ASTM D1748-10

Standard Test Method for Rust Protection by Metal Preservatives in the Humidity Cabinet

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
This test method is used for measuring the relative abilities of metal preservatives to prevent the rusting of steel panels under conditions of high humidity. It should not be relied upon to predict the effectiveness of a metal preservative in which high humidity is not the principal factor in the rusting.
Comparisons made by this test method should normally be limited to similar metal preservative combinations designed for similar applications. The test life required for each type of metal preservative and for each intended application should be based on actual experience with that type of preservative in the intended service.
Since the precision of the test method appears to be less than desired, a number of repeat tests may be necessary to establish the test life of a given metal preservative, and repeat tests by this test method in more than one cabinet are sometimes desirable.
The data obtained from this accelerated test is of interest only in eliminating the most unsuitable materials or for indicating a probable relative order of protection against rust under conditions of high humidity. This test method does not prescribe the exposure periods to be used for a specific product, nor the interpretation to be given to the results.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the evaluation of the rust-preventive properties of metal preservatives under conditions of high humidity.
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard except where the test apparatus or consumable parts are only available in other units. In such cases these will be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to consult and establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

General Information

• Status: Historical
• Publication Date: 30-Sep-2010
• ICS: 77.060 - Corrosion of metals
• Technical Committee: D02 - Petroleum Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricants
• Drafting Committee: D02.L0.03 - Corrosion Testing of Sheet Metal Processing Fluids

Relations

• Replaces: ASTM D1748-02(2008) - Standard Test Method for Rust Protection by Metal Preservatives in the Humidity Cabinet
• Effective Date: 01-Oct-2010
• Referred By: ASTM D2649-20a - Standard Test Method for Corrosion Characteristics of Solid Film Lubricants
• Effective Date: 01-Oct-2010
• Referred By: ASTM G63-15(2023) - Standard Guide for Evaluating Nonmetallic Materials for Oxygen Service
• Effective Date: 01-Oct-2010
• Referred By: ASTM F1110-09(2020) - Standard Test Method for Sandwich Corrosion Test
• Effective Date: 01-Oct-2010

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: D1748 − 10
StandardTest Method for
Rust Protection by Metal Preservatives in the Humidity
1
Cabinet
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D1748; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense.
4
1. Scope* 2.3 Military Standards:
MIL-C-5646F Cloth, Airplane
1.1 This test method covers the evaluation of the rust-
MIL-C-15074E Corrosive Preventive Compound Finger
preventive properties of metal preservatives under conditions
Print Remover
of high humidity.
5
2.4 Society of Automotive Engineers:
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the SAE 1009C Tee Reducer, Bulkhead on Side, Flareless Tube
standard except where the test apparatus or consumable parts
3. Summary of Test Method
are only available in other units. In such cases these will be
regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are for
3.1 Steel panels are prepared to a prescribed surface finish,
information only.
dipped in the test oil, allowed to drain, and then suspended in
a humidity cabinet at 48.9°C (120°F) for a specified number of
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the
hours. The oil fails or passes the test in accordance with the
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
size and number of rust dots on the test surfaces of the panels.
responsibility of the user of this standard to consult and
establish appropriate safety and health practices and deter-
4. Significance and Use
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
4.1 This test method is used for measuring the relative
abilities of metal preservatives to prevent the rusting of steel
2. Referenced Documents
panels under conditions of high humidity. It should not be
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
relied upon to predict the effectiveness of a metal preservative
A109/A109M Specification for Steel, Strip, Carbon (0.25
inwhichhighhumidityisnottheprincipalfactorintherusting.
Maximum Percent), Cold-Rolled
4.2 Comparisons made by this test method should normally
D512 Test Methods for Chloride Ion In Water
be limited to similar metal preservative combinations designed
D516 Test Method for Sulfate Ion in Water
for similar applications. The test life required for each type of
E11 Specification for Woven Wire Test Sieve Cloth and Test
metal preservative and for each intended application should be
Sieves
based on actual experience with that type of preservative in the
E323 Specification for Perforated-Plate Sieves for Testing
intended service.
Purposes
4.3 Since the precision of the test method appears to be less
3
2.2 Federal Standards:
than desired, a number of repeat tests may be necessary to
QQ-S-698 Steel Sheet and Strip, Low Carbon
establish the test life of a given metal preservative, and repeat
tests by this test method in more than one cabinet are
sometimes desirable.
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D02 on
4.4 Thedataobtainedfromthisacceleratedtestisofinterest
Petroleum Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricants and is the direct responsibility of
Subcommittee D02.L0.03 on Corrosion Testing of Sheet Metal Processing Fluids. only in eliminating the most unsuitable materials or for
Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2010. Published November 2010. Originally
indicating a probable relative order of protection against rust
approved in 1960. Last previous edition approved in 2008 as D1748–02(2008).
under conditions of high humidity. This test method does not
DOI: 10.1520/D1748-10.
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
contact ASTM Customer Service at [e-mail]. For Annual Book of ASTM
4
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on Available from Standardization Documents Order Desk, Bldg. 4, Section D,
the ASTM website. 700 Robbins Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094, Attn: NPODS.
3 5
Available from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Available from Society of Automotive Engineers, 400 Commonwealth Dr.,
Office, Washington, DC 20402. Warrendale, PA 15096.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
D1748 − 10
prescribetheexposureperiodstobeusedforaspecificproduct, day, at 7- to 8-h intervals. Remaining standard conditions shall
nor the interpretation to be given to the results. be closely checked once each wee
...

This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation:D1748–02 (Reapproved 2008) Designation: D1748 – 10
Designation: 366/84
Standard Test Method for
Rust Protection by Metal Preservatives in the Humidity
1
Cabinet
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D1748; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the Department of Defense.
1. Scope*
1.1 This test method covers the evaluation of the rust-preventive properties of metal preservatives under conditions of high
humidity.
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard except where the test apparatus or consumable parts are only
available in other units. In such cases these will be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to consult and establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of
regulatory limitations prior to use.
2. Referenced Documents
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
A109/A109M Specification for Steel, Strip, Carbon (0.25 Maximum Percent), Cold-Rolled
D512 Test Methods for Chloride Ion In Water
D516 Test Method for Sulfate Ion in Water
E11 Specification for Woven Wire Test Sieve Cloth and Test Sieves
E323 Specification for Perforated-Plate Sieves for Testing Purposes
3
2.2 Federal Standards:
QQ-S-698 Steel Sheet and Strip, Low Carbon
4
2.3 Military Standards:
MIL-C-5646F Cloth, Airplane
MIL-C-15074E Corrosive Preventive Compound Finger Print Remover
5
2.4 Society of Automotive Engineers:
SAE 1009C Tee Reducer, Bulkhead on Side, Flareless Tube
3. Summary of Test Method
3.1 Steel panels are prepared to a prescribed surface finish, dipped in the test oil, allowed to drain, and then suspended in a
humidity cabinet at 48.9°C (120°F) for a specified number of hours. The oil fails or passes the test in accordance with the size and
number of rust dots on the test surfaces of the panels.
4. Significance and Use
4.1 Thistestmethodisusedformeasuringtherelativeabilitiesofmetalpreservativestopreventtherustingofsteelpanelsunder
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D02 on Petroleum Products and Lubricants and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D02.L0.03
on Corrosion Testing of Sheet Fluids Metal Processing Fluids.
Current edition approved MayOct. 1, 2008.2010. Published July 2008.November 2010. Originally approved in 1960. Last previous edition approved in 20022008 as
D1748–02(2008). DOI: 10.1520/D1748-02R08.10.1520/D1748-10.
2
For referencedASTM standards, visit theASTM website, www.astm.org, or contactASTM Customer Service at [e-mail]. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
3
Available from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
4
Available from Standardization Documents Order Desk, Bldg. 4, Section D, 700 Robbins Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094, Attn: NPODS.
5
Available from Society of Automotive Engineers, 400 Commonwealth Dr., Warrendale, PA 15096.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
D1748 – 10
conditionsofhighhumidity.Itshouldnotbereliedupontopredicttheeffectivenessofametalpreservativeinwhichhighhumidity
is not the principal factor in the rusting.
4.2 Comparisons made by this test method should normally be limited to similar metal preservative combinations designed for
similar applications. The test life required for each type of metal preservative and for each intended application should be based
on actual experience with that type of preservative in the intended service.
4.3 Since the precision of the test method appears to be less than desired, a number of repeat tests may be necessary to establish
the test life of a given metal preservative, and repeat tests by this test method in more than one cabinet are sometimes desirable.
2

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
D1748 – 10
4.4 The data obtained from this acc
...