Standard Test Method for Obtaining Hydrostatic Design Basis for Thermoplastic Pipe Materials

SCOPE
1.1 This test method describes a procedure for obtaining a long-term hydrostatic strength category, referred to herein as the hydrostatic design basis (HDB), for thermoplastic pipe materials based on the material's long-term hydrostatic strength (LTHS). The LTHS is determined by analyzing stress versus time-to-rupture (that is, stress-rupture) test data that cover a testing period of not less than 10 000 h and that are derived from sustained pressure testing of pipe made from the subject material. The data are analyzed by linear regression to yield a best-fit log-stress versus log time-to-fail straight-line equation. Using this equation, the material's mean strength at the 100 000-h intercept (LTHS) is determined by extrapolation. The resultant value of the LTHS determines the HDB strength category to which the material is assigned. An HDB is one of a series of preferred long-term strength values. This test method is applicable to all known types of thermoplastic pipe materials, and for any practical temperature and medium that yields stress-rupture data that exhibit an essentially straight-line relationship when plotted on log stress (pound-force per square inch) versus log time-to-fail (hours) coordinates, and for which this straight-line relationship is expected to continue uninterrupted through at least 100 000 h.
1.2 Unless the experimentally obtained data approximate a straight line, when calculated using log-log coordinates, it is not possible to assign an HDB to the material. Data that exhibit high scatter or a "knee" (a downward shift, resulting in a subsequently steeper stress-rupture slope than indicated by the earlier data) but which meet the requirements of this test method tend to give a lower forecast of LTHS. In the case of data which exhibit excessive scatter or a pronounced "knee," the lower confidence limit requirements of this test method are not met and the data are classified as unsuitable for analysis.
1.3 A fundamental premise of this test method is that when the experimental data define a straight-line relationship in accordance with this test method's requirements, this straight line may be assumed to continue beyond the experimental period, through at least 100 000 h (the time intercept at which the material's LTHS is determined). In the case of polyethylene piping materials this test method includes a supplemental requirement for the "validating" of this assumption. No such validation requirements are included for other materials (see Note 1). Therefore, in all these other cases, it is up to the user of this test method to determine based on outside information whether this test method is satisfactory for the forecasting of a material's LTHS for each particular combination of internal/external environments and temperature.Note 1—Extensive long-term data that have been obtained on commercial pressure pipe grades of polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polybutlene (PB), and cross linked polyethlene (PEX) materials have shown that this assumption is appropriate for the establishing of HDB's for these materials for water and for ambient temperatures. Refer to Note 2 and Appendix X1 for additional information.
1.4 The experimental procedure to obtain individual data points shall be as described in Test Method D 1598, which forms a part of this test method. When any part of this test method is not in agreement with Test Method D 1598, the provisions of this test method shall prevail.
1.5 General references are included at the end of this test method.
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.7 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only and are not considered the sta...

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
09-Dec-2001
Technical Committee
Drafting Committee
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM D2837-01 - Standard Test Method for Obtaining Hydrostatic Design Basis for Thermoplastic Pipe Materials
English language
14 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or discontinued.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information.
An American National Standard
Designation: D 2837 – 01
Standard Test Method for
Obtaining Hydrostatic Design Basis for Thermoplastic Pipe
1
Materials
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D 2837; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the Department of Defense.
1. Scope line may be assumed to continue beyond the experimental
period, through at least 100 000 h (the time intercept at which
1.1 This test method describes a procedure for obtaining a
the material’s LTHS is determined). In the case of polyethylene
long-term hydrostatic strength category, referred to herein as
piping materials this test method includes a supplemental
the hydrostatic design basis (HDB), for thermoplastic pipe
requirement for the “validating” of this assumption. No such
materials based on the material’s long-term hydrostatic
validation requirements are included for other materials (see
strength (LTHS). The LTHS is determined by analyzing stress
Note 1). Therefore, in all these other cases, it is up to the user
versus time-to-rupture (that is, stress-rupture) test data that
of this test method to determine based on outside information
cover a testing period of not less than 10 000 h and that are
whether this test method is satisfactory for the forecasting of a
derived from sustained pressure testing of pipe made from the
material’s LTHS for each particular combination of internal/
subject material. The data are analyzed by linear regression to
external environments and temperature.
yield a best-fit log-stress versus log time-to-fail straight-line
equation. Using this equation, the material’s mean strength at
NOTE 1—Extensive long-term data that have been obtained on com-
the 100 000-h intercept (LTHS) is determined by extrapolation.
mercial pressure pipe grades of polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polybutlene
(PB), and cross linked polyethlene (PEX) materials have shown that this
The resultant value of the LTHS determines the HDB strength
assumption is appropriate for the establishing of HDB’s for these
category to which the material is assigned. An HDB is one of
materials for water and for ambient temperatures. Refer to Note 2 and
a series of preferred long-term strength values. This test
Appendix X1 for additional information.
method is applicable to all known types of thermoplastic pipe
1.4 The experimental procedure to obtain individual data
materials, and for any practical temperature and medium that
points shall be as described in Test Method D 1598, which
yields stress-rupture data that exhibit an essentially straight-
forms a part of this test method. When any part of this test
line relationship when plotted on log stress (pound-force per
method is not in agreement with Test Method D 1598, the
square inch) versus log time-to-fail (hours) coordinates, and for
provisions of this test method shall prevail.
which this straight-line relationship is expected to continue
1.5 General references are included at the end of this test
uninterrupted through at least 100 000 h.
method.
1.2 Unless the experimentally obtained data approximate a
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the
straight line, when calculated using log-log coordinates, it is
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
not possible to assign an HDB to the material. Data that exhibit
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
high scatter or a “knee” (a downward shift, resulting in a
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
subsequently steeper stress-rupture slope than indicated by the
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use
earlier data) but which meet the requirements of this test
1.7 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded
method tend to give a lower forecast of LTHS. In the case of
as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for
data which exhibit excessive scatter or a pronounced “knee,”
information only and are not considered the standard.
the lower confidence limit requirements of this test method are
not met and the data are classified as unsuitable for analysis.
NOTE 2—Over 3 000 sets of data, obtained with thermoplastic pipe and
1.3 A fundamental premise of this test method is that when
piping assemblies tested with water, natural gas, and compressed air, have
2
the experimental data define a straight-line relationship in been analyzed by the Plastic Pipe Institute’s (PPI) Hydrostatic Stress
Board. None of the currently commercially offered compounds included
accordance with thi
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.