Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson's Ratio of Concrete in Compression

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
3.1 This test method provides a stress to strain ratio value and a ratio of lateral to longitudinal strain for hardened concrete at whatever age and curing conditions may be designated.  
3.2 The modulus of elasticity and Poisson's ratio values, applicable within the customary working stress range (0 to 40 % of ultimate concrete strength), are used in sizing of reinforced and nonreinforced structural members, establishing the quantity of reinforcement, and computing stress for observed strains.  
3.3 The modulus of elasticity values obtained will usually be less than moduli derived under rapid load application (dynamic or seismic rates, for example), and will usually be greater than values under slow load application or extended load duration, given other test conditions being the same.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers determination of (1) chord modulus of elasticity (Young's) and (2) Poisson's ratio of molded concrete cylinders and diamond-drilled concrete cores when under longitudinal compressive stress. Chord modulus of elasticity and Poisson's ratio are defined in Terminology E6.  
1.2 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in non-conformance with the standard.  
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
31-Mar-2022
Current Stage
Ref Project

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM C469/C469M-22 - Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson's Ratio of Concrete in Compression
English language
6 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview
Standard
REDLINE ASTM C469/C469M-22 - Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson's Ratio of Concrete in Compression
English language
6 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: C469/C469M − 22
Standard Test Method for
Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete
1
in Compression
This standard is issued under the fixed designation C469/C469M; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year
of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.
A superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope* C174/C174MTestMethodforMeasuringThicknessofCon-
crete Elements Using Drilled Concrete Cores
1.1 This test method covers determination of (1) chord
C192/C192MPractice for Making and Curing ConcreteTest
modulus of elasticity (Young’s) and (2) Poisson’s ratio of
Specimens in the Laboratory
molded concrete cylinders and diamond-drilled concrete cores
C617Practice for Capping Cylindrical Concrete Specimens
whenunderlongitudinalcompressivestress.Chordmodulusof
C670Practice for Preparing Precision and Bias Statements
elasticity and Poisson’s ratio are defined in Terminology E6.
for Test Methods for Construction Materials
1.2 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units
E4Practices for Force Calibration and Verification of Test-
are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in
ing Machines
each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each
E6Terminology Relating to Methods of Mechanical Testing
system shall be used independently of the other. Combining
E83Practice for Verification and Classification of Exten-
values from the two systems may result in non-conformance
someter Systems
with the standard.
E177Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the ASTM Test Methods
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
2.2 ASTM Adjuncts:
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
Compressometers (two drawings) and Extensometers (two
3
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
drawings)
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.4 This international standard was developed in accor-
3. Significance and Use
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
3.1 This test method provides a stress to strain ratio value
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
and a ratio of lateral to longitudinal strain for hardened
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
concrete at whatever age and curing conditions may be
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
designated.
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
3.2 The modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio values,
2. Referenced Documents applicable within the customary working stress range (0 to
40% of ultimate concrete strength), are used in sizing of
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
reinforced and nonreinforced structural members, establishing
C31/C31MPractice for Making and Curing Concrete Test
the quantity of reinforcement, and computing stress for ob-
Specimens in the Field
served strains.
C39/C39MTest Method for Compressive Strength of Cylin-
3.3 The modulus of elasticity values obtained will usually
drical Concrete Specimens
C42/C42MTest Method for Obtaining and Testing Drilled be less than moduli derived under rapid load application
(dynamic or seismic rates, for example), and will usually be
Cores and Sawed Beams of Concrete
greater than values under slow load application or extended
load duration, given other test conditions being the same.
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee C09 on
Concrete and ConcreteAggregatesand is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee
4. Apparatus
C09.61 on Testing for Strength.
Current edition approved April 1, 2022. Published June 2022. Originally
4.1 Testing Machine—Use a testing machine capable of
ɛ1
approved in 1961. Last previous edition approved in 2014 as C469–14 . DOI:
imposing a load at the rate and of the magnitude prescribed in
10.1520/C0469_C0469M-22.
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
3
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on Available from ASTM International Headquarters. Order Adjunct No.
the ASTM website. ADJC0469-E-PDF. Adjunct converted to digital format in 2021.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
C469/C469M − 22
6.4. The mac
...

This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
´1
Designation: C469/C469M − 14 C469/C469M − 22
Standard Test Method for
Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete
1
in Compression
This standard is issued under the fixed designation C469/C469M; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year
of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.
A superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1
ε NOTE—Footnote 3 was editorially updated in February 2021.
1. Scope*
1.1 This test method covers determination of (1) chord modulus of elasticity (Young’s) and (2) Poisson’s ratio of molded concrete
cylinders and diamond-drilled concrete cores when under longitudinal compressive stress. Chord modulus of elasticity and
Poisson’s ratio are defined in Terminology E6.
1.2 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each
system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the
two systems may result in non-conformance with the standard.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of
regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
C31/C31M Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Field
C39/C39M Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens
C42/C42M Test Method for Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of Concrete
C174/C174M Test Method for Measuring Thickness of Concrete Elements Using Drilled Concrete Cores
C192/C192M Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Laboratory
C617 Practice for Capping Cylindrical Concrete Specimens
C670 Practice for Preparing Precision and Bias Statements for Test Methods for Construction Materials
E4 Practices for Force Calibration and Verification of Testing Machines
E6 Terminology Relating to Methods of Mechanical Testing
E83 Practice for Verification and Classification of Extensometer Systems
E177 Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in ASTM Test Methods
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee C09 on Concrete and Concrete Aggregates and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee C09.61 on
Testing for Strength.
Current edition approved March 1, 2014April 1, 2022. Published April 2014June 2022. Originally approved in 1961. Last previous edition approved in 20102014 as
ɛ1
C469–10.–14 . DOI: 10.1520/C0469_C0469M-14E01.10.1520/C0469_C0469M-22.
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
C469/C469M − 22
2.2 ASTM Adjuncts:
3
Compressometers (two drawings) and Extensometers (two drawings)
3. Significance and Use
3.1 This test method provides a stress to strain ratio value and a ratio of lateral to longitudinal strain for hardened concrete at
whatever age and curing conditions may be designated.
3.2 The modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio values, applicable within the customary working stress range (0 to 40 % of
ultimate concrete strength), are used in sizing of reinforced and nonreinforced structural members, establishing the quantity of
reinforcement, and computing stress for observed strains.
3.3 The modulus of elasticity values obtained will usually be less than moduli derived under rapid load application (dynamic or
seismic rates, for example), and will usually be greater than values under slow load application or extended load duration, given
other test conditions being the same.
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.