Standard Index Test Method for Determination of Unvegetated Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Ability to Protect Soil from Rain Splash and Associated Runoff Under Bench-Scale Conditions (Withdrawn 2022)

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This index test method indicates a unvegetated RECP’s ability to reduce rainsplash-induced erosion under bench-scale conditions. This test method may also assist in identifying physical attributes of RECPs that contribute to their erosion-control performance.  
5.2 This test method is bench-scale and therefore, appropriate as an index test for initial indication of product performance, for general comparison of unvegetated RECP capabilities, and for product quality assurance/conformance testing. The results of this test are not indicative of an RECP’s actual field performance.
Note 2: The quality of the result produced by this standard is dependent on the competence of the personnel performing it, and the suitability of the equipment and facilities used. Agencies that meet the criteria of Practice D3740 are generally considered capable of competent and objective testing/sampling/inspections/etc. Users of this standard are cautioned that compliance with Practice D3740 does not itself assure reliable results. Reliable results depend on many factors; Practice D3740 provides a means of evaluating some of those factors.
SCOPE
1.1 This index test method establishes the guidelines, requirements and procedures for evaluating the ability of unvegetated rolled erosion control products (RECPs) to protect soils from simulated rainfall (rain splash) and minimal runoff induced erosion. The critical element of this protection is the ability of the unvegetated RECP to absorb the impact force of raindrops, thereby reducing soil particle loosening through “splash” mechanisms, and limiting the ability of runoff to carry the loosened soil particles.  
1.2 This index test method utilizes bench-scale testing procedures and is not indicative of unvegetated RECP performance in conditions typically found in the field.
Note 1: The values obtained with this bench scale procedure are for initial performance indication, general product comparison and conformance purposes only. These values should not be used in estimating RECP soil protection in actual field use with such calculations as the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) or Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) without verification from qualified, large-scale tests.  
1.3 This index test is not intended to replace full-scale simulation or field testing in acquisition of performance values that are required in the design of erosion control measures utilizing unvegetated RECPs.  
1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses after SI units are provided for information only and are not considered standard.  
1.5 All observed and calculated values shall conform to the guidelines for significant digits and rounding established in Practice D6026, unless superseded by this standard.  
1.5.1 The procedures used to specify how data are collected/recorded or calculated in this standard are regarded as the industry standard. In addition, they are representative of the significant digits that generally should be retained. The procedures used do not consider material variation, purpose for obtaining the data, special purpose studies, or any considerations for the user’s objectives, and it is common practice to increase or reduce significant digits of reported data to be commensurate with these considerations. It is beyond the scope of this index test method to consider significant digits used in analytical methods for engineering design.  
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use and may involve use of hazardous materials, equipment, and operations. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Also, the user must comply with prevalent regulatory codes, such as OSHA (Occupational Health and Safety Administrat...

General Information

Status
Withdrawn
Publication Date
14-Jun-2013
Withdrawal Date
12-Jan-2022
Current Stage
Ref Project

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM D7101-13e1 - Standard Index Test Method for Determination of Unvegetated Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Ability to Protect Soil from Rain Splash and Associated Runoff Under Bench-Scale Conditions (Withdrawn 2022)
English language
7 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
´1
Designation: D7101 − 13
Standard Index Test Method for
Determination of Unvegetated Rolled Erosion Control
Product (RECP) Ability to Protect Soil from Rain Splash and
1
Associated Runoff Under Bench-Scale Conditions
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D7101; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1
ε NOTE—Editorially updated units of measurement statement in April 2018.
1. Scope* significant digits that generally should be retained. The proce-
dures used do not consider material variation, purpose for
1.1 This index test method establishes the guidelines, re-
obtaining the data, special purpose studies, or any consider-
quirements and procedures for evaluating the ability of unveg-
ations for the user’s objectives, and it is common practice to
etated rolled erosion control products (RECPs) to protect soils
increase or reduce significant digits of reported data to be
from simulated rainfall (rain splash) and minimal runoff
commensuratewiththeseconsiderations.Itisbeyondthescope
induced erosion. The critical element of this protection is the
of this index test method to consider significant digits used in
ability of the unvegetated RECP to absorb the impact force of
analytical methods for engineering design.
raindrops, thereby reducing soil particle loosening through
“splash”mechanisms,andlimitingtheabilityofrunofftocarry 1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the
the loosened soil particles. safety concerns, if any, associated with its use and may involve
useofhazardousmaterials,equipment,andoperations.Itisthe
1.2 This index test method utilizes bench-scale testing
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
procedures and is not indicative of unvegetated RECP perfor-
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
mance in conditions typically found in the field.
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use. Also, the user must
NOTE 1—The values obtained with this bench scale procedure are for
comply with prevalent regulatory codes, such as OSHA (Oc-
initial performance indication, general product comparison and confor-
cupational Health and SafetyAdministration) guidelines, while
mancepurposesonly.ThesevaluesshouldnotbeusedinestimatingRECP
using the index test method.
soil protection in actual field use with such calculations as the Universal
Soil Loss Equation (USLE) or Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation
1.7 This international standard was developed in accor-
(RUSLE) without verification from qualified, large-scale tests.
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
1.3 This index test is not intended to replace full-scale
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
simulation or field testing in acquisition of performance values
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
that are required in the design of erosion control measures
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
utilizing unvegetated RECPs.
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as
2. Referenced Documents
standard. The values given in parentheses after SI units are
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
provided for information only and are not considered standard.
D653 Terminology Relating to Soil, Rock, and Contained
1.5 All observed and calculated values shall conform to the
Fluids
guidelines for significant digits and rounding established in
D698 Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Character-
Practice D6026, unless superseded by this standard.
3
istics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft (600
1.5.1 Theproceduresusedtospecifyhowdataarecollected/
3
kN-m/m ))
recorded or calculated in this standard are regarded as the
D6026 Practice for Using Significant Digits in Geotechnical
industry standard. In addition, they are representative of the
Data
D3740 Practice for Minimum Requirements for Agencies
1
ThistestmethodisunderthejurisdictionofASTMCommitteeD18onSoiland
Rock and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D18.25 on Erosion and
2
Sediment Control Technology. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Current edition approved June 15, 2013. Published July 2013. Originally contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
approved in 2007. Last previous edition approved in 2008 as D7101 – 08. DOI: Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
10.1520/D7101-13E01. the ASTM website.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM Interna
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.