ASTM E2819-11(2015)
(Practice)Standard Practice for Single- and Multi-Level Continuous Sampling of a Stream of Product by Attributes Indexed by AQL
Standard Practice for Single- and Multi-Level Continuous Sampling of a Stream of Product by Attributes Indexed by AQL
ABSTRACT
This practice establishes tables and procedures for applying five different types of continuous sampling plans for inspection by attributes using MIL-STD-1235B as a basis for sampling a steady stream of lots indexed by AQL. This practice represents a conversion of MIL-STD1235B to an ASTM-supported standard.
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 The reason for preserving military sampling standards is that many organizations throughout the world still use these standards in their current form. MIL-STD-1235B is no longer supported by the U.S. Department of Defense as of the mid-1990s and is out of print, but does exist in the public domain. This practice represents a conversion of MIL-STD-1235B to an ASTM-supported standard.
4.2 This practice provides the tables and procedures for applying five different types of continuous sampling plans for inspection by attributes. These continuous sampling plans are discussed in Sections 6 – 10 of this practice and each section includes information on:
(a) Initiation of 100 % inspection in use.
(b) Requirements on when to switch to sampling inspection.
(c) Conditions warranting a return to 100 % inspection.
(d) When a change in Code Letter, if desired, can be made.
(e) What to do when the checking inspector finds a defect that was originally found conforming by the screening inspector(s), that is, ineffective screening.
(f) Situations where a defect is found before the switch to 100 % inspection causing excessive periods of 100 % inspection so action must be taken, that is, long periods of screening.
4.2.1 Section 6 (Section 2 in MIL-STD-1235B) describes specific procedures and applications of the CSP-1 sampling plans—a single-level continuous sampling procedure which provides for alternating between sequences of 100 % inspection and sampling inspection.
4.2.2 Section 7 (Section 3 in MIL-STD-1235B) describes specific procedures and applications of the CSP-F sampling plans—a variation of the CSP-1 plans in that CSP-F plans are applied to a relatively short run of product, thereby permitting smaller clearance numbers to be used.
4.2.3 Section 8 (Section 4 in MIL-STD-1235B) describes specific procedures and applications of the CSP-2 sampling plans—a modification of CSP-1 in that 100 % inspection resumes only after a prescribed number of defect-fr...
SCOPE
1.1 This practice establishes tables and procedures for applying five different types of continuous sampling plans for inspection by attributes using MIL-STD-1235B as a basis for sampling a steady stream of lots indexed by AQL.
1.2 This practice provides the sampling plans of MIL-STD-1235B in ASTM format for use by ASTM committees and others. It recognizes the continuing usage of MIL-STD-1235B in industries supported by ASTM. Most of the original text in MIL-STD-1235B is preserved in Sections 6 – 10 of this practice.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
General Information
Buy Standard
Standards Content (Sample)
NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: E2819 − 11 (Reapproved 2015) AnAmerican National Standard
Standard Practice for
Single- and Multi-Level Continuous Sampling of a Stream of
Product by Attributes Indexed by AQL
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E2819; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 3. Terminology
1.1 This practice establishes tables and procedures for 3.1 Definitions:
applying five different types of continuous sampling plans for 3.1.1 For a more extensive list of terms in E11 standards see
inspection by attributes using MIL-STD-1235B as a basis for Terminology E456.
sampling a steady stream of lots indexed by AQL. 3.1.2 acceptance quality limit (AQL), n—qualitylimitthatis
the worst tolerable process average when a continuing series of
1.2 This practice provides the sampling plans of MIL-STD-
lots is submitted for acceptance sampling. E2234
1235B in ASTM format for use by ASTM committees and
3.1.3 average outgoing quality (AOQ), n—the average per-
others. It recognizes the continuing usage of MIL-STD-1235B
cent defective of outgoing product including all accepted lots
in industries supported by ASTM. Most of the original text in
or batches after any defectives found in them are replaced by
MIL-STD-1235B is preserved in Sections 6–10 of this
acceptable units, plus all lots or batches which are not accepted
practice.
after such lots or batches have been effectively 100 % in-
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the
spected and all defective units replaced by acceptable units.
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
E1994
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
3.1.4 average outgoing quality limit (AOQL), n—the maxi-
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
mum AOQ for a given acceptance sampling plan for all
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
possible incoming percentages defective for the process.
2. Referenced Documents E1994
3.1.5 continuous sampling inspection, n—a method of sam-
2.1 ASTM Standards:
pling a stream of product in order of production where the
E456 Terminology Relating to Quality and Statistics
sampling frequency is adjusted based on ongoing inspection
E1994 Practice for Use of Process Oriented AOQL and
results.
LTPD Sampling Plans
3.1.5.1 Discussion—Only those units of product found by
E2234 Practice for Sampling a Stream of Product by Attri-
the inspector or screening crew to be nonconforming are
butes Indexed by AQL
3 rejected. The rest of production, uninspected units as well as
2.2 Military Standards:
units found to be conforming, is allowed to continue down the
MIL-STD-1235A1 Functional Curves of the Continuous
production line as conforming material.
Sampling Plans
3.1.6 critical defect, n—a defect that judgment and experi-
MIL-STD-1235B Single- and Multi-Level Continuous Sam-
ence indicate would result in hazardous or unsafe conditions
pling for Attributes
for individuals using, maintaining, or depending upon the
product, or a defect that judgment and experience indicate is
likely to prevent performance of the function of a major end
This practice is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee E11 on Quality and
item. E2234
Statistics and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E11.30 on Statistical
Quality Control.
3.1.7 critical defective, n—a unit of product which contains
Current edition approved May 15, 2015. Published June 2015. Originally
one or more critical defects and may also contain major and
approved in 2011. Last previous edition approved in 2011 as E2819 – 11. DOI:
10.1520/E2819-11R15. minor, or both, defects. E2234
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
3.1.8 defect, n—any nonconformance of the unit of product
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
with specified requirements. E2234
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
the ASTM website.
3.1.9 inspection, n—the process of measuring, examining,
Available from Standardization Documents Order Desk, DODSSP, Bldg. 4,
testing, or otherwise comparing the unit of product with the
Section D, 700 Robbins Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19111-5098, http://
dodssp.daps.dla.mil. requirements. E2234
Copyright ©ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA19428-2959. United States
E2819 − 11 (2015)
3.1.10 inspection by attributes, n—inspection whereby ei- 3.2.7.1 Discussion—In the typical case the product moves
ther the unit of product is classified simply as defective or on a conveyor belt or line; however, it may be moved in tote
non-defective, or the number of defects in the unit of product boxes, buggies or other conveyances which are operated
is counted, with respect to a given requirement or set of manually or by mobile materials-handling equipment.
requirements. E2234
3.2.8 multi-level, n—plan consisting of periods of 100 %
3.1.11 major defect, n—a defect, other than critical, that is inspection and of sampling inspection at various rates which
likely to result in failure, or to reduce materially the usability
reflect past inspection results.
of the unit of product for its intended purpose. E2234
3.2.9 one hundred percent (100 %) inspection, n—the in-
3.1.12 major defective, n—a unit of product which contains
spection of every unit of product for the defects concerned
one or more major defects, and may also contain minor defects
listed for an inspection station.
but contains no critical defect. E2234
3.2.9.1 Discussion—The two terms, screening and 100 %
inspection, are used interchangeably in this practice.
3.1.13 minor defect, n—a defect that is not likely to reduce
materially the usability of the unit of product for its intended
3.2.10 production interval, n—a finite period of production,
purpose, or is a departure from established standards having
N items in length.
little bearing on the effective use or operation of the unit.
3.2.10.1 Discussion—The production interval is normally a
E2234
shift;itcanbeadayifitisreasonablycertainthatshiftchanges
3.1.14 minor defective, n—a unit of product which contains do not affect quality of product, but shall not be longer than a
one or more minor defects but contains no critical or major day.
defect. E2234
3.2.11 production interval length, n—N, specified number
3.1.15 process average (in inspection), n—the average per- of units to which CSP-F is to be applied.
cent defective or average number of defects per hundred units
3.2.12 sampling frequency, n—f, desired ratio between the
(whichever is applicable) of product submitted by the supplier
number of units of product randomly selected and inspected at
for original inspection. E2234
an inspection station and the number of unit passing the
3.1.16 unit of product, n—thatwhichisinspectedinorderto
inspection station during periods of sampling inspection.
determine its classification as defective or non-defective or to
3.2.12.1 Discussion—In this practice, each f is expressed as
count the number of defects. It may be a single article, a pair,
a fraction of the form, 1/7, 1/25, 1/50, etc. The procedure used
a set, a length, an area, an operation, a volume, a component of
in selecting the sample units should give each unit of product
an end product, or the end product itself. E2234
presented during periods of sampling inspection an equal
3.1.16.1 Discussion—The unit of product may or may not
chance of being selected and inspected. Also referred to as
be the same as the unit of purchase, supply, production, or
“frequency of sampling”.
shipment.
3.2.13 sampling inspection, n—inspection for the defects
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
concerned where the units selected for inspection are selected
3.2.1 checking inspection, n—sampling inspection per-
by sampling.
formed by the supplier on units of product which have already
3.2.14 screening, n—100 % inspection where all defective
been100 %inspectedinordertodeterminetheeffectivenessof
units are removed from the production flow.
the screening crew.
3.2.14.1 Discussion—The two terms, screening and 100 %
3.2.1.1 Discussion—This inspection is performed at the
inspection, are used interchangeably in this practice.
sampling rate f or more often.
3.2.15 single-level, n—planconsistingofalternatingperiods
3.2.2 clearance number, n—i, the number of consecutive
of 100 % inspection and sampling inspection wherein the
conforming, that is, defect-free, units in 100 % inspection
sampling rate is constant.
required prior to qualifying for inspection on a sampling basis.
3.2.3 conforming unit, n—a unit that meets the acceptance
4. Significance and Use
criteria established for the characteristic being considered.
4.1 Thereasonforpreservingmilitarysamplingstandardsis
3.2.4 defects concerned, n—defects being inspected for
that many organizations throughout the world still use these
while using the sampling plan.
standards in their current form. MIL-STD-1235B is no longer
3.2.5 inspection by defect class, n—whenonesamplingplan
supported by the U.S. Department of Defense as of the
is associated with inspection for several kinds of defects
mid-1990s and is out of print, but does exist in the public
collectively and each unit of product inspected is inspected for
domain. This practice represents a conversion of MIL-STD-
each of the defects in the class.
1235B to an ASTM-supported standard.
3.2.6 inspection by individual defect, n—inspection where
4.2 This practice provides the tables and procedures for
one sampling plan is associated with inspection for a single
applying five different types of continuous sampling plans for
defect, or where a sampling plan is applied to each of several
inspection by attributes. These continuous sampling plans are
defects independently.
discussed in Sections6–10 of this practice and each section
3.2.7 moving product, n—inspection where product is flow- includes information on:
ing past the inspection station. (a) Initiation of 100 % inspection in use.
E2819 − 11 (2015)
(b) Requirements on when to switch to sampling inspec- 5.3 Classification of Defects:
tion.
5.3.1 Method of Classifying Defects—A classification of
(c) Conditions warranting a return to 100 % inspection.
defects is the enumeration of possible defects of the unit of
(d) When a change in Code Letter, if desired, can be made.
product classified according to their seriousness. Defects will
(e) What to do when the checking inspector finds a defect
normally be grouped into one or more of the following classes;
that was originally found conforming by the screening
however, defects may be grouped into other classes, or into
inspector(s), that is, ineffective screening.
subclasses within these classes.
(f) Situations where a defect is found before the switch to
5.3.1.1 Critical Defect—A critical defect is a defect that
100 % inspection causing excessive periods of 100 % inspec-
judgment and experience indicate is likely to result in hazard-
tion so action must be taken, that is, long periods of screening.
ous or unsafe conditions for individuals using, maintaining, or
4.2.1 Section 6 (Section 2 in MIL-STD-1235B) describes
depending upon the product; or a defect that judgment and
specific procedures and applications of the CSP-1 sampling
experience indicate is likely to prevent performance of the
plans—a single-level continuous sampling procedure which
tactical function of a major end item such as a ship, aircraft,
provides for alternating between sequences of 100 % inspec-
tank,missile,orspacevehicle.Notethatforaspecialprovision
tion and sampling inspection.
relating to critical defects, see 5.8.2.
4.2.2 Section 7 (Section 3 in MIL-STD-1235B) describes
5.3.1.2 Major Defect—Amajor defect is a defect other than
specific procedures and applications of the CSP-F sampling
critical that is likely to result in failure or materially reduce the
plans—a variation of the CSP-1 plans in that CSP-F plans are
usability of the unit of product for its intended purpose.
applied to a relatively short run of product, thereby permitting
5.3.1.3 Minor Defect—Aminor defect is a defect that is not
smaller clearance numbers to be used.
likely to reduce materially the usability of the unit of product
4.2.3 Section 8 (Section 4 in MIL-STD-1235B) describes
for its intended purpose, or is a departure from established
specific procedures and applications of the CSP-2 sampling
standards having little bearing on the effective use or operation
plans—a modification of CSP-1 in that 100 % inspection
of the unit.
resumes only after a prescribed number of defect-free units
5.3.2 Method of Classifying Defectives—A defective is a
separate any two defective sample units.
unit of product which contains one or more defects. Defectives
4.2.4 Section 9 (Section 5 in MIL-STD-1235B) describes
will usually be classified as follows:
specific procedures and applications of the CSP-T sampling
5.3.2.1 Critical Defective—Acritical defective contains one
plans—a multi-level continuous sampling procedure which
or more critical defects and may also contain major and minor,
provides for reducing the sampling frequency upon demonstra-
or both, defects. Note that for a special provision relating to
tion of superior product quality.
critical defectives, see 5.7.2.
4.2.5 Section 10 (Section 6 in MIL-STD-1235B) describes
5.3.2.2 Major Defective—Amajor defective contains one or
specific procedures and applications of the CSP-V sampling
more major defects, and may also contain minor defects, but
plans—a single-level continuous sampling procedure which is
contains no critical defects.
analternativetoCSP-Tinthattheseplansprovideforreducing
5.3.2.3 Minor Defective—Aminor defective contains one of
the clearance number in good quality situations where reduc-
more minor defects but contains no critical or major defects.
tion of sampling frequency has no economic merit.
5.4 Acceptable Quality Level (AQL):
5. General Description of Sampling Plans
5.4.1 Definition—For continuous sampling plans, the AQL
5.1 This practice establishes continuous sampling plans and is an index to the plans, and has no other meaning.
procedures for inspection by attributes. When this practice is
5.4.2 Use—The AQL, together with the Sample Size Code
referenced in a contract, specification, inspection standard or
Letter, is used for indexing the plans provided herein. The
similar document, the provisions of this practice shall govern
plans are also indexed b
...
This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: E2819 − 11 E2819 − 11 (Reapproved 2015) An American National Standard
Standard Practice for
Single- and Multi-Level Continuous Sampling of a Stream of
Product by Attributes Indexed by AQL
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E2819; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope
1.1 This practice establishes tables and procedures for applying five different types of continuous sampling plans for inspection
by attributes using MIL-STD-1235B as a basis for sampling a steady stream of lots indexed by AQL.
1.2 This practice provides the sampling plans of MIL-STD-1235B in ASTM format for use by ASTM committees and others.
It recognizes the continuing usage of MIL-STD-1235B in industries supported by ASTM. Most of the original text in
MIL-STD-1235B is preserved in Sections 6 – 10 of this practice.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory
limitations prior to use.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
E456 Terminology Relating to Quality and Statistics
E1994 Practice for Use of Process Oriented AOQL and LTPD Sampling Plans
E2234 Practice for Sampling a Stream of Product by Attributes Indexed by AQL
2.2 Military Standards:
MIL-STD-1235A1 Functional Curves of the Continuous Sampling Plans
MIL-STD-1235B Single- and Multi-Level Continuous Sampling for Attributes
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions:
3.1.1 For a more extensive list of terms in E11 standards see Terminology E456.
3.1.2 acceptance quality limit (AQL), n—quality limit that is the worst tolerable process average when a continuing series of
lots is submitted for acceptance sampling. E2234
3.1.3 average outgoing quality (AOQ), n—the average percent defective of outgoing product including all accepted lots or
batches after any defectives found in them are replaced by acceptable units, plus all lots or batches which are not accepted after
such lots or batches have been effectively 100 % inspected and all defective units replaced by acceptable units. E1994
3.1.4 average outgoing quality limit (AOQL), n—the maximum AOQ for a given acceptance sampling plan for all possible
incoming percentages defective for the process. E1994
3.1.5 continuous sampling inspection, n—a method of sampling a stream of product in order of production where the sampling
frequency is adjusted based on ongoing inspection results.
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E11 on Quality and Statistics and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E11.30 on Statistical Quality
Control.
Current edition approved May 1, 2011May 15, 2015. Published July 2011June 2015. Originally approved in 2011. Last previous edition approved in 2011 as E2819 – 11.
DOI: 10.1520/E2819-11.10.1520/E2819-11R15.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
Available from Standardization Documents Order Desk, DODSSP, Bldg. 4, Section D, 700 Robbins Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19111-5098, http://dodssp.daps.dla.mil.
3.1.5.1 Discussion—
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E2819 − 11 (2015)
Only those units of product found by the inspector or screening crew to be nonconforming are rejected. The rest of production,
uninspected units as well as units found to be conforming, is allowed to continue down the production line as conforming material.
3.1.6 critical defect, n—a defect that judgment and experience indicate would result in hazardous or unsafe conditions for
individuals using, maintaining, or depending upon the product, or a defect that judgment and experience indicate is likely to
prevent performance of the function of a major end item. E2234
3.1.7 critical defective, n—a unit of product which contains one or more critical defects and may also contain major and minor,
or both, defects. E2234
3.1.8 defect, n—any nonconformance of the unit of product with specified requirements. E2234
3.1.9 inspection, n—the process of measuring, examining, testing, or otherwise comparing the unit of product with the
requirements. E2234
3.1.10 inspection by attributes, n—inspection whereby either the unit of product is classified simply as defective or
non-defective, or the number of defects in the unit of product is counted, with respect to a given requirement or set of requirements.
E2234
3.1.11 major defect, n—a defect, other than critical, that is likely to result in failure, or to reduce materially the usability of the
unit of product for its intended purpose. E2234
3.1.12 major defective, n—a unit of product which contains one or more major defects, and may also contain minor defects but
contains no critical defect. E2234
3.1.13 minor defect, n—a defect that is not likely to reduce materially the usability of the unit of product for its intended
purpose, or is a departure from established standards having little bearing on the effective use or operation of the unit. E2234
3.1.14 minor defective, n—a unit of product which contains one or more minor defects but contains no critical or major defect.
E2234
3.1.15 process average (in inspection), n—the average percent defective or average number of defects per hundred units
(whichever is applicable) of product submitted by the supplier for original inspection. E2234
3.1.16 unit of product, n—that which is inspected in order to determine its classification as defective or non-defective or to count
the number of defects. It may be a single article, a pair, a set, a length, an area, an operation, a volume, a component of an end
product, or the end product itself. E2234
3.1.16.1 Discussion—
The unit of product may or may not be the same as the unit of purchase, supply, production, or shipment.
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
3.2.1 checking inspection, n—sampling inspection performed by the supplier on units of product which have already been
100 % inspected in order to determine the effectiveness of the screening crew.
3.2.1.1 Discussion—
This inspection is performed at the sampling rate f or more often.
3.2.2 clearance number, n—i, the number of consecutive conforming, that is, defect-free, units in 100 % inspection required
prior to qualifying for inspection on a sampling basis.
3.2.3 conforming unit, n—a unit that meets the acceptance criteria established for the characteristic being considered.
3.2.4 defects concerned, n—defects being inspected for while using the sampling plan.
3.2.5 inspection by defect class, n—when one sampling plan is associated with inspection for several kinds of defects
collectively and each unit of product inspected is inspected for each of the defects in the class.
3.2.6 inspection by individual defect, n—inspection where one sampling plan is associated with inspection for a single defect,
or where a sampling plan is applied to each of several defects independently.
3.2.7 moving product, n—inspection where product is flowing past the inspection station.
3.2.7.1 Discussion—
In the typical case the product moves on a conveyor belt or line; however, it may be moved in tote boxes, buggies or other
conveyances which are operated manually or by mobile materials-handling equipment.
E2819 − 11 (2015)
3.2.8 multi-level, n—plan consisting of periods of 100 % inspection and of sampling inspection at various rates which reflect
past inspection results.
3.2.9 one hundred percent (100 %) inspection, n—the inspection of every unit of product for the defects concerned listed for
an inspection station.
3.2.9.1 Discussion—
The two terms, screening and 100 % inspection, are used interchangeably in this practice.
3.2.10 production interval, n—a finite period of production, N items in length.
3.2.10.1 Discussion—
The production interval is normally a shift; it can be a day if it is reasonably certain that shift changes do not affect quality of
product, but shall not be longer than a day.
3.2.11 production interval length, n—N, specified number of units to which CSP-F is to be applied.
3.2.12 sampling frequency, n—f, desired ratio between the number of units of product randomly selected and inspected at an
inspection station and the number of unit passing the inspection station during periods of sampling inspection.
3.2.12.1 Discussion—
In this practice, each f is expressed as a fraction of the form, 1/7, 1/25, 1/50, etc. The procedure used in selecting the sample units
should give each unit of product presented during periods of sampling inspection an equal chance of being selected and inspected.
Also referred to as “frequency of sampling”.
3.2.13 sampling inspection, n—inspection for the defects concerned where the units selected for inspection are selected by
sampling.
3.2.14 screening, n—100 % inspection where all defective units are removed from the production flow.
3.2.14.1 Discussion—
The two terms, screening and 100 % inspection, are used interchangeably in this practice.
3.2.15 single-level, n—plan consisting of alternating periods of 100 % inspection and sampling inspection wherein the sampling
rate is constant.
4. Significance and Use
4.1 The reason for preserving military sampling standards is that many organizations throughout the world still use these
standards in their current form. MIL-STD-1235B is no longer supported by the U.S. Department of Defense as of the mid-1990s
and is out of print, but does exist in the public domain. This practice represents a conversion of MIL-STD-1235B to an
ASTM-supported standard.
4.2 This practice provides the tables and procedures for applying five different types of continuous sampling plans for inspection
by attributes. These continuous sampling plans are discussed in Sections 6 – 10 of this practice and each section includes
information on:
(a) Initiation of 100 % inspection in use.
(b) Requirements on when to switch to sampling inspection.
(c) Conditions warranting a return to 100 % inspection.
(d) When a change in Code Letter, if desired, can be made.
(e) What to do when the checking inspector finds a defect that was originally found conforming by the screening inspector(s),
that is, ineffective screening.
(f) Situations where a defect is found before the switch to 100 % inspection causing excessive periods of 100 % inspection so
action must be taken, that is, long periods of screening.
4.2.1 Section 6 (Section 2 in MIL-STD-1235B) describes specific procedures and applications of the CSP-1 sampling plans—a
single-level continuous sampling procedure which provides for alternating between sequences of 100 % inspection and sampling
inspection.
4.2.2 Section 7 (Section 3 in MIL-STD-1235B) describes specific procedures and applications of the CSP-F sampling plans—a
variation of the CSP-1 plans in that CSP-F plans are applied to a relatively short run of product, thereby permitting smaller
clearance numbers to be used.
E2819 − 11 (2015)
4.2.3 Section 8 (Section 4 in MIL-STD-1235B) describes specific procedures and applications of the CSP-2 sampling plans—a
modification of CSP-1 in that 100 % inspection resumes only after a prescribed number of defect-free units separate any two
defective sample units.
4.2.4 Section 9 (Section 5 in MIL-STD-1235B) describes specific procedures and applications of the CSP-T sampling plans—a
multi-level continuous sampling procedure which provides for reducing the sampling frequency upon demonstration of superior
product quality.
4.2.5 Section 10 (Section 6 in MIL-STD-1235B) describes specific procedures and applications of the CSP-V sampling
plans—a single-level continuous sampling procedure which is an alternative to CSP-T in that these plans provide for reducing the
clearance number in good quality situations where reduction of sampling frequency has no economic merit.
5. General Description of Sampling Plans
5.1 This practice establishes continuous sampling plans and procedures for inspection by attributes. When this practice is
referenced in a contract, specification, inspection standard or similar document, the provisions of this practice shall govern the
application of all attributes type continuous sampling plans and procedures. Unless otherwise noted herein, the provisions of this
practice shall be carried out by the supplier.
5.2 Application—The conditions that must exist before these sampling plans may be used are: (a) moving product, (b) ample
space, equipment and manpower at or near the site of inspection to permit rapid 100 % inspection when required, (c) relatively
easy and quick inspection, (d) a process which is producing, or is capable of producing, material whose quality is stable, and (e)
the inspection is non-destructive. The sampling plans designated herein are applicable, but not limited, to inspection of various
entities, viz., end items, components, raw materials, data or records, and any other entities, provided that the foregoing conditions
are satisfied.
E2819 − 11 (2015)
5.3 Classification of Defects:
5.3.1 Method of Classifying Defects—A classification of defects is the enumeration of possible defects of the unit of product
classified according to their seriousness. Defects will normally be grouped into one or more of the following classes; however,
defects may be grouped into other classes, or into subclasses within these classes.
5.3.1.1 Critical Defect—A critical defect is a defect that judgment and experience indicate is likely to result in hazardous or
unsafe conditions for individuals using, maintaining, or depending upon the product; or a defect that judgment and experience
indicate is likely to prevent performance of the tactical function of a major end item such as a ship, aircraft, tank, missile, or space
vehicle. Note that for a special provision relating to critical defects, see 5.8.2.
5.3.1.2 Majo
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.