SIST-TS ETSI/TS 102 023 V1.1.1:2005
(Main)Policy requirements for time-stamping authorities
Policy requirements for time-stamping authorities
The work will be based on the policy requirements for certification authorities issuing qualified certificates (TS 101 456) developed in the phase 2 EESSI activity by ETSI. The electronic time stamp is gaining an increasing interest by the business sector and is becoming an important component of electronic signatures, also featured by the ETSI Electronic Signature Format standard TS 101 733. Agreed minimum security and quality requirements are necessary in order to ensure trustworthy validation of long-term electronic signatures.
Politika zahtev za organe za časovno žigosanje
General Information
Standards Content (Sample)
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
SIST-TS ETSI/TS 102 023 V1.1.1:2005
01-maj-2005
3ROLWLND]DKWHY]DRUJDQH]DþDVRYQRåLJRVDQMH
Policy requirements for time-stamping authorities
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: TS 102 023 Version 1.1.1
ICS:
35.040 Nabori znakov in kodiranje Character sets and
informacij information coding
SIST-TS ETSI/TS 102 023 V1.1.1:2005 en
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
SIST-TS ETSI/TS 102 023 V1.1.1:2005
---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
SIST-TS ETSI/TS 102 023 V1.1.1:2005
ETSI TS 102 023 V1.1.1 (2002-04)
Technical Specification
Policy requirements for time-stamping authorities
---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
SIST-TS ETSI/TS 102 023 V1.1.1:2005
2 ETSI TS 102 023 V1.1.1 (2002-04)
Reference
DTS/SEC-004005
Keywords
e-commerce, electronic signature, security,
time-stamping, trust services
ETSI
650 Route des Lucioles
F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex - FRANCE
Tel.:+33492944200 Fax:+33 493654716
Siret N° 348 623 562 00017 - NAF 742 C
Association à but non lucratif enregistrée à la
Sous-Préfecture de Grasse (06) N° 7803/88
Important notice
Individual copies of the present document can be downloaded from:
http://www.etsi.org
The present document may be made available in more than one electronic version or in print. In any case of existing or
perceived difference in contents between such versions, the reference version is the Portable Document Format (PDF).
In case of dispute, the reference shall be the printing on ETSI printers of the PDF version kept on a specific network drive
within ETSI Secretariat.
Users of the present document should be aware that the document may be subject to revision or change of status.
Information on the current status of this and other ETSI documents is available at
http://portal.etsi.org/tb/status/status.asp
If you find errors in the present document, send your comment to:
editor@etsi.fr
Copyright Notification
No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission.
The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.
© European Telecommunications Standards Institute 2002.
All rights reserved.
TM TM TM
DECT , PLUGTESTS and UMTS are Trade Marks of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members.
TM
TIPHON and the TIPHON logo are Trade Marks currently being registered by ETSI for the benefit of its Members.
TM
3GPP is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners.
ETSI
---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
SIST-TS ETSI/TS 102 023 V1.1.1:2005
3 ETSI TS 102 023 V1.1.1 (2002-04)
Contents
Intellectual Property Rights.5
Foreword.5
Introduction .5
1 Scope .6
2 References .6
3 Definitions and abbreviations.7
3.1 Definitions.7
3.2 Abbreviations .7
4 General concepts .8
4.1 Time-stamping services.8
4.2 Time-stamping authority .8
4.3 Subscriber.8
4.4 Time-stamp policy and TSA practice statement.8
4.4.1 Purpose .8
4.4.2 Level of specificity .9
4.4.3 Approach .9
5 Time-stamp Policies.9
5.1 Overview .9
5.2 Identification .9
5.3 User Community and applicability.10
5.4 Conformance .10
6 Obligations and liability .10
6.1 TSA obligations.10
6.1.1 General.10
6.1.2 TSA obligations towards subscribers.10
6.2 Subscriber obligations .10
6.3 Relying party obligations .11
6.4 Liability .11
7 Requirements on TSA practices.11
7.1 Practice and Disclosure Statements.11
7.1.1 TSA Practice statement.11
7.1.2 TSA disclosure Statement.12
7.2 Key management life cycle .13
7.2.1 TSA key generation .13
7.2.2 TSA private key protection.13
7.2.3 TSA public key Distribution.14
7.2.4 Rekeying TSA's Key.14
7.2.5 End of TSA key life cycle.14
7.2.6 Life cycle management of cryptographic module used to sign time-stamps .14
7.3 Time-stamping .15
7.3.1 Time-stamp token .15
7.3.2 Clock Synchronization with UTC.15
7.4 TSA management and operation .16
7.4.1 Security management.16
7.4.2 Asset classification and management .17
7.4.3 Personnel security.17
7.4.4 Physical and environmental security.18
7.4.5 Operations management .19
7.4.6 System Access Management.20
7.4.7 Trustworthy Systems Deployment and Maintenance .20
7.4.8 Compromise of TSA Services .20
ETSI
---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
SIST-TS ETSI/TS 102 023 V1.1.1:2005
4 ETSI TS 102 023 V1.1.1 (2002-04)
7.4.9 TSA termination .21
7.4.10 Compliance with Legal Requirements.21
7.4.11 Recording of Information Concerning Operation of Time-stamping Services .22
7.5 Organizational .22
Annex A (informative): Potential liability in the provision of time-stamping services .24
Annex B (informative): Model TSA disclosure statement.25
B.1 Introduction .25
B.2 The TSA disclosure statement structure.26
Annex C (informative): Coordinated Universal Time.27
Annex D (informative): Long Term Verification of time-stamp token .28
Annex E (informative): Possible for Implementation Architectures - Time-stamping Services.29
E.1 Managed Time-stamping Service.29
E.2 Selective Alternative Quality .30
Annex F (informative): Bibliography.31
History .32
ETSI
---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
SIST-TS ETSI/TS 102 023 V1.1.1:2005
5 ETSI TS 102 023 V1.1.1 (2002-04)
Intellectual Property Rights
IPRs essential or potentially essential to the present document may have been declared to ETSI. The information
pertaining to these essential IPRs, if any, is publicly available for ETSI members and non-members, and can be found
in ETSI SR 000 314: "Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs); Essential, or potentially Essential, IPRs notified to ETSI in
respect of ETSI standards", which is available from the ETSI Secretariat. Latest updates are available on the ETSI Web
server (http://webapp.etsi.org/IPR/home.asp).
Pursuant to the ETSI IPR Policy, no investigation, including IPR searches, has been carried out by ETSI. No guarantee
can be given as to the existence of other IPRs not referenced in ETSI SR 000 314 (or the updates on the ETSI Web
server) which are, or may be, or may become, essential to the present document.
Foreword
This Technical Specification (TS) has been produced by ETSI Technical Committee Security (SEC).
Introduction
In creating reliable and manageable digital evidence it becomes necessary to have an agreed upon method of associating
time data to transaction so that they might be compared to each other at some later time. The quality of this evidence is
based in the process of creating and managing the data structure that represent the events and the quality of the
parametric data points that anchor them to the real world. In this instance this being the time data and how it was
applied.
In addition, in order to verify an electronic signature, it may be necessary to prove that the digital signature from the
signer was applied when the signer's certificate was valid. This is necessary in two circumstances:
1) during the validity period of the signer's certificate, should the signer's private key be compromised and thus
revoked for that reason;
2) after the end of the validity period of the signer's certificate, since CAs are not mandated to process revocation
status information beyond the end of the validity period of the certificates they have issued.
Two generic methods exist to solve this problem. One consists to use a time-mark which is an audit record kept in a
secure audit trail from a trusted third party which attaches a date to a signature value. This proves that the signature was
generated before the date from the time-mark. This method is not the topic of the present document.
Another one consists to use a time-stamp which allows to prove that a datum existed before a particular time. This
technique allows to prove that the signature was generated before the date contained in the time-stamp token. Policy
requirements to cover that case is the primary reason of the present document.
However , it should be observed that these policy requirements allow to address other needs.
The electronic time stamp is gaining an increasing interest by the business sector and is becoming an important
component of electronic signatures, also featured by the ETSI Electronic Signature Format standard TS 101 733, built
upon the Time-Stamp protocol from the IETF (RFC 3161). Agreed minimum security and quality requirements are
necessary in order to ensure trustworthy validation of long-term electronic signatures.
The Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community
framework for electronic signatures defines certification-service-provider as "an entity or a legal or natural person who
issues certificates or provides other services related to electronic signatures". One example of a
certification-service-provider is a time-stamping authority.
ETSI
---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
SIST-TS ETSI/TS 102 023 V1.1.1:2005
6 ETSI TS 102 023 V1.1.1 (2002-04)
1 Scope
The present document specifies policy requirements relating to the operation of Time-stamping Authorities (TSAs). The
present document defines policy requirements on the operation and management practices of TSAs such that
subscribers and relying parties may have confidence in the operation of the time-stamping services.
These policy requirements are primarily aimed at time-stamping services used in support of qualified electronic
signatures (i.e. in line with article 5.1 of the European Directive on a community framework for electronic signatures)
but may be applied to any application requiring to prove that a datum existed before a particular time.
These policy requirements are based upon the use of public key cryptography, public key certificates and reliable time
sources.
The present document may be used by independent bodies as the basis for confirming that a TSA may be trusted for
providing time-stamping services.
The current document addresses requirements for TSAs issuing time-stamp tokens which are synchronized with
Coordinated universal time (UTC) and digitally signed by the TSA.
Subscriber and relying parties should consult the TSA's practice statement to obtain further details of precisely how this
time-stamp policy is implemented by the particular TSA (e.g. protocols used in providing this service).
The current document does not specify:
• protocols used to access the TSA;
NOTE 1: A time-stamping protocol is defined in RFC 3161 and profiled in TS 101 861.
• how the requirements identified herein may be assessed by an independent body;
• requirements for information to be made available to such independent bodies;
• requirements on such independent bodies.
NOTE 2: See CEN Workshop Agreement 14172 "EESSI Conformity Assessment Guidance".
2 References
The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of the present
document.
• References are either specific (identified by date of publication and/or edition number or version number) or
non-specific.
• For a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply.
• For a non-specific reference, the latest version applies.
[1] ITU-R Recommendation TF.460-5 (1997): "Standard-frequency and time-signal emissions".
[2] ITU-R Recommendation TF.536-1 (1998): "Time-scale notations".
[3] Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the
protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement
of such data.
[4] FIPS PUB 140-1 (1994): "Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules".
[5] ISO/IEC 15408 (1999) (parts 1 to 3): "Information technology - Security techniques - Evaluation
criteria for IT security".
ETSI
---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
SIST-TS ETSI/TS 102 023 V1.1.1:2005
7 ETSI TS 102 023 V1.1.1 (2002-04)
[6] CEN Workshop Agreement 14167-2: "Security Requirements for Trustworthy Systems Managing
Certificates for Electronic Signatures - Part 2 Cryptographic Module for CSP Signing
Operations - Protection Profile (MCSO-PP)".
3 Definitions and abbreviations
3.1 Definitions
For the purposes of the present document, the following terms and definitions apply:
NOTE: Where a definition is copied from a referenced document this is indicated by inclusion of the reference
identifier number at the end of the definition.
relying party: recipient of a time-stamp token who relies on that time-stamp token
subscriber: entity requiring data to be time-stamped by a TSA and which has explicitly or implicitly agreed to its terms
and conditions
time-stamp token: data object that binds a representation of a datum to a particular time, thus establishing evidence
that the datum existed before that time
time-stamping authority: authority which issues time-stamp tokens
TSA Disclosure statement: set of statements about the policies and practices of a TSA that particularly require
emphasis or disclosure to subscribers and relying parties, for example to meet regulatory requirements
TSA practice statement: statement of the practices that a TSA employs in issuing time-stamp tokens
TSA system: composition of IT products and components organized to support the provision of time-stamping services
time-stamp policy: named set of rules that indicates the applicability of a time-stamp token to a particular community
and/or class of application with common security requirements
time-stamping unit: set of hardware and software which is managed as a unit and has a single time-stamp token
signing key active at a time
Coordinated Universal Time (UTC): Time scale based on the second as defined in ITU-R Recommendation
TF.460-5 [1].
°
NOTE: For most practical purposes UTC is equivalent to mean solar time at the prime meridian (0 ). More
specifically,UTCisacompromisebetweenthehighlystableatomictime(Temps Atomique
International - TAI) and solar time derived from the irregular Earth rotation (related to the Greenwich
mean sidereal time (GMST) by a conventional relationship). (See annex C for more details).
UTC(k): Time-scale realized by the laboratory "k" and kept in close agreement with UTC, with the goal to reach
±100 ns. (See ITU-R Recommendation TF.536-1 [2]).
NOTE: A list of UTC(k) laboratories is given in section 1 of Circular T disseminated by BIPM and available
from the BIPM website (http://www.bipm.org/).
3.2 Abbreviations
For the purposes of the present document, the following abbreviations apply:
TSA Time-stamping Authority
TST Time-stamp token
UTC Coordinated Universal Time
ETSI
---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
SIST-TS ETSI/TS 102 023 V1.1.1:2005
8 ETSI TS 102 023 V1.1.1 (2002-04)
4 General concepts
4.1 Time-stamping services
The provision of time-stamping services is broken down in the present document into the following component services
for the purposes of classifying requirements:
• Time-stamping provision: This service component generates time-stamp tokens.
• Time-stamping management: The service component that monitors and controls the operation of the
time-stamping services to ensure that the service provided is as specified by the TSA. This service component
has responsibility for the installation and de-installation of the time-stamping provision service. For example,
time-stamping management ensures that the clock used for time-stamping is correctly synchronized with UTC.
This subdivision of services is only for the purposes of clarifying the requirements specified in the current document
and places no restrictions on any subdivision of an implementation of time-stamping services.
4.2 Time-stamping authority
The authority trusted by the users of the time-stamping services (i.e. subscribers as well as relying parties) to issue
time-stamp tokens is called the Time-Stamping Authority (TSA). The TSA has overall responsibility for the provision
of the time-stamping services identified in clause 4.1. The TSA's key is used to sign a time-stamp token and the TSA is
identified in a time-stamp token as the issuer.
The TSA may make use of other parties to provide parts of the Time-Stamping Services. However, the TSA always
maintains overall responsibility and ensures that the policy requirements identified in the present document are met. For
example, a TSA may sub-contract all the component services, including the services which generate time-stamps using
the TSA's key. However, the private key or keys used to generate the time-stamp tokens are identified as belonging to
the TSA which maintains overall responsibility for meeting the requirements defined in the current document.
A TSA may operate several identifiable time-stamping units. Each unit has a different key.
A TSA is a certification-service-provider, as defined in the EU Directive on Electronic Signatures (see article 2(11)),
which issues time-stamp tokens.
4.3 Subscriber
The subscriber may be an organization comprising several end-users or an individual end-user.
When the subscriber is an organization, some of the obligations that apply to that organization will have to apply as well
to the end-users. In any case the organization will be held responsible if the obligations from the end-users are not
correctly fulfilled and therefore the such an organization is expected to suitably inform its end users.
When the subscriber is an end-user, the end-user will be held directly responsible if its obligations are not correctly
fulfilled.
4.4 Time-stamp policy and TSA practice statement
This clause explains the relative roles of Time-stamp policy and TSA practice statement. It places no restriction on the
form of a time-stamp policy or practice statement specification.
4.4.1 Purpose
In general, the time-stamp policy states "what is to be adhered to," while a TSA practice statement states "how it is
adhered to", i.e., the processes it will use in creating time-stamps and maintaining the accuracy of its clock. The
relationship between the time-stamp policy and TSA practice statement is similar in nature to the relationship of other
business policies which state the requirements of the business, while operational units define the practices and
procedures of how these policies are to be carried out.
ETSI
---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
SIST-TS ETSI/TS 102 023 V1.1.1:2005
9 ETSI TS 102 023 V1.1.1 (2002-04)
The present document specifies a time-stamp policy to meet general requirements for trusted time-stamping services.
TSAs specify in TSA practice statements how these requirements are met.
4.4.2 Level of specificity
A time-stamp policy is a less specific document than a TSA practice statement. A TSA practice statement is a more
detailed description of the terms and conditions as well as business and operational practices of a TSA in issuing and
otherwise managing time-stamping services. The TSA practice statement of a TSA enforces the rules established by a
time-stamp policy. A TSA practice statement defines how a specific TSA meets the technical, organizational and
procedural requirements identified in a time-stamp policy.
NOTE: Even lower-level internal documentation may be appropriate for a TSA detailing the specific procedures
necessary to complete the practices identified in the TSA practice statement.
4.4.3 Approach
The approach of a time-stamp policy is significantly different from a TSA practice statement. A time-stamp policy is
defined independently of the specific details of the specific operating environment of a TSA, whereas a TSA practice
statement is tailored to the organizational structure, operating procedures, facilities, and computing environment of a
TSA. A time-stamp policy may be defined by the user of times-stamp services, whereas the TSA practice statement is
always defined by the provider.
5 Time-stamp Policies
5.1 Overview
A time-stamp policy is a "named set of rules that indicates the applicability of a time-stamp token to a particular
community and/or class of application with common security requirements" (see clauses 3.1 and 4.4).
The present document defines requirements for a baseline time-stamp policy for TSAs issuing time-stamp tokens,
supported by the public key certificate of the TSA, with an accuracy of 1 second or better.
NOTE 1: Without additional measures the relying party may not be able to ensure the validity of a time-stamp
token beyond the end of the validity period of the supporting certificate. See annex D on verification of
the validity of a time-stamp token beyond the validity period of the TSA's certificate.
A TSA may define its own policy which enhances the policy defined in the current document. Such a policy shall
incorporate or further constrain the requirements identified in the current document.
If an accuracy of better than 1 second is provided by the TSA then the accuracy shall be indicated in the TSA's
disclosure statement (see clause 7.1.2) and in each time-stamp token issued to an accuracy of better than 1 second.
NOTE 2: It is required that a time-stamp token includes an identifier for the applicable policy (see clause 7.3.1).
5.2 Identification
The object-identifier of the baseline time-stamp policy is:
itu-t(0) identified-organization(4) etsi(0) time-stamp-policy(02023) policy-identifiers(1)
baseline-ts-policy (1)
A TSA shall also include the identifier for the time-stamp policy being supported in the TSA disclosure statement made
available to subscribers and relying parties to indicate its claim of conformance.
ETSI
---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------
SIST-TS ETSI/TS 102 023 V1.1.1:2005
10 ETSI TS 102 023 V1.1.1 (2002-04)
5.3 User Community and applicability
This policy is aimed at meeting the requirements of time-stamping qualified electronic signatures (see European
Directive on Electronic Signatures) for long term validity (e.g. as defined in TS 101 733) but is generally applicable to
any use which has a requirement for equivalent quality.
This policy may be used for public time-stamping services or time-stamping services used within a closed community.
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.