Standard Test Method for Total Wax Content of Corrugated Paperboard

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
Many of the functional properties of wax-treated corrugated paperboard and cartons are dependent on the amount of wax present.  
In the case of wax-saturated, or wax-impregnated, paperboard the principal concern is with the weight of wax used relative to the weight of paperboard present, that is, the weight percent content or pickup. In some applications the saturating wax may be deposited in the three elements of the corrugated board in such a way as to individually control the amount in each element, that is, the medium and the two facings.
In the case of wax-coated corrugated paperboard the principal concern is the weight of wax on the board surface per unit area. The functional values of the wax coating as a barrier or a decorative coating are dependent, in part, on the amount of wax in the continuous surface layer, relative to the area covered. The weight of coating relative to the weight of substrate is not usually a concern with regard to product quality.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the determination of the weight of wax that is present in a specimen of wax-treated corrugated paperboard. The test method is applicable to specimens that have been waxed by either impregnation (saturation) operations or coating operations, or combinations of such operations.
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For precautionary statement, see 5.4 and 7.2.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
30-Apr-2010
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM D3344-90(2010) - Standard Test Method for Total Wax Content of Corrugated Paperboard
English language
3 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: D3344 − 90 (Reapproved2010)
Standard Test Method for
Total Wax Content of Corrugated Paperboard
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D3344; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 4. Significance and Use
1.1 This test method covers the determination of the weight 4.1 Many of the functional properties of wax-treated corru-
of wax that is present in a specimen of wax-treated corrugated gated paperboard and cartons are dependent on the amount of
paperboard. The test method is applicable to specimens that wax present.
have been waxed by either impregnation (saturation) opera-
4.2 In the case of wax-saturated, or wax-impregnated,
tionsorcoatingoperations,orcombinationsofsuchoperations.
paperboard the principal concern is with the weight of wax
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the used relative to the weight of paperboard present, that is, the
standard. The values given in parentheses are for information weight percent content or pickup. In some applications the
only. saturating wax may be deposited in the three elements of the
corrugated board in such a way as to individually control the
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the
amount in each element, that is, the medium and the two
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
facings.
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
4.3 In the case of wax-coated corrugated paperboard the
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use. For precautionary
principal concern is the weight of wax on the board surface per
statement, see 5.4 and 7.2.
unit area. The functional values of the wax coating as a barrier
oradecorativecoatingaredependent,inpart,ontheamountof
2. Terminology
wax in the continuous surface layer, relative to the area
covered. The weight of coating relative to the weight of
2.1 Definitions:
substrate is not usually a concern with regard to product
2.1.1 weight of applied wax coating—theweightofwaxthat
quality.
has been applied to the corrugated board as a coating, ex-
pressed as weight per unit area, usually grams of coating per
5. Apparatus
square metre or pounds of coating per thousand square feet of
5.1 Sample Trimming Equipment—A suitable trimming
board covered.
board or template arrangement equipped with a razor edge
NOTE 1—When it is known that a wax-coated specimen has no
knife for even cutting of specimens so that they have parallel
impregnating wax present, this extraction procedure is normally calcu-
sides and are of the right size. (Aguillotine-type paper cutter is
lated to express the data as “weight of applied wax coating.”
not recommended.)
2.1.2 weight percent wax content—the weight percent of
5.2 Measuring Rule,steel-edged,ruleformeasuringthesize
wax present in and on corrugated board relative to the weight
of specimen to within 0.5 mm.
of unwaxed board substrate measured at 23°C (73°F) and 50 %
relative humidity.
5.3 Beakers, 1000-cm , Griffin-type.
5.4 Solvent —Chlorinated hydrocarbon solvent, 1,1,1-
3. Summary of Test Method
trichloroethane. (Warning—May cause irritation. Avoid con-
3.1 The total quantity of wax associated with the corrugated
tact with the eyes, skin, and clothing. Use only with adequate
board specimen is determined by extracting the wax from the ventilation. Avoid prolonged breathing of vapor or spray mist.
board and evaporating the extract to dryness.
Avoid prolonged or repeated contact with skin. Do not take
internally.)Thesolventusedshouldberesidue-free,andshould
be checked for a residue upon evaporation before using.
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D02 on
Petroleum Products and Lubricantsand is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee The sole source of supply of the apparatus known to the committee at this time
D02.10.0A on Physical/Chemical Properties. is Inhibisol (Brand), Amerace-Esna Corp., Chemical Specialties Division, Tenafly,
Current edition approved May 1, 2010. Published May 2010. Originally NJ 07670. If you are aware of alternative suppliers, please provide this information
approved in 1974. Last previous edition approved in 2005 as D3344 – 90 (2005). to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consid-
DOI: 10.1520/D3344-90R10. erationatameetingoftheresponsibletechnicalcommittee ,whichyoumayattend.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
D3344 − 90 (2010)
5.5 Steel Screen, 325-mesh, approximately 150 mm in di- tion may be hastened by use of a stream of nitrogen. For the
ameter, to fit into a funnel. final stages of evaporation, place the beaker on a hot plate at
about 300°F to completely dissipate solvent vapors or mois-
5.6 Glass Funnel, approximately 100 mm in diameter.
ture. Confirm that evaporation is complete when no solvent
5.7 Watch Glasses.
odor can be detected. Cool and reweigh the tared beaker.
5.8 Steam Bath or Hot Plate in Hood. Record the weight of wax extracted, to the nearest 1 mg.
5.9 Laboratory Hot Plate. NOTE 4—If it is not possible to tare the 1000-cm beaker because of
space limitations on the analytical balance, evaporate most of the solvent
5.10 Analytical Balance reading to the nearest 0.0001 g.
in the 1000-cm beaker and then quantitatively transfer the residue with
rinsings to a smaller tared beaker, and continue the evaporation to dryness
6. Test Specimen
as described in 7.4.
NOTE 5—Use of a Soxhlet extraction technique may result in improved
6.1 Condition all boards at 23°C (73°F) and 50 % relative
precision.
humidity for a minimum of 48 h b
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.