iTeh StandardsiTeh Standards
EURUSD
Your shopping cart is empty.
ASTM

ASTM E2594-09(2014)

(Test Method)

Standard Test Method for Analysis of Nickel Alloys by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (Performance-Based Method)

Standard Test Method for Analysis of Nickel Alloys by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (Performance-Based Method)

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This test method for the chemical analysis of nickel alloys is primarily intended to test material for compliance with specifications such as those under jurisdiction of ASTM Committee B02. It may also be used to test compliance with other specifications that are compatible with the test method.  
5.2 It is assumed that all who use this test method will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely, and that the work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory.  
5.3 This is a performance-based test method that relies more on the demonstrated quality of the test result than on strict adherence to specific procedural steps. It is expected that laboratories using this test method will prepare their own work instructions. These work instructions will include detailed operating instructions for the specific laboratory, the specific reference materials employed, and performance acceptance criteria. It is also expected that, when applicable, each laboratory will participate in proficiency test programs, such as described in Practice E2027, and that the results from the participating laboratory will be satisfactory.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method describes the inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometric analysis of nickel alloys, such as specified by Committee B02, and having chemical compositions within the following limits:    
Element  
Application
Range (%)  
Aluminum  
0.01–1.00  
Boron  
0.001–0.050  
Calcium  
0.001–0.05  
Carbon  
0.10–0.20  
Chromium  
0.01–33.0  
Cobalt  
0.10–20.0  
Copper  
0.01–3.00  
Iron  
0.01–50.0  
Lead  
0.001–0.01  
Magnesium  
0.0001–0.100  
Manganese  
0.01–3.0  
Molybdenum  
0.01–30.0  
Niobium  
0.01–6.0  
Nickel  
25.0–80.0  
Nitrogen  
0.001–0.20  
Oxygen  
0.0001–0.003  
Phosphorous  
0.001–0.030  
Sulfur  
0.0001–0.010  
Silicon  
0.01–1.50  
Tantalum  
0.005–0.10  
Tin  
0.001–0.020  
Titanium  
0.001–6.0  
Tungsten  
0.01–5.0  
Vanadium  
0.01–1.0  
Zirconium  
0.01–0.10
1.2 The following elements may be determined using this test method. The test method user should carefully evaluate the precision and bias statements of this test method to determine applicability of the test method for the intended use.    
Element  
Quantification
Range (%)  
Aluminum  
0.060–1.40  
Boron  
0.002–0.020  
Calcium  
0.001–0.003  
Copper  
0.010–0.52  
Magnesium  
0.001–0.10  
Manganese  
0.002–0.65  
Niobium  
0.020–5.5  
Phosphorous  
0.004–0.030  
Tantalum  
0.010–0.050  
Tin  
0.002–0.018  
Titanium  
0.020–3.1  
Tungsten  
0.007–0.11  
Vanadium  
0.010–0.50  
Zirconium  
0.002–0.10
1.3 This test method has only been interlaboratory tested for the elements and ranges specified. It may be possible to extend this test method to other elements or different concentration ranges provided that method validation is performed that includes evaluation of method sensitivity, precision, and bias as described in this document. Additionally, the validation study must evaluate the acceptability of sample preparation methodology using reference materials or spike recoveries, or both. The user is cautioned to carefully evaluate the validation data against the laboratory’s data quality objectives. Method validation of scope extensions is also a requirement of ISO/IEC 17025.  
1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific warning statements are given in 8.2.6.3 and safety hazard statements are given in Section 9.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
31-May-2014
ICS
77.120.40 - Nickel, chromium and their alloys
Technical Committee
E01 - Analytical Chemistry for Metals, Ores, and Related Materials
Drafting Committee
E01.08 - Ni and Co and High Temperature Alloys
Current Stage
Ref Project

Buy Standard

ASTM E2594-09(2014) - Standard Test Method for Analysis of Nickel Alloys by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (Performance-Based Method)ASTM E2594-09(2014) - Standard Test Method for Analysis of Nickel Alloys by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (Performance-Based Method)
PreviousNext
Standard
ASTM E2594-09(2014) - Standard Test Method for Analysis of Nickel Alloys by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (Performance-Based Method)
English language
10 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview
REDLINE ASTM E2594-09(2014) - Standard Test Method for Analysis of Nickel Alloys by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (Performance-Based Method)REDLINE ASTM E2594-09(2014) - Standard Test Method for Analysis of Nickel Alloys by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (Performance-Based Method)
PreviousNext
Standard
REDLINE ASTM E2594-09(2014) - Standard Test Method for Analysis of Nickel Alloys by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (Performance-Based Method)
English language
10 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: E2594 − 09 (Reapproved 2014)
Standard Test Method for
Analysis of Nickel Alloys by Inductively Coupled Plasma
Atomic Emission Spectrometry (Performance-Based
1
Method)
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E2594; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope
Quantification
Element
Range (%)
1.1 This test method describes the inductively coupled
Magnesium 0.001–0.10
plasma atomic emission spectrometric analysis of nickel Manganese 0.002–0.65
Niobium 0.020–5.5
alloys, such as specified by Committee B02, and having
Phosphorous 0.004–0.030
chemical compositions within the following limits:
Tantalum 0.010–0.050
Tin 0.002–0.018
Application
Element
Titanium 0.020–3.1
Range (%)
Tungsten 0.007–0.11
Aluminum 0.01–1.00
Vanadium 0.010–0.50
Boron 0.001–0.050
Zirconium 0.002–0.10
Calcium 0.001–0.05
Carbon 0.10–0.20
1.3 Thistestmethodhasonlybeeninterlaboratorytestedfor
Chromium 0.01–33.0
the elements and ranges specified. It may be possible to extend
Cobalt 0.10–20.0
Copper 0.01–3.00 this test method to other elements or different concentration
Iron 0.01–50.0
ranges provided that method validation is performed that
Lead 0.001–0.01
includesevaluationofmethodsensitivity,precision,andbiasas
Magnesium 0.0001–0.100
Manganese 0.01–3.0 described in this document. Additionally, the validation study
Molybdenum 0.01–30.0
must evaluate the acceptability of sample preparation method-
Niobium 0.01–6.0
ology using reference materials or spike recoveries, or both.
Nickel 25.0–80.0
Nitrogen 0.001–0.20
The user is cautioned to carefully evaluate the validation data
Oxygen 0.0001–0.003
against the laboratory’s data quality objectives. Method vali-
Phosphorous 0.001–0.030
dation of scope extensions is also a requirement of ISO/
Sulfur 0.0001–0.010
Silicon 0.01–1.50
IEC 17025.
Tantalum 0.005–0.10
1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as
Tin 0.001–0.020
Titanium 0.001–6.0
standard. No other units of measurement are included in this
Tungsten 0.01–5.0
standard.
Vanadium 0.01–1.0
Zirconium 0.01–0.10
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
1.2 The following elements may be determined using this
test method.The test method user should carefully evaluate the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
precision and bias statements of this test method to determine
applicability of the test method for the intended use. bility of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific warning
statementsaregivenin8.2.6.3andsafetyhazardstatementsare
Quantification
Element
Range (%)
given in Section 9.
Aluminum 0.060–1.40
Boron 0.002–0.020
2. Referenced Documents
Calcium 0.001–0.003
2
Copper 0.010–0.52
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D1193 Specification for Reagent Water
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E01 on
Analytical Chemistry for Metals, Ores, and Related Materials and is the direct
2
responsibility of Subcommittee E01.08 on Ni and Co and HighTemperatureAlloys. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Current edition approved June 1, 2014. Published June 2014. Originally contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
approved in 2009. Last previous edition approved in 2009 as E2594 – 09. DOI: Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
10.1520/E2594-09R14. the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
E2594 − 09 (2014)
E50 Practices for Apparatus, Reagents, and Safety Consid- criteria. It is also expected that, when applicable, each labora-
erations for Chemical Analysis of Metals, Ores, and tory will participate in proficiency test programs, such as
Related Materials described in Practice E2027, and that the results from the
E55 Practice for Sampling Wrought Nonferrous Metals and participating laboratory will be satisfactory.
Alloys for Determination of Chemical Composition
E88 Practice for Sampling Nonferrous Metals andAlloys in 6. Interferences
Cast Form for Determination of Chemical Composition
6.1 Practice E1479 describes the typical interferences en-
E135 Terminology Relating to Analytical Chemistry for
countered during the inductively coupled plasma spectrometric
Metals, Ores, and Related Materials
analysis of metal alloys. The user is responsible for ensuring
E1329 Practice for Verificat
...

This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: E2594 − 09 E2594 − 09 (Reapproved 2014)
Standard Test Method for
Analysis of Nickel Alloys by Inductively Coupled Plasma
Atomic Emission Spectrometry (Performance-Based
1
Method)
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E2594; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope
1.1 This test method describes the inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometric analysis of nickel alloys, such as
specified by Committee B02, and having chemical compositions within the following limits:
Application
Element
Range (%)
Aluminum 0.01–1.00
Boron 0.001–0.050
Calcium 0.001–0.05
Carbon 0.10–0.20
Chromium 0.01–33.0
Cobalt 0.10–20.0
Copper 0.01–3.00
Iron 0.01–50.0
Lead 0.001–0.01
Magnesium 0.0001–0.100
Manganese 0.01–3.0
Molybdenum 0.01–30.0
Niobium 0.01–6.0
Nickel 25.0–80.0
Nitrogen 0.001–0.20
Oxygen 0.0001–0.003
Phosphorous 0.001–0.030
Sulfur 0.0001–0.010
Silicon 0.01–1.50
Tantalum 0.005–0.10
Tin 0.001–0.020
Titanium 0.001–6.0
Tungsten 0.01–5.0
Vanadium 0.01–1.0
Zirconium 0.01–0.10
1.2 The following elements may be determined using this test method. The test method user should carefully evaluate the
precision and bias statements of this test method to determine applicability of the test method for the intended use.
Quantification
Element
Range (%)
Aluminum 0.060–1.40
Boron 0.002–0.020
Calcium 0.001–0.003
Copper 0.010–0.52
Magnesium 0.001–0.10
Manganese 0.002–0.65
Niobium 0.020–5.5
Phosphorous 0.004–0.030
Tantalum 0.010–0.050
Tin 0.002–0.018
Titanium 0.020–3.1
Tungsten 0.007–0.11
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E01 on Analytical Chemistry for Metals, Ores, and Related Materials and is the direct responsibility of
Subcommittee E01.08 on Ni and Co and High Temperature Alloys.
Current edition approved March 15, 2009June 1, 2014. Published April 2009June 2014. Originally approved in 2009. Last previous edition approved in 2009 as E2594
– 09. DOI: 10.1520/E2594-09.10.1520/E2594-09R14.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
E2594 − 09 (2014)
Quantification
Element
Range (%)
Vanadium 0.010–0.50
Zirconium 0.002–0.10
1.3 This test method has only been interlaboratory tested for the elements and ranges specified. It may be possible to extend
this test method to other elements or different concentration ranges provided that method validation is performed that includes
evaluation of method sensitivity, precision, and bias as described in this document. Additionally, the validation study must evaluate
the acceptability of sample preparation methodology using reference materials or spike recoveries, or both. The user is cautioned
to carefully evaluate the validation data against the laboratory’s data quality objectives. Method validation of scope extensions is
also a requirement of ISO/IEC 17025.
1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory
limitations prior to use. Specific warning statements are given in 8.2.6.3 and safety hazard statements are given in Section 9.
2. Referenced Documents
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D1193 Specification for Reagent Water
E50 Practices for Apparatus, Reagents, and Safety Considerations for Chemical Analysis of Metals, Ores, and Related Materials
E55 Practice for Sampling Wrought Nonferrous Metals and Alloys for Determination of Chemical Composition
E88 Practice for Sampling Nonferrous Metals and Alloys in Cast Form for Determination of Chemical Composition
E135 Terminology Relating to Analytical Chemistry for Metals, Ores, and Related Materials
E1329 Practice for Verification and Use of Control Charts in Spectrochemical Analysis
E1479 Practice for Describing and Specifying Inductively-Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometers
E1601 Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Evaluate the Performance of an Analytical Method
E2027 Practice for Conducting Proficiency Tests in the Chemical
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

This May Also Interest You

ASTM
ASTM E3047-22(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Analysis of Nickel Alloys by Spark Atomic Emission Spectrometry

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This test method for the chemical analysis of nickel alloys is primarily intended to test material for compliance with compositional specifications such as those under jurisdiction of Committee B02. It may also be used to test compliance with other specifications that are compatible with the test method.  
5.2 It is assumed that all who use this method will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely, and that the work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory.  
5.3 It is expected that laboratories using this method will prepare their own work instructions. These work instructions will include detailed operating instructions for the specific laboratory including information such as applicable analytical methods, drift correction (standardization) protocols, verifiers, and performance acceptance criteria.
SCOPE
1.1 This method describes the spark atomic emission spectrometric (Spark-AES) analysis of nickel alloys, such as those specified by Committee B02, having chemical compositions within the following limits:    
Element  
Application Range (Mass Fraction, %)  
Aluminum  
0.005-6.00  
Boron  
0.001-0.10  
Carbon  
0.005-0.15  
Chromium  
0.01-33.00  
Copper  
0.01-35.00  
Cobalt  
0.01-25.00  
Iron  
0.05-55.00  
Magnesium  
0.001-0.020  
Manganese  
0.01-1.00  
Molybdenum  
0.01-35.00  
Niobium  
0.01-6.0  
Nickel  
25.00-100.0  
Phosphorous  
0.001-0.025  
Silicon  
0.01-1.50  
Sulfur  
0.0001-0.01  
Titanium  
0.0001-6.0  
Tantalum  
0.01-0.15  
Tin  
0.001-0.020  
Tungsten  
0.01-5.0  
Vanadium  
0.0005-1.0  
Zirconium  
0.01-0.10  
1.2 The following elements may be determined using this method.    
Element  
Quantification Range (Mass Fraction, %)  
Aluminum  
0.010-1.50  
Boron  
0.004-0.025  
Carbon  
0.014-0.15  
Chromium  
0.09-20.0  
Cobalt  
0.05-14.00  
Copper  
0.03-0.6  
Iron  
0.17-20  
Magnesium  
0.001-0.03  
Manganese  
0.04-0.6  
Molybdenum  
0.07-5.0  
Niobium  
0.02-5.5  
Phosphorous  
0.005-0.020  
Silicon  
0.07-0.6  
Sulfur  
0.002-0.005  
Tantalum  
0.025-0.15  
Tin  
0.001-0.02  
Titanium  
0.025-3.2  
Tungsten  
0.02-0.10  
Vanadium  
0.005-0.25  
Zirconium  
0.01-0.05  
1.3 This method has been interlaboratory tested for the elements and quantification ranges specified in 1.2. The ranges in 1.2 indicate intervals within which results have been demonstrated to be quantitative. It may be possible to extend this method to other elements or different composition ranges provided that a method validation study as described in Guide E2857 is performed and that the results of this study show that the method extension is meeting laboratory data quality objectives. Supplemental data on other elements not included in the scope are found in the supplemental data tables of the Precision and Bias section.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific safety hazard statements are given in Section 9.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    15 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    15 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1473-22(Test Method)
Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Nickel, Cobalt, and High-Temperature Alloys

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 These test methods for the chemical analysis of metals and alloys are primarily intended as referee methods to test such materials for compliance with compositional specifications, particularly those under the jurisdiction of Committee B02 on Nonferrous Metals and Alloys. It is assumed that all who use these test methods will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely. It is expected that work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory under appropriate quality control practices such as those described in Guide E882.
SCOPE
1.1 These test methods describe the chemical analysis of nickel, cobalt, and high-temperature alloys having chemical compositions within the following limits:    
Element  
Composition Range, %  
Aluminum  
0.005  
to  
7.00  
Beryllium  
0.001  
to  
0.05  
Boron  
0.001  
to  
1.00  
Calcium  
0.002  
to  
0.05  
Carbon  
0.001  
to  
1.10  
Chromium  
0.10  
to  
33.00  
Cobalt  
0.10  
to  
75.00  
Copper  
0.01  
to  
35.00  
Iron  
0.01  
to  
50.00  
Lead  
0.001  
to  
0.01  
Magnesium  
0.001  
to  
0.05  
Manganese  
0.01  
to  
3.0  
Molybdenum  
0.01  
to  
30.0  
Niobium (Columbium)  
0.01  
to  
6.0  
Nickel  
0.10  
to  
98.0  
Nitrogen  
0.001  
to  
0.20  
Phosphorus  
0.002  
to  
0.08  
Sulfur  
0.002  
to  
0.10  
Silicon  
0.01  
to  
5.00  
Tantalum  
0.005  
to  
1.00  
Tin  
0.002  
to  
0.10  
Titanium  
0.01  
to  
5.00  
Tungsten  
0.01  
to  
18.00  
Vanadium  
0.01  
to  
3.25  
Zinc  
0.001  
to  
0.01  
Zirconium  
0.01  
to  
2.50  
1.2 The test methods in this standard are contained in the sections indicated as follows:    
Aluminum, Total by the 8-Quinolinol Gravimetric Method
(0.20 % to 7.00 %)  
53 to 60  
Chromium by the Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method
(0.018 % to 1.00 %)  
91 to 100  
Chromium by the Peroxydisulfate Oxidation—Titration Method
(0.10 % to 33.00 %)  
101 to 109  
Cobalt by the Ion-Exchange-Potentiometric Titration Method
(2 % to 75 %)  
25 to 32  
Cobalt by the Nitroso-R-Salt Spectrophotometric Method
(0.10 % to 5.0 %)  
33 to 42  
Copper by Neocuproine Spectrophotometric Method
(0.010 % to 10.00 %)  
43 to 52  
Iron by the Silver Reduction Titrimetric Method
(1.0 % to 50.0 %)  
118 to 125  
Manganese by the Metaperiodate Spectrophotometric Method
(0.05 % to 2.00 %)  
8 to 17  
Molybdenum by the Ion Exchange—8-Hydroxyquinoline
Gravimetric Method (1.5 % to 30 %)  
110 to 117  
Molybdenum by the Thiocyanate Spectrophotometric Method
(0.01 % to 1.50 %)  
79 to 90  
Nickel by the Dimethylglyoxime Gravimetric Method
(0.1 % to 84.0 %)  
61 to 68  
Niobium by the Ion Exchange—Cupferron Gravimetric Method
(0.5 % to 6.0 %)  
126 to 133  
Silicon by the Gravimetric Method (0.05 % to 5.00 %)  
18 to 24  
Tantalum by the Ion Exchange—Pyrogallol Spectrophotometric
Method (0.03 % to 1.0 %)  
134 to 142  
Tin by the Solvent Extraction-Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.002 % to 0.10 %)  
69 to 78  
1.3 Other test methods applicable to the analysis of nickel alloys that may be used in lieu of or in addition to this method are E1019, E1834, E1835, E1917, E1938, E2465, E2594, E2823.  
1.4 Some of the composition ranges given in ...

  • Standard
    38 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    38 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1835-14(2022)(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Analysis of Nickel Alloys by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This test method is used for the analysis of nickel alloy samples by FAAS to check compliance with compositional specifications. It is assumed that all who use the procedure will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely. It is expected that the work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory and that proper waste disposal procedures will be followed. Appropriate quality control practices must be followed such as those described in Guide E882.  
5.2 Interlaboratory Studies (ILS)5, 6—International interlaboratory studies were conducted by ISO/TC 155/SC4, Analysis of nickel alloys. Results were evaluated in accordance with ISO 5725:1986 and restated to conform to Practice E1601. The method was published as ISO 7530, Parts 1 through 9. The published ISO statistics are summarized separately for each analyte to correspond with Practice E1601.  
5.3 In this test method, some matrix modifiers are specified. However, other additives have come into common use since the original publication of this test method. These may be equally or more effective but have not been tested. It is the responsibility of the user to validate the use of such additives or the use of different dilutions, or both.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers analysis of nickel alloys by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) for the following elements:    
Element  
Compostiton Range, %  
Aluminum  
0.2 to 4.0  
Chromium  
0.01 to 4.0  
Cobalt  
0.01 to 4.0  
Copper  
0.01 to 4.0  
Iron  
0.1 to 4.0  
Manganese  
0.1 to 4.0  
Silicon  
0.2 to 1.0  
Vanadium  
0.05 to 1.0  
1.2 The composition ranges of these elements can be expanded by the use of appropriate standards.  
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific hazards associated with the use of this test method, see Practices E50 and the warning statements included in this test method.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    9 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E2594-20(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Analysis of Nickel Alloys by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (Performance-Based)

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This test method for the chemical analysis of nickel alloys is primarily intended to test material for compliance with specifications such as those under jurisdiction of ASTM Committee B02. It may also be used to test compliance with other specifications that are compatible with the test method.  
5.2 It is assumed that all who use this test method will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely, and that the work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory.  
5.3 This is a performance-based test method that relies more on the demonstrated quality of the test result than on strict adherence to specific procedural steps. It is expected that laboratories using this test method will prepare their own work instructions. These work instructions will include detailed operating instructions for the specific laboratory, the specific reference materials employed, and performance acceptance criteria. It is also expected that, when applicable, each laboratory will participate in proficiency test programs, such as described in Practice E2027, and that the results from the participating laboratory will be satisfactory.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method describes the inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometric analysis of nickel alloys, such as specified by Committee B02, and having chemical compositions within the following limits:    
Element  
Application Range (%)  
Aluminum  
0.01–1.00  
Boron  
0.001–0.050  
Calcium  
0.001–0.05  
Carbon  
0.10–0.20  
Chromium  
0.01–33.0  
Cobalt  
0.10–20.0  
Copper  
0.01–3.00  
Iron  
0.01–50.0  
Lead  
0.001–0.01  
Magnesium  
0.0001–0.100  
Manganese  
0.01–3.0  
Molybdenum  
0.01–30.0  
Niobium  
0.01–6.0  
Nickel  
25.0–80.0  
Nitrogen  
0.001–0.20  
Oxygen  
0.0001–0.003  
Phosphorous  
0.001–0.030  
Sulfur  
0.0001–0.010  
Silicon  
0.01–1.50  
Tantalum  
0.005–0.10  
Tin  
0.001–0.020  
Titanium  
0.001–6.0  
Tungsten  
0.01–5.0  
Vanadium  
0.01–1.0  
Zirconium  
0.01–0.10  
1.2 The following elements may be determined using this test method. The test method user should carefully evaluate the precision and bias statements of this test method to determine applicability of the test method for the intended use.    
Element  
Quantification Range (%)  
Aluminum  
0.060–1.40  
Boron  
0.002–0.020  
Calcium  
0.001–0.003  
Copper  
0.010–0.52  
Magnesium  
0.001–0.10  
Manganese  
0.002–0.65  
Niobium  
0.020–5.5  
Phosphorous  
0.004–0.030  
Tantalum  
0.010–0.050  
Tin  
0.002–0.018  
Titanium  
0.020–3.1  
Tungsten  
0.007–0.11  
Vanadium  
0.010–0.50  
Zirconium  
0.002–0.10  
1.3 This test method has only been interlaboratory tested for the elements and ranges specified. It may be possible to extend this test method to other elements or different quantification ranges provided that method validation is performed that includes evaluation of method sensitivity, precision, and bias as described in this document. Additionally, the validation study must evaluate the acceptability of sample preparation methodology using reference materials or spike recoveries, or both. The user is cautioned to carefully evaluate the validation data against the laboratory’s data quality objectives. Method validation of scope extensions is also a requirement of ISO/IEC 17025.  
1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific warning statements are given in 8.2.6.3 and safety hazard statements are given i...

  • Standard
    10 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    10 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E353-19e1(Test Method)
Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Stainless, Heat-Resisting, Maraging, and Other Similar Chromium-Nickel-Iron Alloys

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 These test methods for the chemical analysis of metals and alloys are primarily intended as referee methods to test such materials for compliance with compositional specifications, particularly those under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee A01 on Steel, Stainless Steel, and Related Alloys. It is assumed that all who use these test methods will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely. It is expected that work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory under appropriate quality control practices such as those described in Guide E882.
SCOPE
1.1 These test methods cover the chemical analysis of stainless, heat-resisting, maraging, and other similar chromium-nickel-iron alloys having chemical compositions within the following limits:    
Element  
Composition Range, %  
Aluminum  
0.002  
to 5.50  
Boron  
0.001  
to 0.20  
Carbon  
0.01  
to 1.50  
Chromium  
0.01  
to 35.00  
Cobalt  
0.01  
to 15.00  
Niobium  
0.01  
to 4.00  
Copper  
0.01  
to 5.00  
Lead  
0.001  
to 0.50  
Manganese  
0.01  
to 20.00  
Molybdenum  
0.01  
to 7.00  
Nickel  
0.01  
to 48.00  
Nitrogen  
0.001  
to 0.50  
Phosphorus  
0.002  
to 0.35  
Selenium  
0.01  
to 0.50  
Silicon  
0.01  
to 4.00  
Sulfur  
0.002  
to 0.50  
Tantalum  
0.01  
to 0.80  
Tin  
0.001  
to 0.05  
Titanium  
0.01  
to 4.50  
Tungsten  
0.01  
to 4.50  
Vanadium  
0.005  
to 1.00  
Zirconium  
0.001  
to 0.20  
1.2 The test methods in this standard are contained in the sections indicated below:    
Sections  
Aluminum, Total, by the 8-Quinolinol Gravimetric Method (0.20 % to 7.00 %)  
119–126  
Aluminum, Total, by the 8-Quinolinol Spectrophotometric Method (0.003 % to 0.20 %)  
71–81  
Carbon, Total, by the Combustion–Thermal Conductivity Method–Discontinued 1986  
153–163  
Carbon, Total, by the Combustion Gravimetric Method (0.05 % to 1.50 %)–Discontinued 2013  
98–108  
Chromium by the Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.006 % to 1.00 %)  
202–211  
Chromium by the Peroxydisulfate Oxidation–Titration Method (0.10 % to 35.00 %)  
212–220  
Chromium by the Peroxydisulfate-Oxidation Titrimetric Method-Discontinued 1980  
145–152  
Cobalt by the Ion-Exchange–Potentiometric Titration Method (2 % to 15 %)  
53–60  
Cobalt by the Nitroso-R-Salt Spectrophotometric Method (0.01 % to 5.0 %)  
61–70  
Copper by the Neocuproine Spectrophotometric Method (0.01 % to 5.00) %)  
109–118  
Copper by the Sulfide Precipitation-Electrodeposition Gravimetric Method (0.01 % to 5.00 %)  
82–89  
Lead by the Ion-Exchange-Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.001 % to 0.50 %)  
127–136  
Manganese by the Periodate Spectrophotometric Method (0.01 % to 5.00 %)  
9–18  
Molybdenum by the Ion Exchange–8-Hydroxyquinoline Gravimetric Method  
242–249  
Molybdenum by the Thiocyanate Spectrophotometric Method (0.01 % to 1.50 %)  
190–201  
Nickel by the Dimethylglyoxime Gravimetric Method (0.1 % to 48.0 %)  
172–179  
Phosphorus by the Alkalimetric Method (0.02 % to 0.35 %)  
164–171  
Phosphorus by the Molybdenum Blue Spectrophotometric Method (0.002 % to 0.35 %)  
19–30  
Silicon by the Gravimetric Method (0.05 % to 4.00 %)  
46–52  
Sulfur by the Gravimetric Method-Discontinued 1988  
30–36  
Sulfur by the Combustion-Iodate Titration Method (0.005 % to 0.5 %)-Discontinued 2014  
37–45  
Sulfur by the Chromatographic Gravimetric Method-Discontinued 1980  
137–144  
Tin by the Solvent Extraction–Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method (0.002 % to 0.10 %)  
180–189  
Tin by the Sulfide ...

  • Standard
    46 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1834-18(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Analysis of Nickel Alloys by Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This test method is primarily intended to test material for compliance with specifications such as those under the jurisdiction of ASTM Technical Committee B02 on Nonferrous Metals and Alloys. It may also be used to test compliance with other specifications that are compatible with the test method.  
5.2 It is assumed that users of this test method shall be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely, and that the work shall be performed in a properly equipped laboratory.  
5.3 This is a performance-based method that relies more on the demonstrated quality of the test result than on strict adherence to specific procedural steps. It is expected that laboratories using this test method shall prepare their own work instructions. These work instructions shall include detailed operating instructions for the specific laboratory, the specific reference materials employed, and the performance acceptance criteria. It is also expected that, when applicable, each laboratory shall participate in proficiency test programs, such as described in Practice E2027, and that the results from the participating laboratory shall be satisfactory.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method describes the graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometric analysis of nickel, such as specified by ASTM Committee B02, and having chemical compositions within the following limits:    
Element  
Application Range
(Mass Fraction %)  
Aluminum  
0. 01 - 6.00  
Boron  
0. 01 - 0.10  
Carbon  
0. 01 - 0.15  
Chromium  
0. 01 - 33.00  
Copper  
0.01 - 35.00  
Cobalt  
0. 01 - 20.00  
Iron  
0.05 - 50.00  
Magnesium  
0. 01 - 0.020  
Molybdenum  
0. 01 - 30.0  
Niobium  
0. 01 - 6.0  
Nickel  
25.00 - 100.0  
Phosphorous  
0.001 - 0.025  
Silicon  
0.01 - 1.50    
Sulfur  
0.0001 - 0.01    
Titanium  
0.0001 - 6.0    
Tungsten  
0.01 - 5.0    
Vanadium  
0.0005 - 1.0  
1.2 The following elements may be determined using this test method:    
Element  
Quantification Range (μg/g)  
Bismuth  
0.2 - 3  
Lead  
0.6 - 12  
Selenium  
0.7 - 10  
Tellurium  
0.4 - 6  
1.3 This test method has only been interlaboratory-tested for the elements and ranges specified. It may be possible to extend this test method to other elements or different concentration ranges provided that a test method validation study that includes an instrument performance evaluation as described in Practice E1770 is performed. Additionally, the validation study shall evaluate the acceptability of sample preparation methodology using reference materials or spike recoveries, or both. The user is cautioned to carefully evaluate the validation data as to the intended purpose of the analytical results.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific hazards statements see 8.2.4.2 and 9.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    9 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    9 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1917-13(2018)(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Determination of Phosphorus in Nickel, Ferronickel, and Nickel Alloys by Phosphovanadomolybdate Spectrophotometry

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This test method is used for the determination of phosphorus in nickel, ferronickel, and nickel alloy samples by molecular absorption spectrometry to check compliance with compositional specifications. It is assumed that all who use the procedure will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely. It is expected that the work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory and that proper waste disposal procedures will be followed. Appropriate quality control practices must be followed, such as those described in Guide E882.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the determination of phosphorus in nickel, ferronickel, and nickel alloys in the range 0.0007 % to 0.05 %.  
1.2 Arsenic, chromium, hafnium, niobium, silicon, tantalum, titanium, and tungsten interfere, but the interference can be avoided by complexation or volatilization (for chromium). The lowest phosphorus content (0.0007 %) can be reached only in samples with low contents of interfering elements.  
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific hazards associated with the use of this test method see Practices E50. Refer to specific warning notes given throughout this test method.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    4 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1938-13(2018)(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Determination of Titanium in Nickel Alloys by Diantipyrylmethane Spectrophotometry

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This test method is used for the determination of titanium in nickel alloy samples by molecular absorption spectrometry to check compliance with compositional specifications. It is assumed that all who use the procedure will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely. It is expected that the work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory and that proper waste disposal procedures will be followed. Appropriate quality control practices must be followed such as those described in Guide E882.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the determination of titanium in nickel alloys in the range 0.3 % to 5.0 %. With appropriate reference materials, the test method may be extended down to 0.05 %.  
1.2 Molybdenum, if present, may cause a high bias to the extent of 0.001 % titanium for every 1 % molybdenum.  
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  For specific hazards associated with the use of this test method, see Practices E50.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    4 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1587-17(Test Method)
Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Refined Nickel

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 These test methods are primarily intended to test refined nickel metal for compliance with compositional specifications. It is assumed that all who use these test methods will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely. It is expected that the analytical work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory under appropriate quality control practices.
SCOPE
1.1 These test methods apply to the chemical analysis of refined nickel and other forms of metallic nickel having chemical compositions within the following limits:    
Element  
Mass Fraction, %  
Antimony, less than  
0.005  
Arsenic, less than  
0.005  
Bismuth, less than  
0.01  
Cadmium, less than  
0.0025  
Carbon, max  
0.03  
Cobalt, max  
1.00  
Copper, max  
1.00  
Hydrogen, max  
0.003  
Iron, max  
0.15  
Lead, less than  
0.01  
Manganese, less than  
0.20  
Nickel, min  
98.0  
Nitrogen, less than  
0.50  
Oxygen, less than  
0.03  
Phosphorus, less than  
0.005  
Selenium, less than  
0.0010  
Silicon, less than  
0.005  
Silver, less than  
0.01  
Sulfur, max  
0.01  
Tellurium, less than  
0.0010  
Thallium, less than  
0.0010  
Tin, less than  
0.005  
Zinc, less than  
0.015  
1.2 These test methods may be used to determine the following elements by the methods indicated below:    
Test Methods  
Sections  
Antimony, Arsenic, Bismuth, Cadmium, Lead, Selenium, Silver, Tellurium, Tin, and Thallium by the Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometric Method  
21 – 31  
Bismuth, Cadmium, Cobalt, Copper, Iron, Lead, Manganese, Silver, and Zinc by the Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometric Method  
9 – 20  
Sulfur by the Methylene Blue Spectrophotometric Method After Generation of Hydrogen Sulfide  
32 – 42  
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific precautions, see Section 6.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    13 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    13 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E2823-17(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Analysis of Nickel Alloys by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (Performance-Based)

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This test method for the chemical analysis of nickel and nickel alloys is primarily intended to test material for compliance with specifications such as those under jurisdiction of ASTM committee B02. It may also be used to test compliance with other specifications that are compatible with the test method.  
5.2 It is assumed that all who use this method will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely, and that the work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory.  
5.3 This is a performance-based method that relies more on the demonstrated quality of the test result than on strict adherence to specific procedural steps. It is expected that laboratories using this method will prepare their own work instructions. These work instructions will include detailed operating instructions for the specific laboratory, the specific reference materials employed, and performance acceptance criteria. It is also expected that, when applicable, each laboratory will participate in proficiency test programs, such as described in Practice E2027, and that the results from the participating laboratory will be satisfactory.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method describes the inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometric analysis of nickel and nickel allys, as specified by Committee B02, and having chemical compositions within the following limits:    
Element  
Application Range (Mass Fraction %)  
Aluminum  
0. 01–6.00  
Boron  
0. 01–0.10  
Carbon  
0. 01–0.15  
Chromium  
0. 01–33.00  
Copper  
0.01–35.00  
Cobalt  
0. 01–20.00  
Iron  
0.05–50.00  
Magnesium  
0. 01–0.020  
Molybdenum  
0. 01–30.0  
Niobium  
0. 01–6.0  
Nickel  
25.00–100.0  
Phosphorous  
0.001–0.025  
Silicon  
0.01–1.50  
Sulfur  
0.0001–0.01  
Titanium  
0.0001–6.0  
Tungsten  
0.01–5.0  
Vanadium  
0.0005–1.0  
1.2 The following elements may be determined using this method.    
Element  
Quantification Range (μg/g)  
Antimony  
0.5–50  
Bismuth  
0.1–11  
Gallium  
2.9–54  
Lead  
0.4–21  
Silver  
1–35  
Tin  
2.2–97  
Thallium  
0.5–3.0  
1.3 This method has only been interlaboratory tested for the elements and ranges specified. It may be possible to extend this method to other elements or different composition ranges provided that method validation that includes evaluation of method sensitivity, precision, and bias as described in this document is performed. Additionally, the validation study must evaluate the acceptability of sample preparation methodology using reference materials and/or spike recoveries. The user is cautioned to carefully evaluate the validation data as to the intended purpose of the analytical results. Guide E2857 provides additional guidance on method validation.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific safety hazard statements are given in Section 9.

  • Standard
    8 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    8 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off