CEN/TR 16705:2014
(Main)Perimeter protection - Performance classification methodology
Perimeter protection - Performance classification methodology
This Technical Report aims at providing information to be used for the design of the future activities for making a 'perimeter protection standard'.
This CEN Technical Report describes a performance classification methodology for the identification of the desired systems performance for perimeter protection systems. It also gives a conceptual framework for matching the desired performance and the capabilities of a possible solution.
Furthermore this CEN Technical Report presents the results of inventories that have been made on current systems and (generic type) products, relevant member states regulations, relevant documents from CEN, CEN/TC 325, ISO and other sources. It should be noted that these inventories cannot be considered complete and any values given should be considered indicative values.
The following subjects are not covered by this Technical Report:
− threats approaching from the sea side;
− threats approaching through the air.
It is recognized that with regard to vital infrastructure and very high risk objects the generic system approach indicated in this Technical Report may not suffice and additional checklists and risk assessment tools may be required.
Schutz von Grundstücksgrenzen - Methodologie für eine Leistungsklassifizierung
Protection périmétrique - Méthode de classification des performances
Perimetrijska zaščita - Metodologija razvrščanja zmogljivosti
CEN/TR 16705 zagotavlja informacije za uporabo pri načrtovanju prihodnjih aktivnosti za oblikovanje standarda perimetrijske zaščite. To tehnično poročilo CEN opisuje metodologijo razvrščanja zmogljivosti za identifikacijo želene zmogljivosti sistemov za sisteme perimetrijske zaščite. Prav tako zagotavlja konceptualni okvir za usklajevanje želene zmogljivosti in sposobnosti mogoče rešitve. Poleg tega to tehnično poročilo CEN predstavi rezultate popisov, ki so bili opravljeni na obstoječih sistemih in proizvodih generičnega tipa, ustrezne uredbe držav članic, ustrezne dokumente CEN, CEN/TC 325, ISO in druge vire. Treba je opozoriti, da se ti popisi ne morejo obravnavati kot popolni in da so vse navedene vrednosti indikativne. To tehnično poročilo ne zajema naslednjih tem: - nevarnosti pri približevanju z morja; - nevarnosti pri približevanju po zraku. Ugotovljeno je, da glede na ključno infrastrukturo in proizvode z zelo visokim tveganjem splošni sistemski pristop iz tega tehničnega poročila morda ne zadostuje in so morda potrebni dodatni kontrolni seznami in orodja za oceno tveganja.
General Information
Standards Content (Sample)
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-julij-2014
3HULPHWULMVND]DãþLWD0HWRGRORJLMDUD]YUãþDQMD]PRJOMLYRVWL
Perimeter protection - Performance classification methodology
Schutz von Grundstücksgrenzen - Methodologie für eine Leistungsklassifizierung
Protection périmétrique - Méthode de classification de performance
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: CEN/TR 16705:2014
ICS:
13.310 Varstvo pred kriminalom Protection against crime
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
TECHNICAL REPORT
CEN/TR 16705
RAPPORT TECHNIQUE
TECHNISCHER BERICHT
April 2014
ICS 13.310
English Version
Perimeter protection - Performance classification methodology
Protection périmétrique - Méthode de classification de Schutz von Grundstücksgrenzen - Methodologie für eine
performance Leistungsklassifizierung
This Technical Report was approved by CEN on 25 March 2014. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee CEN/TC 388.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and United
Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION
EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels
© 2014 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. CEN/TR 16705:2014 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.
Contents Page
Foreword .5
0 Introduction .6
0.1 Purpose .6
0.2 Approach .6
0.3 Vital infrastructure .6
1 Scope .7
2 Normative references .7
3 Terms and definitions .7
4 Performance classification methodology . 15
4.1 Outline of the approach . 15
4.2 Determining the required the level of protection – picture of the methodology . 16
4.3 Assumptions and starting point making the calculation model . 18
4.4 The questionnaire of the calculation the model . 20
4.4.1 Introduction to the questionnaire . 20
4.4.2 Text of the questionnaire annex data entry sheet . 21
5 Modus operandi . 24
5.1 Introduction . 24
5.2 Aggressor types. 24
5.3 Scenarios . 25
5.4 Toolsets . 25
6 Risk assessment methodology . 25
6.1 General . 25
6.2 Risk – Target identification . 26
6.3 Threats . 26
6.4 Site characterization . 26
6.4.1 General . 26
6.4.2 Site and physical environment . 26
6.4.3 Human and social factors of the environment . 27
6.4.4 Use of the site . 27
6.4.5 Type of access . 27
7 Level of protection . 27
8 Determining functional requirements . 28
8.1 Introduction . 28
8.2 Questions for establishing the functional requirement . 28
9 Elements of possible solutions . 29
9.1 Introduction . 29
9.2 Elements of delay . 29
9.2.1 Overview of elements of delay . 29
9.2.2 Fences . 30
9.2.3 Walls . 31
9.2.4 Barriers . 32
9.2.5 Gates . 32
9.2.6 Roadblockers, Bollards . 32
9.3 Elements of detection . 32
9.3.1 Introduction . 32
9.3.2 Overview of elements of detection . 32
9.3.3 Detection . 33
9.3.4 Exterior sensors PIDS . 33
9.3.5 Lighting. 33
9.3.6 Entry/exit control . 33
9.4 External elements . 34
9.5 Local law and regulations. 34
10 Inventories . 34
11 On testing . 35
Annex A Security system operational requirements – Q and A . 36
Annex B Framework for perimeter protection systems evaluation . 39
Annex C An environmental and organizational checklist for perimeter protection . 41
C.1 Introduction . 41
C.2 Environmental checklist for perimeter protection . 41
C.3 Organizational checklist for perimeter protection . 45
Annex D A perimeter security technologies classification . 49
D.1 Introduction . 49
D.2 Four families for intrusion detection . 49
D.2.1 Structure of the annex . 49
D.2.2 Structure of the four main Tables D.3 to D.6 . 50
D.3 Stand-alone equipment . 54
D.4 Fence-mounted sensors . 58
D.5 Active Physical security . 59
D.6 Underground sensors . 62
Annex E Inventory of perimeter intruder detection systems (PIDs) . 64
E.1 Introduction . 64
E.2 Combination of two sensors . 65
Annex F Matrix of current systems and (generic type) products . 71
Annex G On Perimeter surveillance and burglary resistance . 86
G.1 Introduction . 86
G.2 Use of detection systems for perimeter protection . 86
G.2.1 Basic requirements for perimeter surveillance systems . 86
G.2.2 Basic principles of the detection systems. 88
G.2.3 Comparison of detection systems . 89
G.2.4 Summary . 89
G.3 Classification for burglary resistance . 90
G.3.1 Recommendations for the assessment of the resistance class. 90
G.3.2 DIN-Standards for burglar resistance . 91
Annex H Pictures of fences, gates and entrance barriers . 92
H.1 Introduction . 92
H.2 Different sorts of fences . 92
H.2.1 Vegetable fence
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.