Unified reference model for smart manufacturing

IEC 63339:2024 specifies the unified reference model for smart manufacturing (URMSM) using a terminology and structure, and establishes criteria for creating reference models, as specializations, that support smart manufacturing. The terminology and structure comprise a set of common modelling elements, their associations, and conformance criteria. These common modelling elements address aspects and perspectives of products and production and their lifecycle considerations. The URMSM enables an approach for creating multiple models based upon a reference model that is sufficient for understanding significant relationships among entities involved in smart manufacturing (SM) and for the development of standards and other specifications. The URMSM specifications in this document accommodate consistent, coherent, compatible specializations for relevant aspects of manufacturing systems consisting of equipment, products, and services within the domain of manufacturing. Provisions of this document are applicable for a new smart manufacturing reference model (SMRM) or elaboration of existing SMRM capabilities, for example, improving capabilities for analysis of opportunities and synthesis of technological advances, and improving interoperability of new and existing systems. This document is not intended to prescribe interoperability considerations or data schemas of models. Standardization of content relative to models will be the subject of other standards and texts specific to those model domains.

Modèle de référence unifié pour la fabrication intelligente

IEC 63339:2024 specifies the unified reference model for smart manufacturing (URMSM) using a terminology and structure, and establishes criteria for creating reference models, as specializations, that support smart manufacturing. The terminology and structure comprise a set of common modelling elements, their associations, and conformance criteria. These common modelling elements address aspects and perspectives of products and production and their lifecycle considerations. The URMSM enables an approach for creating multiple models based upon a reference model that is sufficient for understanding significant relationships among entities involved in smart manufacturing (SM) and for the development of standards and other specifications. The URMSM specifications in this document accommodate consistent, coherent, compatible specializations for relevant aspects of manufacturing systems consisting of equipment, products, and services within the domain of manufacturing. Provisions of this document are applicable for a new smart manufacturing reference model (SMRM) or elaboration of existing SMRM capabilities, for example, improving capabilities for analysis of opportunities and synthesis of technological advances, and improving interoperability of new and existing systems. This document is not intended to prescribe interoperability considerations or data schemas of models. Standardization of content relative to models will be the subject of other standards and texts specific to those model domains.

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
10-Oct-2024
Current Stage
6060 - International Standard published
Start Date
11-Oct-2024
Due Date
07-Jan-2024
Completion Date
11-Oct-2024
Ref Project

Buy Standard

Draft
IEC/FDIS 63339 - Unified reference model for smart manufacturing Released:8. 09. 2023
English language
89 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


FINAL
INTERNATIONAL ISO/FDIS
DRAFT
STANDARD 63339
ISO/TC 184
Unified reference model for smart
Secretariat: AFNOR
manufacturing
Voting begins on:
2023-09-08
Modèle de référence unifié pour la fabrication intelligente
Voting terminates on:
2023-11-03
This draft is submitted to a parallel vote in ISO and in IEC.
RECIPIENTS OF THIS DRAFT ARE INVITED TO
SUBMIT, WITH THEIR COMMENTS, NOTIFICATION
OF ANY RELEVANT PATENT RIGHTS OF WHICH
THEY ARE AWARE AND TO PROVIDE SUPPOR TING
DOCUMENTATION.
IN ADDITION TO THEIR EVALUATION AS
Reference number
BEING ACCEPTABLE FOR INDUSTRIAL, TECHNO-
ISO/FDIS 63339:2023(E)
LOGICAL, COMMERCIAL AND USER PURPOSES,
DRAFT INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS MAY ON
OCCASION HAVE TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE
LIGHT OF THEIR POTENTIAL TO BECOME STAN-
DARDS TO WHICH REFERENCE MAY BE MADE IN
NATIONAL REGULATIONS. © ISO 2023

ISO/FDIS 63339:2023(E)
FINAL
INTERNATIONAL IEC/FDIS
DRAFT
STANDARD 63339
ISO/TC 184
Unified reference model for smart
Secretariat: AFNOR
manufacturing
Voting begins on:
2023-09-08
Modèle de référence unifié pour la fabrication intelligente
Voting terminates on:
2023-11-03
© ISO 2023
This draft is submitted to a parallel vote in ISO and in IEC.
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may
be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on
the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below
or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
RECIPIENTS OF THIS DRAFT ARE INVITED TO
ISO copyright office
SUBMIT, WITH THEIR COMMENTS, NOTIFICATION
OF ANY RELEVANT PATENT RIGHTS OF WHICH
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
THEY ARE AWARE AND TO PROVIDE SUPPOR TING
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
DOCUMENTATION.
Phone: +41 22 749 01 11
IN ADDITION TO THEIR EVALUATION AS
Reference number
Email: copyright@iso.org
BEING ACCEPTABLE FOR INDUSTRIAL, TECHNO-
IEC/FDIS 63339:2023(E)
Website: www.iso.org
LOGICAL, COMMERCIAL AND USER PURPOSES,
DRAFT INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS MAY ON
Published in Switzerland
OCCASION HAVE TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE
LIGHT OF THEIR POTENTIAL TO BECOME STAN-
DARDS TO WHICH REFERENCE MAY BE MADE IN
ii
NATIONAL REGULATIONS. © ISO 2023

IEC/FDIS 63339:2023(E)
– 2 – IEC FDIS 63339 © IEC 2023
CONTENTS
FOREWORD . 6
INTRODUCTION . 8
1 Scope . 12
2 Normative references . 12
3 Terms, definitions, abbreviated terms, acronyms and conventions . 12
3.1 Terms and definitions . 12
3.2 Abbreviated terms and acronyms . 17
3.3 Conventions . 18
4 Conformance . 18
4.1 Intended usage . 18
4.2 Full conformance . 18
4.3 Partial conformance . 18
4.3.1 Conformance to purpose and context requirements . 18
4.3.2 Conformance to dimensions and coherence . 19
4.3.3 Conformance to semantic modelling of aspects . 19
4.3.4 Conformance to facets and frameworks . 19
5 The URMSM in smart manufacturing concepts . 19
6 Reference model concepts . 20
6.1 SM modelling . 20
6.2 Modelling purpose. 21
6.3 Modelling dimensions. 22
6.4 Dimension coherence . 23
6.5 Stakeholders . 24
6.6 Concerns . 24
6.7 Use case. 25
6.8 Viewpoints and views . 25
6.9 Perspectives . 26
6.9.1 Use of perspective . 26
6.9.2 Stakeholder perspectives . 26
6.9.3 Analytical framework. 26
6.10 Aspects . 27
6.11 Life cycle modelling . 28
6.12 SM semantic modelling . 28
6.12.1 Semantic modelling overview . 28
6.12.2 Forms of semantic representation . 30
6.12.3 Granularity of semantic models . 31
7 Dimensions of URMSM . 32
7.1 Identifying aspect interactions of smart manufacturing . 32
7.2 Specifying modelling dimensions . 32
7.2.1 Collections of aspects as dimensions of smart manufacturing . 32
7.2.2 Collections of dimensions as an analytical framework for smart
manufacturing . 33
7.2.3 Collections of life cycle phases as dimensions of smart manufacturing . 34
7.3 Using a semantic model for analytical reasoning in smart manufacturing . 35
7.4 Selecting facet dimensions based upon concerns . 35
© ISO/2023 – All rights reserved

IEC/FDIS 63339:2023(E)
IEC FDIS 63339 © IEC 2023 – 3 –
7.5 Identify meaningful dimension interactions . 37
7.6 Frameworks as visualizations of interactions . 38
8 Using the URMSM . 41
8.1 Utility of a reference model for smart manufacturing . 41
8.2 Industry specific application of the URMSM . 41
8.3 Specializing URMSM . 42
8.3.1 Specific utilization of the URMSM and rules for derivatives of SMRMs . 42
8.3.2 Manipulating reference models to match purpose . 43
9 Use cases of the URMSM . 44
9.1 Analysis use case . 44
9.1.1 Examining interactions at intersections of aspects . 44
9.1.2 Examining interactions near intersections of aspects . 45
9.1.3 Inserting new capabilities to analyse . 45
9.2 Synthesis use case . 45
9.2.1 Identifying necessary coverage of aspect interactions . 45
9.2.2 Sequencing activities based upon dependencies . 46
9.3 Simulation in SMRM . 46
9.4 Implementation use case . 47
10 Family of reference models based upon the URMSM . 48
10.1 A base of essential SM modelling dimensions . 48
10.2 Re-arranging framework dimensions . 50
10.3 Complementary frameworks for same situation . 50
10.4 Using multiple SMRMs to achieve purpose. 51
Annex A (informative) Concept areas of SM . 52
A.1 Aspects of production and products . 52
A.2 Perspectives of production and products stakeholders . 52
A.3 Lifecycle considerations . 53
A.4 Modelling of products and production using semantic models . 53
A.5 Semantic models . 55
Annex B (informative) Formal Foundation for URMSM . 57
B.1 Modelling framework for URMSM . 57
B.1.1 Formalism caveat . 57
B.1.2 Modelling framework formalism . 57
B.1.3 Using a URMSM framework . 60
B.1.4 Semantic models of dimensions composed of aspects . 62
Annex C (informative) Positioning URMSM among reference models . 65
C.1 Positioning URMSM among reference models . 65
Annex D (informative) Meta-model for reference model analysis . 66
D.1 Meta-model analysis . 66
D.2 Using a meta-model . 66
D.2.1 General . 66
D.2.2 Assumptions, constraints and guidance . 66
D.2.3 Concepts . 67
Annex E (informative) Principles of semantic modelling . 73
E.1 Top level conceptual model . 73
E.2 Semiotic conceptual model . 75
E.3 Top level model domains . 78
© ISO/2023 – All rights reserved

IEC/FDIS 63339:2023(E)
– 4 – IEC FDIS 63339 © IEC 2023
Annex F (informative) Practitioner’s modelling activity in a systematic usage of
URMSM . 80
F.1 Use case derivation of concerns, aspects, and perspectives . 80
F.2 Relationship between aspects on a dimension and model contents . 82
F.2.1 General . 82
F.2.2 Implication of the dimension of lifecycle . 83
F.2.3 Implication of the dimension of smart technology . 83
F.2.4 Implication of the dimension of enterprise hierarchy . 84
F.2.5 Implication of the dimension of capability level . 84
F.3 Concept of step-by-step approach. 84
F.3.1 Formalism caveat . 84
F.3.2 Practical procedure . 85
Annex G (informative) Use case: Value stream . 87
G.1 Overview. 87
G.2 Con
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.