ISO 12242:2012

Measurement of fluid flow in closed conduits — Ultrasonic transit-time meters for liquid

ISO 12242:2012 specifies requirements and recommendations for ultrasonic liquid flowmeters, which utilize the transit time of ultrasonic signals to measure the flow of single-phase homogenous liquids in closed conduits. There are no limits on the minimum or maximum sizes of the meter. ISO 12242:2012 specifies performance, calibration and output characteristics of ultrasonic meters (USMs) for liquid flow measurement and deals with installation conditions. It covers installation with and without a dedicated proving (calibration) system. It covers both in-line and clamp-on transducers (used in configurations in which the beam is non-refracted and in those in which it is refracted). Included are both meters incorporating meter bodies and meters with field-mounted transducers.

Mesurage de débit des fluides dans les conduites fermées — Compteurs ultrasoniques pour liquides

General Information

• Status: Published
• Publication Date: 02-Jul-2012
• ICS: 17.120.10 - Flow in closed conduits
• Technical Committee: ISO/TC 30/SC 5 - Velocity and mass methods
• Drafting Committee: ISO/TC 30/SC 5 - Velocity and mass methods
• Current Stage: 9060 - Close of review
• Completion Date: 04-Mar-2031

Standards Content (Sample)

������������� ISO
�������� 12242
����� �������
2012�0��01
Measurement of fluid flow in closed
conduits — Ultrasonic transit-time
meters for liquid
Mesurage de débit des fluides dans les conduites fermées —
Compteurs ultrasoniques pour liquides
��������� ������
��� 12242�2012���
�
��� 2012
� ��� 2012
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s
member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
Case postale 56 • CH-1211 Geneva 20
���� � 41 22 �49 01 11
Fax + 41 22 749 09 47
E-mail [e-mail]
��� �����������
Published in Switzerland
�� � ��� 2012 � ��� ������ ��������

Contents Page
Foreword . v
Introduction .vi
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
3.1 Quantities . 1
3.2 Meter design . 2
3.3 Thermodynamic conditions . 3
3.4 Statistics . 3
3.5 Calibration . 5
3.6 Symbols and subscripts . 5
3.7 Abbreviated terms . 7
4 Principles of measurement . 7
4.1 Description . 7
4.2 Volume flow . 9
4.3 Generic description .10
4.4 Time delay considerations . 11
4.5 Refraction considerations .14
4.6 Reynolds number .15
4.7 Temperature and pressure correction .15
5 Performance requirements .15
6 Uncertainty in measurement .16
6.1 Introduction .16
6.2 Evaluation of the uncertainty components .16
7 Installation .18
7.1 General .18
7.2 Use of a prover .19
7.3 Calibration in a laboratory or use of a theoretical prediction procedure .19
7.4 Additional installation effects .21
8 Test and calibration .22
8.1 General .22
8.2 Individual testing — Use of a theoretical prediction procedure .22
8.3 Individual testing — Flow calibration under flowing conditions .23
9 Performance testing .24
9.1 Introduction .24
9.2 Repeatability and reproducibility .25
9.3 Additional test for meters with externally mounted transducers .25
9.4 Assessing the uncertainty of a meter whose performance is predicted using a theoretical
prediction procedure .26
9.5 Fluid-mechanical installation conditions .26
9.6 Path failure simulation and exchange of components .27
10 Meter characteristics .27
10.1 Meter body, materials, and construction .27
10.2 Transducers .29
10.3 Electronics .29
10.4 Software .30
10.5 Exchange of components .31
10.6 Determination of density and temperature .31
11 Operational practice .32
11.1 General .32
� ��� 2012 � ��� ������ �������� ���

11.2 Audit process .32
11.3 Operational diagnostics .34
11.4 Audit trail during operation; inter-comparison and inspection .36
11.5 Recalibration .37
Annex A (normative) Temperature and pressure correction .42
Annex B (informative) Effect of a change of roughness .48
Annex C (informative) Example of uncertainty calculations .52
Annex D (informative) Documents .65
Bibliography .67
�� � ��� 2012 � ��� ������ ��������

Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies
(ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO
technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been
established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and
non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the International
Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International Standards
adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an
International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent
rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
ISO 12242 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 30, Measurement of fluid flow in closed conduits,
Subcommittee SC 5, Velocity and mass methods�
� ��� 2012 � ��� ������ �������� �

Introduction
Ultrasonic meters (USMs) have become one of the accepted flow measurement technologies for a wide range
of liquid applications, including custody-transfer and allocation measurement. Ultrasonic technology has
inherent features such as no pressure loss and wide rangeability.
USMs can deliver diagnostic information through which it may be possible to demonstrate that an ultrasonic
liquid flowmeter is performing in accordance with specification. Owing to the extended diagnostic capabilities,
this International Standard advocates the addition and use of automated diagnostics instead of labour-intensive
quality checks. The use of automated diagnostics makes possible a condition-based maintenance system.
�� � ��� 2012 � ��� ������ ��������

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 12242:2012(E)
Measurement of fluid flow in closed conduits — Ultrasonic
transit-time meters for liquid
1 Scope
This International Standard specifies requirements and recommendations for ultrasonic liquid flowmeters,
which utilize the transit time of ultrasonic signals to measure the flow of single-phase homogenous liquids in
������ ���������
There are no limits on the minimum or maximum sizes of the meter.
This International Standard specifies performance, calibration and output characteristics of ultrasonic meters
(USMs) for liquid flow measurement and deals with installation conditions. It covers installation with and without
a dedicated proving (calibration) system. It covers both in-line and clamp-on transducers (used in configurations
in which the beam is non-refracted and in those in which it is refracted). Included are both meters incorporating
meter bodies and meters with field-mounted transducers.
2 Normative references
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated
references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document
(including any amendments) applies.
ISO 4006, Measurement of fluid flow in closed conduits — Vocabulary and symbols
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO 4006 and the following apply.
3.1 Quantities
3.1.1
volume flowrate
q
V
�V
q =
V
�t
�����
V �� �������
t �� ����
[42]
NOTE Adapted from ISO 80000-4:2006, 4-30.
3.1.2
metering pressure
absolute fluid pressure in a meter under flowing conditions to which the indicated volume of liquid is related
3.1.3
mean velocity in the meter body
v
fluid flowrate divided by the cross-sectional area of the meter body
� ��� 2012 � ��� ������ �������� 1

3.1.4
mean pipe velocity
v
p
fluid flowrate divided by the cross-sectional area of the upstream pipe
NOTE Where a meter has a reduced bore, the mean velocities in the upstream pipe and within the meter body itself differ.
3.1.5
path velocity
average fluid velocity on an ultrasonic path
3.1.6
Reynolds number
dimensionless parameter expressing the ratio between the inertia and viscous forces
3.1.7
pipe Reynolds number
Re
D
dimensionless parameter expressing the ratio between the inertia and viscous forces in the pipe
ρvD vD
pp
Re ==
D
μν
kv
�����
ρ is mass density;
v is the mean pipe velocity;
�
D is the pipe internal diameter;
m is the dynamic viscosity;
ν is the kinematic viscosity
��
NOTE Where a meter has a reduced bore, it is possible also to define the throat Reynolds number, in whose definition
the mean velocity in the meter body, the meter internal diameter and the kinematic viscosity are used.
3.2 Meter design
3.2.1
meter body
pressure-containing structure of the meter
3.2.2
ultrasonic path
path travelled by an ultrasonic signal between a pair of ultrasonic transducers
3.2.3
axial path
path travelled by an ultrasonic signal either on or parallel to the axis of the pipe
3.2.4
diametrical path
ultrasonic path whereby the ultrasonic signal travels through the centre-line or long axis of the pipe
3.2.5
chordal path
ultrasonic path whereby the ultrasonic signal travels parallel to the diametrical path
2 � ��� 2012 � ��� ������ ��������

3.2.6
field mounted
external to the pipe, attached on site, not prior to a laboratory calibration
3.3 Thermodynamic conditions
3.3.1
metering conditions
conditions, at the point of measurement, of the fluid of which the volume is to be measured
NOTE Also known as operating conditions or actual conditions.
3.3.2
standard conditions
defined temperature and pressure conditions used in the measurement of fluid quantity so that the standard
volume is the volume that would be occupied by a quantity of fluid if it were at standard temperature and pressure
NOTE 1 Standard conditions may be defined by regulation or contract.
NOTE 2 Not preferred alternatives: reference conditions, base conditions, normal conditions, etc.
NOTE 3 Metering and standard conditions relate only to the volume of the liquid to be measured or indicated, and
[44]
should not be confused with rated operating conditions or reference conditions (see ISO/IEC Guide 99:2007, 4.9 and
[44]
4.11), which refer to influence quantities (see ISO/IEC Guide 99:2007, 2.52).
3.3.3
specified conditions
conditions of the fluid at which performance specifications of the meter are given
3.4 Statistics
3.4.1
error
measured quantity value minus a reference quantity value
[44]
[ISO/IEC Guide 99:2007, 2.16]
3.4.2
repeatability (of results of measurements)
closeness of the agreement between the results of successive measurements of the same measurand carried
out under the same conditions of measurement
NOTE 1 These conditions are called repeatability conditions.
NOTE 2 Repeatability conditions include:
— the same measurement procedure;
— the same observer;
— the same measuring instrument, used under the same conditions;
— the same location;
— repetition over a short period of time.
NOTE 3 Repeatability may be expressed quantitatively in terms of the dispersion characteristics of the results.
[43]
[ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008, B.2.15]
� ��� 2012 � ��� ������ �������� 3

3.4.3
reproducibility (of results of measurements)
closeness of the agreement between the results of measurements of the same measurand carried out under
changed conditions of measurement
NOTE 1 A valid statement of reproducibility requires specification of the conditions changed.
NOTE 2 The changed conditions may include:
— principle of measurement;
— method of measurement;
� ���������
— measuring instrument;
— reference standard;
— location;
� ���������� �� ����
� �����
NOTE 3 Reproducibility may be expressed quantitatively in terms of the dispersion characteristics of the results.
NOTE 4 Results are here usually understood to be corrected results.
[43]
[ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008, B.2.16]
3.4.4
resolution
smallest difference between indications of a meter that can be meaningfully distinguished
3.4.5
zero flow reading
flowmeter reading when the liquid is at rest, i.e. both axial and non-axial velocity components are essentially zero
3.4.6
linearization
way of reducing the non-linearity of an ultrasonic meter, by applying correction factors
NOTE The linearization can be applied in the electronics of the meter or in a flow computer connected to the USM.
The correction can be, for example, piece-wise linearization or polynomial linearization.
3.4.7
uncertainty (of measurement)
parameter, associated with the result of a measurement, that characterizes the dispersion of the values that
could reasonably be attributed to the measurand
NOTE 1 The parameter may be, for example, a standard deviation (or a given multiple of it), or the half-width of an
interval having a stated level of confidence.
NOTE 2 Uncertainty of measurement comprises, in general, many components. Some of these components may be
evaluated from the statistical distribution of the results of series of measurements and can be characterized by experimental
standard deviations. The other components, which can also be characterized by standard deviations, are evaluated from
assumed probability distributions based on experience or other information.
NOTE 3 It is understood that the result of the measurement is the best estimate of the value of the measurand, and
that all components of uncertainty, including those arising from systematic effects, such as components associated with
corrections and reference standards, contribute to the dispersion.
[43]
[ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008, B.2.18]
4 � ��� 2012 � ��� ������ ��������

3.4.8
standard uncertainty
u
uncertainty of the result of a measurement expressed as a standard deviation
[43]
[ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008, 2.3.1]
3.4.9
expanded uncertainty
U
quantity defining an interval about the result of a measurement that may be expected to encompass a large
fraction of the distribution of values that could reasonably be attributed to the measurand
[43]
[ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008, 2.3.5]
NOTE 1 The large fraction is normally 95 % and is generally associated with a coverage factor k = 2�
NOTE 2 The expanded uncertainty is often referred to as the uncertainty.
3.4.10
coverage factor
numerical factor used as a multiplier of the standard uncertainty in order to obtain an expanded uncertainty
[43]
NOTE Adapted from ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008, 2.3.6.
3.5 Calibration
3.5.1
flow calibration
calibration in which fluid flows through the meter
3.5.2
theoretical prediction procedure
procedure by which the performance of a meter is theoretically predicted, without liquid flowing through the meter
3.5.3
performance testing
testing of a representative sample of meters to determine, for example, reproducibility and installation
requirements for meters geometrically similar to themselves
3.6 Symbols and subscripts
The symbols and subscripts used in this International Standard are given in Tables 1 and 2.
� ��� 2012 � ��� ������ �������� 5

Table 1 — Symbols
a
Quantity Symbol Dimensions SI unit
2 2
Cross-sectional area of meter body A � �
−1
Speed of sound in fluid c �� m/s
Internal diameter of the meter body d � �
Internal pipe diameter D � �
−1 −2
Young’s modulus E ML � Pa
Function of path velocities f � 1
Integers (1,2,3, …) i,j,n � 1
Calibration factor K � 1
Body end correction factor K � 1
�
� −1 � � �
Path-geometry factor K � �� �� � or m/s
�
Velocity profile correction factor K � 1
�
Body style correction factor K � 1
�
Minimum distance to a specified upstream flow disturbance l � �
���
Path length l � �
�
−1 −2
�������� �������� p ML � Pa
3 −1 3
Volume flowrate q � � � /s
V
Internal pipe radius r � �
External pipe radius R � �
Throat Reynolds number Re � 1
d
Pipe Reynolds number Re � 1
D
Percentage maximum deviation in measured flowrate due to upstream
S
� 1
fittings
Absolute temperature of the liquid T Θ �
Transit time t � �
Time delay t � �
−1
Mean axial fluid velocity in the meter body v �� m/s
−1
Mean axial fluid velocity on ultrasonic path, i v �� m/s
i
−1
Mean axial fluid velocity in the upstream pipe v �� m/s
�
Transducer axial separation X � �
−1 −1
Thermal expansion coefficient α Θ �
Pipe wall thickness δ � �
−1 −1
m
Dynamic viscosity ML � Pa s
2 −1 2
Kinematic viscosity ν � � � /s
��
−3 3
ρ
Density of the liquid ML kg/m
Poisson’s ratio s � 1
Angle between ultrasonic path and pipe axis φ � rad
a
M ≡ mass; L ≡ ������≡ � ��� �� � ≡ Θtemperature.
�
Non-refracting configuration.
�
Refracting configuration.
6 � ��� 2012 � ��� ������ ��������

Table 2 — Subscripts
Subscript Meaning
cal under calibration conditions
meas measured (uncorrected)
�� under operational conditions
���� actual (corrected)
3.7 Abbreviated terms
AGC automatic gain control
��� factory acceptance test
MSOS measured speed of sound
��� signal to noise ratio
��� ����� �� �����
���� ��������� ����� �� �����
USM ultrasonic meter
USMP USM package, including meter tubes, flow conditioner, flow computer and thermowell
4 Principles of measurement
4.1 Description
The ultrasonic transit-time flowmeter is a sampling device that measures discrete path velocities using one
or more pairs of transducers. Each pair of transducers is located a known distance, l , apart such that one is
�
upstream of the other (see Figure 1). The upstream and downstream transducers send and receive pulses of
ultrasound alternately, referred to as contra-propagating transmission, and the times of arrival are used in the
calculation of average axial velocity, v. At any given instant, the difference between the apparent speed of sound
in a moving liquid and the speed of sound in that same liquid at rest is directly proportional to the instantaneous
velocity of the liquid. As a consequence, a measure of the average axial velocity of the liquid along a path can
be obtained by transmitting an ultrasonic signal along the path in both directions and subsequently measuring
the transit time difference.
The volume flowrate of a liquid flowing in a completely filled closed conduit is defined as the average velocity
of the liquid over a cross-section multiplied by the area of the cross-section. Thus, by measuring the average
velocity of a liquid along one or more ultrasonic paths (i.e. lines, not the area) and combining the measurements
with knowledge of the cross-sectional area and the velocity profile over the cross-section, it is possible to
obtain an estimate of the volume flowrate of the liquid in the conduit.
� ��� 2012 � ��� ������ �������� 7

Figure 1 — Measurement principle
Several techniques can be used to obtain a measure of the average effective speed of propagation of an
ultrasonic signal in a moving liquid in order to determine the average axial flow velocity along an ultrasonic path
line. However, the normal technique applied in modern USMs is the direct time differential technique.
The basis of this technique is the measurement of the transit time of ultrasonic signals as they propagate
between a transmitter and a receiver. The velocity of propagation of the ultrasonic signal is the sum of the
speed of sound, c, and the flow velocity in the direction of propagation. Therefore the transit time upstream and
downstream can be expressed as:
l
p
t ≈ .dl �1�
fl_up/dn
∫
c+•vn
l
l=0
�����
c is the speed of sound in the fluid;
n is the unit normal vector to the wave front;
v is the flow velocity vector at location, l, on the path l .
l �
NOTE This is correct whether the transmitter is upstream or downstream.
With the assumptions that the flow velocity is in the axial direction only and that v << c, where v is the mean
i i
axial flow velocity on ultrasonic path line i, then the upstream and downstream transit times can be written as
l
p
t = �2�
fl_up
cv− cosφ
i
l
p
t = (3)
fl_dn
cv+ cosφ
i
Rearranging terms and solving for v �����
i
tt−
2v cosφ
11 fl_up fl_dn
i
−= = �4�
tt tt l
fl_dn fl_up fl_up fl_dn p
8 � ��� 2012 � ��� ������ ��������

l
Δt
p
v = (5)
i
2cosφ tt
fl_up fl_dn
�����
l is the distance between the transducers;
�
Δt is the difference in transit times;
φ is the angle of inclination of the ultrasonic signal with respect to the axial direction of the flow.
The speed of sound can be calculated as follows:
tt+
11 2c
fl_up fl_dn
+= = (6)
tt tt l
fl_dn fl_up fl_up fl_dn p
tt+
l
()
fl_up fl_dn
p
c = ���
2 tt
fl_up fl_dn
4.2 Volume flow
The individual path velocity measurements are combined by a mathematical function to yield an estimate of the
mean velocity in the meter body:
v � f�v , ., v ) (8)
1 n
�����n i s the total number of paths.
Owing to variations in path configuration and different proprietary approaches of solving Formula (8), even for
a given number of paths, the exact form of f�v , ., v ) can vary.
1 n
The relationship between the mean pipe velocity and the measured path velocities depends on the flow profile.
In fully developed flow, the flow profile depends only on the Reynolds number and the pipe roughness.
One possible solution is to calculate the mean velocity as a weighted sum of the path velocities and to apply a
velocity profile factor, K , to compensate for profile changes. The value of K is calculated by an algorithm that
� �
takes into account flow regime (laminar, transitional, and turbulent), as well as other process variables, as required.
n
vK= wv �9�
p∑ ii
i=1
The volume flowrate, q , is given by:
V
q � Av �10�
V
�����
v is the estimate of the mean pipe velocity;
A is the cross-sectional area of the measurement section.
Note that increasing n may reduce the uncertainty associated with flow profile variations.
� ��� 2012 � ��� ������ �������� 9

4.3 Generic description
4.3.1 General
This sub-clause is a generic description of USMs for liquids. It recognizes the scope for variation within
commercial designs and the potential for new developments. For the purpose of description, USMs are
considered to consist of several components, namely:
a) transducers;
b) meter body with ultrasonic path configuration;
c) electronic data processing and presentation unit.
NOTE In a meter with externally mounted transducers, the meter body is the pipe to which the transducers are fixed.
4.3.2 Transducers
Transducers are the transmitters and receivers of the ultrasonic signal. They can be supplied in various forms.
Typically they comprise a piezoelectric element with electrode connections and a supporting mechanical
structure with which the process connection is made.
Typical arrangements are shown in Figures 2 and 3. To measure the axial velocity, the transducer transmits
ultrasonic waves at a non-perpendicular angle to the meter body axis in the direction of a second transducer or
reflection point in the meter body interior. There are two methods of mounting the transducers:
a) external to the pressure-retaining boundary;
b) internal to the pressure-retaining boundary.
The beam of the USM may be
1) refracted;
2) non-refracted.
Figure 2 — Non-refracted configuration
10 � ��� 2012 � ��� ������ ��������

Figure 3 — Refracted configuration with an external mount
If the transducers are external to the pipe wall boundary, then the beam is always refracted; this configuration is
typically referred to as clamp-on or field mounted. The geometry of a refracted beam is a function of, among other
things, the liquid sound velocity (and thus temperature). The beam geometry determines the optimal transducer
position. If the transducers are not placed at their optimal position, the measurement uncertainty increases.
If the transducers are internal to the pipe wall boundary, this configuration is typically referred to as in-line; the
beam is almost always non-refracted.
4.3.3 Meter body and ultrasonic path configurations
The meter body is essentially a pipe to which the transducers are attached. Temperature and pressure have an
effect on the pipe area (see 4.7 and Annex A). In a reduced-bore meter, the area of the measurement section
is smaller than that of the pipe.
USMs are available in a variety of path configurations. The numbers of measurement paths are generally
chosen based on a requirement with respect to variations in velocity distribution and required accuracy.
As well as variations in the radial position of the measurement paths in the cross-section, the path configuration
can be varied in orientation to the pipe axis. By utilizing reflection of the ultrasonic wave from the interior of the
meter body or from a fabricated reflector, the path can traverse the cross-section several times.
Some ultrasonic path types are illustrated in Figures 4 and 5. Figure 4 shows examples of single-path meters,
Figure 5 examples of multipath meters.
Velocity measurements made on multiple paths are typically less susceptible to changes in flow profile than
those made on a single path. Double traverses in a single plane are much less sensitive to non-axial velocity
components than single traverse paths. Other configurations, e.g. the triple traverse mid-radius path, may be
sensitive to non-axial components but can be used in combination to eliminate or to reduce the effects of swirl
and cross-flow. Direct paths can be single, double or crossed.
4.3.4 Time measurement
All USMs contain an electronic part that generates and receives signals and performs time measurement.
4.4 Time delay considerations
In 4.1 it is assumed that the ultrasonic signal spends all of the transit time in the fluid and that the direction of
propagation is at an angle, φ, to the pipe wall. In a real system, the measured time between the ultrasonic signal
� ��� 2012 � ��� ������ �������� 11

leaving the transmitter and being received at the receiver includes a time delay, t , due to intervening materials,
electronics, signal processing, cable lengths, etc.:
t � t � t �11�
me_up/dn fl_up/dn 0
Here it is assumed that the difference between the delay times t and t is small compared with the
0��� 0���
transit times t . Any difference between t and t results in a zero offset.
me_up/dn 0��� 0���
Formulae (5) and (7) then take the form
l
p Δt
v = �12�
i
2cos(φ tt−−)(tt )
me_up 00me_dn
lt()+−tt2
pme_up me_dn 0
c = (13)
2 ()tt−−()tt
me_up 00me_dn
a)  Diametrical path b)  Diametrical path, reflecting
c)  Axial path d)  Complex reflecting path
Figure 4 — Some Ultrasonic path types for single-path meters
12 � ��� 2012 � ��� ������ ��������

a)  Diametrical multipath b)  Diametrical multipath, reflecting
c)  Chordal multipath d)  Chordal multipath, planar
e)  Chordal multipath, non-planar f)  Chordal multipath, reflected chords
g)  Chordal multipath, crossed chords h)  Compound multipath
Figure 5 — Some ultrasonic path types for multipath meters
4.5 Refraction considerations
It is necessary for USMs that utilize externally mounted transducer arrangements (see Figure 3) to compensate
for refraction in order to operate properly and accurately. When a sound wave passes through an interface
between two materials at oblique angles and the materials have different acoustic impedances, both reflected
and refracted waves are produced. Sound-wave refraction takes place as the sound passes from the transducer
into the pipe wall, from the pipe wall into pipe lining (if present), and from the pipe or pipe lining into the liquid. This
is due to the different velocities of the acoustic waves within these materials. With externally mounted transducer
arrangements, Formula (5) is usually rearranged into a different form, which is derived in this subclause.
With the definition of the angles according to Figure 3, Snell’s law can be expressed as Formula (14):
cosφ cosφ
cosφ
t w
== �14�
cc c
t w
�����
c is the speed of sound in the transducer’s coupling wedge;
�
c is the speed of sound in the wall;
�
c is the speed of sound in the liquid.
As a consequence, φ and l in Formulae (5) and (12) become functions of the speeds of sound, c , c , and c and
� � �
hence in general, of the temperature, pressure, and composition of the process fluid and intervening materials.
Using the assumption (already made in 4.1) that the velocity is much smaller than the speed of sound in the
fluid, the product of the transit times in the fluid measured upstream and downstream approximately equals the
square of the transit time t in the fluid with no flow:
fl
ΔΔt t Δt
  
2 2
tt =+t t − =−t ≈ t (15)
fl_up fl_dn fl fl fl fl
  
22 4
  
Formula (5) becomes:
l
Δt
p
v = (16)
i
2cosφ
t
fl
The speed of sound in the fluid can be substituted for the path length and the transit time in the fluid. Then from
Formula (14) the speed of sound and angle in the coupling wedge are substituted for the speed of sound and
angle in the fluid:
l
c
p ΔΔt ct Δt
t
v == = �1��
i
coscφφos
cosφ t 22t t 2t
t
fl fl fl fl
The sum of the transit times in the fluid measured upstream and downstream equals twice the transit time in the fluid:
c Δt
t
v = (18)
i
cosφ
tt+
t
fl_up fl_dn
Just as in 4.4 the transit times t and t in the fluid are replaced by the measured transit times t ,
fl_up fl_dn �����
t , and the delay time t �
����� 0
c
Δt
t
v = �19�
i
cos(φ tt+− 2t )
tme_up me_dn 0
Thus the measured flow velocity is not directly dependent on the speed of sound in the fluid.
14 � ��� 2012 � ��� ������ ��������

4.6 Reynolds number
The pipe Reynolds number is given by:
vDρ
�
Re = �20�
D
μ
�����
D is the internal diameter of the pipe;
v is the mean axial liquid velocity in the pipe;
�
ρ is the actual density;
m is the dynamic viscosity.
The effect of the Reynolds number on the uncertainty of a USM is discussed in 6.2.3.
4.7 Temperature and pressure correction
During flow calibration, the meter flow calibration factor is determined and applied. Any subsequent change in
pressure or temperature from that encountered during the flow calibration alters the physical dimensions of the
meter and, if not corrected for, introduces a systematic flow measurement error. In general, the temperature
and pressure during calibration are different from those encountered under operating conditions. Temperature
and pressure correction is not always necessary for process applications. For many instruments, the influence
of pressure and temperature is typically negligible compared with the total uncertainty. For high accuracy
applications (e.g. custody transfer) and extreme temperatures or pressures, this may no longer be the case.
In A.1 to A.4, a simple approach is given to allow an initial estimate to be made of the flow error caused
by temperature and pressure conditions that differ from the calibration reference condition. If this error is
significant relative to the uncertainty required for custody transfer or allocation purposes, a more detailed
[41]
assessment of flow error has to be performed as described in A.5. ISO 17089-1:2010, Annex E provides an
extensive and detailed explanation of the process and readers are advised to consult that document for the
background to many of the statements made in Annex A.
5 Performance requirements
The selection of the USM depends on its required performance. There are many different applications.
The performance is normally specified in terms of uncertainty in measured volume flowrate over a working
range of Reynolds number (or flowrate). For control purposes, any value of uncertainty may be specified. For
custody-transfer measurement, users usually refer to the performance criteria described in relevant application
standards, such as those of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), the Organisation
Internationale de Métrologie Légale (OIML), the American Petroleum Institute (API) Manual of petroleum
measurement standards, or others where uncertainty, repeatability and linearity are specified.
The uncertainty is derived in Clause 6 using the equations derived in Clause 4. Clause 7 covers installation
effects (on both the calibration and the use of the USM). Clause 8 describes calibration. Clause 9 covers the
components of uncertainty that need only be evaluated once for a design of USM. Clause 11 covers how to
deliver the performance in Clause 5 through the audit trail, and how to maintain it through the use of diagnostics
and recalibration in the field (using a prover) and in the laboratory. Clause 10 covers meter characteristics,
especially in terms of design, manufacture and markings.
� ��� 2012 � ��� ������ �������� 15

6 Uncertainty in measurement
6.1 Introduction
[43]
Following ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008, this analysis is based on the mathematical relationship between the
measured volume flow and all input quantities on which it depends. The standard uncertainty of each input
quantity is evaluated and the combined uncertainty is derived by propagation of uncertainty.
The volume flow measured by a USM is given by Formulae (9) and (10). When the meter is calibrated, a
calibration factor K is included. Thus the volume flow is:
n
qK= KA wv �21�
Vip ∑ i
i=1
So the uncertainty depends on
a) the uncertainty u�K) in the calibration factor K�
b) the uncertainty u�K � �� dK ue to the velocity profile;
� �
c) the uncertainty u�A) in the area of the measurement cross-section;
d) the uncertainty u�v) due to the path-velocity measurement.
The evaluation of u�v) is based on Formula (12) or Formula (19), as appropriate. The first factor on the right
hand side of Formula (12) and Formula (19) can be referred to as the path geometry factor, K � �� ����������
�
what transit time difference is caused by a certain path velocity and transit time. The dimensions of K ������
�
on whether Formula (12) or Formula (19) is used. The total uncertainty in the measurement of the path velocity
���� �������� ��� ��������� ����� �����������
1) the uncertainty u�K ) in the path geometry factor;
�
2) the uncertainty u�t) in the time measurement;
3) the uncertainty u�t ) in the delay time compensation.
If temperature and pressure influences have to be considered, the appropriate expressions need to be included
in Formulae (12) and (21). The uncertainties of the temperature and pressure measurement are added as
additional uncertainty components.
The standard uncertainty of the flow measurement is derived from the components by propagation of uncertainty.
The level of confidence of the standard uncertainty is 68 %, assuming a normal distribution (see ISO/IEC Guide
[43]
98-3:2008, 4.3.6). A coverage factor can be applied to report an expanded uncertainty with a higher level of
confidence; usually the coverage factor is k = 2, resulting in a level of confidence of approximately 95 % (see
[43]
ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008, 6.3.3).
Examples of uncertainty calculations are given in Annex C.
6.2 Evaluation of the uncertainty components
6.2.1 Introduction
The evaluation of the uncertainty components depends, among other things, on how the meter is calibrated.
Calibration methods are
a) theoretical prediction procedure only;
b) flow calibration in a laboratory (no in situ use of a prover or a master meter);
16 � ��� 2012 � ��� ������ ��������

�� in situ calibration, at certain time intervals, against a master meter which is itself calibrated in a flow
laboratory at certain time intervals;
�� in situ calibration against a prover, at certain time intervals;
�� in situ calibration, at certain time intervals, against a master meter which is itself calibrated against a
prover at certain time intervals.
When the meter is calibrated, a calibration factor derived from the calibration result removes some of the
sources of error. Thus, the uncertainties of all input quantities that are assumed to be constant are removed
and replaced by the uncertainty in the calibration factor which is identical to the uncertainty of the calibration.
This may apply to uncertainties u�A), u�K ), and u�t ) when a meter is flow calibrated on the same meter body
� 0
to be installed in the field. A field calibration by means of a prover also reduces the contribution of uncertainty
�� �uK ) that is caused by flow profile disturbances.
�
One way of evaluating the uncertainty of an input quantity is performance testing. This applies, for example, to the
flow-profile uncertainty caused by perturbations and to the path geometry factor with externally mounted transducers.
It is possible that some input quantities that are considered constant at calibration do not stay constant after
the meter is installed in the field. An evaluation of the long-term uncertainty, therefore, requires all components
�� �� �����������
The evaluation of the individual uncertainty components is described in 6.2.2 to 6.2.7.
NOTE See also 7.4.2, 7.4.3, 7.4.4, and 7.4.1. Damage increases the uncertainty
...