ASTM F1224-89(2004)e1
(Guide)Standard Guide for Providing System Evaluation for Emergency Medical Services (Withdrawn 2012)
Standard Guide for Providing System Evaluation for Emergency Medical Services (Withdrawn 2012)
SCOPE
1.1 This guide covers providing system evaluation for emergency medical services (1), including authority, responsibility, objectives, approaches, data, applications, and implementation.
Note 1—This guide does not address evaluation for individual prehospital, hospital, or posthospital providers. (Related guides will be developed.)
WITHDRAWN RATIONALE
This guide covers providing system evaluation for emergency medical services including authority, responsibility, objectives, approaches, data, applications, and implementation.
Formerly under the jurisdiction of Committee F30 on Emergency Medical Services, this guide was withdrawn in July 2012 because it is obsolete.
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
´1
Designation:F1224–89(Reapproved2004)
Standard Guide for
Providing System Evaluation for Emergency Medical
Services
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F1224; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
´ NOTE—Paragraph 10.1 was editorially revised in June 2004.
1. Scope 4.2 This guide covers the methods and materials that are
necessary to evaluate quality for emergency medical services
1.1 This guide covers providing system evaluation for
systems at both the system operations and patient care levels.
emergency medical services (1), including authority, respon-
sibility, objectives, approaches, data, applications, and imple-
5. Authority
mentation.
5.1 The authority for providing system evaluation for emer-
NOTE 1—This guide does not address evaluation for individual prehos-
gency medical services rests with the entity that is utlimately
pital, hospital, or posthospital providers. (Related guides will be devel-
legally responsible for system operation and evaluation.
oped.)
6. Responsibility
2. Referenced Documents
6.1 The responsibility for providing system evaluation for
2.1 ASTM Standards:
emergency medical services systems rests with the directors of
F1149 Practice for Qualifications, Responsibilities, andAu-
the entities specified in 5.1.
thority of Individuals and Institutions Providing Medical
6.2 The responsibility for providing adequate financial re-
Direction of Emergency Medical Services
sources and appropriate medical confidentiality for system
F1177 Terminology Relating to Emergency Medical Ser-
evaluation for emergency medical services rests with the
vices
entities specified in 5.1.
6.3 Independent evaluation of individual parts of the emer-
3. Terminology
gency medical services system by prehospital, hospital, or
3.1 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
posthospital providers must be integrated with and must not be
3.1.1 system evaluation—a review of the performance of
substituted for system evaluation.
emergency medical services systems by qualified, experienced
individuals.
7. Objectives
3.1.2 minimum data set—the minimum number of data
7.1 System evaluation of quality for emergency medical
elements required for system evaluation.
services entails five objectives (2) including:
3.2 Definitions—See Terminology F1177.
7.1.1 Setting priorities,
7.1.2 Assessing outcome,
4. Significance of Use
7.1.3 Identifying problems,
4.1 This guide establishes system evaluation as an essential
7.1.4 Effecting changes, and
component of emergency medical services systems.
7.1.5 Reassessing outcome.
This guide is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F30 on Emergency
8. Approaches
Medical Services and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee F30.03 on
8.1 System evaluation of quality entails approaches of
Organization/Management.
Current edition approved Apr. 1, 2004. Published April 2004. Originally structure, process, and outcome, singly or combined (3).
´1
approved in 1989. Last previous edition approved in 1996 as F1224 – 89 (1996) .
8.2 The approaches specified in 8.1 should be applied at
DOI: 10.1520/F1224-89R04E01.
both the system operations and patient care levels.
The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to the references at the end of this
8.2.1 Applied at the system operations level (Table 1) these
guide.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
approaches provide a means of identifying issues that require
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
further attention, including:
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
8.2.1.1 System operation, and
the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
´1
F1224–89 (2004)
TABLE 1 Approaches and Methods for System Evaluation for
10. Applications
Emergency Medical Services
10.1 Patients should be considered for evaluation by emer-
Evaluation Approaches Evaluation Methods
gency medical services systems when classified into the
Structure (standards) ASTM guides (to be developed)
categories identified in Table 2.
Process (care) Medical direction (Guide F1149) (1)
10.2 Emergency medical services systems incorporating
Outcome (results) Intermediate: preventable morbidity (4)
Final: preventable morbidity
subsystems, such as those for burn, behavioral, cardiac, pedi-
preventable mortality(5)
atric, perinatal, toxicologic, or traumatic emergencies, may
Combined Preventable morbidity
require categories in addition to those specified in Table 2.
Preventable mortality
Tracers (6)
When required, such categories should be identified in their
Registries (7)
respective subsystem standards.
Generic Screens (8)
11. Implementation
11.1 Implementation of system evaluation for emerg
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.