ASTM E1669-95a(2012)
(Classification)Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Location, Access and Wayfinding
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Location, Access and Wayfinding
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.
This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.
This classification can be used to estimate the following:
Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.
Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.
Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.
Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification contains pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for locating the building and finding the way inside the building.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-6, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-6) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E2334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to and compatible with Practice E2334. Each requires the other.
FIG. 1 Scale A.14.1 for Public Transportation (Urban Sites)
FIG. 2 Scale A.14.2 for Staff Visits to Other Offices
FIG. 3 Scale A.14.3 for Vehicular Entry and Parking
FIG. 3Scale A.14.3 for Vehicular Entry and Parking (continued)
FIG. 4 Scale A.14.4 for Wayfinding to Building and Lobby
FIG. 4Scale A.14.4 for Wayfinding to Building and Lobby (continued)
F...
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation:E1669 −95a (Reapproved 2012) An American National Standard
Standard Classification for
Serviceability of an Office Facility for Location, Access and
1,2
Wayfinding
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E1669; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope E2334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to
and compatible with Practice E2334. Each requires the other.
1.1 This classification contains pairs of scales for classify-
ing an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is,
2. Referenced Documents
the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible
2.1 ASTM Standards:
requirements for locating the building and finding the way
E631 Terminology of Building Constructions
inside the building.
E2334 Practice for Setting an Upper Confidence Bound For
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales,
aFractionorNumberofNon-Conformingitems,oraRate
shown in Figs. 1-6, are for classifying one topic of serviceabil-
of Occurrence for Non-conformities, Using Attribute
ity. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see
Data, When There is a Zero Response in the Sample
Figs. 1-6) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic,
E1679 Practice for Setting the Requirements for the Service-
which occupants might require. The matching entry in the
ability of a Building or Building-Related Facility, and for
Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) is a translation of the
Determining What Serviceability is Provided or Proposed
requirement into a description of certain features of a facility 4
2.2 ISO Document:
which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely
ISO 6240 International Standard, Performance Standards in
to meet that level of required serviceability.
Building—Contents and Presentation
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6)
3. Terminology
are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick
scanningtoestimateapproximately,quickly,andeconomically,
3.1 Definitions:
how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or
3.1.1 facility—a physical setting used to serve a specific
another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not
purpose. E631
for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is
3.1.1.1 Discussion—A facility may be within a building, a
performing.
whole building, or a building with its site and surrounding
environment; or it may be a construction that is not a building.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of
The term encompasses both the physical object and its use.
serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to
estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned
3.1.2 facility serviceability—the capability of a facility to
but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings perform the function(s) for which it is designed, used, or
and outline specifications have been prepared.
required to be used. E631
3.1.2.1 Discussion—The scope of this performance is of the
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility
facility as a system, including its subsystems, components and
to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state
materials and their interactions, such as acoustical,
how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a
hydrothermal, air purity, and economic; and of the relative
serviceability score. That information is found in Practice
importance of each performance requirement.
3.1.3 offıce—a place, such as a room, suite, or building, in
which business, clerical or professional activities are
This classification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E06 on
conducted. E631
Performance of Buildings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E06.25
on Whole Buildings and Facilities.
Current edition approved April 1, 2012. Published May 2012. Originally
approved in 1995. Last previous edition approved in 2005 as E1669 – 95a (2005). For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
DOI: 10.1520/E1669-95AR12. contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Portions of this document are based on material originally prepared by the Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
International Centre for Facilities (ICF) and © 1993 by ICF and Minister of Public the ASTM website.
Works and Government Services Canada. Their cooperation in the development of Available from American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St.,
this standard is acknowledged. 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, http://www.ansi.org.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E1669−95a (2012)
FIG. 1 Scale A.14.1 for Public Transportation (Urban Sites)
E1669−95a (2012)
FIG. 2 Scale A.14.2 for Staff Visits to Other
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.