oSIST prEN 15269-4:2022
(Main)'Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 4: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted glass doorsets'
'Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 4: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted glass doorsets'
This European Standard covers hinged and pivoted doors, doorsets and door assemblies with glass based
leaves. Throughout this document the term “doorset” will be used to cover doors, doorsets and door
assemblies. It prescribes the methodology for extending the application of test results obtained from fire
resistance test(s) conducted in accordance with EN 1634-1 and/or EN 1634-3 and/or EN 1191.
Subject to the completion of the appropriate test or tests, the extended application may cover all or some
of the following examples:
integrity (E), integrity & radiation (EW) or integrity & insulation (EI1 or EI2) classification;
ambient temperature smoke control (Sa) and medium temperature smoke control (S200)
classifications;
ability to close and durability of self-closing (C0 – C5);
glazed elements;
side, transom or over panels;
items of building hardware;
decorative and protective finishes;
intumescent seals and non-intumescent (e.g. smoke, draught or acoustic) seals;
alternative supporting construction(s).
This standard does not cover horizontal doorsets and windows.
Erweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen zur Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit und/oder Rauchdichtigkeit von Türen, Toren und Fenstern einschließlich ihrer Baubeschläge - Teil 4: Feuerwiderstand von Drehflügeltüren aus Glas
Dieses Dokument gilt für Dreh- und Schwenktüren, Türelemente und Türbaugruppen mit Glasflügeln. In diesem Dokument wird der Begriff „Tür“ verwendet, um sowohl Türen, als auch Türelemente und die aus verschiedenen Elementen bestehende Türeinheit abzudecken. Es schreibt die Methodologie zur Erweiterung der Anwendung von Ergebnissen der Prüfung(en) der Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit nach EN 1634-1 und/oder EN 1634-3 und/oder EN 1191 vor.
In Abhängigkeit von der Durchführung der entsprechenden Prüfung(en) kann der erweiterte Anwendungsbereich einige oder alle der folgenden Bereiche abdecken:
— Klassifizierungen von nicht wärmegedämmten Elementen (E) sowie solchen mit Anforderungen an die Strahlung (EW) oder wärmegedämmten Elementen (EI1 oder EI2);
— Klassifizierungen der Rauchdichtheit bei Umgebungstemperatur (Sa) und der Rauchdichtheit bei erhöhter Temperatur (S200);
— Fähigkeit zum Schließen und Dauerhaftigkeit der Selbstschließung (C0 – C5);
— verglaste Bauteile;
— Seiten-, Querträger- oder Oberteile;
— Baubeschläge;
— dekorative Beschichtungen und/oder Schutzbeschichtungen;
— dämmschichtbildende Dichtungen und nicht dämmschichtbildende Dichtungen zur Behinderung von Rauchdurchtritt (Rauchschutzdichtungen), Durchzug oder Schallübertragung (Schallschutzdichtungen);
— alternative Tragkonstruktion(en).
Dieses Dokument behandelt keine horizontalen Türen und Fenster.
Application étendue des résultats d’essais en matière de résistance au feu et/ou d’étanchéité à la fumée des blocs-portes, blocs-fermetures et ouvrants de fenêtre, y compris leurs éléments de quincaillerie intégrés - Partie 4 : Résistance au feu des blocs-portes battants et pivotants en verre
Le présent document couvre les portes battantes et pivotantes, les blocs-portes et les ensembles de
portes avec des vantaux à base de verre. Tout au long du présent document, le terme « bloc-porte »
servira à désigner les portes, les blocs-portes et les ensembles de portes. En effet, cet emploi induit
l’application de la méthodologie permettant d’étendre les résultats d’essais obtenus lors du ou des
essais de résistance au feu effectués conformément à l’EN 1634-1 et/ou EN 1634-3 et/ou EN 1191.
Sous réserve de la réalisation de l’essai ou des essais appropriés, l’application étendue peut couvrir tout
ou partie des exemples suivants :
— les classements d’étanchéité au feu (E), d’étanchéité au feu/rayonnements (EW) ou d’étanchéité au
feu/isolation thermique (EI1 ou EI2) ;
— les classements d’étanchéité à la fumée à température ambiante (Sa) et d’étanchéité à la fumée à
température moyenne (S200) ;
— la capacité de fermeture et la durabilité de la fermeture automatique (C0 – C5) ;
— les éléments vitrés ;
— les panneaux latéraux, d’imposte ou supérieurs affleurants ;
— les éléments de quincaillerie de bâtiment ;
— les finitions décoratives et de protection ;
— les joints intumescents et les joints non-intumescents (étanchéité à la fumée, l’air, acoustique) ;
— une ou plusieurs autres constructions supports.
Le présent document ne couvre pas les blocs-portes et fenêtres au format paysage.
Razširjena uporaba rezultatov preskusov požarne odpornosti in/ali dimotesnosti za vrata, zapore in okna, ki se odpirajo, vključno z njihovim okovjem - 4. del: Požarna odpornost steklenih vrat na tečajih z vrtljivim krilom
General Information
Standards Content (Sample)
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
oSIST prEN 15269-4:2022
01-december-2022
Razširjena uporaba rezultatov preskusov požarne odpornosti in/ali dimotesnosti
za vrata, zapore in okna, ki se odpirajo, vključno z njihovim okovjem - 4. del:
Požarna odpornost steklenih vrat na tečajih z vrtljivim krilom
'Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door,
shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware -
Part 4: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted glass doorsets'
Erweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen zur Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit
und/oder Rauchdichtigkeit von Türen, Toren und Fenstern einschließlich ihrer
Baubeschläge - Teil 4: Feuerwiderstand von Drehflügeltüren aus Glas
Application étendue des résultats d ’essais en matière de résistance au feu et/ou
d’étanchéité à la fumée des blocs-portes, blocs-fermetures et ouvrants de fenêtre, y
compris leurs éléments de quincaillerie intégrés - Partie 4 : Résistance au feu des blocs-
portes battants et pivotants en verre
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: prEN 15269-4
ICS:
13.220.50 Požarna odpornost Fire-resistance of building
gradbenih materialov in materials and elements
elementov
91.060.50 Vrata in okna Doors and windows
oSIST prEN 15269-4:2022 en,fr,de
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 15269-4:2022
---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 15269-4:2022
DRAFT
EUROPEAN STANDARD
prEN 15269-4
NORME EUROPÉENNE
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
October 2022
ICS 13.220.50; 91.060.50
English Version
'Extended application of test results for fire resistance
and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable
window assemblies, including their elements of building
hardware - Part 4: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted
glass doorsets'
Application étendue des résultats d'essais en matière Erweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen
de résistance au feu et/ou d'étanchéité à la fumée des zur Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit und/oder
blocs-portes, blocs-fermetures et ouvrants de fenêtre, y Rauchdichtigkeit von Türen, Toren und Fenstern
compris leurs éléments de quincaillerie intégrés - einschließlich ihrer Baubeschläge - Teil 4:
Partie 4 : Résistance au feu des blocs-portes battants et Feuerwiderstand von Drehflügeltüren aus Glas
pivotants en verre
This draft European Standard is submitted to CEN members for enquiry. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee
CEN/TC 127.
If this draft becomes a European Standard, CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations
which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration.
This draft European Standard was established by CEN in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other
language made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC
Management Centre has the same status as the official versions.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,
Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and
United Kingdom.
Recipients of this draft are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are
aware and to provide supporting documentation.
Warning : This document is not a European Standard. It is distributed for review and comments. It is subject to change without
notice and shall not be referred to as a European Standard.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION
EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2022 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. prEN 15269-4:2022 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.
---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 15269-4:2022
prEN 15269-4:2022 (E)
Contents Page
European foreword . 3
Introduction . 4
1 Scope . 5
2 Normative references . 5
3 Terms and definitions . 6
4 Determination of the field of extended application . 7
5 Extended application report . 9
6 Classification report. 9
Annex A (normative) Construction parameter variations . 10
Annex B (normative) Configurations for doorsets incorporating side and/or over panels . 97
Annex C (normative) Construction parameter variations - weight . 120
Annex D (normative) Construction parameter variations - timber replacement . 121
Annex E (normative) Test scenarios for Butt joint glazing as supporting construction . 122
Bibliography . 125
2
---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 15269-4:2022
prEN 15269-4:2022 (E)
European foreword
This document (prEN 15269-4:2022) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 127 “Fire
safety in buildings”, the secretariat of which is held by BSI.
This document is currently submitted to the CEN Enquiry.
This document has been prepared under a mandate given to CEN by the European Commission and the
European Free Trade Association, and supports essential requirements of EU Directive(s).
This document is one of a series entitled EN 15269 or EN 17020. A list of all parts in the EN 15269 and
the EN 17020 series can be found on the CEN website.
3
---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 15269-4:2022
prEN 15269-4:2022 (E)
Introduction
This document is one of the EN 15269 and EN 17020 series of standards to be used for the purpose of
producing an extended application report based on the evaluation of one or more fire resistance and/or
smoke control and/or durability of self-closing tests. These standards may also be used to identify the
best selection of test specimens required to cover a wide range of product variations.
A review of the doorset construction parameters can indicate that one or more characteristics may be
improved by a particular parameter variation. All evaluations need to be made on the basis of retaining
the fire resistance and/or smoke control and/or durability of self-closing classification(s) obtained from
testing to the relevant test standard. However, this will never lead to an increased classification for any
specific performance parameter beyond that achieved during any one test unless specifically identified
in the relevant Construction Parameter Variation Table within this standard.
For general requirements for applying this standard see EN 15269-1.
4
---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 15269-4:2022
prEN 15269-4:2022 (E)
1 Scope
This document covers hinged and pivoted doors, doorsets and door assemblies with glass based leaves.
Throughout this document the term “doorset” will be used to cover doors, doorsets and door assemblies.
It prescribes the methodology for extending the application of test results obtained from fire resistance
test(s) conducted in accordance with EN 1634-1 and/or EN 1634-3 and/or EN 1191.
Subject to the completion of the appropriate test or tests, the extended application may cover all or some
of the following examples:
— integrity (E), integrity & radiation (EW) or integrity & insulation (EI or EI ) classification;
1 2
— ambient temperature smoke control (Sa) and medium temperature smoke control (S )
200
classifications;
— ability to close and durability of self-closing (C0 – C5);
— glazed elements;
— side, transom or over panels;
— items of building hardware;
— decorative and protective finishes;
— intumescent seals and non-intumescent (e.g. smoke, draught or acoustic) seals;
— alternative supporting construction(s).
This document does not cover horizontal doorsets and windows.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
EN 179, Building hardware - Emergency exit devices operated by a lever handle or push pad, for use
on escape routes - Requirements and test methods
EN 844 (all parts), Round and sawn timber — Terminology
EN 1154, Building hardware - Controlled door closing devices - Requirements and test methods
EN 1191, Windows and doors - Resistance to repeated opening and closing - Test method
EN 1363-1, Fire resistance tests - Part 1: General requirements
EN 1364-1:2015, Fire resistance tests for non-loadbearing elements - Part 1: Walls
EN 1634-1, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door, shutter and openable window assemblies
and elements of building hardware — Part 1: Fire resistance test for doors, shutters and openable
windows
5
---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 15269-4:2022
prEN 15269-4:2022 (E)
EN 1634-2, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door, shutter and openable window assemblies
and elements of building hardware - Part 2: Fire resistance characterisation test for elements of building
hardware
EN 1634-3, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door and shutter assemblies, openable windows
and elements of building hardware - Part 3: Smoke control test for door and shutter assemblies
EN 1935, Building hardware - Single-axis hinges - Requirements and test methods
EN 12150-1, Glass in building - Thermally toughened soda lime silicate safety glass - Part 1: Definition
and description
EN 12519, Windows and pedestrian doors - Terminology
EN 13501-2, Fire classification of construction products and building elements - Part 2: Classification
using data from fire resistance tests, excluding ventilation services
EN 15254-4:2018, Extended application of results from fire resistance tests - Non-loadbearing walls -
Part 4: Glazed constructions
EN 15269-1, Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door,
shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 1: General
requirements
EN ISO 13943, Fire safety - Vocabulary (ISO 13943)
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in EN 1363-1, EN 12519,
EN ISO 13943, EN 1634-1, EN 1634-2, EN 1634-3, EN 1191 and EN 15269-1 and the following apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
• IEC Electropedia: available at https://www.electropedia.org/
• ISO Online browsing platform: available at https://www.iso.org/obp
3.1
most onerous configuration
configuration with the lowest relevant performance in terms of mode of failure and/or highest distortion,
also be evaluated taking the intended construction parameter variation(s) into account
Note 1 to entry: For example if the construction parameter variation involves a change to glazing or side panel and
over panel configurations then the previous result where these have been tested would need to be used to make the
evaluation of most onerous.
3.2
effective rebate depth
dimension of the door leaf thickness of overlapping adjacent edges of door leaf relative to the door frame,
transom or side panel or flush over panel
3.3
hybrid frame
frame constructed of a steel core material, cladded with insulating inorganic materials (e.g. gypsum)
6
---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 15269-4:2022
prEN 15269-4:2022 (E)
3.4
doorset without frame
door leaf directly installed in the supporting construction (low or high density rigid supporting
construction or a previously tested non-standard supporting construction)
3.5
representative specimen
similar design
fundamentally the same
door leaf design which has ‘fundamentally the same’ or ‘similar’ construction as another door leaf design
for the purpose of evaluating parameter variations providing the relevant aspects of tested performance
are considered
Note 1 to entry: see EN 15269-1 for further guidance on evaluation of similar/fundamentally the same
3.6
single action doorset
doorset which opens only in one direction, from closed position up to a maximum of 180°
3.7
double action doorset
swing door
doorset which opens in both directions, from closed position up to a maximum of ±180°
3.8
full scale test
test of a doorset in accordance with EN 1634-1
3.9
small scale test
test on elements of building hardware in accordance with EN 1634-2 and where the decision process,
given in EN 1634-2, permits its use
3.10
flush over panel
panel above the door without a transom
4 Determination of the field of extended application
4.1 General
4.1.1 Before there can be any consideration for extended application, a representative doorset shall have
been tested in accordance with EN 1634-1 and/or EN 1634 3 and/or EN 1191 to achieve a test result
which could generate a classification in accordance with EN 13501-2 at least equal to the classification
subsequently required from extended application considerations.
4.1.2 A review of the doorset construction parameters can indicate that one or more characteristics may
be improved by a particular parameter variation. All evaluations shall be made on the basis of retaining
the classifications obtainable from testing to EN 1634-1 and/or EN 1634 3 and/or EN 1191, including
those lower than the test duration. However, this shall never lead to an increased classification for any
specific parameter beyond that achieved during any one test, unless specifically identified in the relevant
Construction Parameter Variation Tables.
7
---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 15269-4:2022
prEN 15269-4:2022 (E)
4.1.3 If, when following the extended application procedure, any part of the classified product cannot be
covered by the extended application rules then that part shall be omitted from the subsequent extended
application report and classification report.
4.2 How to use the extended application rules in Annex A
4.2.1 Identify the variations from the original test specimen(s), which are required to be covered by an
extended application report.
4.2.2 Locate the variations in the appropriate parameter variation by reference to columns (1) and (2) of
Annex A.
4.2.3 For the required performance characteristic(s) in column (3) establish from the contents of column
(4) of Annex A whether any extended application is available beyond the direct application rules (DIAP)
in EN 1634-1 and/or EN 1634 3 and/or EN 1191 without the need for further testing.
4.2.4 Where this is deemed to be possible, it can be recorded in the extended application report together
with any appropriate restrictions and the stated rules from column (4) of Annex A.
4.2.5 Where the variations required can only be achieved from additional testing, the additional test
should be made on a representative specimen type i.e. a doorset of the same or more onerous
configuration. Alternatively, column (5) of Annex A identifies an option for alternative testing and
relevant test parameters.
4.2.6 Most onerous configuration must be the one with the lowest relevant performance in terms of mode
of failure and/or highest distortion but must also be evaluated taking the intended construction
parameter variation(s) into account. For example if the construction parameter variation involves a
change to glazing or side panel and over panel configurations then the previous result where these have
been tested would need to be used to make the evaluation of most onerous.
4.3 Procedure for maximum field of extended application
4.3.1 It is possible to provide an extended field of application for a particular performance characteristic
from a single test (for fire resistance and smoke control of an asymmetrical doorset only for the face
tested). However, where a manufacturer envisages to manufacture a range of doorsets incorporating
single leaf doorsets and also double leaf doorsets with or without side, transom or over panels, with or
without glazing, louvres (ventilation/air transfer grilles), with alternative item of building hardware, etc.,
it is recommended that careful consideration is given to the complete range of doorset designs and
options. This helps to minimise the testing required before testing commences.
4.3.2 Establish all the parameter variations, which are required to be part of the product range.
4.3.3 Determine which are the most important specification requirements and incorporate as many as
possible into the specimen(s) for the first tests in the series.
4.3.4 Conduct the first fire resistance, smoke control and/or durability of self-closing test or a series of
tests and then establish which of the original desired parameter variations have not been covered by the
fire resistance, smoke control and/or durability of self-closing tests, including direct application
possibilities of the relevant test standard(s).
4.3.5 Identify these parameter variations in Annex A and establish if any extended application is possible
without further testing.
8
---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 15269-4:2022
prEN 15269-4:2022 (E)
4.3.6 Record this for the extended application report together with any restrictions and rules given in
column (4) in Annex A.
4.3.7 Evaluate which, if any, of the desired parameter variations have not been covered by the field of
direct application of the relevant test standard(s) or the initial field of extended application derived from
4.3.5.
4.3.8 Determine if the product range is to include only single leaf doorsets or if the range is to also include
double leaf configurations. Where only single leaf doorsets are to be part of the product range, the
outstanding construction parameter variations shall only be incorporated into specimens for the single
leaf doorset. Where single leaf and double leaf doorsets are to be included in the product range, the
outstanding construction parameter variations for the extended application of single leaf doorsets may
be incorporated into either repeated single leaf doorset tests or, in the weakest option, as defined in
column 4 of Table A.1 to Table A.6, double leaf doorset configurations. See also Annex B.
4.3.9 Select the required outstanding parameter variations from column (1) and column (2) of Annex A
and observe from column (5) in Annex A which are the most appropriate, weakest specimen options for
further testing.
4.3.10 If the complete selection of required parameter variations has not been covered by the tests
completed in accordance with 4.3.8 and 4.3.9 above, then an appropriate test or tests may be repeated
with the additional product variations incorporated for the required performance characteristic(s).
4.4 Analysis of test results
4.4.1 In order to maximise the field of extended application, it is important that the test reports shall
record details of any premature integrity and/or insulation failure, as well as details of any significant
distortion.
4.4.2 Where a series of tests forms the basis for the extended application, the field of extended application
shall be based on the lowest performance of each performance characteristic achieved from the complete
series of tests unless premature failure has been attributed to one or more specific construction
parameter variations.
4.4.3 Where it has been possible to clearly identify specific parameter failures, the extended application
for all other construction parameter variations can be based on the performance achieved after isolating
the premature failure(s), provided the requirements of clause 4.1.1 is met. Where the specific
Construction Parameter variation requires EN 1634-1 Category B performance and where failures can be
identified as having no relevance to this aspect of the construction, they can be disregarded and the failure
time and associated Category revised accordingly.
5 Extended application report
Prepare an extended application report in accordance with the requirements of Clause 6 of EN 15269-1,
based on the results of evaluations in accordance with the above.
When additional test data based on similar designs (within a product family) are used to extend the field
of application, the rationale for using the test data should be mentioned in the EXAP report.
6 Classification report
The classification report shall be determined from the results of the extended application report and
presented in accordance with EN 13501-2.
9
---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 15269-4:2022
prEN 15269-4:2022 (E)
Annex A
(normative)
Construction parameter variations
A.1 General
This Table is designed to be used by experts competent in the field of fire resistance, smoke control and
durability of self-closing testing of hinged or pivoted doorsets with glass-based leaves.
This Table shall only be used to assess a field of extended application when at least one positive test
according:
• fire resistance test to EN 1634 1 (for fire resistance characteristics) and/or;
• smoke control test to EN 1634-3 (for smoke control characteristics) and/or;
• durability of self-closing test to EN1191 (for durability of the self-closing characteristics),
has generated a classification according to EN 13501-2. Only results from tests in accordance with
European standards can be used as basis for extended application.
The first two columns identify possible variations to the construction details of the specimen tested.
Column (3) determines the particular performance characteristic as follows:
• F for fire resistance characteristics;
• S for smoke control characteristics;
• D for durability of the self-closing characteristics.
For some parameters of fire resistance characteristics, it is necessary to evaluate whether the specimen
displayed a high, medium or low level of distortion during the test. Where this is the case, the following
levels shall be used to establish high, medium and low distortion doorsets as measured using the
maximum relative movement at any position between the edge of the door leaf and door frame or
between the meeting edges of door leaves or the relative movement of the framing members for panelled
systems. The measurements shall be taken from the start of the test at any time during the complete
required classification period. The deflections shall be measured at the positions given in EN 1634-1:
Low: < 40 % of effective rebate depth;
Medium: ≥ 40 % and ≤ 85 % of effective rebate depth;
High: > 85 % of effective rebate depth.
The evaluation of the influence of a parameter variation on performance characteristics (E/EW/EI) lead
to the judgement of the possibility of the extension of the field of application, the results of which are
given in column 5. In certain cases in column 5, it is a requirement to achieve Category B; the
requirements for this are given in EN 1634-1.
Where additional tests are deemed to be necessary, column (5) defines the test scenario to be used for
each characteristic F, S and D. Where it is possible to use information from tests performed on one
configuration for evidence on a different configuration, this allowance has been made in order to reduce
the overall number of tests required for extended application evaluation e.g. single action doorsets to
double action doorsets.
10
---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 15269-4:2022
prEN 15269-4:2022 (E)
Where an additional test is defined in column 5, this test could be a single or double action doorset if not
mentioned otherwise.
Where additional tests from both faces of the doorset are required, this is defined in column (5) explicitly.
In case of fire resistance (F) for symmetrical doors, only one test is sufficient. In the case of smoke control
characteristics (S) one specimen can be used for tests of both faces.
In order to maximize the possible field of extended application from a minimum number of tests, the
parameter changes have been spread over a series of test specimens. The recommended tests for each
parameter are dependent on the classification required and the preferred options.
Test evidence of test according EN 1364-1 could not be used for the door leaf.
Where more than a single parameter variation is required, the influence on other variations shall also be
taken into account.
Whenever the weight of the door leaf is higher than tested according EN 1191 the requirements of Annex
C have to be fulfilled if durability of self-closing is considered.
Test scenarios for tests on fire resistance according to EN 1634-1: The following test scenarios are
defined and referred to in column (5) of Tables A.1- A6:
Additional test single or double leaf doorset.
Test scenario FA:
Test from the most onerous side based on test results as given by basic tests.
Additional test can be single or double leaf doorset
Test scenario FB
Additional test single or double leaf doorset.
Test scenario FC
If the seal is positioned between the meeting edges of the door leaves the
additional test shall be a double leaf doorset
Test scenario FD For single leaf doorsets additional test can be single or double leaf doorset.
For double leaf doorsets additional test shall be double leaf doorset.
Test from the most onerous side based on test results as given by basic tests.
Single leaf doorset from most onerous side for single leaf doors, double leaf
Test scenario FE
doorset from most onerous side for double leaf doors
For single leaf doorsets additional test single leaf doorset, for double leaf doorsets
Test scenario FF
additional test double leaf doorset.
For use in flexible construction, test should be performed in a flexible supporting
construction.
Test from the most onerous side based on test results as given by basic tests.
For single leaf doorsets additional test single leaf or double leaf doorset, for
Test scenario FG
double leaf doorsets additional test double leaf doorset
Test scenarios for smoke control tests according to EN 1634-3: The following test scenarios are defined
and referred to in column (5) of Tables A.1- A6:
Test scenario SA: Test shall be performed with a single or double leaf door
Test scenario SB: Tests shall be performed from both sides with a single leaf door.
Test scenario SC: Tests shall be performed from both sides with a double leaf door.
Test scenario SD: Test shall be performed from the worst side with a double leaf doorset for single
or double leaf doorsets or with a single leaf doorset for single leaf doorsets
11
---------------------- Page: 13 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 15269-4:2022
prEN 15269-4:2022 (E)
Test scenario SE: Test shall be performed from the worst side with a single leaf doorset for single
leaf doorsets or a double leaf doorset for double leaf doorsets respectively
Test scenario SF: Tests shall be performed from both sides with a single leaf doorset for single leaf
doorsets or a double leaf doorset for double leaf doorsets respectively. If the
3
double leaf doorset test leads to a leakage of ≤ 20 m /h, this test is sufficient for
single leaf doorsets as well.
Test scenarios for durability of self-closing tests according EN 1191: The following test scenarios are
defined and referred to in column (5) of Tables A.1- A6:
Test scenario DA: Test shall be performed with a single or double leaf door
Test scenario DB: Tests shall be performed with a single leaf door.
Test scenario DC: Tests shall be performed with a double leaf door.
Test scenario DD: Test should be a double leaf doorset for single and double leaf doorsets, or
single leaf doorset for single leaf doorsets.
Test scenario DE: Test should be a single leaf doorset for single and double leaf doorsets, or
double leaf doorset for double leaf doorsets.
12
---------------------- Page: 14 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 15269-4:2022
prEN 15269-4:2022 (E)
A.2 C
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.