Systems and software engineering — Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) — Common Industry Format (CIF) for reporting usability evaluations

This document describes the common industry format (CIF) for reporting usability evaluations. It provides a classification of evaluation approaches and the specifications for the content items (content elements) to be included in an evaluation report based on the selected evaluation approach(es). The intended users of the usability evaluation reports are identified, as well as the situations in which the usability evaluation report can be applied. The usability evaluation reports in this document are applicable to software and hardware systems and products or services used for predefined tasks (excluding generic products, such as a display screen or a keyboard). The content elements are intended to be used as part of system-level documentation resulting from development processes such as those in ISO 9241-210 and the ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 7 process standards (e.g. ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 on systems lifecycle management, ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207 on software lifecycle management and ISO/IEC 33001 on process capability assessment).

Ingénierie des systèmes et logiciels — Exigences et évaluation de la qualité des systèmes et logiciels (SQuaRE) — Format industriel commun pour le reporting des évaluations d'utilisabilité

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
26-Jan-2025
Current Stage
6060 - International Standard published
Start Date
27-Jan-2025
Due Date
27-Jan-2025
Completion Date
27-Jan-2025
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ISO 25062:2025 - Systems and software engineering — Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) — Common Industry Format (CIF) for reporting usability evaluations Released:27. 01. 2025
English language
30 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


International
Standard
ISO 25062
First edition
Systems and software
2025-01
engineering — Systems and
software Quality Requirements and
Evaluation (SQuaRE) — Common
Industry Format (CIF) for reporting
usability evaluations
Ingénierie des systèmes et logiciels — Exigences et évaluation de
la qualité des systèmes et logiciels (SQuaRE) — Format industriel
commun pour le reporting des évaluations d'utilisabilité
Reference number
© ISO 2025
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may
be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on
the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below
or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: +41 22 749 01 11
Email: copyright@iso.org
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii
Contents Page
Foreword .iv
Introduction .v
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 Outcomes and types of usability evaluations . 5
4.1 Outcomes of a usability evaluation .5
4.2 Types of usability evaluation .6
4.3 Assessing conformity of the object of evaluation against specified evaluation criteria .6
5 Conformance . 8
6 Overview of content elements within an evaluation report . 9
7 Description of content elements within an evaluation report . 9
7.1 Executive summary .9
7.2 Description of the object of evaluation .10
7.3 Purpose of the usability evaluation .10
7.4 Evaluation methodology .11
7.4.1 General .11
7.4.2 Type(s) of evaluation used .11
7.4.3 Evaluator(s) .11
7.4.4 Evaluation participants . .11
7.4.5 Tasks used for evaluation . 12
7.4.6 Evaluation environment . 13
7.4.7 Data collected during the evaluation .14
7.4.8 Additional content for conformity assessment (if used) . 15
7.5 Data analysis and results .16
7.5.1 Data analysis .16
7.5.2 Reported results .17
7.6 Recommendations .19
7.7 Conclusions .19
7.8 Appendix .19
7.8.1 General .19
7.8.2 Evaluation protocol .19
7.8.3 Sequence of organizational activities for conducting the evaluation . 20
7.8.4 Independent variables . 20
7.8.5 Predefined evaluation criteria . 20
7.8.6 General instructions given to the participants .21
7.8.7 Specific instructions on tasks .21
7.8.8 Additional content on ethics and intellectual property .21
Annex A (informative) Checklist of content elements for a usability evaluation report .22
Annex B (informative) Evaluation report outline .26
Bibliography .29

iii
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through
ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee
has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations,
governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely
with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are described
in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the different types
of ISO document should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the
ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
ISO draws attention to the possibility that the implementation of this document may involve the use of (a)
patent(s). ISO takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of any claimed patent
rights in respect thereof. As of the date of publication of this document, ISO had not received notice of (a)
patent(s) which may be required to implement this document. However, implementers are cautioned that
this may not represent the latest information, which may be obtained from the patent database available at
www.iso.org/patents. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions
related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to the World Trade
Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), see www.iso.org/iso/foreword.html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 159, Ergonomics, Subcommittee SC 4,
Ergonomics of human-system interaction.
This first edition of ISO 25062 cancels and replaces the first edition ISO/IEC 25062:2006, which has been
technically revised.
The main change is as follows:
— the scope of the document has been significantly expanded to go beyond usability test reports and deal
with all types of usability evaluations.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www.iso.org/members.html.

iv
Introduction
This document provides a framework and consistent terminology for reporting the results of usability
evaluations of an interactive system. It is intended to assist those who perform usability evaluations in
documenting and communicating the results of usability evaluations as part of the system development
lifecycle.
NOTE ISO/IEC 25040 specifies a framework for quality evaluation.
The human-centred design approach of ISO 9241-210 is well established and focuses specifically on
making systems usable. Usability can be achieved by applying human-centred design throughout
the system development lifecycle. It is important that all the relevant types of information related to
usability (information items) are identified and communicated as part of a human-centred approach. The
identification and communication of relevant types of information related to usability enables the design
and testing of the usability of a system.
The information items for reporting the results of usability evaluations of an interactive system can be
integrated in any process models. For the purpose of establishing process models, ISO/IEC/IEEE 24774
and ISO/IEC TS 33061 specify the format and conformity requirements for process models, respectively.
In addition, ISO/IEC/IEEE 15289 defines the types and content of information items developed and used in
process models for system and software life cycle management. ISO/IEC TS 33060 and ISO/IEC TS 33061
define work products, including information items, for the purpose of process capability assessment. Process
models and associated information items for human-centred design of interactive systems are contained in
ISO 9241-210 and ISO TS 18152, respectively.
The common industry format (CIF) for usability documents are part of the SQuaRE (Systems and software
Quality Requirements and Evaluation) group of standards developed by ISO/TC 159, and described
in ISO/IEC 25000, Systems and software engineering — Systems and software Quality Requirements and
Evaluation (SQuaRE) — Guide to SQuaRE.
The CIF documents use definitions that are consistent with the ISO 9241 series on ergonomics of human-
system interaction, as this is the terminology that is normally used for this subject matter.
ISO TR 25060 gives an overview of the CIF standards, which include documents covering the following
information items:
— reporting usability evaluations (ISO 25062);
— context of use description (ISO/IEC 25063);
— user needs report (ISO/IEC 25064);
— user requirements specification (ISO 25065).
Table 1 presents an overview of the structure and the contents of the SQuaRE standards.
Table 1 — Organization of the SQuaRE series
SQuaRE architecture and sub-projects
ISO/IEC 25030 covering quality ISO/IEC 25010, ISO/IEC 25011, ISO/IEC 25012, ISO/IEC 25040 covering quali-
requirements and ISO/IEC 25019 covering qu
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.