTM
51818:2013(E). ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
© ISO/ASTM International 2019 – All rights reserved
1

---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
ISO/ASTM DIS 51818:2019(E)
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom- 17025:2017 General requirements for the competence of
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical testing and calibration laboratories
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. 12749-4 Nuclear energy, nuclear technologies, and radio-
logical protection – Vocabulary – Part 4: Dosimetry for
2. Referenced documents
radiation processing
2
2.5 Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM)
2.1 ASTM Standards:
E2232 Guide for Selection and Use of Mathematical Meth- Reports:
JCGM 100:2008, GUM 1995, with minor corrections,
ods for Calculating Absorbed Dose in Radiation Process-
ing Applications Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression
5
of uncertainty in measurement
E3083 Terminology Relating to Radiation Processing: Do-
simetry and Applications JCGM 200:2012, VIM International vocabulary of metrol-
6
ogy – Basic and general concepts and associated terms
F1355 GuideforIrradiationofFreshAgriculturalProduceas
a Phytosanitary Treatment
3. Terminology
F1356 Guide for Irradiation of Fresh, Frozen or Processed
Meat and Poultry to Control Pathogens and Other Micro- 3.1 Definitions:
organisms
3.1.1 absorbed dose (D)—quotient of dε¯ by dm, where dε¯ is
2
2.2 ISO/ASTM Standards: the mean energy imparted by ionizing radiation to matter of
51261 Practice for Calibration of Routine Dosimetry Sys- incremental mass dm (ICRU-85a), thus
tems for Radiation Processing
D 5 dε¯⁄dm
51275 Practice for Use of a Radiochromic Film Dosimetry
3.1.1.1 Discussion—TheSIunitofabsorbeddoseisthegray
System
(Gy),where1grayisequivalenttotheabsorptionof1jouleper
51607 Practice for Use of an Alanine-EPR Dosimetry Sys-
kilogram of the specified material (1 Gy=1J/ kg).
tem
3.1.1.2 Discussion—Throughout this practice, “absorbed
51649 Practice for Dosimetry in an Electron Beam Facility
dose” is referred to as “dose”.
forRadiationProcessingatEnergiesbetween300keVand
3.1.2 approved laboratory—laboratory that is a recognized
25 MeV
national metrology institute; or has been formally accredited to
51650 Practice for Use of a Cellulose Triacetate Dosimetry
ISO/IEC 17025; or has a quality system consistent with the
System
requirements of ISO/IEC 17025.
51707 Guide for Estimating Uncertainties in Dosimetry for
3.1.3 average beam current—time-averaged electron beam
Radiation Processing
current.
52303 Guide forAbsorbed-Dose Mapping in Radiation Pro-
cessing Facilities
3.1.4 beam width—dimension of the irradiation zone per-
52628 Practice for Dosimetry in Radiation Processing
pendicular to the direction of product movement, at a specified
52701 Guide for Performance Characterization of Dosim-
distance from the accelerator window.
eters and Dosimetry Systems for Use in Radiation Pro-
3.1.5 calibration curve—expression of the relation between
cessing
indication and corresponding measuredquantityvalue (VIM).
2.3 International Commission on Radiation Units and Mea-
3.1.5.1 Discussion—In radiation processing standards, the
3
surements (ICRU) Report:
term ‘dosimeter response’ is generally used for ‘indication.’
ICRU Report 80 Dosimetry Systems for Use in Radiation
3.1.6 depth-dose distribution—variation of absorbed dose
Processing
with depth from the incident surface of a material exposed to
ICRU Report 85a Fundamental Quantities and Units for
a given radiation.
Ionizing Radiation
4
3.1.7 dosimeter—device that, when irradiated, exhibits a
2.4 ISO Standards:
quantifiable change that can be related to absorbed dose in a
11137-1:2006 Sterilization of health care products – Radia-
given material using appropriate measurement instruments and
tion – Part 1: Requirements for development, validation
procedures.
and routine control of a sterilization process for medical
devices
3.1.8 dosimetry system—interrelatedelementsusedformea-
14470:2011 Food irradiation – Requirements for the suring absorbed dose, consisting of dosimeters, measurement
development, validation and routine control of the ioniz-
instruments and their associated reference standards, and
ing radiation used for the treatment of food
procedures for the system’s use.
3.1.9 electron beam energy—kinetic energy of the acceler-
2
ated electrons in the beam.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
contact ASTM Customer Service at [e-mail]. For Annual Book of ASTM
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
5
the ASTM website. Document produced by Working Group 1 of the Joint Committee for Guides in
3
Available from the International Commission on Radiation Units and Metrology (JCGM WG1), Available free of charge at the BIPM website (http://
Measurements, 7910 Woodmont Ave., Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20814, U.S.A. www.bipm.org).
4 6
Available from International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO Document produced by Working Group 2 of the Joint Committee for Guides in
Central Secretariat, BIBC II, Chemin de Blandonnet 8, CP 401, 1214 Vernier, Metrology (JCGM WG2), Available free of charge at the BIPM website (http://
Geneva, Switzerland, http://www.iso.org. www.bipm.org).
© ISO/ASTM International 2019 – All rights reserved
2

---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
ISO/ASTM DIS 51818:2019(E)
3.1.10 measurement uncertainty—non-negative parameter oftenusedinconjunctionwithphysical,chemical,orbiological
characterizing the dispersion of the quantity values being testing of the product, to help verify specific treatment param-
attributed to a measurand, based on the information used eters.
NOTE 2—In many cases dosimetry results can be related to other
(VIM).
quantitative product properties; for example, gel fraction, melt flow,
3.1.11 metrological traceability—property of a measure-
elastic modulus, molecular weight distribution, or degree of cure.
ment result whereby the result can be related to a reference
4.2 Radiation processing specifications usually include a
through a documented unbroken chain of calibrations, each
minimum or maximum absorbed dose limit, or both. For a
contributing to the measurement uncertainty (VIM).
given application these limits may be set by government
3.1.12 referencematerial—homogeneousmaterialofknown
regulation or by limits inherent to the product itself.
radiation absorption and scattering properties used to establish
4.3 Critical operating parameters must be controlled to
characteristics of the irradiation process, such as scan
obtain reproducible dose distribution in processed materials.
uniformity, depth-dose distribution, and reproducibility of dose
The electron beam energy, beam current, beam width and
delivery.
process line speed (conveying speed) affect absorbed dose.
3.1.13 routine monitoring position—position where ab-
4.4 Before any electron beam facility can be routinely
sorbed dose is monitored during routine processing to ensure
utilized, it must be characterized to determine the relationship
that the product is receiving the absorbed dose specified for the
between dose to product and the main operating parameters.
process.
This involves testing of the process equipment, calibrating the
3.1.14 uncertainty budget—statement of a measurement
measuring instruments and the dosimetry system, and demon-
uncertainty, of the components of that measurement
strating the ability to consistently deliver the required dose
uncertainty, and of their calculation and combination (VIM).
within predetermined specifications.
3.1.14.1 Discussion—An uncertainty budget should include
4.5 In order to establish metrological traceability for a
the measurement model, estimates, and measurement uncer-
dosimetry system and to measure doses with a known level of
tainties associated with the quantities in the measurement
uncertainty, it is necessary to calibrate the dosimetry system
model, covariances, type of applied probability density
under irradiation conditions that are consistent with those
functions, degrees of freedom, type of evaluation of measure-
encountered in routine use. For example, a dosimetry system
ment uncertainty, and any coverage factor.
calibration conducted using penetrating gamma radiation or
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
high energy electrons may result in significant dose measure-
3.2.1 D —absorbed dose to water in the first micrometer of
µ
ment errors when the dosimetry system is used at low energy
7
water equivalent absorbing material (1).
electron beam facilities. Details of calibration are discussed in
3.2.1.1 Discussion—D is a term used by an approved
µ
Section 5.
laboratory to specify reported surface dose values of transfer
standard dosimeters based on adjustments made to account for
5. Selection and calibration of the dosimetry system
user site specific calibration irradiation conditions.
5.1 Selection of Dosimetry Systems:
3.2.2 linear process rate—product length irradiated per unit
5.1.1 ISO/ASTM 52628 identifies requirements for selec-
time to deliver a given dose.
tion of dosimetry systems. For dosimetry at low-energy elec-
3.2.3 mass process rate—product mass irradiated per unit
tron beam facilities consideration should specifically be given
time to deliver a given dose.
to the limited range of such electrons which might give rise to
3.2.4 area process rate—product area irradiated per unit
significant dose gradients through the thickness of the dosim-
time to deliver a given dose.
eter. By choosing thin film dosimeters this problem can be
minimized (1).
NOTE 1—Definitions of other terms used in this standard that pertain to
radiation measurement and dosimetry may be found in ISO/ASTM 52628, 5.1.2 When selecting a dosimetry system, consideration
ASTM Terminology E3083, and ISO 12749-4. Definitions in these
should be given to effects of influence quantities on the
documents are compatible with ICRU Report 85a, and therefore, may be
response of the dosimeter (see ISO/ASTM 52701). One such
used as alternative references. Where appropriate, definitions used in this
influence quantity might be irradiation atmosphere, and some
standard have been derived from, and are consistent with, general
low-energy accelerator applications involve irradiation in
metrological definitions given in the VIM.
oxygen-free conditions which might influence dosimeter re-
sponse.
4. Significance and use
5.2 Calibration of the Dosimetry System:
4.1 A variety of irradiation processes use low energy elec-
5.2.1 The dosimetry system shall be calibrated prior to use
tron beam facilities to modify product characteristics. Dosim-
and at intervals thereafter in accordance with the user’s
etry requirements, the number and frequency of measurements,
documented procedure that specifies details of the calibration
and record keeping requirements will vary depending on the
process and quality assurance requirements. General condi-
type and end use of the products being processed. Dosimetry is
tions for calibration methods are given in ISO/ASTM 51261.
NOTE 3—For some applications it might not be a requirement that
7
The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to the bibliography at the end of this calibration of the dosimetry system is established and maintained with
standard. traceability to national or international standards. The user must decide
© ISO/ASTM International 2019 – All rights reserved
3

---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
ISO/ASTM DIS 51818:2019(E)
whether or not measurement traceability is required for the specific NOTE 8—Some applications may not require OQ dose measurements to
irradiation process, and it is the user who therefore accepts responsibility be traceable to a national standard (see Annex A4).
for reproducibility and documentation of the process. For more informa-
NOTE 9—Dose measurements for OQ may have to be carried out using
tion on relative dose measurements see Annex A4.
a dosimetry system calibration curve obtained by irradiation at another
facility. This calibration curve should be verified, and corrections applied
5.2.2 The calibration irradiation may be performed by
to the OQ dose measurements as needed.
irradiating the dosimeters at (a) an approved laboratory or (b)
NOTE 10—Distance between beam window and dosimeter should be
an irradiator where the normal irradiation conditions are used
specified for dose measurements carried out during OQ.
for calibration irradiation of routine dosimeters together with
6.2.1 The performance of the low-energy electron beam
transfer standard dosimeters issued and analyzed by an ap-
facility depends primarily on the electron beam energy. It
proved laboratory. In case of option (a), the resulting calibra-
might therefore be necessary to carry out separate OQ mea-
tion curve shall be verified for the actual conditions of use (see
surements for each energy selected for the operation of the
ISO/ASTM 51261). The same applies for option (b) if irradia-
facility.
tion conditions different from the actual production conditions
6.2.2 The relevant dosimetric OQ measurements are de-
have been used for the calibration irradiation.
scribed in more detail in AnnexA1. They typically include the
NOTE 4—While 5.2.2 is valid for most dosimeter calibration
following:
irradiations, it must be recognized that the irradiation of various dosim-
6.2.2.1 Dose as Function of Average Beam Current, Beam
eterswithlowenergyelectrons(lessthan300keV)willlikelyleadtodose
Width and Conveying Speed—Dose to the product irradiated in
gradients through the thickness of the dosimeter. When the dosimeter
an electron beam facility is proportional to average beam
response is measured, this will lead to a dose value (an apparent dose,
D ) that is based on the assumption that there are no dose gradients current (I), inversely proportional to conveying speed (V), and
app
within the dosimeter. However, if dose gradients exist within the
inversely proportional to beam width (W ). The last relation-
b
dosimeter, then for a given set of irradiation conditions, the apparent dose
ship is valid for product that is conveyed through the beam
will depend on the thickness of the dosimeter, i.e., dosimeters with
zone perpendicular to the beam width. This is expressed as:
different thickness will measure different apparent doses. One solution to
overcome this problem is that all dose measurements are specified as dose
D 5 ~K·I!/~V·W ! (1)
b
towaterinthefirstmicrometerofthewaterequivalentabsorbingmaterial.
This is given the symbol D and is independent of the dosimeter thickness
where:
µ
(1). Annex A2 describes the application of this principle for dose
D = absorbed dose (Gy),
measurements carried out during calibraton.
I = average beam current (A),
NOTE 5—Dose gradient within a dosimeter is most pronounced in
-1
V = conveying speed (m s ),
dosimeters with thicknesses that represent a significant fraction of the
W = beam width (m), and
electron range (see Fig. A2.1). Using thin dosimeters, e.g. in the order of
b
2
10 µm, will reduce the gradient and hence the difference between dose at K = slopeofthestraightlinerelationshipinEq1(Gy·m )
the front and the back of the dosimeter.
/ (A · s).
5.3 Measurement Instrument Calibration and Performance
This straight-line relationship shall be determined for each
Verification—For the calibration of the instruments, and for the
energy selected for the operation of the facility. In order to
verification of instrument performance between calibrations,
determine the relationship, dose shall be measured at a specific
ISO/ASTM 51261, the relevant ISO/ASTM orASTM standard
location using a number of selected parameter sets of beam
for the dosimetry system, and/or instrument-specific operating
current, conveying speed and beam width to cover the operat-
manuals should be consulted.
ing range of the facility.
NOTE 11—Deviations from the straight-line relationship should be
6. Installation and operational qualification
investigated.
6.1 Installation qualification (IQ) is carri
...