CEN ISO/TS 17444-2:2013

Electronic fee collection - Charging performance - Part 2: Examination Framework (ISO/TS 17444-2:2013)

ISO/TS 17444-2:2013 defines the Examination Framework for the measurement of Charging Performance Metrics defined in ISO/TS 17444-1 to be used during Evaluation and/or on-going Monitoring.
It specifies a method for the specification and documentation of a Specific Examination Framework which can be used by the responsible entity to evaluate charging performance for a particular information exchange interface or for overall charging performance within a Toll Scheme.
It provides a toolbox of Examination Tests for the roles of Toll Charger and Toll Service Provider for the following Scheme types:
DSRC Discrete;
Autonomous Discrete;
Autonomous Continuous.
The detailed choice of the set of examination tests to be used depends on the application and the respective context. Compliance with ISO/TS 17444-2:2013 is understood as using the definitions and prescriptions laid out in ISO/TS 17444-2:2013 whenever the respective system aspects are subjected to performance measurements, rather than using other definitions and examination methods than the ones specified in ISO/TS 17444-2:2013.
Out of scope of ISO/TS 17444-2:2013 are the following aspects:
ISO/TS 17444-2:2013 does not propose specific numeric performance bounds, or average or worst-case error bounds in percentage or monetary units. Those decisions are left to the Toll Charger (or to agreements between Toll Charger and Service Provider).This Technical Specification does not consider the evaluation of the expected performance of a system based on modelling and measured data from trial at another place.
ISO/TS 17444-2:2013 does not consider the specification of a common reference system which would be required for comparison of performance between systems.
ISO/TS 17444-2:2013 defines measurements only on standardised interfaces. Proprietary interfaces are excluded, because it is not possible to define standardised metrics on such system properties. These excluded interfaces are among others the link between Toll Charger RSE and central systems in DSRC systems, and the additional sensor input of GNSS modules (inertial sensors, CAN-bus for wheel ticks, etc.).

Elektronische Gebührenerhebung - Abbuchungsdurchführung - Teil 2: Rahmenbedingungen für Prüfungen (ISO/TS 17444-2:2013)

Perception du télépéage - Performance d'imputation - Partie 2: Cadre d'examen (ISO/TS 17444-2:2013)

L'ISO/TS 17444-2:2013 définit le cadre d'examen pour le mesurage des métriques de performance d'imputation définies dans l'ISO/TS 17444‑1 à utiliser pendant l'évaluation et/ou la surveillance continue.
L'ISO/TS 17444-2:2013 spécifie une méthode pour la spécification et la documentation d'un cadre d'examen spécifique pouvant être utilisé par l'entité responsable pour évaluer la performance d'imputation d'une interface d'échange d'informations particulière ou la performance globale d'imputation d'un système de péage.
Elle fournit une boîte à outils de tests d'examen relatifs aux rôles de percepteur de péage et de prestataire de services de péage pour les types de système suivants:
a) DSRC discret;
b) autonome et discret;
c) autonome et continu.
Le choix détaillé de l'ensemble des tests d'examen à utiliser dépend de l'application et du contexte correspondant. Par conformité à la présente spécification, on entend l'utilisation des définitions et des spécifications stipulées dans la présente Spécification technique chaque fois que les aspects correspondants du système font l'objet de mesures des performances, plutôt que l'utilisation de définitions et de méthodes d'examen autres que celles spécifiées dans la présente Spécification technique.
Les aspects suivants ne relèvent pas du domaine d'application de la présente Spécification technique:
l'ISO/TS 17444-2:2013 ne propose pas de limites numériques de performance spécifiques ni de limites d'erreur moyenne ou dans le cas le plus défavorable, en pourcentage ou en unités monétaires. Ces décisions sont laissées au percepteur de péage (ou relèvent d'accords entre le percepteur de péage et le prestataire de services de péage). La présente Spécification technique n'envisage pas d'évaluer la performance attendue d'un système en se fondant sur une modélisation et des données mesurées lors d'un essai effectué à un autre endroit;
l'ISO/TS 17444-2:2013 n'envisage pas la spécification d'un système de référence commun qui serait requis pour comparer la performance de différents systèmes;
l'ISO/TS 17444-2:2013 définit des mesures réalisées uniquement sur des interfaces normalisées. Les interfaces propriétaires sont exclues, parce qu'il n'est pas possible de définir des mesures normalisées des propriétés de tels systèmes. Ces interfaces exclues comprennent entre autres la liaison entre les infrastructures de bord de route (RSE) du percepteur de péage et les systèmes centraux des systèmes de communications dédiées à courte portée (DSRC) ainsi que l'entrée capteur supplémentaire des modules du GNSS (système mondial de navigation par satellite) (capteurs inertiels, bus CAN pour incréments de roue, etc.).

Elektronsko pobiranje pristojbin - Izvajanje zaračunavanja - 2. del: Okvirni pogoji za preverjanje (ISO/TS 17444-2:2013)

General Information

• Status: Withdrawn
• Publication Date: 19-Nov-2013
• Withdrawal Date: 21-Nov-2017
• ICS: 03.220.20 - Road transport
• ICS: 35.240.60 - IT applications in transport
• Technical Committee: CEN/TC 278 - Road transport and traffic telematics
• Drafting Committee: CEN/TC 278/WG 1 - Electronic fee collection and access control (EFC)
• Current Stage: 9960 - Withdrawal effective - Withdrawal
• Completion Date: 22-Nov-2017
• Directive: 2004/52/EC - Interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community
• Mandate: M/338 - Standardisation mandate to CEN, CENELEC and ETSI in support of interoperabilty of electonic road toll systems in the community
• Ref Project: SIST-TS CEN ISO/TS 17444-2:2014 - Electronic fee collection - Charging performance - Part 2: Examination Framework (ISO/TS 17444-2:2013)

Relations

• Replaced By: CEN ISO/TS 17444-2:2017 - Electronic fee collection - Charging performance - Part 2: Examination framework (ISO/TS 17444-2:2017)
• Effective Date: 06-Dec-2017

Standards Content (Sample)

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-marec-2014
(OHNWURQVNRSRELUDQMHSULVWRMELQ,]YDMDQMH]DUDþXQDYDQMDGHO2NYLUQLSRJRML
]DSUHYHUMDQMH,6276
Electronic fee collection - Charging performance - Part 2: Examination Framework
(ISO/TS 17444-2:2013)
Elektronische Gebührenerhebung - Erhebungsqualität - Teil 2: Rahmenbedingungen für
Prüfungen (ISO/TS 17444-2:2013)
Perception du télépéage - Performance d'imputation - Partie 2: Cadre d'examen (ISO/TS
17444-2:2013)
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: CEN ISO/TS 17444-2:2013
ICS:
03.220.20 Cestni transport Road transport
35.240.60 Uporabniške rešitve IT v IT applications in transport
transportu in trgovini and trade
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION
CEN ISO/TS 17444-2
SPÉCIFICATION TECHNIQUE
TECHNISCHE SPEZIFIKATION
November 2013
ICS 03.220.20; 35.240.60
English Version
Electronic fee collection - Charging performance - Part 2:
Examination Framework (ISO/TS 17444-2:2013)
Perception du télépéage - Performance d'imputation - Elektronische Gebührenerhebung - Erhebungsqualität - Teil
Partie 2: Cadre d'examen (ISO/TS 17444-2:2013) 2: Rahmenbedingungen für Prüfungen (ISO/TS 17444-
2:2013)
This Technical Specification (CEN/TS) was approved by CEN on 30 September 2013 for provisional application.

The period of validity of this CEN/TS is limited initially to three years. After two years the members of CEN will be requested to submit their
comments, particularly on the question whether the CEN/TS can be converted into a European Standard.

CEN members are required to announce the existence of this CEN/TS in the same way as for an EN and to make the CEN/TS available
promptly at national level in an appropriate form. It is permissible to keep conflicting national standards in force (in parallel to the CEN/TS)
until the final decision about the possible conversion of the CEN/TS into an EN is reached.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and United
Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION

EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG

CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels
© 2013 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. CEN ISO/TS 17444-2:2013 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.

Contents Page
Foreword .3

Foreword
This document (CEN ISO/TS 17444-2:2013) has been prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 204
"Intelligent transport systems" in collaboration with Technical Committee CEN/TC 278 “Intelligent transport
systems” the secretariat of which is held by NEN.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent
rights. CEN [and/or CENELEC] shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
According to the CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the following
countries are bound to announce this Technical Specification: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus,
Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany,
Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland,
Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom.
Endorsement notice
The text of ISO/TS 17444-2:2013 has been approved by CEN as CEN ISO/TS 17444-2:2013 without any
modification.
TECHNICAL ISO/TS
SPECIFICATION 17444-2
First edition
2013-11-15
Electronic fee collection — Charging
performance —
Part 2:
Examination Framework
Perception du télépéage — Performance d'imputation —
Partie 2: Cadre d'examen
Reference number
ISO/TS 17444-2:2013(E)
©
ISO 2013
ISO/TS 17444-2:2013(E)
©  ISO 2013
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission.
Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
Case postale 56  CH-1211 Geneva 20
Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11
Fax + 41 22 749 09 47
E-mail [e-mail]
Web www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO 2013 – All rights reserved

ISO/TS 17444-2:2013(E)
Contents Page
Foreword .vi
Introduction.vii
1 Scope.1
2 Normative references.1
3 Terms and definitions .2
4 Symbols and Abbreviated terms .7
5 Examination Framework.8
5.1 General .8
5.2 Method for defining a Specific Examination Framework .9
5.2.1 Selection of Metrics to be evaluated .9
5.2.2 Definition of environmental conditions and associated performance requirements.10
5.2.3 Determination of Required Sample Sizes .10
5.2.4 Selection of methods for generating Charging Input and Reference Data .10
5.2.5 Determination of Test Routes / Sub-set of Charged Network for generating representative
trips.10
5.2.6 Documentation of the Specific Examination Framework.11
5.3 Sources of Data .11
5.4 Methods of generating charging input.14
5.4.1 Predefined routes (identifier: “PVP”) .15
5.4.2 Reference System (used in combination with identifiers: “PVR” and “UVR”) .16
5.4.3 Simulated OBE / FE (identifier: “SO”) .17
5.4.4 Dedicated OBE Testing (identifier: “DO”).17
5.5 Applicability of metrics scheme types .18
5.6 Charging Metric Selection Tables.21
5.6.1 General .21
5.6.2 DSRC Discrete .21
5.6.3 Autonomous Discrete .22
5.6.4 Autonomous Continuous .23
6 Examination Tests.25
6.1 Common (and DSRC Discrete) Examination Tests.25
6.1.1 General .25
6.1.2 ET-CM-E2E-1 E2E Correct Charging Rate.25
6.1.3 ET-CM-E2E-2 E2E Overcharging Rate.26
6.1.4 ET-CM-E2E-3 E2E Undercharging Rate.26
6.1.5 ET-CM-E2E-4 E2E Late Charging Rate .27
6.1.6 ET-CM-UA-1 UA - Correct Charging Rate.28
6.1.7 ET-CM-UA-2 UA - Overcharging Rate.28
6.1.8 ET-CM-UA-3 UA - Undercharging Rate.29
6.1.9 ET-CM-UA-4 UA - Accurate application of Payments and Refunds .30
6.1.10 ET-CM-UA-5 UA – Accurate Personalisation of OBUs .30
6.1.11 ET-CM-PC-1 PC - Correct Charging Rate.31
6.1.12 ET-CM-PC-2 PC – Overcharging Rate .31
6.1.13 ET-CM-PC-3 PC - Undercharging Rate .32
6.1.14 ET-CM-PC-4 PC - Latency – TC .33
6.1.15 ET-CM-PC-5 PC - Late Payment Claims .33
6.1.16 ET-CM-PC-6 PC – Rejected Payment Claim Rate.34
6.1.17 ET-CM-BD-1 BD - Correct Charging Rate.34
6.1.18 ET-CM-BD-2 BD – Overcharging Rate .35
6.1.19 ET-CM-BD-3 BD - Undercharging Rate.36
6.1.20 ET-CM-BD-4 BD - Incorrect Charging Rate.37
ISO/TS 17444-2:2013(E)
6.1.21 ET-CM-BD-5 BD - Latency – TC.37
6.1.22 ET-CM-BD-6 BD – Late Billing Details .38
6.1.23 ET-CM-BD-7 BD – Rejected Billing Details Rate.38
6.1.24 ET-CM-BD-8 BD – Incorrectly rejected Billing Details Rate .39
6.1.25 ET-CM-BD-9 BD – Inferred Billing Details Rate .39
6.2 DSRC Discrete – Optional DSRC Toll Declaration Metrics.40
6.2.1 General.40
6.2.2 ET-CM-TD-1 TD - Correct Toll Declaration Generation .40
6.2.3 ET-CM-TD-2 TD - Incorrect Toll Declaration Generation.40
6.2.4 ET-CM-TD-3 TD – Late Toll Declarations.41
6.2.5 ET-CM-TD-4 TD - TSP Event Detection.41
6.2.6 ET-CM-TD-5 TD - TSP False Positive .42
6.3 Autonomous Discrete Specific Examination Tests.43
6.3.1 General.
...