ASTM E2082-12(2020)
(Guide)Standard Guide for Descriptive Analysis of Shampoo Performance
Standard Guide for Descriptive Analysis of Shampoo Performance
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
6.1 The methods outlined in this guide can be used to qualitatively and quantitatively describe the performance and sensory characteristics of shampoos.
6.2 The methods described in this guide may be used for product formulation and research guidance as well as for quality control.
6.3 These methods may be used by individuals who familiarize themselves with these procedures and who have previous experience with sensory evaluation.
6.4 Variables that may affect results include, but are not limited to, water conditions (for example, hardness), hair type, and hair condition. These variables should be controlled or accounted for in the experimental design.
6.5 These are suggested procedures and are not intended to exclude alternate methods, which may effectively provide the same or similar results.
SCOPE
1.1 The objective of this guide is to provide procedures which may be used in the design, execution, and analysis of studies to quantitatively assess the objective sensory attributes of shampoos. This is one of many appropriate techniques used in the hair-care industry. These attributes can then be used to define performance of shampoos and to provide direction in product formulation, research guidance testing, and claim substantiation. This guide includes the sensory properties involved in dispensing a product, as well as the attributes pertinent to shampooing swatches, half and whole heads. Although this guide is specific to shampoos, the procedures should be applicable to most hair-care products.
1.2 Guidelines are provided for the definition of terminology, procedures for manipulation of products, identification/selection of hair type, and assessor training. References for rating scales are not provided in this guide. The user should be aware that some sensory practices may require the use of attribute references (anchors) when training the assessors.
1.3 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: E2082 − 12 (Reapproved 2020)
Standard Guide for
Descriptive Analysis of Shampoo Performance
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E2082; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 2.2 ASTM Publications:
MNL13 Descriptive Analysis Testing for Sensory Evalua-
1.1 The objective of this guide is to provide procedures
tion
which may be used in the design, execution, and analysis of
MNL26 Sensory Testing Methods, 2nd Edition
studies to quantitatively assess the objective sensory attributes
MNL30 Relating Consumer, Descriptive, and Laboratory
of shampoos. This is one of many appropriate techniques used
Data to Better Understand Consumer Responses
in the hair-care industry. These attributes can then be used to
STP758 Guidelines for the Selection and Training of Sen-
define performance of shampoos and to provide direction in
sory Panel Members
product formulation, research guidance testing, and claim
2.3 Code of Federal Regulations:
substantiation. This guide includes the sensory properties
21 CFR 50.25 Protection of Human Subjects—Elements of
involved in dispensing a product, as well as the attributes
Informed Consent
pertinent to shampooing swatches, half and whole heads.
3. Terminology
Although this guide is specific to shampoos, the procedures
should be applicable to most hair-care products.
3.1 Definitions:
3.1.1 Definitions of terms other than those given as follows
1.2 Guidelines are provided for the definition of
appear in Terminology E253.
terminology, procedures for manipulation of products,
3.2 Definitions:
identification/selection of hair type, and assessor training.
3.2.1 cosmetologist—a licensed, trained professional who
References for rating scales are not provided in this guide. The
has been certified by state or government agencies to apply
user should be aware that some sensory practices may require
hair-care products to human heads; these individuals may be
the use of attribute references (anchors) when training the
alternately described as beauticians, stylists, hairdressers, or
assessors.
cosmetologists.
1.3 This international standard was developed in accor-
3.2.2 subjects—those individuals recruited to participate in
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
a study for the quality or condition of their hair, to serve as
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
sample carriers.
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
3.2.3 trained panel—a group of assessors who have been
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
formally trained to evaluate the visual and tactile properties of
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
shampoo or hair, using a standard descriptive analysis method
which quantifies attributes on a rating scale over a set time
2. Referenced Documents
period; the number may vary depending on the complexity of
the test and the skill of the assessor.
2.1 ASTM Standards:
E253 Terminology Relating to Sensory Evaluation of Mate-
4. Equipment
rials and Products
4.1 The following equipment may be used during the
evaluation process:
4.1.1 General:
This guide is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E18 on Sensory
4.1.1.1 Light Source—A consistent light source is recom-
Evaluation and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E18.07 on Personal
mended for use during evaluation of shine or luster. It is
Care and Household Evaluation.
Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2020. Published October 2020. Originally
approved in 2000. Last previous edition approved in 2012 as E2082 – 12. DOI:
10.1520/E2082-12R20. Available from ASTM International Headquarters, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Available from U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on Documents, 732 N. Capitol St., NW, Washington, DC 20401-0001, http://
the ASTM website. www.access.gpo.gov.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E2082 − 12 (2020)
TABLE 1 Comparative Overview of Shampoo Testing Using
important to control the amount of light as well as the angle
Trained Evaluators
and distance from the hair.
Swatches Versus Subjects
4.1.1.2 Water Source—Temperature and hardness should be
Swatch Subject: Half or Whole Head
consistent. If controlled temperature sinks are used, they
should all have the same, consistent flow rate.
Highly Controlled Testing: Less Controlled:
Controlled procedure, limited Controlled procedure but highly
4.1.1.3 Blow Dryer—Specifications should be documented
variability variable hair/scalp types and
(that is, wattage, voltage, power level, air velocity, and
Uniform hair samples (typically conditions (length, diameter,
temperature).
commercially blended 9virgin9 hair) oiliness, dirtiness, damage, etc.)
Often may purchase/create In special cases, may screen/
4.1.1.4 Syringes/Pipettes, Petri Dishes.
desired/target hair types target specific hair types
4.1.1.5 Towels (cloth or paper, or both).
Artificial: Less Artificial:
4.1.1.6 Combs—It is recommended that all combs be iden-
Lack scalp/sebum involvement, Scalp ⁄sebum involvement,
tical in material and construction (that is, tooth length,
packing/scalp orientation effects, packing/whole-head effects,
thickness, and distance between teeth). They should be appro-
single hair type represented usually incorporates a range of
hair types/conditions
priately cleaned before each use. For evaluations on subject
heads, combs must be sanitized properly prior to use with each
Initial Investment: Initial Investment:
test subject.
Lower capital requirements per Higher capital requirements per
station station
4.1.1.7 Thermometer.
Controlled environment should Requires suitable salon-style
4.1.1.8 Hygrometer.
include controlled lighting, water facilities/stations with controlled
4.1.2 Additional Equipment for Evaluation on Swatches: flow, and individual assessor lighting, water flow, etc.
stations May require fewer total stations
4.1.2.1 Hair Swatches (see Section 8 for preparation proce-
Several approaches available,
dure).
varying in sophistication and
expense
4.1.3 Additional Equipment for Evaluation on Subjects
Depending on testing volume
(Salon Setting):
and scheduling, may require a
4.1.3.1 All-purpose Styling Chair. greater total number of stations
4.1.3.2 Capes.
Initial Training and Maintenance: Initial Training and Maintenance:
4.1.3.3 Wet/Dry Sanitizers.
Variable, but probably grossly Variable, but probably grossly
similar for swatch and subject similar for swatch and subject
testing testing
5. Summary of Guide
Lower Cost for Testing: Higher Cost for Testing:
5.1 This guide provides guidelines for the identification,
Assessor fees, consumables In addition to assessors’ fees
selection, and training of assessors, using a common
(syringes, etc.) and consumables; there are
Hair reusable over extended subject fees, recruiting costs
procedure, so they may effectively evaluate the sensory attri-
periods May require services of a
butes of shampoos and the effects of their use on hair. This
licensed cosmetologist for some
guidedescribestheevaluationusinghairswatchesandsubjects
types of testing
(half and whole heads).
Sample Turn Around: Sample Turn Around:
5.2 During swatch evaluation, a panel of trained assessors Rapid testing, high throughput, Less rapid testing, assessors
assessors available as needed — available, but may require
treats hair swatches with the shampoo products, and evaluate
little to no lead time additional lead time for subject
the appearance, product pick-up, application, foaming, and wet
recruiting
hair and dry hair attributes of the shampoo.
Evaluations/Evaluators : Evaluations/Evaluators:
5.3 Evaluations using live subjects are typically performed
Typically requires fewer total Requires more total evaluations
evaluations but more (minimum of (subjects), but may require fewer
inasalon-typesetting.Insomecases,theservicesofalicensed
7 to 10) evaluators, usually 2 or trained assessors (see 10.1)
cosmetologist may be required by state or local law. Licensed
more reps/product Simultaneous descriptive and
cosmetologists may bring an expanded frame of reference and subject self-assessment possible
may be trained as descriptive assessors. Many of the attributes
evaluated on subject heads are similar to those evaluated on
swatches.
5.4 Acomparative overview highlighting the characteristics
6.3 These methods may be used by individuals who famil-
of shampoo evaluation using swatches and using live subjects
iarizethemselveswiththeseproceduresandwhohaveprevious
is provided in Table 1.
experience with sensory evaluation.
6. Significance and Use
6.4 Variables that may affect results include, but are not
limited to, water conditions (for example, hardness), hair type,
6.1 The methods outlined in this guide can be used to
and hair condition. These variables should be controlled or
qualitatively and quantitatively describe the performance and
accounted for in the experimental design.
sensory characteristics of shampoos.
6.2 The methods described in this guide may be used for 6.5 These are suggested procedures and are not intended to
product formulation and research guidance as well as for exclude alternate methods, which may effectively provide the
quality control. same or similar results.
E2082 − 12 (2020)
7. Trained Panel Selection and Descriptive Training 7.3.2 Priortocompletingascreeningquestionnaire,thetime
commitment for training (orientation and practice sessions),
7.1 The objective is to select and train assessors to evaluate
potential duration of the panel, panel objectives, and assessor
the visual and tactile properties of shampoos on hair swatches
commitment should be discussed with each candidate. In
using a descriptive analysis method. The selection process
addition,inthecaseofacosmetologistassessor,thedifferences
should include the principles embodied inASTM STP758.The
between conduct and responsibilities as a trained evaluator and
task of the assessor is to describe product and hair attributes by
those of a cosmetologist should be emphasized.
ratingtheperceivedquantityandqualityofspecifiedattributes.
7.3.3 A screening questionnaire is recommended (refer to
7.2 Trained Panel Selection:
7.2.3.1).
7.2.1 Assessors may be recruited from within the company,
7.3.4 Select 15 to 20 assessors. This number may vary
or from the local community. The use of licensed cosmetolo-
depending on the complexity of the test and the skill of the
gists as trained assessors adds an additional qualification to the
assessors. The following criteria may be used as a guideline.
community recruit.
Other approaches are described in ASTM MNL13 and ASTM
7.2.2 The choice to use internal employees allows a com-
STP758.
pany to have assessors on site and control proprietary infor-
7.3.4.1 Screening Questionnaire:
mation. It may, however, create potential resource and sched-
(1) Availability for the complete orientation and 80–100 %
uling conflicts, since panel evaluation will not be the
of the training practice sessions.
employees’ primary job focus.
(2) No health-related problems, such as, skin irritations,
7.2.3 The use of local community residents allows the
central nervous system disorders, or medications which might
company to schedule more panel time per week and may lower
interfere with the central nervous system or reduce skin and
the risk of losing assessors.Alarge pool of potential assessors
muscle activity.
is usually available.
(3) Correct and comprehensive descriptive answers to
7.2.3.1 Ascreening questionnaire is recommended to deter-
75 % or more of the open-ended tactile questions in the
mine availability, interest, general knowledge of tactile
screening questionnaire.
properties, ability to use descriptive words, and ability to use
(4) Correct rating of 80 % or more of the scaling exercises
rating scales.This questionnaire is used to eliminate unsuitable
in the screening questionnaire (see Figs. 1 and 2).
candidates. Some questions on the screening questionnaire
7.3.4.2 Interview—Eachcandidateshouldbeinterviewedby
relate to previous and current employment. Assess if any of
thepaneladministratorortrainertodetermineattitude,interest,
these questions conflicts with individual company policy (see
and ability to learn and work in a group situation. The
Table 2) It is recommended that the form be approved by the
candidateshoulddemonstrategoodverbalskills,ahighinterest
company’s human resources department.
in descriptive dynamics, and a cooperative yet confident
7.2.4 With specific training, licensed cosmetologists may
personality (see Table 3).
represent a special type of descriptively trained assessor. In
7.4 Trained Panel Orientation/Training:
some states, licensing is required to apply certain hair-care
7.4.1 The panel trainer needs to orient assessors first to the
products to live models (subjects). Information concerning the
general concepts, such as, the definition, components, and
legal requirements for licensing professional cosmetologists
application of descriptive analysis testing. This will take
may be obtained through the states’ Board of Beauty Culture.
approximately two hours.
7.2.5 Licensed cosmetologists typically will require higher
7.4.2 Assessors are introduced to the need for strictly
compensation than non-licensed candidates. Since licensed
controlled sample application procedures and for the careful
cosmetologists are experienced, they may require a shorter
definition of each sensory attribute. This will take approxi-
trainingperiod.Theymayalsohavesomepreconceivedbiases.
mately two hours.
7.2.6 When cosmetologists are trained as descriptive
7.4.3 A discussion and demonstration of each attribute is
evaluators, the difference between their traditional role and
conducted at each stage of the evaluation. This establishes the
their role as a trained descriptive evaluator should be carefully
overall structure of the descriptive analysis of hair-care prop-
explained.
erties. Assessors are encouraged to d
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.