iTeh StandardsiTeh Standards
EURUSD
Your shopping cart is empty.
ASTM

ASTM G56-82(2005)

(Test Method)

Standard Test Method for Abrasiveness of Ink-Impregnated Fabric Printer Ribbons

Standard Test Method for Abrasiveness of Ink-Impregnated Fabric Printer Ribbons

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
This test method differentiates between ribbons on the basis of their ability to cause wear on surfaces with which they come in contact.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the determination of the abrasiveness of ink-impregnated fabric printer ribbons by means of a sliding wear test.
1.2 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.
This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
31-Oct-2005
ICS
35.260 - Office machines
Technical Committee
G02 - Wear and Erosion
Drafting Committee
G02.30 - Abrasive Wear
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Replaces
ASTM G56-82(2000)e1 - Standard Test Method for Abrasiveness of Ink-Impregnated Fabric Printer Ribbons
Effective Date
01-Nov-2005
Replaced By
ASTM G56-10 - Standard Test Method for Abrasiveness of Ink-Impregnated Fabric Printer Ribbons and Other Web Materials
Effective Date
01-Nov-2005

Buy Standard

ASTM G56-82(2005) - Standard Test Method for Abrasiveness of Ink-Impregnated Fabric Printer RibbonsASTM G56-82(2005) - Standard Test Method for Abrasiveness of Ink-Impregnated Fabric Printer Ribbons
PreviousNext
Standard
ASTM G56-82(2005) - Standard Test Method for Abrasiveness of Ink-Impregnated Fabric Printer Ribbons
English language
4 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information.
Designation:G56–82 (Reapproved 2005)
Standard Test Method for
Abrasiveness of Ink-Impregnated Fabric Printer Ribbons
ThisstandardisissuedunderthefixeddesignationG56;thenumberimmediatelyfollowingthedesignationindicatestheyearoforiginal
adoptionor,inthecaseofrevision,theyearoflastrevision.Anumberinparenthesesindicatestheyearoflastreapproval.Asuperscript
epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
NOTE 1—These two motions ensure that the unused ribbon is continu-
1. Scope
ally supplied to the contact area of the wear specimen; however, the
1.1 This test method covers the determination of the abra-
contact region usually contains a mixture of unused and used ribbon
sivenessofink-impregnatedfabricprinterribbonsbymeansof
surface.
a sliding wear test.
5. Significance and Use
1.2 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded
as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical
5.1 This test method differentiates between ribbons on the
conversions to SI units that are provided for information only
basisoftheirabilitytocausewearonsurfaceswithwhichthey
and are not considered standard.
come in contact.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the
6. Apparatus
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
6.1 Ribbon Support Surface—The overall shape of this
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
member is that of a cylindrical drum 48 6 1 in. (12206 25
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
mm) in diameter, concentric to within 0.0005 in. (0.013 mm)
total run-out, and 8.25+0.25−0 in. (210+6−0 mm) wide
2. Referenced Documents
(seeFig.1).Thesupportsurfaceisthecylindricalsurface.This
2.1 ASTM Standards:
surface shall be rigid, made of metal (Note 2), and have a slot
G40 Terminology Relating to Wear and Erosion
no greater than 0.020 in. (0.5 mm) in it so that the ends of the
ribbon may be fed through into the interior. The interior shall
3. Terminology
contain a mechanism to uniformly provide tension to the
3.1 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
ribbon specimen. This member shall be able to rotate about its
3.1.1 abrasive wear coeffıcient (for a ribbon)—ameasureof
axis and provide a linear velocity at the surface of the ribbon
the ability of the ribbon to wear surfaces with which it comes
of 321 6 6 in./s (8150 6 150 mm/s).
in contact.The larger the value, the greater the ability to cause
NOTE 2—2024 aluminum with a minimum thickness of 0.25 in. (6.35
wear.The abrasive wear coefficient determined by this method
mm) is adequate.The roughness of this surface should not exceed 20 µin.
isdirectlyproportionaltothevolumeofmaterialremovedfrom
(0.5 µm), CLA.
the steel sphere in the test.
6.2 Wear Specimen Support—This member shall be able to
3.2 For additional terms pertinent to this test method, see
press a rigidly mounted 0.25-in. (6.35-mm) diameter spherical
TerminologyG40.
wear specimen against the ribbon surface and advance the
4. Summary of Test Method specimen across the surface of the ribbon specimen in an axial
direction at a rate of 0.001 6 0.0001 in. (0.254 6 0.025 mm)
4.1 A ribbon specimen is wrapped around the cylindrical
perdrumrevolution(seeFig.2).Themountingshallbeofsuch
surface of a drum. A hardened steel sphere is pressed against
a construction that continual contact with the ribbon surface is
the ribbon surface. While the drum rotates about its axis, the
maintained with a normal load of 0.22 lb (this corresponds to
steel sphere is slowly moved in an axial direction across the
the dead-weight load produced by a 100-g mass) between the
surface of the ribbon (Note 1). After a specified amount of
wear specimen and ribbon surface and sufficiently rigid so that
sliding has occurred, the test is stopped and the volume of
no rotation occurs.
material removed from the steel sphere is determined. This
volumeisthenusedtocomputeanabrasivewearcoefficientfor
the ribbon specimen.
Adiscussionofthewearprocessandtheinfluenceofvariousparametersonthe
wearcanbefoundinBayer,R.G.,“WearbyPaperandRibbon” Wear,Vol49,1978,
ThistestmethodisunderthejurisdictionofASTMCommitteeG02onErosion pp. 147–168 and Bayer, R. G., “ Mechanism of Wear by Ribbon and Paper,” IBM
and Wear, and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee G02.30 on Wear. Journal of Research and Development,Vol22,No.6,November1978,pp.668–674
Current edition approved Nov. 1, 2005. Published November 2005. Originally An implementation of the apparatus required is discussed in “Testing Machine
´1
approved in 1977. Last previous edition approved in 2000 as G56–82(2000) . for the Evaluation of Wear by Paper,” available from ASTM Headquarters as
DOI: 10.1520/G0056-82R05. G02-1000.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
G56–82 (2005)
mounted ribbon specimen shall be allowed to equilibrate for a
minimum of1hatthe relative humidity and temperature at
which the test will be conducted.
9. Procedure
9.1 Put one end of the ribbon through the slot in the drum
and fasten to the tension device. Then wrap the ribbon around
the surface of the drum so that the outer surface of the ribbon
is exposed. Feed the other end of the ribbon through the slot
andfastentothetensiondevice.Applysufficienttensionsothat
the ribbon uniformly conforms to the surface of the drum and
is held taut. Align the ribbon specimen so that the wear
specimen does not contact or slide off the edges during the
course of the test.
9.2 After the wear specimen is mounted to the wear speci-
mensupport,pressthewearspecimenagainstthesurfaceofthe
ribbon with a load of 100 g. Contact should be made near but
Metric Equivalents
notwiththeedgeoftheribbon.Aftertheloadhasbeenapplied,
in. 0.020 0.25 1 8.25 48
simultaneously start the axial motion of the specimen and the
mm 0.51 6.35 25.4 210 1220
rotation of the drum.
FIG. 1 Ribbon Support Surface
9.3 For ribbon specimens of sufficient width, continue the
5 6
sliding for a minimum of 30 min, or 5.8 310 in. (14.7 310
mm) of sliding, without coming in contact with the edge of the
ribbon specimen. Then remove the wear specimen from the
surface while the drum is still rotating. Record the sliding
duration.
9.4 For narrower specimens for which this cannot be done,
remove the wear specimen from the ribbon surface prior to
contacting the ribbon edge, while the drum is still rotating.
Record the duration of sliding. Then stop
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

This May Also Interest You

ASTM
ASTM E1694-22(Classification)
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Special Facilities and Technologies

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale in this classification provides a means for estimating the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability, and for comparing that level against the level of any other building or facility.  
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.  
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.  
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following: (1) serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use; (2) the serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built; and (3) the serviceability (potential) of a facility for which a remodelling has been planned.  
4.5 The use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.  
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)  
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for special facilities and technologies.  
1.2 Each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-4, is for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (DEMAND Scale see Figs. 1-4) summarizes one level of requirement for serviceability on which occupants might require. The matching paragraph in the Facility Rating Scale (SUPPLY Scale see Figs. 1-4) is an interpretation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Demand Scale A.13.1 for Group or Shared Conference Center  
FIG. 1 Supply Scale A.13.1 for Group or Shared Conference Center (continued)
FIG. 2 Demand Scale A.13.2 for Video Conferencing Provision  
FIG. 2 Supply Scale A.13.2 for Video Conferencing Provision (continued)
FIG. 3 Demand Scale A.13.3 for Simultaneous Interpretation  
FIG. 3 Supply Scale A.13.3 for Simultaneous Interpretation (continued)
FIG. 4 Demand Scale A.13.4 for Satellite and Microwave Links  
FIG. 4 Supply Scale A.13.4 for Satellite and Microwave Links (continued)
FIG. 5 Demand and Supply Scales A.13.5 for Telecommunications Center  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (See Figs. 1-4) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning, to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, and evaluating how an office facility is performing.  
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.  
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of service...

  • Standard
    10 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    10 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1663-22(Classification)
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Typical Office Information Technology

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-18) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.  
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape. Further information may be found in ISO 19208.  
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.  
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:  
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.  
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.  
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.  
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.  
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)  
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers matched sets of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for performance to support typical office equipment for information technology.  
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each matched set of scales, shown in Figs. 1-18, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each topic is typically broken down into two more demand functions and supply features. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-18) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-18) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Demand Scale A.5.1 for Density of Office Computers and Equipment
FIG. 2 Supply Scale A.5.1 for Density of Office Computers and Equipment
FIG. 3 Demand Scale A.5.2.1 for Location of Available Power
FIG. 4 Supply Scale A.5.2.1 for Power Distribution
FIG. 5 Demand Scale A.5.2.2 for Plug-in Points at Workstation
FIG. 6 Supply Scale A.5.2.2 for Plug-in Points per Workstation
FIG. 7 Demand Scale A.5.3 for Reliability and Quality of Supply
FIG. 8 Supply Scale A.5.3 for Reliability and Quality of Supply
FIG. 9 Demand Scale A.5.4.1 for Horizontal Distribution
FIG. 10 Supply Scale A.5.4.1 for Horizontal Distribution
FIG. 11 Demand Scale A.5.4.2 for Risers
FIG. 12 Supply Scale A.5.4.2 for Risers
FIG. 13 Demand Scale A.5.4.3 for Entrance Facility
FIG. 14 Supply Scale A.5.4.3 for Entrance Facility
FIG. 15 Demand Scale A.5.4.4 for Service to the Site
FIG. 16 Supply Scale A.5.4.4 for Service to the Site
FIG. 17 Demand Scale A.5.5 for Cable Plant
FIG. 18 Supply Scale A.5.5 for Cable Plant  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-18) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well ...

  • Standard
    20 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    20 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1664-19(Classification)
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Layout and Building Factors

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-12) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.  
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.  
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility or within a group of office facilities.  
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:  
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.  
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.  
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.  
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.  
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)  
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers matched sets of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for layout and building factors.  
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each matched set of scales, shown in Figs. 1-12, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each topic is typically broken down into two or more demand functions or supply features. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-12) summarizes one level of serviceability on that function, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-12) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Demand Scale A.7.1.1 for Constraints on Layout  
FIG. 2 Demand Scale A.7.1.2 for Constraints of Population Density  
FIG. 3 Demand Scale A.7.1.3 for Cost of Upgrade  
FIG. 4 Supply Scale A.7.1.1 for Constraints on Layout  
FIG. 5 Supply Scale A.7.1.2 for Population Density Supported  
FIG. 6 Supply Scale A.7.1.3 for Cost of Upgrade  
FIG. 7 Demand Scale A.7.2.1 for Tolerance of Sound and Visual Conditions  
FIG. 8 Demand Scale A.7.2.2 Avoiding Glare on Monitors  
FIG. 9 Supply Scale A.7.2.1 Constraints on Layout  
FIG. 10 Supply Scale A.7.2.2 Avoiding Glare on Monitors  
FIG. 11 Demand Scale A.7.3 for Influence of Building Loss Features on Space Needs  
FIG. 12 Supply Scale A.7.3 Influence of Building Loss Features on Space Needs  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-12) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.  
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facil...

  • Standard
    15 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    15 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM D5740-18(Guide)
Standard Guide for Writing Material Standards in the Classification D4000 Format

ABSTRACT
This guide has been prepared to aid in the writing of material standards using the Classification D 4000 format.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification system covers ___ materials suitable for _____________. The inclusion or exclusion of recycled plastics in this classification system must be addressed here.  
1.2 The properties included in this standard are those required to identify the compositions covered. Other requirements necessary to identify particular characteristics important to specialized applications are to be specified by using suffixes as given in Section 5.  
1.3 This classification system and subsequent line callout (specification) are intended to provide a means of calling out plastic materials used in the fabrication of end items or parts. It is not intended for the selection of materials. Material selection can be made by those having expertise in the plastic field only after careful consideration of the design and the performance required of the part, the environment to which it will be exposed, the fabrication process to be employed, the costs involved, and the inherent properties of the material other than those covered by this standard.  
Note 1: Insert Note 1 here to show the appropriate ISO equivalency statement.  
1.4 The following precautionary caveat pertains only to the test method portion, Section 11, of this classification system: This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Guide
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Guide
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1668-95a(2018)(Classification)
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Amenities to Attract and Retain Staff

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.  
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.  
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.  
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:  
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.  
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.  
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.  
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.  
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)  
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements in support of recruiting and keeping quality employees.  
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-6, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-6) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Scale A.12.1 for Food  
FIG. 1 Scale A.12.1 for Food (continued)  
FIG. 2 Scale A.12.2 for Shops  
FIG. 3 Scale A.12.3 for Daycare  
FIG. 4 Scale A.12.4 for Exercise Room  
FIG. 5 Scale A.12.5 for Bicycle Racks for Staff  
FIG. 6 Scale A.12.6 for Seating Away from Work Areas  
FIG. 6 Scale A.12.6 for Seating Away from Work Areas (continued)  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.  
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.  
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E1334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to and compatible with Practice E1334. Each...

  • Standard
    9 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1667-95a(2018)(Classification)
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Image to the Public and Occupants

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-7) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.  
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.  
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement for a single office facility or within a group of office facilities.  
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:  
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.  
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.  
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.  
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.  
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)  
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for image to the public and occupants.  
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-7, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-7) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-7) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.  
FIG. 1 Scale A.11.1 for Exterior Appearance  
FIG. 1 Scale A.11.1 for Exterior Appearance (continued)  
FIG. 2 Scale A.11.2 for Public Lobby of Building  
FIG. 2 Scale A.11.2 for Public Lobby of Building (continued)  
FIG. 3 Scale A.11.3 for Public Spaces Within the Building  
FIG. 3 Scale A.11.3 for Public Spaces Within the Building (continued)  
FIG. 4 Scale A.11.4 for Appearance and Spaciousness of Office Spaces  
FIG. 5 Scale A.11.5 for Finishes and Materials in Office Spaces  
FIG. 6 Scale A.11.6 for Identity Outside the Building  
FIG. 6 Scale A.11.6 for Identity Outside the Building (continued)  
FIG. 7 Scale A.11.7 for Neighborhood and Site  
FIG. 7 Scale A.11.7 for Neighborhood and Site (continued)  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-7) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.  
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.  ...

  • Standard
    14 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1693-95(2018)(Classification)
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Protection of Occupant Assets

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each facility rating scale in this classification provides a means for estimating the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability, and for comparing that level against the level of any other building or facility.  
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.  
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.  
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following: (1) the serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use; (2) the serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built; and (3) the serviceability (potential) of a facility for which a remodeling has been planned.  
4.5 The use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.  
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)  
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment or fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements to protect occupant assets.  
1.2 Each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-8, printed side by side on a page, are for classifying one topic of serviceability within that aspect of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-8) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic that occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-8) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility that, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.  
FIG. 1 Scale A.8.1 for Control of Access from Building Public Zone to Occupant Reception Zone
FIG. 1 Scale A.8.1 for Control of Access from Building Public Zone to Occupant Reception Zone (continued)
FIG. 2 Scale A.8.2 for Interior Zones of Security
FIG. 2 Scale A.8.2 for Interior Zones of Security (continued)
FIG. 3 Scale A.8.3 for Vaults and Secure Rooms
FIG. 3 Scale A.8.3 for Vaults and Secure Rooms (continued)
FIG. 4 Scale A.8.4 for Security of Cleaning Service Systems
FIG. 4 Scale A.8.4 for Security of Cleaning Service Systems (continued)
FIG. 5 Scale A.8.5 for Security of Maintenance Service Systems
FIG. 6 Scale A.8.6 for Security of Renovations Outside Active Hours
FIG. 6 Scale A.8.6 for Security of Renovations Outside Active Hours (continued)
FIG. 7 Scale A.8.7 for Systems for Secure Garbage
FIG. 8 Scale A.8.8 for Security of Key and Card Control Systems  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-8) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning, to estimate approximately, rapidly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, and evaluating how an office facility is performing.  
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be...

  • Standard
    15 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1669-95a(2018)(Classification)
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Location, Access and Wayfinding

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.  
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.  
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.  
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:  
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.  
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.  
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.  
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.  
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)  
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification contains pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for locating the building and finding the way inside the building.  
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-6, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-6) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Scale A.14.1 for Public Transportation (Urban Sites)  
FIG. 2 Scale A.14.2 for Staff Visits to Other Offices  
FIG. 3 Scale A.14.3 for Vehicular Entry and Parking  
FIG. 3 Scale A.14.3 for Vehicular Entry and Parking  (continued)  
FIG. 4 Scale A.14.4 for Wayfinding to Building and Lobby  
FIG. 4 Scale A.14.4 for Wayfinding to Building and Lobby (continued)  
FIG. 5 Scale A.14.5 for Capacity of Internal Movement Systems  
FIG. 5 Scale A.14.5 for Capacity of Internal Movement Systems  (continued)  
FIG. 6 Scale A.14.6 for Public Circulation and Wayfinding in Building  
FIG. 6 Scale A.14.6 for Public Circulation and Wayfinding in Building (continued)  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.  
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.  
1.5 This classificatio...

  • Standard
    12 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1660-95a(2018)(Classification)
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Support for Office Work

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.  
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.  
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.  
4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following:  
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.  
4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.  
4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.  
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.  
4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)  
4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for performance to support typical office work.  
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Fig. 1 through Fig. 6,  are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.  
FIG. 1 Scale A.1.1 for Photocopying  
FIG. 1 Scale A.1.1 for Photocopying (continued)  
FIG. 1 Scale A.1.1 for Photocopying  (continued)  
FIG. 2 Scale A.1.2 for Training Rooms, General  
FIG. 2 Scale A.1.2 for Training Rooms, General (continued)  
FIG. 2 Scale A.1.2 for Training Rooms, General (continued)  
FIG. 3 Scale A.1.3 for Training Rooms for Computer Skills  
FIG. 3 Scale A.1.3 for Training Rooms for Computer Skills (continued)  
FIG. 4 Scale A.1.4 for Interview Rooms  
FIG. 4 Scale A.1.4 for Interview Rooms (continued)  
FIG. 5 Scale A.1.5 for Storage and Floor Loading  
FIG. 5 Scale A.1.5 for Storage and Floor Loading (continued)  
FIG. 6 Scale A.1.6 for Shipping and Receiving  
FIG. 6 Scale A.1.6 for Shipping and Receiving  (continued)  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Fig. 1 through Fig. 6) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.  
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been plan...

  • Standard
    16 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1671-95a(2018)(Classification)
Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Cleanliness

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-5) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.  
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.  
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the following:  
4.3.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.  
4.3.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.  
4.3.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.  
4.4 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.  
4.5 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)  
4.6 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for cleanliness.  
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-5, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-5) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-5) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
FIG. 1 Scale B.4.1 for Exterior and Public Areas  
FIG. 1 Scale B.4.1 for Exterior and Public Areas (continued)  
FIG. 2 Scale B.4.2 for Office Areas (Interior)  
FIG. 3 Scale B.4.3 for Toilets and Washrooms  
FIG. 4 Scale B.4.4 for Special Cleaning  
FIG. 5 Scale B.4.5 for Waste Disposal for Building  
FIG. 5 Scale B.4.5 for Waste Disposal for Building (continued)  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-5) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning and rating a facility and not for evaluating or diagnosing it.  
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.  
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E1334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to and compatible with Practice E1334. Each requires the other.  
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    8 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off