SIST EN 301 140-4-1:2001
(Main)Intelligent Network (IN); Intelligent Network Application Protocol (INAP); Capability Set 2 (CS2); Part 4: Abstract Test Suite (ATS) specification and Partial Protocol Implementation eXtra Information for Testing (PIXIT) proforma for Service Switching Function (SSF); Sub-part 1: Basic capability set of CS-1 including CS-2 complements
Intelligent Network (IN); Intelligent Network Application Protocol (INAP); Capability Set 2 (CS2); Part 4: Abstract Test Suite (ATS) specification and Partial Protocol Implementation eXtra Information for Testing (PIXIT) proforma for Service Switching Function (SSF); Sub-part 1: Basic capability set of CS-1 including CS-2 complements
ATS & Partial PIXIT proforma for DE/SPS-03038-1 & 2 & 3
Inteligentno omrežje (IN) - Aplikacijski del inteligentnega omrežja (INAP) - Nabor zmožnosti 2 (CS2) - 4. del: Abstraktni preskušalni niz (ATS) in delna dodatna informacija za preskušanje izvedbe protokola (PIXIT) - Specifikacija za funkcijo preklapljanja storitev (SSF) - 1. podpoglavje: Osnovni nabor zmožnosti CS-1, vključno s komponentami CS-2
General Information
Standards Content (Sample)
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.Intelligent Network (IN); Intelligent Network Application Protocol (INAP); Capability Set 2 (CS2); Part 4: Abstract Test Suite (ATS) specification and Partial Protocol Implementation eXtra Information for Testing (PIXIT) proforma for Service Switching Function (SSF); Sub-part 1: Basic capability set of CS-1 including CS-2 complements33.040.35Telefonska omrežjaTelephone networksICS:Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z:EN 301 140-4-1 Version 1.1.3SIST EN 301 140-4-1:2001en01-september-2001SIST EN 301 140-4-1:2001SLOVENSKI
STANDARD
SIST EN 301 140-4-1:2001
ETSIEN301140-4-1V1.1.3(2000-05)EuropeanStandard(Telecommunicationsseries)IntelligentNetwork(IN);IntelligentNetworkApplicationProtocol(INAP);CapabilitySet2(CS2);Part4:AbstractTestSuite(ATS)specificationandPartialProtocolImplementationeXtraInformationforTesting(PIXIT)proformaforServiceSwitchingFunction(SSF);Sub-part1:BasiccapabilitysetofCS-1includingCS-2complementsSIST EN 301 140-4-1:2001
ETSIETSIEN301140-4-1V1.1.3(2000-05)2ReferenceDEN/SPS-03038-4-1KeywordsIN,CS1,CS2,INAP,ATS,PIXIT,SSFETSI650RoutedesLuciolesF-06921SophiaAntipolisCedex-FRANCETel.:+33492944200Fax:+33493654716SiretN°34862356200017-NAF742CAssociationàbutnonlucratifenregistréeàlaSous-PréfecturedeGrasse(06)N°7803/88ImportantnoticeIndividualcopiesofthepresentdocumentcanbedownloadedfrom:http://www.etsi.orgThepresentdocumentmaybemadeavailableinmorethanoneelectronicversionorinprint.Inanycaseofexistingorperceiveddifferenceincontentsbetweensuchversions,thereferenceversionisthePortableDocumentFormat(PDF).Incaseofdispute,thereferenceshallbetheprintingonETSIprintersofthePDFversionkeptonaspecificnetworkdrivewithinETSISecretariat.Usersofthepresentdocumentshouldbeawarethatthedocumentmaybesubjecttorevisionorchangeofstatus.InformationonthecurrentstatusofthisandotherETSIdocumentsisavailableathttp://www.etsi.org/tb/status/Ifyoufinderrorsinthepresentdocument,sendyourcommentto:editor@etsi.frCopyrightNotificationNopartmaybereproducedexceptasauthorizedbywrittenpermission.Thecopyrightandtheforegoingrestrictionextendtoreproductioninallmedia.©EuropeanTelecommunicationsStandardsInstitute2000.Allrightsreserved.SIST EN 301 140-4-1:2001
ETSIETSIEN301140-4-1V1.1.3(2000-05)3ContentsIntellectualPropertyRights.5Foreword.51Scope.62References.63Definitionsandabbreviations.73.1Definitions.73.2Abbreviations.73.3ISO9646abbreviations.83.4ISO9646definitions.84Testarchitecture.84.1AbstractTestMethod(ATM).84.2Overallconfiguration.84.3TestofSSF-SCFinterfaceusingINAP.94.4TestofSCF-SCFinterfaceusingINAP.104.5Pointsofcontrolandobservation(PCOs).104.6Testsystem.104.7Functionalconfigurations.114.7.1SSF-SCFinterface.114.7.2SCF-SCFinterface.124.7.3Referencetoproductimplementation.124.8Protocolprimitives.134.8.1ProtocolprimitivesatPCO_1andPCO_2.134.8.2ProtocolprimitivesatPCO_3_1andPCO_3_2.145ATSconventions.145.1Namingconventions.145.1.1Declarationspart.145.1.1.1TestsuitetypeandstructuredtypedefinitionsByReference.145.1.1.2Testsuiteoperationsdefinitions.155.1.1.3Testsuiteparameterdeclarations.155.1.1.4Testcaseselectionexpressiondefinitions.155.1.1.5TestsuiteconstantdeclarationsByReference.155.1.1.6Testsuitevariabledeclarations.155.1.1.7Testcasevariabledeclarations.155.1.1.8Timerdeclarations.155.1.1.9ASPtypedefinitions.165.1.1.10Aliasdefinitions.165.1.2Constraintspart.165.1.3Dynamicpart.165.1.3.1Testcaseidentifier.175.1.3.2Teststepidentifier.175.1.3.3Preambleidentifier.175.1.3.4Postambleidentifier.175.1.3.5Defaultidentifier.176Implementationconventions.186.1TCandTPmapping.187ATSgeneralities.187.1ATSdesign.187.1.1Methodology.187.2TestConfiguration.197.2.1Example.217.3ATSrestrictions.21SIST EN 301 140-4-1:2001
ETSIETSIEN301140-4-1V1.1.3(2000-05)4AnnexA(normative):ATSforCS1INAP(subsetoftheINAPCS2).22A.1TheTTCNGraphicalform(TTCN.GR).22A.2TheTTCNMachineProcessableform(TTCN.MP).22AnnexB(normative):PartialPIXITproformaforINAPCS1layer.23B.1Identificationsummary.23B.2ATSsummary.23B.3Testlaboratory.23B.4Clientidentification.23B.5SUT.24B.6Protocollayerinformation.24B.6.1Protocolidentification.24B.6.2IUTinformation.24B.6.2.1Implicitsendevents.24B.6.2.2CoreINAPParametervalues.25B.6.2.3TCAPParametervalues.26AnnexC(normative):ProtocolConformanceTestReport(PCTR)proformaforCOREINAPCS1protocollayer.27C.1Identificationsummary.27C.1.1Protocolconformancetestreport.27C.1.2IUTidentification.27C.1.3Testingenvironment.27C.1.4Limitsandreservation.28C.1.5Comments.28C.2IUTconformancestatus.28C.3Staticconformancesummary.28C.4Dynamicconformancesummary.29C.5Staticconformancereviewreport.29C.6Testcampaignreport.30C.7Observations.32History.33SIST EN 301 140-4-1:2001
ETSIETSIEN301140-4-1V1.1.3(2000-05)5IntellectualPropertyRightsIPRsessentialorpotentiallyessentialtothepresentdocumentmayhavebeendeclaredtoETSI.TheinformationpertainingtotheseessentialIPRs,ifany,ispubliclyavailableforETSImembersandnon-members,andcanbefoundinSR000314:"IntellectualPropertyRights(IPRs);Essential,orpotentiallyEssential,IPRsnotifiedtoETSIinrespectofETSIstandards",whichisavailablefromtheETSISecretariat.LatestupdatesareavailableontheETSIWebserver(http://www.etsi.org/ipr).PursuanttotheETSIIPRPolicy,noinvestigation,includingIPRsearches,hasbeencarriedoutbyETSI.NoguaranteecanbegivenastotheexistenceofotherIPRsnotreferencedinSR000314(ortheupdatesontheETSIWebserver)whichare,ormaybe,ormaybecome,essentialtothepresentdocument.ForewordThisEuropeanStandard(Telecommunicationsseries)hasbeenproducedbyETSITechnicalCommitteeServicesandProtocolsforAdvancedNetworks(SPAN).Thepresentdocumentispart4,sub-part1ofamulti-partENcoveringtheIntelligentNetworkApplicationProtocol(INAP)capabilityset2,asidentifiedbelow:Part1:"Protocolspecification";Part2:"ProtocolImplementationConformanceStatement(PICS)proformaspecification";Part3:"TestSuiteStructureandTestPurposes(TSS&TP)specificationforServiceSwitchingFunction(SSF)";Part4:"AbstractTestSuite(ATS)specificationandPartialProtocolImplementationeXtraInformationforTesting(PIXIT)proformaforServiceSwitchingFunction(SSF)";Sub-part1:"BasiccapabilitysetofCS-1includingCS-2complements";Sub-part2:"CallPartyHandling(CPH)";Sub-part3:"SpecializedResourceFunctions(SRF)";Part5:"DistributedFunctionalPlane(DFP)[ITU-TRecommendationQ.1224(1997),modified]".NationaltranspositiondatesDateofadoptionofthisEN:28April2000DateoflatestannouncementofthisEN(doa):31July2000DateoflatestpublicationofnewNationalStandardorendorsementofthisEN(dop/e):31January2001DateofwithdrawalofanyconflictingNationalStandard(dow):31January2001SIST EN 301 140-4-1:2001
ETSIETSIEN301140-4-1V1.1.3(2000-05)61ScopeThepresentdocumentprovidestheAbstractTestSuite(ATS)fortestingoftheServiceSwitchingFunction(SSF)andtheSpecializedResourceFunction(SRF)ofthecoreIntelligentNetworkApplicationProtocol(INAP)accordingtoEN301140-1[1].Inthisspecificpart4-1,thepartofCapabilitySet2(CS2)dealingwithCS1functionsiscovered.AnnexAprovidestheTreeandTabularCombinedNotation(TTCN).AnnexBprovidesthePartialProtocolImplementationeXtraInformationforTesting(PIXIT)Proforma.AnnexCprovidestheProtocolConformanceTestReport(PCTR)Proforma.TheISOstandardforthemethodologyofconformancetesting,ISO/IEC9646-1[4],ISO/IEC9646-2[5],ISO/IEC9646-3[6]andISO/IEC9646-5[7],aswellastheETSIrulesforconformancetesting,ETS300406[9]areusedasabasisforthetestmethodology.2ReferencesThefollowingdocumentscontainprovisionswhich,throughreferenceinthistext,constituteprovisionsofthepresentdocument.• Referencesareeitherspecific(identifiedbydateofpublication,editionnumber,versionnumber,etc.)ornon-specific.• Foraspecificreference,subsequentrevisionsdonotapply.• Foranon-specificreference,thelatestversionapplies.• Anon-specificreferencetoanETSshallalsobetakentorefertolaterversionspublishedasanENwiththesamenumber.[1]ETSIEN301140-1(V1.3):"IntelligentNetwork(IN);IntelligentNetworkApplicationProtocol(INAP);CapabilitySet2(CS2);Part1:Protocolspecification".[2]ETSIETS300374-1:"IntelligentNetwork(IN);IntelligentNetworkCapabilitySet1(CS1);CoreIntelligentNetworkApplicationProtocol(INAP);Part1:Protocolspecification".[3]ITU-TRecommendationQ.771:"Functionaldescriptionoftransactioncapabilities".[4]ISO/IEC9646-1:"Informationtechnology-OpenSystemsInterconnection-Conformancetestingmethodologyandframework-Part1:GeneralConcepts".(SeealsoCCITTRecommendationX.290).[5]ISO/IEC9646-2:"Informationtechnology-OpenSystemsInterconnection-Conformancetestingmethodologyandframework-Part2:AbstractTestSuiteSpecification".(SeealsoCCITTRecommendationX.291(1991)).[6]ISO/IEC9646-3:"Informationtechnology-OpenSystemsInterconnection-Conformancetestingmethodologyandframework-Part3:TheTreeandTabularCombinedNotation(TTCN)".(SeealsoCCITTRecommendationX.292(1992)).[7]ISO/IEC9646-5:"Informationtechnology-OpenSystemsInterconnection-Conformancetestingmethodologyandframework-Part5:Requirementsontestlaboratoriesandclientsfortheconformanceassessmentprocess".(SeealsoCCITTRecommendationX.292(1992)).[8]ISO/IEC9646-6:"Informationtechnology-OpenSystemsInterconnection-Conformancetestingmethodologyandframework-Part6:Protocolprofiletestspecification".[9]ETSIETS300406:"MethodsforTestingandSpecification(MTS);Protocolandprofileconformancetestingspecifications;Standardizationmethodology".SIST EN 301 140-4-1:2001
ETSIETSIEN301140-4-1V1.1.3(2000-05)7[10]ITU-TRecommendationQ.1224(1997):"DistributedfunctionalplaneforintelligentnetworkCapabilitySet2".[11]ETSIEN301140-2:"IntelligentNetwork(IN);IntelligentNetworkApplicationProtocol(INAP);CapabilitySet2(CS2);Part2:ProtocolImplementationConformanceStatement(PICS)proformaspecification".3Definitionsandabbreviations3.1DefinitionsForthepurposesofthepresentdocument,thetermsanddefinitionsgiveninEN301140-1[1]apply.3.2AbbreviationsForthepurposesofthepresentdocument,thefollowingabbreviationsapply:BIInvalidBehaviourtestsBOInopportuneBehaviourtestsBVValidBehaviourtestsCACapabilitytestsCPCo-ordinationPointCSCapabilitySetINIntelligentNetworkINAPIntelligentNetworkApplicationProtocolIUTImplementationUnderTestMSCMessageSequenceChartMTCMasterTestComponentPDUProtocolDataUnitPTCParallelTestComponentSCFServiceControlFunctionSCPServiceControlPointSDLSystemDescriptionLanguageSRFSpecializedResourceFunctionSSFServiceSwitchingFunctionSSPServiceSwitchingPointSUTSystemUnderTestTCAPTransactionCapabilitiesApplicationPartTDPTriggerDetectionPointSIST EN 301 140-4-1:2001
ETSIETSIEN301140-4-1V1.1.3(2000-05)83.3ISO9646abbreviationsForthepurposesofthepresentdocumentthefollowingISO/IEC9646-1[4]abbreviationsapply:ASPAbstractServicePrimitiveATMAbstractTestMethodATSAbstractTestSuiteICSImplementationConformanceStatementIUTImplementationUnderTestIXITImplementationeXtraInformationforTestingLTLowerTesterNWKNetworkLayerPCOPointofControlandObservationPDUProtocolDataUnitPICSProtocolImplementationConformanceStatementPIXITProtocolImplementationeXtraInformationforTestingSAPServiceAccessPointSPyTSinglePartyTestingSUTSystemUnderTestTCTestCaseTPTestPurposeTSSTestSuiteStructureTTCNTreeandTabularCombinedNotationUTUpperTester3.4ISO9646definitionsForthepurposesofthepresentdocumentthefollowingISO/IEC9646-3[6]definitionsapply:TTCN.GRTTCN.MPForthepurposesofthepresentdocumentthefollowingISO/IEC9646-5[7]definitionsapply:ProtocolConformanceTestReport(PCTR)PCTRproforma4Testarchitecture4.1AbstractTestMethod(ATM)ThisclausedescribestheATMusedfortestingtheINAPprotocol.ItistheembeddedvariantoftheremotetestmethodusedinMultyPartyTesting(MPyT)context,asdefinedinISO/IEC9646-2[5].Thistestmethodhasbeenselected,because:-thistestmethodimpliesnospecificrequirementsfromtheImplementationUnderTest(IUT);-theupperServiceAccessPoint(SAP)oftheIUTcannotbedirectlyobserved;-thistestmethodplacesminimumlimitationsintherealizationofconformancetesting.4.2OverallconfigurationFigure1describesthetestarchitecturewhichwillbeusedforthedefinitionoftheATS.Asingletestarchitecturecoversalltestingconfigurationrequirements.SIST EN 301 140-4-1:2001
ETSIETSIEN301140-4-1V1.1.3(2000-05)9Figure1:Multi-party,single-layertestingcontext:oneIUTand4typesofLTsFigure1showsthemulti-party,singlelayertestingcontext.Thesamearchitecturecanbeusedfortestingseveralinterfaces.TherolesofIUTandLTschangeaccordingtotheprotocoltobetestedintheIUT.Table1givesthenatureoftheIUTandLTsaccordingtotheprotocolundertest.Table1:possibletestingconfigurationsTestConfigTestedInterfaceIUTLT1LT2LT3_1LT3_2FunctionalConfiguration1SSF-SCFSSFSCFSRFSigconASigconBA2SSF-SCFSSFSCF-SigconASigconBB3SCF-SCFSCFSSFSCFSigconASigconBC4.3TestofSSF-SCFinterfaceusingINAPThetestprogramcontainstheprogramofthemainLT1maintesteraswellastheco-ordinationpointstoco-ordinatethetaskswiththeothertestersLT2andLT3.IUT:istheSSF-INAP.LT1:testprogramistheSCF.LT2:testprogramistheSRF-INAPwhenrequired.LT3:informaltestprogramforactionsandobservationatthesignallingcontrolpoints,toplaytheroleofendusersA,BandCforinstance.ThereareasmanyLT3asrequiredbythetestconfiguration(LT3_1,LT3_2,.)accordingtothenumberofendusersA,BandCinvolvedinaservicescenarioforinstance,usingdifferenttypesofprotocols).Pm:containstheprotocolsusedbelowtheINAPbetweenSCPandSSP,alsobetweenSSPandSRF.Theycouldbee.g.TCAP,SCCPandMTPofSS7etc.Pn:containstheprotocolsusedbelowtheLT3_1betweentheIUTandtheSignallingcontrolpoint.ItcouldbetheDSS1protocolsorISUPSS7protocol(inthecaseofhavingatransitexchange).SIST EN 301 140-4-1:2001
ETSIETSIEN301140-4-1V1.1.3(2000-05)10Pz:containstheusedprotocolsbelowtheLT3_2betweentheIUTandtheSignallingcontrolpoint.ItcouldbetheDSS1protocolsorISUPSS7protocol(inthecaseofhavingatransitexchange).4.4TestofSCF-SCFinterfaceusingINAPThetestprogramcontainstheprogramofthemainLT1maintesteraswellastheco-ordinationpointstoco-ordinatethetaskswiththeothertestersLT2andLT3.IUT:istheSCF-INAPundertest.LT1:testprogramistheSSF.LT2:testprogramistheSecondSCF.LT3:informaltestprogramforactionsandobservationatthesignallingcontrolpoints,toplaytheroleofendusersA,BandCforinstance.ThereareasmanyLT3asrequiredbythetestconfiguration(LT3_1,LT3_2,.)accordingtothenumberofendusersA,BandCinvolvedinaservicescenarioforinstance,usingdifferenttypesofprotocols).Pm:containstheprotocolsusedbelowtheINAPbetweenSCPandSSP,alsobetweenSSPandSRF.Theycouldbee.g.TCAP,SCCPandMTPofSS7etc.Pn:containstheprotocolsusedbelowtheLT3_1betweentheIUTandtheSignallingcontrolpoint.ItcouldbetheDSS1protocolsorISUPSS7protocol(inthecaseofhavingatransitexchange).Pz:containstheusedprotocolsbelowtheLT3_2betweentheIUTandtheSignallingcontrolpoint.ItcouldbetheDSS1protocolsorISUPSS7protocol(inthecaseofhavingatransitexchange).4.5Pointsofcontrolandobservation(PCOs)PCO-Declarations.PCO_1:ThisPCOisatthecoreINAPinterfacebetweenSSPandSCP.ThelowerlayerprotocolisPm.Itcouldbee.g.TCAP.PCO_2:ThisPCOisatthecoreINAPinterfacebetweenSSPandSRF.ThelowerlayerprotocolisPm.Itcouldbee.g.TCAP,ISUP,B-ISUP,TUPortheNWKofDSS1.PCO_3_1:ThisPCOisattheinterfacebetweenSSPandSignallingControlA.ThelowerlayerprotocolisPn.Itcouldbee.g.ISUP,B-ISUP,TUPortheNWKofDSS1.PCO_3_2:ThisPCOisattheinterfacebetweenSSPandSignallingControlB.ThelowerlayerprotocolisPz.Itcouldbee.g.ISUP,B-ISUP,TUPortheNWKofDSS1.4.6TestsystemItisexpectedthatthetestsystemsupportstheprotocolsPm,Pm-1,Pm-2andtheprotocolsforPnandPz.ItisexpectedthatthetestsystemsupportsthePCORequirementsofPCO_1,PCO_2,PCO_3_1andPCO_3_n.SIST EN 301 140-4-1:2001
ETSIETSIEN301140-4-1V1.1.3(2000-05)114.7Functionalconfigurations4.7.1SSF-SCFinterfaceSCPSSPIPNon-integratedSRFSCFSSFCCFSRFSDFFigure2:SCPwithsingleSSPConfigurationA:IUT=SSF(nonintegratedwithSRF)SCPSSPIntegratedSRFSCFSSFCCFSRFSDFFigure3:SCPwithsingleSSPConfigurationB:IUT=SSF(integratedwithSRF)SIST EN 301 140-4-1:2001
ETSIETSIEN301140-4-1V1.1.3(2000-05)124.7.2SCF-SCFinterfaceSCPSSPIntegratedSRFSCFSSFCCFSRFSDFFigure4:SCPtoSCPConfigurationC:IUT=SCFFigure5:VoidFigure6:Void4.7.3ReferencetoproductimplementationTheSUTcaneitherbeaLocalExchange(LE)oraTransitExchange(TE).Theexactnumberoftesters(LT3aloneorLT3_1andLT3_2)willdependuponthetypeofexchangeandtheconfigurationoftheexchange,asexplainedbythefollowingexamplesofimplementation.Figure7:ConfigurationwithLocalExchangeasSUTFigure7showsaconfigurationwheretheSUTisaLocalExchange.Inthiscase,signallingofacallmaybedoneeitherwithDSS1andISUP(AandBinvolved)oronlywithDSS1(AandCinvolved).SIST EN 301 140-4-1:2001
ETSIETSIEN301140-4-1V1.1.3(2000-05)13Figure8:ConfigurationwithTransitExchangeasSUTFigure8showsaconfigurationwheretheSUTisaTransitExchange.Inthiscase,signallingusesISUPprotocolonly.4.8Protocolprimitives4.8.1ProtocolprimitivesatPCO_1andPCO_2ThetransmissionofINAPmessagesattheinterfacebetweenSCFandSSForSSFandSRFusesTCAPprimitives.TheLT1,LT2communicatewiththelowerprotocolsviatheSAPswiththeTCAP-primitivesshownintables2and3accordingtoclause10ofETS300374-1[2]andITU-TRecommendationQ.771[3].Table2PrimitivesfordialoguehandlingAbstractServicePrimitiveTypeTC_BEGINRequestorIndicationTC_CONTINUERequestorIndicationTC_ENDRequestorIndicationTC_U_ABORTaRequestorIndicationTC_U_ABORTbRequestorIndicationTC_P_ABORTaIndicationTC_P_ABORTbIndicationTC-NOTICEIndicationTable3PrimitivesforcomponentshandlingAbstractServicePrimitiveTypeTC_INVOKERequestorIndicationTC_U_ERRORRequestorIndicationTC_U_REJECTRequestorIndicationTC_L_REJECTIndicationTC_R_REJECTIndicationTC_U_CANCELRequestorIndicationTCAPisincludedintheSDLmodelofCS2INAP.SIST EN 301 140-4-1:2001
ETSIETSIEN301140-4-1V1.1.3(2000-05)144.8.2ProtocolprimitivesatPCO_3_1andPCO_3_2Inordertobeprotocolindependent,asetofprimitivesisdefinedatthisinterface,andthenexttableisanexampleofthemappingbetweenthisgenericinterfaceandthepossiblesignallingprotocolslikeISUPandDSS1.Herefollowsthelistoftheseprimitivesforthegenericinterfaceandatablegivingthemappingofthegenericprimitivesintorealprotocols.Table4MappingtablefortheinterfacebetweenSSPandsignallingcontrolpointPCO_3-1or3-2interfaceprimitivesTypeifISUPusedifDSS1usedifotherprotocolsusedSetupIndicationRequestResponseConfirmIAMANMSetupAnswer?ReleaseRequestIndicationREL/RLCDisconnect?SubsequentAddressRequestIndicationSAMInformation?AddressEndRequestIndicationSAMInformation?CallProgressRequestIndicationACM,CPGProgress,Alerting?ServiceFeatureRequestIndication?Facility??NetworkSuspendRequestIndicationSUSPEND--?NetworkResumeRequestIndicationRESUME--?5ATSconventionsThisclausedescribestheconventionsappliedtodefinetheATSandgivesthenamingconventionschosenforthedifferentelementsoftheATS.TheATSconventionsareintendedtogiveabetterunderstandingoftheATSbuttheydescribealsotheconventionsmadeforthedevelopmentoftheATS,thusforanylatermaintenancepurposesorfurtherdevelopmentoftheATS,theconventionsdescribedinthisclauseshallbeconsidered.5.1Namingconventions5.1.1DeclarationspartThissubclausedescribesthenamingconventionschosenfortheelementsoftheATSdeclarationspart.5.1.1.1TestsuitetypeandstructuredtypedefinitionsByReferenceInordertoavoidmisalignmentproblemswiththestandard,allthetypesusedinthisATShavebeendefinedbyreference.ThesameASN.1filescontainingthestandardtypedefinitionshavebeenusedasmodulescontainingthereferencedtypedefinitions.EXAMPLE:TypeNameTypeReferenceModuleIdentifierCallResultCallResultINCS2datatypesWhereanabbreviationisincludedinthedeclarationname,thereisanunderscore("_")beforeand/orafterit,separatingitfromtherestoftheidentifier.Thisrulewithabbreviationsappliestoallthenamingconventionsinthewholetestsuite.SIST EN 301 140-4-1:2001
ETSIETSIEN301140-4-1V1.1.3(2000-05)155.1.1.2TestsuiteoperationsdefinitionsThetestsuiteoperationidentifiersarecomposedofstringsinuppercaselettersstartingwiththeuppercasestring"TSO_".Thedifferentstringsinthedefinitionareseparatedwithunderscores.5.1.1.3TestsuiteparameterdeclarationsThetestsuiteparameteridentifiersarecomposedofstringsinuppercaselettersstartingbytheuppercasestring"PIC_"or"PIX_"andseparatedbyunderscores.IfthetestsuiteparameterreferencesaPICSitem,theprefix"PIC_"isused.IfthetestsuiteparameterreferencesaPIXITitem,theprefix"PIX_"isused.EXAMPLE:PIX_CalledPartyNumber1Completenamesasdefinedinthespecificationsareused.5.1.1.4TestcaseselectionexpressiondefinitionsThenamingconventionsforthetestcaseselectionexpressiondefinitionsusefreetextstartingwithanuppercaseletter.Thenameoftheexpressionisintendedtoexplainclearlytheselectionrule.Thetestcaseselectionexpressionsaregenerallylogicalcombinationsofthetestsuiteparameterdefinitions.5.1.1.5Testsuiteconstantdeclara
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.