CEN/TS 15213-5:2006
(Main)Road transport and traffic telematics - After-theft systems for the recovery of stolen vehicles - Part 5: Messaging interface
Road transport and traffic telematics - After-theft systems for the recovery of stolen vehicles - Part 5: Messaging interface
This Technical Specification specifies guidelines for co-operation and the procedures to be followed between the LEA and ATSVR System Operating Centers (SOC) in response to alarm signals by ATSVR systems. For purposes of optimum mutual communication, this Technical Specification also includes suggestions and a format for the electronic exchange of information.
ATSVR are electronic systems that enable a communication centre or other authorised facility, such as the LEA, to monitor the location and theft status of a vehicle. Other information may also be available including the speed and direction of the vehicle. These systems may be automatically activated by a signal from an
anti-theft security device or upon receipt of a signal from an authorised SOC following confirmation of theft.
Systems may be short range or long range and may use different technology to achieve results. Systems may identify the vehicle from on-board data or via reference to data held externally to the vehicle. Nevertheless, the standards of data and speed of communication should be compliant with requirements in this set of standards. System reliability and good, consistent procedures are extremely important.
System operators and users must remain aware that the level and timing of any response ultimately remains the responsibility of the LEA where the vehicle is currently located by an ATSVR system. It is implicit that there should be a uniform way of dealing internationally with these systems when a stolen vehicle is in a country other than where the originating SOC is located.
Straßentransport- und Verkehrstelematik (RTTT) - Systeme für das Wiederfinden gestohlener Fahrzeuge - Teil 5: Schnittstelle für die Mitteilungsübermittlung
Diese Technische Spezifikation legt Leitlinien für die Zusammenarbeit zwischen der Strafverfolgungsbehörde
(LEA) und den ATSVR-Systembetriebszentren (SOC) fest sowie die Vorgehensweisen, die beide nach
Alarmsignalen von ATSVR-Systemen zu befolgen haben. Für eine optimale Kommunikation enthält diese
Technische Spezifikation außerdem Vorschläge und ein Format für den elektronischen
Informationsaustausch.
ATSVR sind elektronische Systeme, die es einem Kommunikationszentrum oder einer autorisierten
Einrichtung, zum Beispiel einer LEA, ermöglichen, den Aufenthaltsort und den Diebstahlstatus eines
Fahrzeugs zu beobachten. Es können auch weitere Informationen verfügbar sein, darunter Geschwindigkeit
und Richtung des Fahrzeugs. Diese Systeme können durch ein Signal von einem Diebstahlschutzgerät oder
nach Empfang eines Signals von einem autorisierten SOC nach Bestätigung des Diebstahls automatisch
aktiviert werden.
Bei den Systemen kann es sich um Nahbereichs- oder Weitbereichssysteme handeln, die unterschiedliche
Techniken einsetzen können. Sie können das Fahrzeug anhand von fahrzeugseitig vorliegenden Daten oder
durch Bezugnahme auf Daten, die außerhalb des Fahrzeugs vorgehalten werden, identifizieren. Dennoch
sollten die Daten und die Kommunikationsgeschwindigkeit den Anforderungen der vorliegenden
Dokumentenreihe entsprechen. Die Zuverlässigkeit der Systeme sowie gute, beständige Vorgehensweisen
sind außerordentlich wichtig.
Systembetreibern und -nutzern muss bewusst sein, dass das Ausmaß und die zeitliche Festlegung jeder
Reaktion letztendlich in der Verantwortung der LEA liegen, in deren Zuständigkeitsbereich das Fahrzeug sich
nach den Angaben eines ATSVR-Systems aktuell befindet. Es versteht sich, dass bei diesen Systemen auf
internationaler Ebene eine einheitliche Vorgehensweise angewendet werden sollte, wenn sich ein
gestohlenes Fahrzeug in einem anderen Land als dem aufhält, in dem sich das anrufende SOC befindet.
Télématique des transports - Systèmes intervenant après un vol pour la récupération des véhicules volés - Partie 5 : Interface de messagerie
Cestna transportna in prometna telematika - Sistemi za odkrivanje ukradenih vozil - 5. del: Vmesnik za sporočanje
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-december-2006
&HVWQDWUDQVSRUWQDLQSURPHWQDWHOHPDWLND6LVWHPL]DRGNULYDQMHXNUDGHQLK
YR]LOGHO 9PHVQLN]DVSRURþDQMH
Road transport and traffic telematics - After-theft systems for the recovery of stolen
vehicles - Part 5: Messaging interface
Straßentransport - und Verkehrstelematik - Systeme zum Wiederfinden gestohlener
Fahrzeuge - Teil 5: Schnittstelle für Nachrichten
Télématique des transports - Systemes intervenant apres un vol pour la récupération des
véhicules volés - Partie 5 : Interface de messagerie
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: CEN/TS 15213-5:2006
ICS:
13.310 Varstvo pred kriminalom Protection against crime
35.200 Vmesniška in povezovalna Interface and interconnection
oprema equipment
43.040.15 $YWRPRELOVNDLQIRUPDWLND Car informatics. On board
9JUDMHQLUDþXQDOQLãNLVLVWHPL computer systems
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION
CEN/TS 15213-5
SPÉCIFICATION TECHNIQUE
TECHNISCHE SPEZIFIKATION
November 2006
ICS 35.240.60
English Version
Road transport and traffic telematics - After-theft systems for the
recovery of stolen vehicles - Part 5: Messaging interface
Télématique des transports - Systèmes intervenant après
un vol pour la récupération des véhicules volés - Partie 5 :
Interface de messagerie
This Technical Specification (CEN/TS) was approved by CEN on 5 September 2006 for provisional application.
The period of validity of this CEN/TS is limited initially to three years. After two years the members of CEN will be requested to submit their
comments, particularly on the question whether the CEN/TS can be converted into a European Standard.
CEN members are required to announce the existence of this CEN/TS in the same way as for an EN and to make the CEN/TS available
promptly at national level in an appropriate form. It is permissible to keep conflicting national standards in force (in parallel to the CEN/TS)
until the final decision about the possible conversion of the CEN/TS into an EN is reached.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France,
Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania,
Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION
EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
Management Centre: rue de Stassart, 36 B-1050 Brussels
© 2006 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. CEN/TS 15213-5:2006: E
worldwide for CEN national Members.
Contents Page
Foreword.3
Introduction .4
1 Scope .5
2 Normative references .5
3 Terms and definitions .5
4 Symbols and abbreviations .5
5 Message requirements.6
5.1 National and local level messaging for ATSVR technology.6
5.2 International level messaging for ATSVR technology.7
6 SOC Approval by LEA. .7
6.1 Non-confirmed theft and calls from non-certified SOC's .7
6.2 The minimum standard for an approved SOC .7
7 Procedures .10
7.1 Procedure for the System Operating Centre (ATSVR SOC).10
7.2 Co-operation procedure to the Law Enforcement Agency (LEA SOC’s) .11
8 Remote Engine Degradation Function .12
9 General requirements on data Protection.13
Annex A (informative) Form for vehicle registration for use by ATSVR SOCs.14
Annex B (informative) Message specification .16
Annex C (informative) Suggestion for a model to be used in Internet communication.19
Bibliography .24
Foreword
This document (CEN/TS 15213-5:2006) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 278 “Road
Transport and Traffic Telematics”, the secretariat of which is held by NEN.
According to the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the following
countries are bound to announce this Technical Specification: Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Czech Republic,
Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden,
Switzerland and United Kingdom.
Introduction
This Technical Specification was developed by CEN/TC 278 "Road transport and traffic telematics" Working
Group 14 (WG 14) on the subject of After Theft Systems for Vehicle Recovery (ATSVR).
WG 14 is comprised representatives and experts from police, insurance associations (CEA), car
manufacturers, transport associations, vehicle rental associations and ATSVR system and product providers
working in cooperation with Europol and the European Police Cooperation Working Group (EPCWG).
This Technical Specification was developed to define an architecture within the CEN/TC 278 guidelines
through which a level of interoperability can be achieved between Systems Operating Centres (SOC) and Law
Enforcement Agencies (LEA), both nationally and internationally.
This document will provide minimum standards of information and assurance to users regarding the
functionality of systems, so as to enable the recovery of vehicles, detect offenders and reduce crime.
This Technical Specification should be read in conjunction with CEN/TS 15213-1 Road transport and traffic
telematics – After-theft systems for the recovery of stolen vehicles - Reference architecture and terminology
which provides the preliminary framework for ATSVR concepts.
1 Scope
This Technical Specification specifies guidelines for co-operation and the procedures to be followed between
the LEA and ATSVR System Operating Centers (SOC) in response to alarm signals by ATSVR systems. For
purposes of optimum mutual communication, this Technical Specification also includes suggestions and a
format for the electronic exchange of information.
ATSVR are electronic systems that enable a communication centre or other authorised facility, such as the
LEA, to monitor the location and theft status of a vehicle. Other information may also be available including
the speed and direction of the vehicle. These systems may be automatically activated by a signal from an
anti-theft security device or upon receipt of a signal from an authorised SOC following confirmation of theft.
Systems may be short range or long range and may use different technology to achieve results. Systems
may identify the vehicle from on-board data or via reference to data held externally to the vehicle.
Nevertheless, the standards of data and speed of communication should be compliant with requirements in
this set of standards. System reliability and good, consistent procedures are extremely important.
System operators and users must remain aware that the level and timing of any response ultimately remains
the responsibility of the LEA where the vehicle is currently located by an ATSVR system. It is implicit that
there should be a uniform way of dealing internationally with these systems when a stolen vehicle is in a
country other than where the originating SOC is located.
2 Normative references
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated
references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced
document (including any amendments) applies.
CEN/TS 15213-1:2005, Road transport and traffic telematics - After-theft systems for the recovery of stolen
vehicles - Part 1: Reference architecture and terminology
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this Technical Specification, the terms and definitions given in CEN/TS 15213-1:2005
apply.
4 Symbols and abbreviations
4.1
ATSVR
After Theft Systems for Vehicle Recovery
4.2
DE
Detection Equipment
4.3
LEA
Law Enforcement Agency (see CEN/TS 15213-1)
4.4
LR
Long Range
4.5
OBE
On Board Equipment
4.6
SOC
System Operating Centre
4.7
SR
Short Range
5 Message requirements.
5.1 National and local level messaging for ATSVR technology
The potential for widespread adoption of ATSVR and the possibility of false or malicious calls requires an
agreed process at local and national level. Figure 1 illustrates messaging at the national level.
Figure 1 — National level: five-step process
The five steps are as follows:
a) SOC notifies the Vehicle Owner or Authorised User of unauthorised use of the Target Vehicle/OR, the
owner notifies SOC of the theft starting the process where the system is activated by the SOC.
b) Vehicle Owner or Authorised User confirms that the Target Vehicle has been stolen.
c) SOC and/or owner/authorised user reports the vehicle as a Confirmed Stolen Vehicle to LEA. When a car
jacking is confirmed by other, possibly technical means, the SOC is not obliged to confirm the emergency
call to the owner/authorised user who is with the vehicle.
d) SOC gives the location, speed, direction, and other data to LEA and provides continuous commentary or
regular updates at defined intervals of time or distance. This data is system dependent.
e) LEA decides on the level of response and advises SOC.
5.2 International level messaging for ATSVR technology
The exchange of information between police forces across borders is a matter for those police forces, Interpol,
Europol and Schengen to address and not for CEN.
These LEA organisations are responsible for the exchange of crime intelligence and operations against
organised crime. Looking to the future when many vehicles will be fitted with After Theft devices, some of
which will also offer audit trials for debt collection or failure to return hire vehicles. These applications are not
an area that will concern these international police organisations. Indeed, the tracking of a stolen car will be
low on the list of their priorities when speed may be essential as the vehicle travels towards seaports or non-
EU countries.
This scenario is based on the fact that a bureau in one country can easily monitor the theft and location of
vehicles in several other countries. The police in the country where the vehicle is stolen may not agree to
detain a vehicle and driver based on information from a non-police source outside their country.
The preferred model is that if a company offers an ATSVR product that is capable of operating in other
countries and some SOC facility is required to contact the police, then the responsibility for transmitting the
information across borders remains with the SOC. It is not for the police to assist them with international
communication to carry out their commercial obligations.
It should be the responsibility of the SOC to have links with an authorised SOC in each country where the
system will operate. The location/tracking information will be passed to the SOC in the country where the
vehicle was stolen and they will contact the local police and give details of location. This way the operators
speak the local language, will know much of the local geography and will be known to the police who may
then have more faith in the information being correct.
At the time of first publication of this Technical Specification the information exchange will be by telephone,
but future systems will make it possible to exchange data information electronically.
6 SOC Approval by LEA.
6.1 Non-confirmed theft and calls from non-certified SOC's
LEA’s do not normally accept location/tracking data for non-confirmed thefts or from a non-approved SOC.
There will be occasions where such information is accompanied by other important information that leads an
LEA to believe that, in spite of the lack of conformity with these rules, there is a special case to accept that
police response is desirable. Such occasions will be the rare exception than the rule and there must be no
assumption by the ATSVR provider, the SOC or the owner of vehicles that such response will be given. The
only reasonable
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.