SIST EN ISO 7539-1:2014

Corrosion of metals and alloys - Stress corrosion testing - Part 1: General guidance on testing procedures (ISO 7539-1:2012)

ISO 7539-1:2012 describes the general considerations that apply when designing and conducting tests to assess susceptibility of metals to stress corrosion.
ISO 7539-1:2012 also gives some general guidance on the selection of test methods.

Korrosion der Metalle und Legierungen - Prüfung der Spannungsrisskorrosion - Teil 1: Allgemeiner Leitfaden für Prüfverfahren (ISO 7539-1:2012)

1.1   Dieser Teil von ISO 7539 beschreibt die allgemeinen Betrachtungen, die für die Planung und Durchführung von Prüfungen zur Beurteilung der Anfälligkeit von Metallen gegenüber Spannungsrisskorrosion gelten.
1.2   Dieser Teil von ISO 7539 gibt zusätzlich einen allgemeinen Leitfaden für die Auswahl von Prüfverfahren.
ANMERKUNG 1   Die einzelnen Prüfverfahren sind im Detail nicht in diesem Teil von ISO 7539 behandelt. Diese sind Gegenstand der weiteren Teile von ISO 7539.
ANMERKUNG 2   Dieser Teil von ISO 7539 ist unter den Bedingungen des kathodischen Schutzes anwendbar.

Corrosion des métaux et alliages - Essais de corrosion sous contrainte - Partie 1: Lignes directrices générales relatives aux méthodes d'essai (ISO 7539-1:2012)

L'ISO 7539-1:2012 décrit les considérations générales qui s'appliquent à la mise au point et à la réalisation des essais servant à évaluer la sensibilité des métaux à la corrosion sous contrainte.
L'ISO 7539-1:2012 donne également des directives générales sur la sélection des méthodes d'essais.

Korozija kovin in zlitin - Ugotavljanje pokanja zaradi napetostne korozije - 1. del: Splošna navodila za postopke preskušanja (ISO 7539-1:2012)

Ta del standarda ISO 7539 opisuje splošne pogoje, ki veljajo pri projektiranju in izvajanju preskusov za ocenjevanje dovzetnosti kovin za korozijo. Ta del standarda ISO 7539 podaja tudi splošna navodila za izbiro metod preskušanja.

General Information

• Status: Published
• Publication Date: 01-Jun-2014
• ICS: 77.060 - Corrosion of metals
• Technical Committee: IPKZ - Protection of metals against corrosion
• Current Stage: 6060 - National Implementation/Publication (Adopted Project)
• Start Date: 14-May-2014
• Due Date: 19-Jul-2014
• Completion Date: 02-Jun-2014
• Ref Project: EN ISO 7539-1:2012 - Corrosion of metals and alloys - Stress corrosion testing - Part 1: General guidance on testing procedures (ISO 7539-1:2012)

Relations

• Replaces: SIST EN ISO 7539-1:1999 - Corrosion of metals and alloys - Stress corrosion testing - Part 1: General guidance on testing procedures (ISO 7539-1:1987)
• Effective Date: 01-Jul-2014

Overview

EN ISO 7539-1:2012 (ISO 7539-1:2012) provides general guidance on stress corrosion testing for metals and alloys. Published by CEN/ISO, this Part 1 describes the general considerations to be applied when designing and conducting tests that assess susceptibility to stress corrosion cracking (SCC). It also gives guidance on selecting appropriate test methods and is applicable under a range of laboratory and service-like environments, including cathodic protection conditions.

Key topics and requirements

The standard defines terms and outlines the main factors affecting stress corrosion testing without prescribing single test procedures (these are covered in other parts of the ISO 7539 series). Key technical topics include:

• Selection of test method: guidance to choose between methods based on objectives, material and service conditions.
• Stressing systems: overview of common approaches such as constant total strain, constant load, and slow strain rate testing.
• Environmental aspects: control and reporting of temperature, water chemistry, flow rate, and electrochemical conditions for reproducible SCC tests.
• Time-dependent issues: considerations for crack initiation, pitting, intergranular corrosion and hydrogen uptake during long exposures.
• Specimen design and manufacture: recommendations on specimen geometry, surface condition, area effects, pre-cracked specimens and weldment testing.
• Test hardware and cells: guidance on designing corrosion test cells and initiating tests.
• Assessment and reporting: criteria for determining crack initiation time, time-to-failure, average crack velocity and consistent result interpretation.

Practical applications

EN ISO 7539-1:2012 is used to:

• Develop repeatable laboratory test programs to evaluate SCC susceptibility of metals, alloys and coatings.
• Support material selection and qualification for corrosive service environments (petrochemical, power generation, marine).
• Guide failure analysis and root-cause investigations where stress-assisted corrosion is suspected.
• Standardize testing and reporting across R&D, quality assurance and certification labs to compare materials and treatments.
• Inform corrosion control strategies including cathodic protection assessments.

Who should use this standard

• Corrosion engineers and materials scientists
• Mechanical and metallurgical testing laboratories
• Manufacturers of pressure equipment, pipelines, fasteners and structural components
• Asset owners, inspectors and regulatory bodies concerned with component integrity

Related standards

Part 1 complements the other parts of ISO 7539, which provide detailed methods for specific specimen types and techniques (bent-beam, U‑bend, uniaxial tension, C‑ring, pre‑cracked specimens, slow strain rate testing, weldment evaluation, hydrogen embrittlement guidance). Refer to the full ISO 7539 series for procedural details.

Standards Content (Sample)

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-julij-2014
1DGRPHãþD
SIST EN ISO 7539-1:1999
Korozija kovin in zlitin - Ugotavljanje pokanja zaradi napetostne korozije - 1. del:
Splošna navodila za postopke preskušanja (ISO 7539-1:2012)
Corrosion of metals and alloys - Stress corrosion testing - Part 1: General guidance on
testing procedures (ISO 7539-1:2012)
Korrosion der Metalle und Legierungen - Prüfung der Spannungsrisskorrosion - Teil 1:
Allgemeiner Leitfaden für Prüfverfahren (ISO 7539-1:2012)
Corrosion des métaux et alliages - Essais de corrosion sous contrainte - Partie 1: Lignes
directrices générales relatives aux méthodes d'essai (ISO 7539-1:2012)
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: EN ISO 7539-1:2012
ICS:
77.060 Korozija kovin Corrosion of metals
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

EUROPEAN STANDARD
EN ISO 7539-1
NORME EUROPÉENNE
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
December 2012
ICS 77.060 Supersedes EN ISO 7539-1:1995
English Version
Corrosion of metals and alloys - Stress corrosion testing - Part
1: General guidance on testing procedures (ISO 7539-1:2012)
Corrosion des métaux et alliages - Essais de corrosion Korrosion der Metalle und Legierungen - Prüfung der
sous contrainte - Partie 1: Lignes directrices générales Spannungsrisskorrosion - Teil 1: Allgemeiner Leitfaden für
relatives aux méthodes d'essai (ISO 7539-1:2012) Prüfverfahren (ISO/FDIS 7539-1:2012)
This European Standard was approved by CEN on 18 December 2012.

CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this European
Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national
standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN member.

This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by translation
under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre has the same
status as the official versions.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and United
Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION

EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG

Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels
© 2012 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. EN ISO 7539-1:2012: E
worldwide for CEN national Members.

Contents Page
Foreword .3
Foreword
This document (EN ISO 7539-1:2012) has been prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 156 "Corrosion of
metals and alloys" in collaboration with Technical Committee CEN/TC 262 “Metallic and other inorganic
coatings” the secretariat of which is held by BSI.
This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an identical
text or by endorsement, at the latest by June 2013, and conflicting national standards shall be withdrawn at
the latest by June 2013.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent
rights. CEN [and/or CENELEC] shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
This document supersedes EN ISO 7539-1:1995.
According to the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organisations of the following
countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech
Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece,
Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal,
Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom.
Endorsement notice
The text of ISO 7539-1:2012 has been approved by CEN as a EN ISO 7539-1:2012 without any modification.

INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 7539-1
Second edition
2012-12-15
Corrosion of metals and alloys —
Stress corrosion testing —
Part 1:
General guidance on testing procedures
Corrosion des métaux et alliages — Essais de corrosion sous
contrainte —
Partie 1: Lignes directrices générales relatives aux méthodes d’essai
Reference number
ISO 7539-1:2012(E)
©
ISO 2012
ISO 7539-1:2012(E)
© ISO 2012
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from either ISO at the
address below or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
Case postale 56 • CH-1211 Geneva 20
Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11
Fax + 41 22 749 09 47
E-mail [e-mail]
Web www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO 2012 – All rights reserved

ISO 7539-1:2012(E)
Contents Page
Foreword .iv
1 Scope . 1
2 Terms and definitions . 1
3 Background . 2
4 Selection of test method . 3
5 Stressing systems . 4
5.1 General . 4
5.2 Constant total strain tests . 4
5.3 Constant load tests . 5
5.4 Slow strain rate tests . 6
6 Environmental aspects . 7
6.1 General . 7
6.2 Temperature . 7
6.3 Water chemistry . 7
6.4 Flow rate . 9
6.5 Electrochemical aspects . 9
7 Time dependent issues .10
7.1 General .10
7.2 Pitting and intergranular corrosion .10
7.3 Hydrogen uptake .10
8 Specimen design and manufacture .11
8.1 General .11
8.2 Surface condition .11
8.3 Area effects .13
8.4 Pre-cracked test pieces .13
8.5 Welds .14
9 Stress corrosion test cells .14
10 Initiation of stress corrosion tests .15
11 Assessment and treatment of results .15
Annex A (informative) Guide to selection of mechanical test method .18
Bibliography .20
ISO 7539-1:2012(E)
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International
Standards adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting.
Publication as an International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies
casting a vote.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
ISO 7539-1 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 156, Corrosion of metals and alloys.
This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (ISO 7539-1:1987), which has been
technically revised.
ISO 7539 consists of the following parts, under the general title Corrosion of metals and alloys — Stress
corrosion testing:
— Part 1: General guidance on testing procedures
— Part 2: Preparation and use of bent-beam specimens
— Part 3: Preparation and use of U-bend specimens
— Part 4: Preparation and use of uniaxially loaded tension specimens
— Part 5: Preparation and use of C-ring specimens
— Part 6: Preparation and use of pre-cracked specimens for tests under constant load or constant displacement
— Part 7: Method for slow strain rate testing
— Part 8: Preparation and use of specimens to evaluate weldments
— Part 9: Preparation and use of pre-cracked specimens for tests under rising load or rising displacement
— Part 10: Reverse U-bend method
— Part 11: Guidelines for testing the resistance of metals and alloys to hydrogen embrittlement and
hydrogen-assisted cracking
iv © ISO 2012 – All rights reserved

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 7539-1:2012(E)
Corrosion of metals and alloys — Stress corrosion testing —
Part 1:
General guidance on testing procedures
1 Scope
1.1 This part of ISO 7539 describes the general considerations that apply when designing and
conducting tests to assess susceptibility of metals to stress corrosion.
1.2 This part of ISO 7539 also gives some general guidance on the selection of test methods.
NOTE 1 Particular methods of test are not treated in detail in this part of ISO 7539. These are described in the
additional parts of ISO 7539.
NOTE 2 This part of ISO 7539 is applicable to cathodic protection conditions.
2 Terms and definitions
2.1
stress corrosion
process involving conjoint corrosion and straining of the metal due to applied or residual stress
2.2
threshold stress
〈stress corrosion〉 stress above which stress corrosion cracks initiate and grow, for the specified
test conditions
2.3
threshold stress intensity factor
K
ISCC
〈stress corrosion cracking〉 stress intensity factor above which stress corrosion crack propagation is
sustained
Note 1 to entry: The threshold stress intensity factor is a concept of linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) and
is applicable when the plastic zone size is large compared with the microstructure and a high constraint to plastic
deformation prevails; i.e. under plain strain-predominant conditions. For growing stress corrosion cracks, LEFM
is not necessarily applicable in detail but is adopted as a pragmatic tool that is commonly used.
Note 2 to entry: Stress corrosion cracks may initiate at a surface or a surface defect and grow in the “short crack”
regime at stress levels below the apparent threshold stress intensity factor. However, LEFM is not applicable in
the short crack regime and sustained propagation of these cracks requires that the threshold stress intensity
factor be exceeded.
2.4
test environment
either a service environment, or an environment produced in the laboratory, to which the test specimen
is exposed and which is maintained constant or varied in an agreed manner
Note 1 to entry: In the case of stress corrosion, the environment is often quite specific (see Clause 6).
ISO 7539-1:2012(E)
2.5
start of test
time when the stress is applied or when the specimen is exposed to the test environment, whichever
occurs later
2.6
crack initiation time
period from the start of a test to the time when a crack is detectable by the means employed
2.7
time to failure
period elapsing between the start of a test and the occurrence of failure, the criterion of failure being the
first appearance of cracking or the total separation of the test piece, or some agreed intermediate condition
2.8
slow strain rate test
test for evaluating the susceptibility of a metal to stress corrosion cracking that most commonly involves
pulling a tensile specimen to failure in a representative environment at a constant displacement rate, the
−5 −1 −8 −1
displacement rate being chosen to generate nominal strain rates usually in the range 10 s to 10 s
Note 1 to entry: Slow strain rate testing may also be applied to specimens in bend.
2.9
strain to failure
strain at which failure occurs in a slow strain rate test expressed usually as the plastic strain to failure
See ISO 7539-7.
2.10
average crack velocity
maximum depth of crack(s) due to stress corrosion, divided by the test time
2.11
orientation
direction of applied tensile stress of a test specimen with respect to some specified direction in the
product from which it was prepared, e.g. the rolling direction in the plate
3 Background
3.1 Although it is generally agreed that cracking is the usual result of stress corrosion, other
manifestations such as intergranular corrosion or elongated fissures, which are enhanced by the presence
of stress, have also to be recognized.
As far as this part of ISO 7539 is concerned, all phenomena involving metal dissolution or the action of
hydrogen introduced into the metal as the result of simultaneous effects of a corrosive environment and
a tensile stress are included, except for embrittlement by liquid metal and exfoliation corrosion.
3.2 There exists a wide diversity of methods used for assessing the stress corrosion properties of
metals. Each has its own particular advantage in certain situations.
3.3 Stress corrosion cracking depends on both the exposure conditions and the mechanical and
microstructural characteristics of the material and susceptibility or resistance to stress corrosion can only be
defined in that context. Thus, for example, there is no intrinsic threshold stress intensity factor for a material.
3.4 Ideally, in order to establish the risk of stress corrosion in a given application, it is necessary to
carry out simulation testing under all likely service exposure conditions. In practice, this is difficult, if
not impossible, and rarely achieved, but a number of “standard tests” have been found as a result of
experience to provide reasonable guidance on likely service behaviour for given specific applications.
However, these laboratory “standard tests” are only appropriate to service conditions where experience
2 © ISO 2012 – All rights reserved

ISO 7539-1:2012(E)
has shown an appropriate relationship, however empirical, to exist. The fact that a given alloy passes or
does not pass a test previously found useful in relation to another alloy may or may not be significant and
a test that discriminates correctly between alloys used for a given application will not necessarily provide
safe guidance if the exposure conditions are different. The use of a standard test beyond the point for
which there is experience therefore requires validation.
3.5 In the following clauses, attention is drawn particularly to the fact that the stress corrosion process
can be extremely sensitive to small changes in exposure or test conditions. The user of materials is
responsible for selecting the conditions under which stress corrosion tests are performed and the fact that
some tests are described in this part of ISO 7539 does not imply that these tests are the most appropriate
ones for any given situation. The justification for describing these tests in a standard is that they are in
widespread use and have been proven as valid for specific or common equipment-environment systems.
However, the responsibility for interpretation of the test results remains with the user of materials and it
is in no way diminished by the existence of this standard.
3.6 In addition to specific parts of ISO 7539 to cover the most widely used methods, it is considered
that this more general document, concerned with the selection of test details and the interpretation of
results, is required.
4 Selection of test method
4.1 Before embarking on a programme of stress corrosion testing, a decision has to be made regarding
which type of test is appropriate. Such a decision depends largely upon the purpose of the test and the
information required. While some tests attempt to reproduce service conditions as closely as possible
and are of value to the plant engineer, others may be designed to study a mechanistic aspect of failure. In
the former, for example, restrictions of material, space, time, etc., may mean the use of a relatively simple
test procedure whereas in other circumstances more sophisticated testing techniques may be essential.
Thus, studies of crack propagation rates may involve the use of pre-cracked specimens, although these
may be inappropriate when considering, for example, the effects of surface finish. Although a number of
sophisticated techniques are available, the adoption of a simple test may prove of great value in some
circumstances when more elaborate techniques cannot be used.
4.2 When selecting a test method of the pass/fail type, it is important to realize that this should not
be so severe that it leads to the condemnation of a material that would prove adequate for a particular
service condition, nor should it be so trifling as to encourage the use of a material in circumstances where
rapid failure would ensue.
4.3 The aim of stress corrosion testing is usually to provide information more quickly than can be
obtained from service experience, but at the same time predictive of service behaviour. Among the most
common approaches employed to achieve this are the use of higher stress, slow continuous straining,
pre-cracked specimens, higher concentration of species in test environment than in service environment,
increased temperature, and electrochemical stimulation. It is important however, that these methods be
controlled in such a way that the details of the failure mechanism are not changed.
4.4 If it is too difficult to reproduce the service conditions exactly, it may be useful to analyse the stress
corrosion process in order to determine as far as possible the main factors operating at different stages.
The stress corrosion test then selected may involve only one step of the corrosion mechanism.
4.5 A brief guide to the selection of test methods is included in Annex A.
ISO 7539-1:2012(E)
5 Stressing systems
5.1 General
Methods of loading test pieces, whether initially plain (i.e. nominally free from notches or pre-cracks),
notched or pre-cracked, can be conveniently grouped according to whether they involve
a) a constant total strain (see 5.2);
b) a constant load (see 5.3);
c) an applied slow strain rate (see 5.4).
In the case of pre-cracked specimens, threshold conditions are defined in terms of a stress intensity
value K and tests may also be conducted under constant stress intensity conditions. Knowledge of
ISCC
the limitations of the various methods is at least as important as the choice of method of stressing.
5.2 Constant total strain tests
5.2.1 These form by far the most popular type of test as a group, since bend tests in a variety of forms
come into this category. Furthermore, they simulate the fabrication stresses that are frequently associated
with service failures.
5.2.2 Material in sheet form is frequently tested by bending; plate material is tested under tension or as
C-rings, with the latter also used for testing tubular products and other semi-finished products of round
cross-section.
5.2.3 Bend tests have the attraction of employing simple, and therefore frequently cheap, specimens and
restraining jigs The tests may involve deforming the specimen plastically into a U-shape or adopting 2-point,
3-point, or 4-point bend configurations with a nominal applied stress at or below yield. For materials with
a discrete yield point, elastic theory can be used to calculate the stress when testing at applied stresses
up to that stress level. More commonly, and especially for corrosion resistant alloys, a discrete yield point
is not observed and it is necessary to attach strain gauges to the specimen and deflect the specimen to
achieve the desired level of total strain (usually up to a maximum of the 0,2 % plastic strain)
5.2.4 Tubular material may be tested in the form of C-rings or O-rings, the former being stressed by
partial opening or closing of the gap and the latter by forced insertion of a plug that is appropriately
oversized for the bore. The C-ring has also been found to be particularly useful for testing thick product
forms, e.g. aluminium alloys in the short transverse direction.
5.2.5 Constant total strain tensile tests are sometimes preferred to bend tests because the initial stress is
more readily characterized and through–thickness gradients of stress have to be considered in bend specimens.
5.2.6 The restraining frame used for either bend or tensile tests should be sufficiently stiff that constant
displacement is maintained throughout the test.
NOTE The stiffness of the stressing frame employed may also influence the time to failure of a specimen
because of stress relaxation, quite apart from any effect that it may have upon the initial stress level.
5.2.7 The use of restraining frames may be avoided by employing internally stressed specimens
containing residual stresses as the result of inhomogeneous deformation. The latter may be introduced
by plastic bending, e.g. by producing a bulge in sheet or plate material, or by welding. However, such
tests involve problems in systematic variation of the initial stress, which usually achieves maximum
values in the region of the yield stress. Moreover, elastic spring-back, in introducing residual stresses by
bulging plate or partially flattening tube, may cause problems. Where welding is involved the structural
modifications may raise difficulties, unless the test is simulative of a practical situation.
4 © ISO 2012 – All rights reserved

ISO 7539-1:2012(E)
5.2.8 Constant total strain specimens are sometimes loaded by being placed initially into conventional
testing machines or similar devices and then, while being maintained in the strained condition, having a
restraining frame attached. When the load applied by the testing machine is removed, the specimen remains
stressed by virtue of the restraint imposed by the frame, the assumption being made that the strain in the
specimen remains constant as the restraint is transferred from the testing machine to the frame. Strain
gauging can be used to confirm that there is no stress relaxation in the specimen. When testing at elevated
temperature, consideration should be given to the change of material properties with temperature.
5.2.9 Stress relaxation may occur because of creep of the material, specimen thinning, or because some
of the displacement is taken up by opening of the crack/s formed.
NOTE 1 Creep relaxation is most significant at elevated temperatures but can be important at ambient
temperature in some cases (e.g. duplex stainless steels). The extent of relaxation should be assessed before testing
and consideration of the value of constant total strain testing made, recognizing also that dynamic plastic strain
is an inherent feature during any transient creep process.
NOTE 2 Specimen thinning is best assessed at the end of the test and the increased effective stress evaluated,
accounting for any significant non-uniformity of thinning.
NOTE 3 The extent to which crack opening relaxes the stress will be dependent on the number of cracks
formed, which will be material-environment sensitive. In some cases, the relaxation can be such that the specimen
does not fail. Thus, post-test inspection for the existence of cracks is always required, the presence of which will
constitute a failure.
5.3 Constant load tests
5.3.1 These may simulate more closely stress corrosion failure from applied or working stresses. Also,
since the mechanical driving force increases as a crack propagates, such tests are more likely to lead to
early failure or total failure than are constant total strain tests (see 5.2).
5.3.2 The relatively massive machinery usually required for dead-weight loading tests upon specimens
of appreciable cross-section is sometimes circumvented by the use of a compression spring. The spring
characteristics are chosen to ensure that the relaxation that occurs during testing does not significantly
change the load. In the same category are modified proving rings used in the calibration of tensile testing
machines. The axial load applied to a tensile specimen contained within the ring can be determined from
measurement of the change in diameter of the calibrated ring.
5.3.3 An alternative approach for minimizing the size of the loading system is to reduce the cross-section
of the specimen, e.g. by the use of very fine wire. However, it is dangerous to reduce the cross-section too
far unless failure by stress corrosion is confirmed by, for example, metallography. This is because, in some
stress corrosion environments, failure may result from pitting or other forms of attack with an attendant
increase in the effective stress to the ultimate tensile strength of the metal. Other dangers are attendant
on the use of specimens of very small section (see 8.2.2).
5.3.4 The cost of testing specimens under constant load on individual testing machines can be
minimised by testing chains of specimens on a single machine. This practice also reduces the test
chamber requirements. Chains of uniaxial tensile specimens can be connected with simple loading links,
but this approach is better suited to situations where failures are not anticipated since the failure of a
single specimen would invalidate the remainder. Chains of more compliant pre-cracked specimens can
be connected with loading links, which are designed to progressively unload specimens as crack growth
occurs in order to avoid disturbance to the other specimens that would otherwise be inevitable in the
event of a failure. Users of such chain-linked specimens have to demonstrate that failure of an individual
specimen does not invalidate the testing requirements for the other specimens.
5.3.5 The use of a tension specimen having a tapered gauge length has the obvious attraction of providing
a range of initial stresses in a single specimen. However, caution should be exercised with their use in, for
example, determination of accurate threshold stress levels. The stress gradient is critical. Also such factors
ISO 7539-1:2012(E)
as number of cracks present and net section yielding may influence the result. It may be more appropriate
to use such specimens in “screening” tests to be followed by more limited conventional testing.
5.3.6 Constant load tests involve an increasing stress situation as cracks propagate; therefore, cracks
once initiated are less likely to stop propagating than in the case of constant total strain tests for which
stress relaxation may occur.
5.4 Slow strain rate tests
5.4.1 The application of slow dynamic straining is an important adjunct to conventional constant
total strain or constant load testing because dynamic plastic strain is a key factor in the process of crack
initiation and propagation. Indeed, localized dynamic straining will play an important role in the failure
process in constant total strain or constant load testing.
Nevertheless, while recognizing the mechanistic significance of the process, for engineering purposes,
the conventional use of the method remains primarily as a sorting or screening test. With very few
exceptions, there are no acceptance criteria based on slow strain rate testing and quantifying actual
strain rates in service remains elusive.
The slow strain rate method is most commonly used for testing of plain tensile specimens but has also
been adapted for pre-cracked fracture mechanics specimens (see ISO 7539-9 for the determination of
the threshold stress intensity factor).
−6 −1
In essence, the method involves the application of a relatively slow strain or deflection rate (e.g. 10 s )
to a specimen, under the appropriate environmental influence, until failure occurs.
5.4.2 Early use of the test was in providing data whereby the effects of such variables as alloy
composition and structure, or inhibitive additions to cracking environments, could be compared and
also for promoting stress corrosion cracking in combinations of alloy and environment that could not
be caused to fail in the laboratory under conditions of constant load or constant total strain. Thus, it
constitutes a relatively severe type of test in the sense that it frequently promotes stress corrosion failure
in the laboratory where other modes of stressing plain specimens do not promote cracking.
5.4.3 The equipment required for slow strain testing is simply a device that permits a selection of strain
rates while being powerful enough to cope with the loads generated. Purpose-built apparatus usually
consists of a moderately stiff frame and a drive mechanism through a series of reduction gears that allows
−3 −8 −1
a selection of crosshead speeds in the range 10 to 10 mm·s . Indeed, it is the crosshead rate that is
commonly controlled to give the desired nominal strain rate.
Plain or pre-cracked specimens in tension may be used, but if the cross-section of these would need to
be large or the loads high, bend specimens may be used.
NOTE In most common use in testing of plain tensile specimens, the displacement of the crosshead is measured
rather than that of the specimen. Accordingly, the measured displacement includes displacement of all features in
the load train including the load cell. Thus, the apparent elastic modulus does not relate to the specimen but will
depend on the test system as a whole. Similarly, the actual elastic strain rate on the specimen will also vary from
one test assembly to the other. However, when plastic deformation occurs most of the displacement then occurs
in the specimen and test system sensitivity becomes less significant.
5.4.4 It is important to appreciate that the same strain rate does not produce the same cracking response
in all systems and that the rate has to be chosen in relation to the particular system being studied. Thus,
−6 −1
while a strain rate of 10 s is often employed in screening tests, the absence of stress corrosion cracking
at this strain rate does not preclude the possibility that stress corrosion failure may be induced at a lower
−8 −1
strain rate, e.g. 10 s .
6 © ISO 2012 – All rights reserved

ISO 7539-1:2012(E)
6 Environmental aspects
6.1 General
Historically, stress corrosion cracking was considered to occur in rather specific alloy/environment
combinations, e.g. austenitic stainless steels in chloride solutions, mild steels in nitrate solutions, brass in
ammoniacal solution. However, the list of such combinations continues to grow with time and instances
of the cracking of materials in a very wide range of environments including high-purity water have
been observed. Nevertheless, it is important to recognize that relatively small variations in environment
conditions are important, requiring close attention to detail in solution preparation and control of all
environmental parameters during testing.
The three key features of environmental control are temperature, water chemistry and flow rate with
applied electrode potential an additional factor where appropriate.
While this part of ISO 7539 is concerned primarily with aqueous environments, exposure to organic
fluids and gaseous environments may also induce cracking. In the latter case, gas pressure and purity
will be the key variables to control.
6.2 Temperature
The significant influence of temperature upon chemical processes is well known, with reaction rates
generally increasing in response to a rise in temperature. While this may also be the case in many
corrosion processes, the influence of temperature is, for a number of reasons, frequently more complex.
An increase in temperature, together with a corresponding increase in reaction rates, may result in
a reduced corrosion rate due, for example, to the more rapid formation of protective films. In other
systems, an increase in temperature may be necessary to activate localized corrosion as a precursor to
stress corrosion cracking. However, too high a temperature may enhance the localized corrosion rate
to the extent that the transition to a crack does not occur. Similarly, the reduction in the solubility of
oxygen in aqueous solutions, which may accompany an increase in temperature, can also have an effect,
and other examples could be quoted. Thus, there may be temperature windows for cracking, some of
which may be experienced only during system transients. These could include start-up and shut-down
or system upsets (e.g. cooling water failure causing a transient rise in temperature)
In view of the foregoing, it is clear that the test temperature should be closely controlled and whenever
possible this should be selected to correspond to that expected in service, including scheduled transients.
Although, as indicated in 4.3, increased temperature is sometimes used to accelerate test results, clearly
such an approach must be undertaken with caution.
6.3 Water chemistry
6.3.1 The water chemistry adopted should represent as closely as possible the intended service
environment. Nevertheless, for screening purposes, standardized environments are often adopted. These
should be chosen carefully to be representative of the primary features of the plant environment as the
relative susceptibility of alloys can change with change in solution composition.
In relation to simulating service environments, it is important to remember that local concentrations may
occur; e.g. in crevices or where heat transfer takes place across interfaces, and that the bulk environment
may not be that which causes cracking. Hence, it may be necessary to simulate those characteristics in
testing (e.g. creviced specimens).
6.3.2 In preparing the solution, the baseline water quality depends on the application, with distilled
or deionised water being adequate for preparing artificial seawater for example but high-purity water
−1
of conductivity less than 0,1 μScm being necessary for simulating boiling water reactor environments.
It is also important to recognize that the chemicals used in synthesis should be at least of analytical
reagent grade quality. It is prudent to check the assay of these and to consider a higher grade where the
concentration of minor constituents might be significant, as when using concentrated solutions. This is a
consideration also when testing in strongly acidic or alkaline solutions.
ISO 7539-1:2012(E)
6.3.3 There are situations where relatively small changes in environment can promote marked changes
in cracking response. The possible problems associated with the use of nominally 42 % boiling MgCl
for testing stainless steels may serve as an example. Since the hydrate of MgCl is hygroscopic, solution
preparation by weighing may lead to appreciable differences in boiling point and hence in time to failure
in a stress corrosion test; it is therefore preferable to prepare the solution by adding water to the hydrate
to achieve a particular boiling point.
6.3.4 In all testing, the test solution should ideally remain constant for the duration of the test. For
some standardized environments, some change is tolerated for pragmatic reasons, for simplicity of
testing and cost. More generally, it is important to ensure that the solution pH and dissolved gas content
remain within acceptable tolerances and that contamination of the solution with reaction products does
not influence the stress corrosion cracking behaviour. Furthermore, solution contamination directly or
indirectly from the test cell needs to be considered. Examples include dissolution of silicates from glass at
elevated temperatures, release of additive from plastics, permeation of oxygen through plastic tubing in
de-aerated systems.
Ideally, the electrode potential of the test specimen should be monitored (where practicable) as this will
provide critical insight with respect to the state of the metal and reaction processes as well as providing
an important index of system stability.
6.3.5 The effects of varying the pH of the environment in relation to general corrosion are well
recognized and, where appropriate studies have been made, the effects upon stress corrosion are no less
marked. Changes in the pH of an environment during a test may be as important as the initial pH. The pH
change during a test depends upon the volume of solution and the surface area of the specimen exposed,
as well as upon the duration of the test. Use of a relatively large volume of solution with a small exposed
area of metal, or replenishment of solution during the test, is likely to be associated with smaller pH
changes and hence possibly different times to failure than would be the case with a small solution volume
and large exposed area; indeed, if these quantities are sufficiently small and large respectively, failure may
not occur at all in some systems. If tests are carried out with anodic stimulation, these effects of pH change
may be aggravated, especially if the counter electrode is immersed in the stress corrosion cell. Indeed,
in some cases where electrochemical stimulation is used, solution decomposition may occur to such an
extent that the mechanism of failure is significantly changed from that which occurs at the free corrosion
potential. Buffered solutions are sometimes used to overcome these problems, but their use may alter the
mechanism of cracking or even inhibit this mode of failure and should be considered carefully.
The extent of pH increase that can be tolerated will be system dependent, but an increase constrained
to below 0,2 is advised.
It should also be recognized that a pH increase may occur at the test-solution interface but be less
marked in the bulk solution. For this reason, stirring of the solution can be important th
...