iTeh StandardsiTeh Standards
EURUSD
Your shopping cart is empty.
ISO

ISO 16363:2012

(Main)

Space data and information transfer systems — Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories

Space data and information transfer systems — Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories

ISO 16363:2012 defines a recommended practice for assessing the trustworthiness of digital repositories. It is applicable to the entire range of digital repositories. ISO 16363:2012 can be used as a basis for certification.

Systèmes de transfert des informations et données spatiales — Audit et certification des référentiels numériques de confiance

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
13-Feb-2012
ICS
49.140 - Space systems and operations
Technical Committee
ISO/TC 20/SC 13 - Space data and information transfer systems
Drafting Committee
ISO/TC 20/SC 13 - Space data and information transfer systems
Current Stage
9599 - Withdrawal of International Standard
Due Date
05-Mar-2025
Completion Date
05-Mar-2025
Ref Project

Relations

Revised
ISO 16363:2025 - Space data and information transfer systems — Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories
Effective Date
15-Jul-2023

Buy Standard

ISO 16363:2012 - Space data and information transfer systems -- Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositoriesISO 16363:2012 - Space data and information transfer systems -- Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories
PreviousNext
Standard
ISO 16363:2012 - Space data and information transfer systems -- Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories
English language
70 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 16363
First edition
2012-02-15
Space data and information transfer
systems — Audit and certification of
trustworthy digital repositories
Systèmes de transfert des informations et données spatiales — Audit et
certification des référentiels numériques de confiance

Reference number
©
ISO 2012
©  ISO 2012
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from either ISO at the address below or
ISO's member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
Case postale 56  CH-1211 Geneva 20
Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11
Fax + 41 22 749 09 47
E-mail copyright@iso.org
Web www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO 2012 – All rights reserved

Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies
(ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO
technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been
established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and
non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International Standards
adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an
International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent
rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
ISO 16363 was prepared by the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) (as
CCSDS 652.0-M-1, September 2011) and was adopted (without modifications except those stated in Clause 2
of this International Standard) by Technical Committee ISO/TC 20, Aircraft and space vehicles, Subcommittee
SC 13, Space data and information transfer systems.

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 16363:2012(E)

Space data and information transfer systems — Audit and
certification of trustworthy digital repositories
1 Scope
This International Standard defines a recommended practice for assessing the trustworthiness of digital
repositories. It is applicable to the entire range of digital repositories. This International Standard can be used
as a basis for certification.
The scope and field of application are furthermore detailed in subclauses 1.1 and 1.2 of the enclosed CCSDS
publication.
2 Requirements
Requirements are the technical recommendations made in the following publication (reproduced on the
following pages), which is adopted as an International Standard:
CCSDS 652.0-M-1, September 2011, Audit and certification of trustworthy digital respositories
For the purposes of international standardization, the modifications outlined below shall apply to the specific
clauses and paragraphs of publication CCSDS 652.0-M-1.
Pages i to v
This part is information which is relevant to the CCSDS publication only.
Page 1-6
Add the following information to the reference indicated:
[1] Document CCSDS 650.0-B-1, January 2002, is equivalent to ISO 14721:2003.
Page B-1
Add the following information to the reference indicated:
[B5] Document CCSDS 661.0-B-1, September 2008, is equivalent to ISO 13527:2010.
[B6] Document CCSDS 644.0-B-3, June 2010, is equivalent to ISO 15889:2011.
[B7] Document CCSDS 647.1-B-1, June 2001, is equivalent to ISO 21961:2003.
3 Revision of publication CCSDS 652.0-M-1
It has been agreed with the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems that Subcommittee
ISO/TC 20/SC 13 will be consulted in the event of any revision or amendment of publication CCSDS 652.0-M-1.
To this end, NASA will act as a liaison body between CCSDS and ISO.
(blank page)
2 © ISO 2012 – All rights reserved

ISO 16363:201(E)
Recommendation for Space Data System Practices
AUDIT AND
CERTIFICATION OF
TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL
REPOSITORIES
RECOMMENDED PRACTICE
CCSDS 652.0-M-1
MAGENTA BOOK
September 2011
ISO 16363:201(E)
(blank page)
4 © ISO 2012 – All rights reserved

ISO 16363:201(E)
AUDIT AND CERTIFICATION OF TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL REPOSITORIES
AUTHORITY
Issue: Recommended Practice, Issue 1
Date: September 2011
Location: Washington, DC, USA
This document has been approved for publication by the Management Council of the
Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) and represents the consensus
technical agreement of the participating CCSDS Member Agencies. The procedure for
review and authorization of CCSDS documents is detailed in the Procedures Manual for the
Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems, and the record of Agency participation in
the authorization of this document can be obtained from the CCSDS Secretariat at the
address below.
This document is published and maintained by:

CCSDS Secretariat
Space Communications and Navigation Office, 7L70
Space Operations Mission Directorate
NASA Headquarters
Washington, DC 20546-0001, USA
CCSDS 652.0-M-1 Page i September 2011
AUDIT AND CERTIFICATION OF TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL REPOSITORIES
STATEMENT OF INTENT
The Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) is an organization officially
established by the management of its members. The Committee meets periodically to address
data systems problems that are common to all participants, and to formulate sound technical
solutions to these problems. Inasmuch as participation in the CCSDS is completely voluntary,
the results of Committee actions are termed Recommendations and are not in themselves
considered binding on any Agency.
CCSDS Recommendations take two forms: Recommended Standards that are prescriptive
and are the formal vehicles by which CCSDS Agencies create the standards that specify how
elements of their space mission support infrastructure shall operate and interoperate with
others; and Recommended Practices that are more descriptive in nature and are intended to
provide general guidance about how to approach a particular problem associated with space
mission support. This Recommended Practice is issued by, and represents the consensus of,
the CCSDS members. Endorsement of this Recommended Practice is entirely voluntary
and does not imply a commitment by any Agency or organization to implement its
recommendations in a prescriptive sense.
No later than five years from its date of issuance, this Recommended Practice will be
reviewed by the CCSDS to determine whether it should: (1) remain in effect without change;
(2) be changed to reflect the impact of new technologies, new requirements, or new
directions; or (3) be retired or canceled.
In those instances when a new version of a Recommended Practice is issued, existing
CCSDS-related member Practices and implementations are not negated or deemed to be non-
CCSDS compatible. It is the responsibility of each member to determine when such Practices
or implementations are to be modified. Each member is, however, strongly encouraged to
direct planning for its new Practices and implementations towards the later version of the
Recommended Practice.
CCSDS 652.0-M-1 Page ii September 2011
ISO 16363:201(E)
AUDIT AND CERTIFICATION OF TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL REPOSITORIES
FOREWORD
This document is a technical Recommendation to use as the basis for providing audit and
certification of the trustworthiness of digital repositories. It provides a detailed specification
of criteria by which digital repositories shall be audited.
The OAIS Reference Model (reference [1]) contained a roadmap which included the need for
a certification standard. The initial work was to be carried out outside CCSDS and then
brought back into CCSDS to take into the standard.
In 2003, Research Libraries Group (RLG) and the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA) created a joint task force to specifically address digital repository
certification. That task force published Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification:
Criteria and Checklist (TRAC—reference [B3]), on which this Recommended Practice is
based.
Through the process of normal evolution, it is expected that expansion, deletion, or
modification of this document may occur. This Recommended Practice is therefore subject
to CCSDS document management and change control procedures, which are defined in the
Procedures Manual for the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. Current
versions of CCSDS documents are maintained at the CCSDS Web site:
http://www.ccsds.org/
Questions relating to the contents or status of this document should be addressed to the
CCSDS Secretariat at the address indicated on page i.
CCSDS 652.0-M-1 Page iii September 2011
AUDIT AND CERTIFICATION OF TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL REPOSITORIES
At time of publication, the active Member and Observer Agencies of the CCSDS were:
Member Agencies
– Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI)/Italy.
– Canadian Space Agency (CSA)/Canada.
– Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES)/France.
– China National Space Administration (CNSA)/People’s Republic of China.
– Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR)/Germany.
– European Space Agency (ESA)/Europe.
– Federal Space Agency (FSA)/Russian Federation.
– Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)/Brazil.
– Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA)/Japan.
– National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)/USA.
– UK Space Agency/United Kingdom.
Observer Agencies
– Austrian Space Agency (ASA)/Austria.
– Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (BFSPO)/Belgium.
– Central Research Institute of Machine Building (TsNIIMash)/Russian Federation.
– China Satellite Launch and Tracking Control General, Beijing Institute of Tracking
and Telecommunications Technology (CLTC/BITTT)/China.
– Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)/China.
– Chinese Academy of Space Technology (CAST)/China.
– Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO)/Australia.
– CSIR Satellite Applications Centre (CSIR)/Republic of South Africa.
– Danish National Space Center (DNSC)/Denmark.
– Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia Aeroespacial (DCTA)/Brazil.
– European Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites
(EUMETSAT)/Europe.
– European Telecommunications Satellite Organization (EUTELSAT)/Europe.
– Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development Agency (GISTDA)/Thailand.
– Hellenic National Space Committee (HNSC)/Greece.
– Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO)/India.
– Institute of Space Research (IKI)/Russian Federation.
– KFKI Research Institute for Particle & Nuclear Physics (KFKI)/Hungary.
– Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KARI)/Korea.
– Ministry of Communications (MOC)/Israel.
– National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT)/Japan.
– National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)/USA.
– National Space Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan (NSARK)/Kazakhstan.
– National Space Organization (NSPO)/Chinese Taipei.
– Naval Center for Space Technology (NCST)/USA.
– Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)/Turkey.
– Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission (SUPARCO)/Pakistan.
– Swedish Space Corporation (SSC)/Sweden.
CCSDS 652.0-M-1 Page iv September 2011
ISO 16363:201(E)
AUDIT AND CERTIFICATION OF TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL REPOSITORIES
– United States Geological Survey (USGS)/USA.
CCSDS 652.0-M-1 Page v September 2011
AUDIT AND CERTIFICATION OF TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL REPOSITORIES
DOCUMENT CONTROL
Document Title Date Status
CCSDS Audit and Certification of September Original issue
652.0-M-1 Trustworthy Digital Repositories, 2011
Recommended Practice,
Issue 1
CCSDS 652.0-M-1 Page vi September 2011
ISO 16363:201(E)
AUDIT AND CERTIFICATION OF TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL REPOSITORIES
CONTENTS
Section Page
1 INTRODUCTION. 1-1

1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE . 1-1
1.2 APPLICABILITY . 1-1
1.3 RATIONALE . 1-1
1.4 STRUCTURE OF THIS DOCUMENT. 1-2
1.5 DEFINITIONS . 1-3
1.6 CONFORMANCE . 1-6
1.7 REFERENCES . 1-6

2 OVERVIEW OF AUDIT AND CERTIFICATION CRITERIA . 2-1

2.1 A TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL REPOSITORY . 2-1
2.2 EVIDENCE.
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

This May Also Interest You

ISO
ISO 16919:2025(Main)
Space data and information transfer systems — Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of candidate trustworthy digital repositories

This document defines a CCSDS Recommended Practice (and ISO standard) on which to base the operations of the organization(s) which assess the trustworthiness of digital repositories using the latest version of CCSDS 652.0/ISO 16363 (reference REF R_652x0m2AuditandCertificationofTrustwor \h[1] 08D0C9EA79F9BACE118C8200AA004BA90B02000000080000002900000052005F00360035003200780030006D0032004100750064006900740061006E006400430065007200740069006600690063006100740069006F006E006F0066005400720075007300740077006F0072000000 ) and provide the appropriate certification. This document specifies requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of digital repositories, based on the metrics contained within ISO/IEC 17021-1 (reference REF R_ISOIEC170212011ConformityAssessmentReq \h \* MERGEFORMAT [4] 08D0C9EA79F9BACE118C8200AA004BA90B02000000080000002900000052005F00490053004F0049004500430031003700300032003100320030003100310043006F006E0066006F0072006D006900740079004100730073006500730073006D0065006E0074005200650071000000 ) and reference REF R_652x0m2AuditandCertificationofTrustwor \h[1] 08D0C9EA79F9BACE118C8200AA004BA90B02000000080000002900000052005F00360035003200780030006D0032004100750064006900740061006E006400430065007200740069006600690063006100740069006F006E006F0066005400720075007300740077006F0072000000 . It is primarily intended to support the accreditation of bodies providing such certification. ISO/IEC 17021-1 provides the bulk of the requirements on bodies offering audit and certification for general types of management systems. However, for each specific type of system, specific additional requirements will be needed, for example, to specify the standard against which the audit is to be made and the qualifications which auditors require. This document provides the (small number of) specific additions required for bodies providing audit and certification of candidate trustworthy digital repositories. Trustworthy here means that they can be trusted to maintain, over the long-term, the understandability and usability of digitally encoded information placed into their safekeeping. In order improve readability the section numbers are kept consistent with those of ISO/IEC 17021-1. Some subsections are applicable as they stand, and these are simply enumerated; otherwise additions to subsections are explicitly given. In the former case the sections may consist of just a few sentences. As a result this document must be read in conjunction with ISO/IEC 17021-1. The requirements contained in this CCSDS Recommended Practice need to be demonstrated in terms of competence and reliability by any organization or body providing certification of digital repositories.

  • Standard
    23 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ISO
ISO 23507:2025(Main)
Space data and information transfer systems — Information preparation to enable long term use

This document deals with the aspects of a project, in particular the terminology used. Many of these terms are already used with various definitions within the target communities for this practice, for example, space, science, life sciences, libraries, records management, and archival communities. It is expected that other communities can easily map this terminology to the terminology used within those communities. The Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS) provided a starting point and inputs from a variety of other sources were used to arrive at the terms used within this standard. This document accomplishes the following: – identifies the Additional Information to be collected or improved at various points; – forms a basis for the specification of Data Management Plans (DMPs); – forms a basis for the identification and/or development of additional standards and implementation guides, including those that address particular concerns in more detail.

  • Standard
    59 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ISO
ISO 16363:2025(Main)
Space data and information transfer systems — Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories

This document defines a CCSDS Recommended Practice on which to base an audit and certification process for assessing the trustworthiness of digital repositories. The scope of application of this document is the entire range of digital repositories.

  • Standard
    77 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ISO
ISO 22669:2021(Main)
Space data and information transfer systems — Space link extension (SLE) — Return-all-frames service specification

This document defines, in an abstract manner, the RAF service in terms of: the operations necessary to provide the service; the parameter data associated with each operation; the behaviors that result from the invocation of each operation; and the relationship between, and the valid sequence of, the operations and resulting behaviors. It does not specify: individual implementations or products; the implementation of entities or interfaces within real systems; the methods or technologies required to acquire telemetry frames from signals received from a spacecraft; the methods or technologies required to provide a suitable environment for communications; or the management activities required to schedule, configure, and control the RAF service.

  • Standard
    136 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    136 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ISO
ISO 26143:2021(Main)
Space data and information transfer systems — Space link extension (SLE) — Return operational control fields service specification

The purpose of this document is to define the Space Link Extension (SLE) Return Operational Control Fields (ROCF) service in conformance with the SLE Reference Model (reference [1]). The ROCF service is an SLE transfer service that delivers to a mission user all operational control fields from one master channel or one virtual channel. This document defines, in an abstract manner, the ROCF service in terms of: the operations necessary to provide the service; the parameter data associated with each operation; the behaviors that result from the invocation of each operation; and the relationship between, and the valid sequence of, the operations and resulting behaviors. It does not specify: individual implementations or products; the implementation of entities or interfaces within real systems; the methods or technologies required to acquire telemetry frames from signals received from a spacecraft; the methods or technologies required to provide a suitable environment for communications; or the management activities required to schedule, configure, and control the ROCF service. NOTE – Reference [1] defines the Return Master Channel Operational Control Field (Rtn MC-OCF) service and the Return Virtual Channel Operational Control Field (Rtn VC-OCF) service as two distinct services. Subsequent study has indicated that it is preferable to define one service that provides the functionality of both. The ROCF service defined here does just that. It is anticipated that a future issue of reference [1] will take the same approach, deleting the Rtn MC-OCF and Rtn VC-OCF services and replacing them with the Rtn OCF service.

  • Standard
    144 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    144 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ISO
ISO 21077:2021(Main)
Space data and information transfer systems — Digital motion imagery

The purpose of this document is to provide a common reference and framework of standards for digital motion video and imagery, and to provide recommendations for utilization of international standards for sharing or distributing motion video and imagery between spacecraft elements and ground systems. The scope of this document includes traditional real-time streaming video and television, including human and robotic spacecraft-to-spacecraft and spacecraft-to-ground systems, as well as video recorded and distributed later, either as a real-time stream or as a file transfer. In this context, real-time streaming includes all modes where video is sent from a spacecraft in a continuous stream and is intended for immediate use when received, regardless of the latency of the transmission path. Other specialized motion imagery applications, such as high-speed scientific motion imagery and multi-spectral motion imagery, are not addressed in this document. However, if a specialized imagery camera system has a requirement to interface to spacecraft systems in a video mode, it would be required to match these interfaces. Ground-systems-to-ground-systems video distribution is obviously a key component of the entire video system. However, this is not the primary focus of this document. Currently, there are significant differences in the ways mission video products are exchanged between the various space agencies on the ground. This is the result of differences in network topologies between space agencies, and agreements for video sharing. Those differences preclude there being a standard methodology for delivering video imagery between agencies. Prior to the commencement of video transmission between space agencies, system design reviews and performance testing should be done between the ground systems in use to assure operability when video imagery comes from spacecraft.

  • Standard
    34 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    34 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ISO
ISO 22670:2021(Main)
Space data and information transfer systems — Space link extension (SLE) — Return-channel-frames service specification

The purpose of this document is to define the Space Link Extension (SLE) Return Channel Frames (RCF) service in conformance with the SLE Reference Model (reference [1]). The RCF service is an SLE transfer service that delivers to a mission user all telemetry frames from one master channel or one virtual channel. This document defines, in an abstract manner, the RCF service in terms of: the operations necessary to provide the service; the parameter data associated with each operation; the behaviors that result from the invocation of each operation; and the relationship between, and the valid sequence of, the operations and resulting behaviors. It does not specify: individual implementations or products; the implementation of entities or interfaces within real systems; the methods or technologies required to acquire telemetry frames from signals received from a spacecraft; the methods or technologies required to provide a suitable environment for communications; or the management activities required to schedule, configure, and control the RCF service. NOTE – Reference [1] defines the Return Master Channel Frames (Rtn MC Frames) service and the Return Virtual Channel Frames (Rtn VC Frames) service as two distinct services. Subsequent study has indicated that it is preferable to define one service that provides the functionality of both. The RCF service defined here does just that. It is anticipated that a future issue of reference [1] will take the same approach, deleting the Rtn MC Frames and Rtn VC Frames services and replacing them with the RCF service.

  • Standard
    141 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    141 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ISO
ISO 22672:2021(Main)
Space data and information transfer systems — Space link extension (SLE) — Forward space packet service specification

This document defines the Forward Space Packet (FSP) service in conformance with the transfer services specified in reference [1], Cross Support Reference Model―Part 1: SLE Services. The FSP service is a Space Link Extension (SLE) transfer service that enables a mission to send Space Packets to a spacecraft in sequence-controlled or expedited mode. This document defines, in an abstract manner, the FSP service in terms of: the operations necessary to provide the transfer service; the parameter data associated with each operation; the behaviors that result from the invocation of each operation; and the relationship between, and the valid sequence of, the operations and resulting behaviors. It does not specify: individual implementations or products; the implementation of entities or interfaces within real systems; the methods or technologies required to radiate Space Packets to a spacecraft and to acquire telemetry frames from the signals received from that spacecraft for extraction of the Operational Control Field; the methods or technologies required for communications; or the management activities necessary to schedule, configure, and control the FSP service. NOTE – While the FSP service as described in reference [1] is conceived to handle a variety of packet data structures, this version of the FSP Recommended Standard is restricted to the handling of Space Packets as defined in reference [6]. This version of the FSP Recommended Standard is specific to the transfer of Space Packets to be transmitted via the Telecommand protocol stack as defined in references [3], [4], and [5]. The Cross Support Reference Model (reference [1]) specifies that the FSP service may also be used in conjunction with the Advanced Orbiting System protocol stack, but that mode of operation is outside the scope of this version of the Recommended Standard. The FSP service is provided in the online delivery mode, as defined in reference [1]. The offline delivery mode is the subject of further study.

  • Standard
    190 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    190 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ISO
ISO 18441:2021(Main)
Space data and information transfer systems — Space link extension — Application program interface for transfer services — Core specification

This document defines the Application Program Interface in terms of: the components that provide the services of the API; the functionality provided by each of the components; the interfaces provided by each of the components; and the externally visible behavior associated with the interfaces exported by the components. It does not specify: individual implementations or products; the internal design of the components; and the technology used for communications. This document defines those aspects of the Application Program Interface, which are common for all SLE service types or for a subset of the SLE service types, e.g., all return link services or all forward link services. It also defines a framework for specification of service type-specific elements of the API. Service-specific aspects of the API are defined by supplemental Recommended Practice documents for SLE return link services (references [10], [11], and [12]) and SLE forward link services (references [13] and [14]). This document for the Application Program Interface responds to the requirements imposed on such an API by the CCSDS SLE transfer service Recommended Standards that were available when this document was released.

  • Standard
    365 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    365 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ISO
ISO 22671:2021(Main)
Space data and information transfer systems — Space link extension (SLE) — Forward communications link transmission unit (CLTU) service specification

This document defines the Communications Link Transmission Unit (CLTU) service in conformance with the transfer services specified in reference [1], Cross Support Reference Model—Part 1: SLE Services. The Forward CLTU service is a Space Link Extension (SLE) transfer service that enables a mission to send Communications Link Transmission Units (CLTUs) to a spacecraft. This document defines, in an abstract manner, the Forward CLTU service in terms of: the operations necessary to provide the transfer service; the parameter data associated with each operation; the behaviors that result from the invocation of each operation; and the relationship between, and the valid sequence of, the operations and resulting behaviors. It does not specify: individual implementations or products; the implementation of entities or interfaces within real systems; the methods or technologies required to radiate data to a spacecraft and to acquire telemetry frames from the signals received from that spacecraft for extraction of the Operational Control Field; the methods or technologies required for communications; or the management activities necessary to schedule, configure, and control the Forward CLTU service.

  • Standard
    143 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    143 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off