ASTM D6617-17
(Practice)Standard Practice for Laboratory Bias Detection Using Single Test Result from Standard Material
Standard Practice for Laboratory Bias Detection Using Single Test Result from Standard Material
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Laboratories performing petroleum test methods can use this practice to set an acceptable tolerance zone for infrequent testing of CS or CCS material, based on ε, and a desired Type I error, for the purpose of ascertaining if the test method is being performed without bias.
4.2 This practice can be used to estimate the power of correctly detecting bias of different magnitudes, given the acceptable tolerance zone set in 4.1, and hence, gain insight into the limitation of the true bias detection capability associated with this acceptable tolerance zone. With this insight, trade-offs can be made between desired Type I error versus desired bias detection capability to suit specific business needs.
4.3 The CS testing activities described in this practice are intended to augment and not replace the regular statistical monitoring of test method performance as described in Practice D6299.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice covers a methodology for establishing an acceptable tolerance zone for the difference between the result obtained from a single implementation of a test method on a Check Standard (CS) and its ARV, based on user-specified Type I error, the user-established test method precision, the standard error of the ARV, and a presumed hypothesis that the laboratory is performing the test method without bias.
Note 1: Throughout this practice, the term “user” refers to the user of this practice, and the term “laboratory” (see 1.1) refers to the organization or entity that is performing the test method.
1.2 For the tolerance zone established in 1.1, a methodology is presented to estimate the probability that the single test result will fall outside the zone, in the event that the presumed hypothesis is not true and there is a bias (positive or negative) of a user-specified magnitude that is deemed to be of practical concern.
1.3 This practice is intended for ASTM Committee D02 test methods that produce results on a continuous numerical scale.
1.4 This practice assumes that the normal (Gaussian) model is adequate for the description and prediction of measurement system behavior when it is in a state of statistical control.
Note 2: While this practice does not cover scenarios in which multiple results are obtained on the same CS under site precision or repeatability conditions, the statistical concepts presented are applicable. Users wishing to apply these concepts for the scenarios described are advised to consult a statistician and to reference the CS methodology described in Practice D6299.
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
General Information
Buy Standard
Standards Content (Sample)
NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: D6617 − 17 An American National Standard
Standard Practice for
Laboratory Bias Detection Using Single Test Result from
1
Standard Material
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D6617; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
INTRODUCTION
Due to the inherent imprecision in all test methods, a laboratory cannot expect to obtain the
numerically exact accepted reference value (ARV) of a check standard (CS) material every time one
is tested. Results that are reasonably close to theARV should provide assurance that the laboratory is
performing the test method either without bias, or with a bias that is of no practical concern, hence
requiring no intervention. Results differing from the ARV by more than a certain amount, however,
should lead the laboratory to take corrective action.
a statistician and to reference the CS methodology described in Practice
1. Scope*
D6299.
1.1 This practice covers a methodology for establishing an
1.5 This international standard was developed in accor-
acceptable tolerance zone for the difference between the result
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
obtained from a single implementation of a test method on a
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Check Standard (CS) and its ARV, based on user-specified
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
Type I error, the user-established test method precision, the
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
standard error of theARV, and a presumed hypothesis that the
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
laboratory is performing the test method without bias.
2. Referenced Documents
NOTE 1—Throughout this practice, the term “user” refers to the user of
this practice, and the term “laboratory” (see 1.1) refers to the organization 2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
or entity that is performing the test method.
D2699Test Method for Research Octane Number of Spark-
1.2 Forthetolerancezoneestablishedin1.1,amethodology
Ignition Engine Fuel
ispresentedtoestimatetheprobabilitythatthesingletestresult
D6299Practice for Applying Statistical Quality Assurance
will fall outside the zone, in the event that the presumed
and Control Charting Techniques to Evaluate Analytical
hypothesis is not true and there is a bias (positive or negative)
Measurement System Performance
of a user-specified magnitude that is deemed to be of practical
D7915Practice for Application of Generalized Extreme
concern.
Studentized Deviate (GESD) Technique to Simultane-
ously Identify Multiple Outliers in a Data Set
1.3 ThispracticeisintendedforASTMCommitteeD02test
methods that produce results on a continuous numerical scale.
3. Terminology
1.4 This practice assumes that the normal (Gaussian) model
3.1 Definitions for accepted reference value (ARV),
is adequate for the description and prediction of measurement
accuracy, bias, check standard (CS), in statistical control, site
system behavior when it is in a state of statistical control.
precision, site precision standard deviation (σ ), site preci-
SITE
NOTE2—Whilethispracticedoesnotcoverscenariosinwhichmultiple
sion conditions, repeatability conditions, and reproducibility
results are obtained on the same CS under site precision or repeatability
conditions can be found in Practice D6299.
conditions,thestatisticalconceptspresentedareapplicable.Userswishing
to apply these concepts for the scenarios described are advised to consult
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
3.2.1 acceptable tolerance zone, n—a numerical zone
bounded inclusively by zero 6 k ε (k is a value based on a
1
This practice is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee D02 on Petroleum
Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricantsand is the direct responsibility of Subcom-
2
mittee D02.94 on Coordinating Subcommittee on QualityAssurance and Statistics. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Current edition approved May 1, 2017. Published May 2017. Originally contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
approved in 2000. Last previous edition approved in 2013 as D6617–13. DOI: Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
10.1520/D6617-17. the ASTM website.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
D6617 − 17
user-specifiedTypeIerror;εisdefinedin3.2.7)suchthatifthe 2 2
ε 5 =σ 1SE (4
...
This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: D6617 − 13 D6617 − 17 An American National Standard
Standard Practice for
Laboratory Bias Detection Using Single Test Result from
1
Standard Material
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D6617; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
INTRODUCTION
Due to the inherent imprecision in all test methods, a laboratory cannot expect to obtain the
numerically exact accepted reference value (ARV) of a check standard (CS) material every time one
is tested. Results that are reasonably close to the ARV should provide assurance that the laboratory is
performing the test method either without bias, or with a bias that is of no practical concern, hence
requiring no intervention. Results differing from the ARV by more than a certain amount, however,
should lead the laboratory to take corrective action.
1. Scope*
1.1 This practice covers a methodology for establishing an acceptable tolerance zone for the difference between the result
obtained from a single implementation of a test method on a Check Standard (CS) and its ARV, based on user-specified Type I error,
the user-established test method precision, the standard error of the ARV, and a presumed hypothesis that the laboratory is
performing the test method without bias.
NOTE 1—Throughout this practice, the term user“user” refers to the user of this practice;practice, and the term laboratory“laboratory” (see 1.1) refers
to the organization or entity that is performing the test method.
1.2 For the tolerance zone established in 1.1, a methodology is presented to estimate the probability that the single test result
will fall outside the zone, in the event that the presumed hypothesis is not true and there is a bias (positive or negative) of a
user-specified magnitude that is deemed to be of practical concern (that is, the presumed hypothesis is not true).concern.
1.3 This practice is intended for ASTM Committee D02 test methods that produce results on a continuous numerical scale.
1.4 This practice assumes that the normal (Gaussian) model is adequate for the description and prediction of measurement
system behavior when it is in a state of statistical control.
NOTE 2—While this practice does not cover scenarios in which multiple results are obtained on the same CS under site precision or repeatability
conditions, the statistical concepts presented are applicable. Users wishing to apply these concepts for the scenarios described are advised to consult a
statistician and to reference the CS methodology described in Practice D6299.
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D2699 Test Method for Research Octane Number of Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel
D6299 Practice for Applying Statistical Quality Assurance and Control Charting Techniques to Evaluate Analytical Measure-
ment System Performance
1
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D02 on Petroleum Products Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricantsand is the direct responsibility of
Subcommittee D02.94 on Coordinating Subcommittee on Quality Assurance and Statistics.
Current edition approved June 15, 2013May 1, 2017. Published July 2013May 2017. Originally approved in 2000. Last previous edition approved in 20082013 as
D6617 – 08.D6617 – 13. DOI: 10.1520/D6617-13.10.1520/D6617-17.
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
D6617 − 17
E178D7915 Practice for Dealing With Outlying ObservationsApplication of Generalized Extreme Studentized Deviate (GESD)
Technique to Simultaneously Identify Multiple Outliers in a Data Set
3. Terminology
3.1 Defin
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.