Standard Guide for Performance of Chinese Hamster Ovary Cell/Hypoxanthine Guanine Phosphoribosyl Transferase Gene Mutation Assay

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
2.1 The CHO/HGPRT assay detects forward mutations of the X-linked hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (hgprt) locus (coding for the enzyme, HGPRT) in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Cells originally derived from Chinese hamster ovary tissue are exposed to a test article and, following an appropriate cell culture regimen, descendants of the original treated population are monitored for the loss of functional HGPRT, presumably due to mutations. Resistance to a purine analogue, 6-thioguanine (6TG) (or less desirably, 8-azaguanine (8AG)), is employed as the genetic marker. HGPRT catalyzes the conversion of the nontoxic 6TG to its toxic ribophosphorylated derivative. Loss of the enzyme or its activity therefore leads to cells resistant to 6TG.  
2.2 Because HGPRT is an enzyme of the purine nucleotide salvage pathway, loss of the enzyme is not a lethal event. Different types of mutational events (base substitutions, frameshifts, deletions, some chromosomal type lesions, and so forth) should theoretically be detectable at the hgprt locus. The CHO/HGPRT assay has been used to study a wide range of mutagens, including radiations (2-4), and a wide variety of chemicals (1), and complex chemical mixtures (5).
SCOPE
1.1 This guide highlights some of the more relevant biological concepts as they are currently understood, and summarizes the critical technical aspects for acceptable bioassay performances as they currently are perceived and practiced. The Chinese hamster ovary cell/hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (CHO/HGPRT) assay (1) 2 has been widely applied to the toxicological evaluation of industrial and environmental chemicals.  
1.2 This guide concentrates on the practical aspects of cell culture, mutagenesis procedures, data analysis, quality control, and testing strategy. The suggested approach represents a consensus of the panel members for the performance of the assay. It is to be understood, however, that these are merely general guidelines and are not to be followed without the use of sound scientific judgement. Users of the assay should evaluate their approach based on the properties of the substances to be tested and the questions to be answered.  
1.3 Deviation from the guidelines based on sound scientific judgement should by no means invalidate the results obtained.  
1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
31-Jan-2018
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Guide
ASTM E1262-88(2018) - Standard Guide for Performance of Chinese Hamster Ovary Cell/Hypoxanthine Guanine Phosphoribosyl Transferase Gene Mutation Assay
English language
5 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: E1262 − 88 (Reapproved 2018)
Standard Guide for
Performance of Chinese Hamster Ovary Cell/Hypoxanthine
Guanine Phosphoribosyl Transferase Gene Mutation Assay
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E1262; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
1.1 This guide highlights some of the more relevant bio-
logical concepts as they are currently understood, and summa-
2. Significance and Use
rizes the critical technical aspects for acceptable bioassay
2.1 The CHO/HGPRT assay detects forward mutations of
performances as they currently are perceived and practiced.
theX-linkedhypoxanthine-guaninephosphoribosyltransferase
The Chinese hamster ovary cell/hypoxanthine guanine phos-
(hgprt) locus (coding for the enzyme, HGPRT) in Chinese
phoribosyl transferase (CHO/HGPRT) assay (1) has been
hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Cells originally derived from
widely applied to the toxicological evaluation of industrial and
Chinese hamster ovary tissue are exposed to a test article and,
environmental chemicals.
following an appropriate cell culture regimen, descendants of
1.2 This guide concentrates on the practical aspects of cell
the original treated population are monitored for the loss of
culture, mutagenesis procedures, data analysis, quality control,
functionalHGPRT,presumablyduetomutations.Resistanceto
and testing strategy. The suggested approach represents a
a purine analogue, 6-thioguanine (6TG) (or less desirably,
consensus of the panel members for the performance of the
8-azaguanine (8AG)), is employed as the genetic marker.
assay. It is to be understood, however, that these are merely
HGPRT catalyzes the conversion of the nontoxic 6TG to its
general guidelines and are not to be followed without the use
toxic ribophosphorylated derivative. Loss of the enzyme or its
of sound scientific judgement. Users of the assay should
activity therefore leads to cells resistant to 6TG.
evaluate their approach based on the properties of the sub-
2.2 Because HGPRT is an enzyme of the purine nucleotide
stances to be tested and the questions to be answered.
salvage pathway, loss of the enzyme is not a lethal event.
1.3 Deviation from the guidelines based on sound scientific
Different types of mutational events (base substitutions,
judgement should by no means invalidate the results obtained.
frameshifts, deletions, some chromosomal type lesions, and so
forth)shouldtheoreticallybedetectableatthehgprtlocus.The
1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as
standard. No other units of measurement are included in this CHO/HGPRT assay has been used to study a wide range of
mutagens, including radiations (2-4), and a wide variety of
standard.
chemicals (1), and complex chemical mixtures (5).
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
3. Characteristics of CHO Cells
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
3.1 Different CHO cell lines/subclones are appropriate for
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
theCHO/HGPRTassay.TheCHO-K1-BH4celllinedeveloped
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
and extensively characterized by (6) is probably the most
1.6 This international standard was developed in accor-
widely employed. The CHO(WT) cell line and its derivative,
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
CHO-AT3-2, are used to monitor mutations at other gene loci
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
in addition to hgprt (7, 8). While there are differences among
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
thecelllinesemployed,anumberofgeneralcharacteristicsare
critical for the performance of the assay:
3.1.1 The cloning efficiency (CE) of the stock cultures
This guide is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee F04 on Medical and
should not be less than 70%. The CE of untreated or solvent
Surgical Materials and Devicesand is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee
control experimental cultures should not be less than 50%.
F04.16 on Biocompatibility Test Methods.
Current edition approved Feb. 1, 2018. Published April 2018. Originally
3.1.2 Culturesinlogarithmicphaseofgrowthshouldhavea
approved in 1988. Last previous edition approved in 2013 as E1262–88 (2013).
population doubling time of 12 to 16 h.
DOI: 10.1520/E1262-88R18.
3.1.3 The modal chromosome number should be 20 or 21,
Theboldfacenumbersinparenthesesrefertothelistofreferencesattheendof
this guide. as is characteristic of the particular cell line/subclone used.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E1262 − 88 (2018)
3.1.4 Cultures should be free from microbial and myco- exogenous systems (for example, hepatocytes, S9 from other
plasma contamination. animal species or produced using different enzyme induction
conditions, and other cofactor mixtures) can also be used
3.2 The cell properties that are critical for the assay should
depending on the intent of the experiment.
be routinely monitored as part of the quality control regimen.
4.2.5 Estimation of Cytotoxicity—Plating CHO cells imme-
Routine quality control procedures should include testing of
diately after treatment for cytotoxicity determination is gener-
serum and media for each new purchase, as well as myco-
ally expected to yield the most accurate results. Otherwise,
plasma and karyotype checks at least once yearly, preferably
cytotoxicity can be estimated on the day after treatment.
once every three months.
Aliquots of the cells are plated to allow for colony develop-
ment.CytotoxicityisusuallyexpressedasrelativeCEwhichis
4. Mutagenesis Procedures
the ratio of the CE of the treated cells to that of the solvent
4.1 The mutagenesis protocol can be divided into three
control. Viability determination should take into account any
phases: mutagen treatment, expression, and selection.
loss of cells during the treatment period, cell trypsinization
4.2 Mutagen Treatment:
procedures, and the overnight incubation period.
4.2.1 Cell Plating—Cells should be in exponential phase
4.2.6 Positive and Solvent Controls—An appropriate nega-
when plated for treatment. Several media (for example, Ham’s
tive control is treatment of cells with the solvent used for the
F12,alpha-MEM)thatareknowntobeoptimalforcellgrowth
test article. Positive controls, both direct-acting and indirect-
can be used. Cells should be seeded at an appropriate cell
acting, should also be included to demonstrate the adequacy of
density to allow exponential growth as well as quantitation of
the experimental conditions to detect known mutagens. An
induced responses. A common practice is to plate 0.5×10
untreated control may also be included to evaluate the effects
2 6 2
cells in a 25-cm flask, or 1.5×10 cells in a 75-cm flask, on
of the solvent on mutagenicity. Commonly used positive
the day before treatment.
controls are ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) and N-methyl-N'-
4.2.2 Chemical Handling—The solubility of the test article
nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) as direct-acting mutagens,
in an appropriate medium should be determined before treat-
and benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) and dimethylnitrosamine (DMN) as
ment. Commonly used solvents are, in the order of preference,
promutagens that require metabolic activation.
medium, water, dimethylsulfoxide, ethanol, and acetone.
4.3 Expression of Induced Mutations:
Generally, the nonaqueous solvent concentration should not
4.3.1 After mutation at the hgprt locus, the mutant pheno-
exceed 1% and should be constant for all samples.As part of
typerequiresaperiodoftimebeforeitiscompletelyexpressed
the solubility test, an aliquot of the test chemical should be
(expression requires the loss of pre-existing enzyme activity).
added to the treatment medium to note any pH changes, the
Phenotypic expression is presumably achieved by dilution of
presence of any chemical precipitation, and any apparent
the pre-existing HGPRT enzyme and mRNA through cell
reaction of the chemical or solvent with the culture vessel.The
division and macromolecular turnover. At the normal popula-
solvent of choice should not have any undesirable reactions
tion doubling times of 12 to 16 h for CHO cells, an expression
with the test article, culture vessel, or cells.
period of 7 to 9 days is generally adequate (11, 12).
4.2.3 Addition of Test Article to Cells—Stock solutions of
4.3.2 The most widely employed method for phenotypic
the test samples are prepared and aliquots are added to each
expression allows exponential growth of the cells for a defined
flask. Dilutions of the test article should be such that the
time period after mutagen treatment. CHO cells can be
concentrationofsolventremainsconstantforallsamples.Cells
subcultured with 0.05% trypsin with or without EDTA.
are generally treated with the test article for at least 3 h. For
Aliquotsof1×10 cellsaresubculturedat2or3dayintervals
treatmenttimesof3to5h,serum-freemediumcanbeused.As
in 100-mm diameter tissue culture dishes or 75 cm t-flasks.
serum is required to maintain cell division, medium containing
Either complete medium or hypoxanthine-free medium can be
serum should be used for a prolonged treatment period (for
employed, with either dialyzed or nondialyzed serum. It is
example, 16 h or longer). Serum requirement for treatment
important to ensure that the medium employed will allow a
periods between 5 and 16 h should be determined on a
population doubling time of 12 to 16 h.
case-by-case basis.
4.3.3 Besides the normal growth of cells as monolayer
4.2.4 Exogenous Activation Systems—Aroclor 1254-
cultures,alternativemethodsofsubculturinginvolvingsuspen-
induced rat liver homogenate (S9) is the most commonly used
sion (8), unattached (13), and division arrested (14) cultures
exogenous metabolic activating system for the assay.When S9
have also been successful. The use of a particular subculture
is used, cofactors for the mixed function monooxygenases
regimen in the expression period should be substantiated by
should be present. Calcium chloride (CaCl ), which enhances
data demonstrating the achievement of optimal expression.
the mutagenicity of nitrosamines and polycyclic hydrocarbons
4.4 Mutant Selection:
(9, 10), appears to be another useful addition. However, the
need for CaCl has yet to be documented for a wide variety of 4.4.1 Conditions for the selection of mutants must be
chemicals. A commonly used cofactor mixture consists of defined to ensure that only mutant cells are able to form
sodium phosphate (50 mM, pH 7.0 to 8.0), NADP (4 mM), colonies and that there is no significant reduction in the ability
glucose-6-phosphate (5 mM), potassium chloride (30 mM), of mutant cells to form colonies. In general, cells are plated in
magnesiumchloride(10mM),andCaCl (10mM).S9isadded tissueculturedishesforattachedcolonygrowth (11),orinagar
directlytothecofactormixture.OnevolumeoftheS9/cofactor for suspended colony growth (15).An advantage of the former
mixture is added to 4 volumes of the treatment medium. Other isthatafterthecoloniesarefixedandstained,theplatescanbe
E1262 − 88 (2018)
counted at a later date. An advantage of the latter is that 6.1.4 The highest test article concentration should, if
metabolic cooperation between wild type and mutant cells is possible, result in a significant cytotoxic response (for
reduced, allowing selection of a higher cell number per plate. example, 10% to 30% survival, where survival is the percent
For attached colonies, the cells are in general cultured for a of the treated population that is viable after treatment). This is
period of 6 to 8 days and the number of colonies counted after particularly important if the response is negative. For noncy-
fixing (for example, with 10% formalin or 70% methanol), totoxic test articles, the highest concentration has generally
andstaining(forexample,with10%Giemsaorcrystalviolet). been 1 to 10 mg/mL, or to the limit of solubility.
Soft agar colonies are usually counted in situ after a culturing
7. Data Analysis
period of 10 to 14 days.
4.4.2 Reliable selection has been established in
7.1 Due to the possibility of stochastic fluctuation, only
hypoxanthine-free medium containing dialyzed serum and 10
samples with no fewer than 100 000 viable cells after treat-
µM 6TG. Fetal bovine serum, newborn bovine serum, or calf
ment should be used for data analysis. Judgement on mutagen-
serum can be used, providing that the serum has been ad-
icity should be made based on the following information:
equately tested and shown to support the desirable character-
7.1.1 Dose response relationship.
istics of CHO cells as described here. Dialyzed serum is
7.1.2 Significance of response (in comparison to the nega-
usually necessary to eliminate the competition between 6TG
tive control).
andpurinebasesintheserum.Ithasbeenfoundthataselection
7.1.3 Reproducibility of the results.
cell density of 2×10 or fewer cells per 100 mm dish for
7.2 Exact statistical analysis is difficult because the distri-
attached colony growth (14, 16) and 10 or fewer cells per 100
bution of the number of mutant colonies depends on the
mmdish(in30mLofagar)foragarcolonygrowth (15)allows
complex processes of cell growth and death after mutagen
essentially 100% recovery of mutant cells.
treatment. While other appropriate methods can be used, the
following two approximate methods are used commonly:
5. Data Presentation
7.2.1 WeightedRegressionAnalysis—Aweightedregression
5.1 Results from the assay should include the following
analysis where the weights are proportional to the observed
experimental data:
number of mutant colonies divided by the square of the
5.1.1 Concentrations and solvents used for the test article
observed mutant frequency (17). This weighting scheme was
and positive controls.
derived by assuming that the variance of the observed mutant
5.1.2 Absolute and relative cloning efficiencies (CE) in the
frequency is a constant multiple of that which would occur if
concurrent cytotoxicity assay.
the number of mutant colonies on each selection plate per
5.1.2.1 Absolute CE—Absolute CE equals the number of
t
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.