ISO/IEC 10164-6:1993/Amd 1:1996
(Amendment)Information technology — Open Systems Interconnection — Systems Management: Log control function — Amendment 1: Implementation conformance statement proformas
Information technology — Open Systems Interconnection — Systems Management: Log control function — Amendment 1: Implementation conformance statement proformas
Includes tables, which document the mandatory and optional management information specific to the Log Control Management Function. Will be used by Profile specifiers, for example those developing International Standardized Profiles (ISPs), to specify and explicit subset of capability, which will afford interoperability between implementations.
Technologies de l'information — Interconnexion de systèmes ouverts (OSI) — Gestion-système: Fonction de contrôle de journal — Amendement 1: Formulaires de déclaration de conformité d'instance
General Information
Relations
Buy Standard
Standards Content (Sample)
INTERNATIONAL ISO/IEC
STANDARD
10164-6
First edition
1993-06-I 5
AMENDMENT 1
1996-05-I 5
Information technology - Open Systems
Interconnection - Systems Management:
Log control function
AMENDMENT 1: Implementation conformance
statement proformas
Technologies de /‘information
- lnterconnexion de sys t&mes ouverts
(OSI) - Gestion-systemes: Fonction de contrdle de journal
AMENDEMENT 7: Proformes KS
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
ISO/IEC 10164-6: 1993/Amd.l: 1996(E)
Foreword
IS0 (the International Organization for Standardization) and IEC (the International
Electrotechnical Commission) form the specialized system for worldwide
standardization. National bodies that are members of IS0 or IEC participate in the
development of International Standards through technical committees established by
the respective organization to deal with particular fields of technical activity. IS0 and
IEC technical committees collaborate in fields of mutual interest. Other international
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with IS0 and IEC, also
take part in the work.
In the field of information technology, IS0 and IEC have established a joint technical
committee, ISO/IEC JTC 1. Draft International Standards adopted by the joint technical
committee are circulated to national bodies for voting. Publication as an International
Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the national bodies casting a vote.
Amendment 1 to International Standard ISOLIEC 10164-6 was prepared by Joint
Technical Committee ISO/IEC JTC 1, Znformution technology, Subcommittee SC 21,
Open systems interconnection, data management and open distributed processing, in
collaboration with ITU-T. The identical text is published as ITU-T Rec. X.73YAmd. 1.
0 ISO/IEC 1996
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be repro-
duced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photo-
copying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the publisher.
ISO/IEC Copyright Office l Case Postale 56 l CH-1211 Geneve 20 l Switzerland
Printed in Switzerland
---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
0 ISOIIEC ISO/IEC 10164-6: 1993/Amd.l: 1996(E)
Introduction
This amendment includes tables, which document the mandatory and optional management information specific to the
Log Control Management Function. This amendment will be used by Profile specifiers, for example those developing
International Standardizes Profiles (ISPs), to specify an explicit subset of capability, which will afford interoperability
between implementatations. The tables also include a column for equipment vendors to state the capability of their
products in terms of the Profiles or base specification.
The table structures comply with the Guidelines for
Implementation Conformance Statement Proformas specified in ITU-T Recommendation X.724 I ISO/IEC 10165-6.
111
---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
This page intentionally left blank
---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
ISO/IEC 10164-6: 1993/Amd.l: 1996(E)
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD
ITU-T RECOMMENDATION
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - OPEN SYSTEMS INTERCONNECTION -
SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT: LOG CONTROL FUNCTION
AMENDMENT 1
(to ITU-T Rec. X.735 I ISO/IEC 10164-6)
Implementation conformance statement proformas
Add the following footnote to thefirst list item in 2.1:
“I) As amended by ITU-T Rec. X.701Kor.2 I ISO/IEC 10040Kor.2”
Add the following reference to 2.1:
2)
Cb
-
ITU-T Recommendation X.724 (1993) I ISO/IEC 10165-6: 1994, Information technology - Open Systems
Interconnection - Structure of management information: Requirements and guidelines for implementation
conformance statement proformas associated with ON management.”
Add the following references to 2.2:
3)
bb
- CCITT Recommendation X.291 (1992), OSI conformance testing methodology and framework for
protocol Recommendations for CCITT applications - Abstract test suite specification.
Open Systems Interconnection - Conformance testing
ISO/IEC 9646-2: 199 1, Information technology -
methodology and framework - Part 2: Abstract test suite specification.
-
ITU-T Recommendation X.2962), OH conformance testing methodology and framework for protocol
Recommendations for ITU-T applications - Implementation conformance statements.
ISO/IEC 9646-7: 1995, Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Conformance testing
Part 7: Implementation Conformance Statements.
methodology and framework -
And then add the following footnote:
2)
Presently at the stage of draft.
Apply the following changes to 3.4:
4)
Replace “dependent conformance” with “managed object conformance statement (MOCS)“.
Replace “general conformance” with “management information conformance statement (MICS)“.
Relabel items f) through i) as h) through k) and insert the following new items:
“f) MICS proforma;
g) MOCS proforma;”
change to 3.7:
Apply the following
5) .
Replace “system conformance statement” with the foliowing:
“a) PICS proforma;
protocol implementation conformance statement;
b)
system conformance statement.”
C>
Renumber 3.8 as 3.9 and insert the following new subclause:
6)
bb
38 . Implementation conformance statement proforma definitions
This Recommendation I International Standard makes use of the following terms defined in ITU-T Rec. X.724 I
ISO/IEC 10165-6:
a) Managed Relationship Conformance Statement (MRCS);
b) Management Conformance Summary (MCS);
c) MCS proforma;
d) MRCS proforma.”
ITU-T Rec. X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 E) 1
---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
ISO/IEC 10164-6:1993/Amd.l:1996(E)
Add the following abbreviations to clause 4:
7)
“ICS Implementation Conformance Statement
MCS Management Conformance Summary
Management Information Conformance Statement
MICS
Managed Object Conformance Statement
MOCS
MRCS Managed Relationship Conformance Statement
PIGS Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement”
Replace clause I3 with the following:
66
13 Conformance
International Standard shall comply with the
Implementations claiming to conform to this Recommendation
conformance requ irements as defined in the following subclauses.
13.1 Static conformance
The implementation shall conform to the requirements of th is Recommendation International Standard in the manager
11 be made in Table A. 1.
role, the agent role, or both roles. A claim of conformance to at least one role sha
If a claim of conformance is made for support in the manager role, the implementation shall support at least one
management operation or notification of the log managed object or at least one management operation of a subclass of
the log record managed object specified by this Recommendation I International Standard. The conformance
requirements in the manager role for those management operations and notifications are identified in Table A.3 and
further tables referenced by Annex A.
If a claim of conformance is made for support in the agent role, the implementation shall support one or more instances
of the log managed object class identified in Table A.4. In the agent role, conformance may also be claimed to
subclasses of the log record object class.
The implementation shall support the transfer syntax derived from the encoding rules specified in CCITT Rec. X.209 I
ISO/IEC 8825 named (joint-iso-ccitt asnl(1) basicEncoding( 1)) for the abstract data types referenced by the definitions
for which support is claimed.
NOTE - Prior to the publication of this amendment, this Recommendation I International Standard identified general and
dependent conformance classes. A claim of conformance similar to general conformance class can be made by stating support in the
manager role, the agent role, or both roles, for the log control functional unit in Table A.2. A claim of conformance similar to
dependent conformance class can be made by stating support for at least one of the items in Tables A.3 or A.4.
13.2 Dynamic conformance
to this Recommendation I International Standard shall support the elements of
Implemen tations claiming to conform
.med.
finitions of semantics corresponding to the defin itions for which support is clai
procedure and de
13.3 Management implementation conformance statement requirements
Any MCS proforma, MICS proforma, MOCS proforma, and MRCS proforma which conforms to this Recommendation I
International Standard shall be technically identical to the proformas specified in Annexes A, B, C and D preserving
table numbering and the index numbers of items, and differing only in pagination and page headers.
The supplier of an implementation which is claimed to conform to this Recommendation I International Standard shall
complete a copy of the Management Conformance Summary (MCS) provided in Annex A as part of the conformance
requirements together with any other ICS proformas referenced as applicable from that MCS. An ICS which conforms to
this Recommendation I International Standard shall:
-
describe an implementation which conforms to this Recommendation I International Standard;
-
have been completed in accordance with the instructions for completion given in ITU-T Rec. X.724 I
ISOLIEC 101656;
-
include the information necessary to uniquely identify both the supplier and the implementation.”
2 ITU-T Rec. X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 E)
---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
ISO/IEC 10164-6: 1993/Amd.l:1996(E)
Relabel Annexes A and B as E and F respectively, and insert the following annexes:
9)
Annex A
MCS proforma3)
(This annex forms an integral part of this Recommendation I International Standard)
Al .
Introduction
A.1.1
Purpose and structure
The Management Conformance Summary (MCS) is a statement by a supplier that identifies an implementation and
provides information on whether the implementation claims conformance to any of the listed set of documents that
specify conformance requirements to OS1 management.
The MCS proforma is a document in the form of a questionnaire that when completed by the supplier of an
implementation becomes the MCS.
A.1.2 Instructions for completing the MCS proforma to produce a MCS
The supplier of the implementation shall enter an explicit statement in each of the boxes provided. Specific instruction is
provided in the text which precedes each table.
A.l.3 Symbols, abbreviations and terms
For all annexes of this Recommendation I International Standard, the following common notations, defined in CCITT
Rec. X.291 I ISO/IEC 9646-2 and ITU-T Rec. X.296 I ISOLIEC 9646-7, are used for the Status column:
m Mandatory;
0 Optional;
C Conditional;
Prohibited;
X
-
Not applicable or out of scope.
NOTES
‘m’, and ‘0’ are prefixed by “c:” when nested under a conditional or optional item of the same table;
1 ‘C’,
2 ‘0’ may be suffixed by “.N” (where N is a unique number) for selectable options among a set of status values.
Support of at least one of the choices (from the items with the same value of N) is required.
For all annexes of this Recommendation I International Standard, the following common notations, defined in CCITT
Rec. X.291 I ISO/IEC 9646-2 and ITU-T Rec. X.296 I ISO/IEC 9646-7, are used for the Support column:
Y Implemented;
N Not implemented;
-
No answer required;
The item is ignored (i.e. processed syntactically but not semantically).
Ig
A.1.4 Table format
Some of the tables in this Recommendation I International Standard have been split because the information is too wide
to fit on the page. Where this occurs, the index number of the first block of columns are the index numbers of the
corresponding rows of the remaining blocks of columns. A complete table reconstructed from the constituent parts
should have the following layout:
Etc.
Index First block of columns Second block of columns
3, Users of this Recommendation I International Standard may freely reproduce the MCS proforma in this annex so that it can be
used for its intended purpose, and may further publish the completed MCS. Instructions for the MCS proforma are specified
in ITU-T Rec. X.724 I ISO/IEC 10165-6.
ITU-T Rec. X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 E) 3
---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
ISO/IEC 10164-6:1993/Amd.l:1996(E)
In this Recommendation I International Standard the constituent parts of the table appear consecutively, starting with the
first block of columns.
When a table with sub-rows is too wide to fit on a page, the continuation table(s) have been constructed with index
numbers identical to the index numbers in the corresponding rows of the first table, and with sub-index numbers
corresponding to the sub-rows within each indexed row. For example, if Table X.1 has 2 rows and the continuation of
Table X. 1 has 2 sub-rows for each row, the tables are presented as follows:
Table X.1 - Title
support
*
Index A B C D E F G
1 a b -
2 a b -
Table X.1 (concluded) - Title
Index Sub-index H I J K L
1 1.1 h i
j
1.2 h i
j
h i
2 2.1
j
1 2.2
I I h I i I j I I I
A complete table reconstructed from the constituent parts should have the following layout:
I 1
I SuPPofi I
J K L
Index A B C D E F G Sub-index H I
1 a b - 1.1 h i
j
1.2 h i
j
2 a b - 2.1 h i
j
I
.
i
1 2.2
I I I I I I I h I I J I I I
I I
References made to cells within tables shall be interpreted as references within reconstructed tables. In the example
above, the reference X. l/id corresponds to the blank cell in column G for row with Index 1, and X. l/l .2b corresponds to
the blank cell in column L for row with Sub-index 1.2.
A.2 Identification of the implementation
A.2.1
Date of statement
The supplier of the implementation shall enter the date of this statement in the box below. Use the format DD-MM-
YYYY.
Date of statement
1
I
ITU-T Rec. X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 E)
---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
ISO/IEC 10164-6: 1993/Amd.l:1996(E)
A.2.2 Identification of the implementation
The supplier of the implementation shall enter information necessary to uniquely identify the implementation and the
system(s) in which it may reside, in the box below.
A.2.3
Contact
The supplier of the implementation shall provide information on whom to contact if there are any queries concerning the
contents of the MCS or any referenced implementation conformance statement, in the box below.
A.3 Identification of the Recommendations I International Standards in which the management
information is defined
The supplier of the implementation shall enter the title, reference number and date of the publication of the
Recommendations I International Standards which specify the management information to which conformance is
claimed, in the box below.
Recommendations I International Standards to which conformance is claimed
A.3.1 Technical corrigenda implemented
The supplier of the implementation shall enter the reference numbers of implemented technical corrigenda which modify
the identified Recommendations I International Standards, in the box below.
A.3.2 Amendments implemented
The supplier of the implementation shall state the titles and reference numbers of implemented amendments to the
identified Recommendations I International Standards, in the box below.
ITU-T Rec. X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 E) 5
---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
ISO/IEC 10164-6: 1993/Amd.l: 1996(E)
A.4 Management conformance summary
The supplier of the implementation shall state the capabilities and features supported and provide a summary of
conformance claims to Recommendations I International Standards using the tables in this annex.
The supplier of the implementation shall specify the roles that are supported, in Table A. 1.
Table A.1 - Roles
Additional information
Index Roles supported Status Support
1 Manager role support 0.1
2 Agent role support 0.1
The supplier of the implementation shall specify support for the systems management functional units, in Table A.2.
Table A.2 - Systems management functional units
Manager Agent
Additional information
Index Systems management functional unit name Status Support Status Support
1 log control functional unit cl c2
cl c2
2 monitor log functional unit
cl: if A.l/la then o else -.
c2: if A. 1/2a then o else -.
The supplier of the implementation shall specify support for management information in the manager role, in Table A.3.
Table A.3 - Manager role minimum conformance requirement
Status support Additional information
Index Item
c3
1 Operations on managed objects
c4
2 State change notification for log managed objects
c4
3 Object creation notification for log managed objects
I I I
I
c4
4
1 Object deletion notification for log managed objects
~~ 1-- I
I I
~4
5 Attribute value change notification for log managed objects
~4
6 Processing error alarm notification for log managed objects
c3: if A.2/la or A.2/2a then m else (if Al/la then 0.2 else -).
c4: if A.Ula then m else (if A.2/2a then 0.2 else (if A.l/la then 0.2 else -)).
NOTE - Manager role minimum conformance requires support for at least one of the items identified in this table. Support for
either of the functional units identified in Table A.2 mandates support for some of those items. Conditions c3 and c4 express both
of these requirements.
The supplier of the implementation shall specify support for management information in the agent role, in Table A.4. If
additional subclasses of log records are supported, the supplier of the implementation shall list the classes in the
Additional information column.
6 IT&T Rec. X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 E)
---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
ISO/IEC 10164-6: 1993/Amd.l: 1996(E)
Table A.4 - Agent role minimum conformance requirement
Index Item Status support Additional information
1 Log managed object class c5
2 c6
Sub-classes of log records associated with notifications
emitted by the log managed object
3 Additional sub-classes of log records c7
c5: if A.l/2a then m else -.
c6: if A.l/2a and A.5/la then m else -.
c7: if A.l/2a then o else --”
NOTE - Condition c6 makes it mandatory, if logging is supported, to support the event log records associated with the
notifications supported.
Table A.5 - Logging of event records
Additional
Index Status Support
information
1 Does the implementation support logging of event records in agent role? C8
i
c8: if A. 1/2a then o else -.
I
The supplier of the implementation shall provide information on claims of conformance to any of the Recommendations
I International Standards summarized in Tables A.6 to A.9. For each Recommendation I International Standard that the
supplier of the implementation claims conformance to, the corresponding conformance statement(s) shall be completed,
or referenced by, the MCS. The supplier of the implementation shall complete the Support, Table numbers and
Additional information columns.
In Tables A.6 to A.9, the Status column is used to indicate whether the supplier of the implementation is required to
complete the referenced tables or referenced items. Conformance requirements are as specified in the referenced tables
or referenced items and are not changed by the value of the MCS Status column. Similarly, the Support column is used
by the supplier of the implementation to indicate completion of the referenced tables or referenced items.
Table A.6 - PICS support summary
Table
Identification of the Table
numbers Constraints Additional
Index document that includes of PICs Description Status Support numbers
information
and values
of PIGS
the PICS proforma
proforma
1 CCI’IT Rec. X.730 I Annex E SM application context OBJECT m
ISO/IEC 10164-l all tables IDENTIFIER
NOTE - Conformance to the MAPDUs defined in this Recommendation I International Standard can be claimed by
completing the corresponding tables in the MICS and MOCS annexes of the referenced Recommendations I International Standards.
ITU-T Rec. X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 E)
7
---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------
ISO/IEC 10164-6: 1993/Amd.l: 1996(E)
Table A.7 - MOCS support summary
Table
I I I
Table
Identification of the
Additional
Constraints
numbers
Status support numbers
Description
Index document that includes
information
and values
of MOCS
I
of MOCS
the MOCS proforma
CCITT Rec. X.730 I
1
ISO/IEC 10164- 1
2 CCI’IT Rec. X.731 I Annex C statechange record
ISO/IEC 10164-2 all tables
Annex C alarmRecord
3 CCITT Rec. X.733 I
ISO/IEC 10 164-4 all tables
4 CCITT Rec. X.735 1 Annex C
log
all tables
ISO/IEC 10 164-6
c9: if A.4/2a then m else -.
Table A.8 - MRCS support summary
Table
Table
Identification of the
Additional
Constraints
numbers
Status Support numbers
Description
Index document that includes of MRCS
information
and values
of MRCS
the MRCS proforma
proforma
cl0
CCITI’ Rec. X.735 I Item logRecord-log name -
1
binding
ISO/IEC 10164-6 D. l/l
Item log-system name - cl1
1 CCITT Rec. X.735 I
D. l/2 binding
ISO/IEC 10164-6
~10: if A.5/la then o else -.
cll: ifA.4/lathenoelse-.
Table A.9 - MICS support summary
Table
Table
Identification of the
Additional
Constraints
numbers
Status Support numbers
Description
Index document that includes of MICS
information
and values
of MICS
the MICS proforma
proforma
-
cl2
management
CCITI’ Rec. X.735 I Tables B.l
and B.2 operations
ISO/IEC 10164-6
-
cl3
Table B. 1 objectcreation,
CCITI’ Rec. X.730 I
objectDeletion and
ISO/IEC 10164-l
attributevaluechange
notifications
-
cl4
CCITI’ Rec. X.731 I Table B.l statechange
notification
ISO/IEC 10 164-2
cl5
-
CCITT Rec. X.733 I Item B.1/4 processingErrorAlarm
notification
ISO/IEC 10 164-4
~12: if A.3/la then m else -.
~13: if A.3/3a or A.3/4a or A.3/5a then m else -.
if A.3/2a then m else -.
~14:
~15: if A.3/6a then m else -.
8 ITU-T Rec. X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 E)
----------------------
...
NORME
ISO/CEI
I NTER NAT1 ONALE
10164-6
Premiere édition
1993-06-1 5
AMENDEMENT 1
1996-05-1 5
Technologies de l'information -
Interconnexion de systèmes ouverts
(OS) - Gestion-systèmes: Fonction de
commande des registres de consignation
AMENDEMENT 1 : Formulaires de déclaration
de conformité d'instance
Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Systems
Management: Log control function
AMENDMENT 1: Implementation conformance statement proformas
Numéro de reference
ISO/CEI 10164-6:1993/Amd.l:1996(F)
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
ISO/CEI 10164-6:1993/Amd.l:1996(F)
Avant-propos
L‘ISO (Organisation internationale de normalisation) et la CE1 (Commission
électrotechnique internationale) forment ensemble un système consacré à la
normalisation internationale considérée comme un tout. Les organismes nationaux
membres de 1’ISO ou de la CE1 participent au développement de Normes inter-
nationales par l’intermédiaire des comités techniques créés par l’organisation
concernée afin de s’occuper des différents domaines particuliers de l’activité
technique. Les comités techniques de I’ISO et de la CE1 collaborent dans des
domaines d’intérêt commun. D’autres organisations internationales, gouverne-
mentales ou non gouvernementales, en liaison avec 1’ISO et la CE1 participent
également aux travaux.
Dans le domaine des technologies de l’information, YISO et la CE1 ont crét un
comité technique mixte, l’ISO/CEI JTC 1. Les projets de Normes internationales
adoptés par le comité technique mixte sont soumis aux organismes nationaux pour
approbation, avant leur acceptation comme Normes internationales. Les Normes
internationales sont approuvées conformément aux procédures qui requièrent
l’approbation de 75 9’0 au moins des organismes nationaux votants.
L‘Amendement 1 à la Norme internationale ISO/CEI 10164-6: 1993 a été élaboré par
1, Technologies de l’infomtion, sous-
le comité technique mixte ISO/CEI JTC
comité SC 21, Interconnexion des systkmes ouverts, gestion des données et
traitement distribué ouvert, en collaboration avec WIT-T. Le texte identique est
publié en tant que Recommandation UIT-T X.735/Amd. 1.
Q ISOICEI 1996
Droits de reproduction rdservis. Sauf prescription diffdrente, aucune partie de cette publication ne peut
etre reproduite ni utilisee sous quelque forme que ce soit et par aucun proc6d6, dlectronique ou
mdcanique, y compris la photocopie et les microfilms, sans l’accord dcrit de l’dditeur.
ISO/CEI Copyright Office Case postale 56 CH-121 1 Genbve 20 Suisse
Imprime en Suisse
11
---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
0 ISO/CEI
ISO/CEI 10164-6:1993/Amd.l:1996(F)
Introduction
Le present amendement contient les tableaux qui indiquent les informations de gestion obligatoires et facultatives
propres B la fonction de gestion de commande de journalisation. I1 sera utilise par les specificateurs de profils, par
exemple ceux qui Claborent des profils normalisbs internationaux (ISP) (international standardized profiles), quand ils
spbcifient un sous-ensemble explicite de capacitbs afin d'assurer l'interopbrabilitb des applications. Les tableaux
comportent aussi une colonne dans laquelle les fournisseurs d'bquipements indiqueront les capacitbs de leurs produits en
ou de spbcifications de base. La structure des tableaux est conforme aux lignes directrices contenues
termes de profils
dans la Rec. UIT-T X.724 I ISO/CEI 10165-6 pour l'etablissement des formulaires de d6claration de conformitt des
instances de protocole.
iii
---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
ISO/CEI 10164-6:1993/Amd.l:1996(F)
NORME INTERNATIONALE
RECOMMANDATION UIT-T
TECHNOLOGIES DE L'INFORMATION - INTERCONNEXION DE SYSTkMES
OUVERTS (OSI) - GESTION-SYSTÈMES: FONCTION DE COMMANDE
DES REGISTRES DE CONSIGNATION
AMENDEMENT 1
Formulaires de déclaration de conformité d'instance
Au paragraphe 2.1, ajouter la note de bas de page suivante au premier élément de la liste:
1)
ce1) Tel que modifi6e par la Rec. UIT-T X.70UCor.2 I ISO/CEI 10040/Cor.2.>>
Au paragraphe 2. I, ajouter la référence suivante:
2)
<<- Recommandation UIT-T X.724 (1993) I ISOKEI 10165-6:1994, Technologie de l'information -
Interconnexion des systdmes ouverts - Structure de l'information de gestion: Spécifications et directives
pour l'établissement des formulaires de déclaration de conformité d'instances de protocole associés à la
gestion OSI. >>
Au paragraphe 2.2, ajouter les références suivantes:
3)
ce- Recommandation X.291 du CCITT (1992), Cadre général et méthodologie des tests de conformité
d'interconnexion des systdmes ouverts pour les Recommandations sur les protocoles pour les applications
du CCIiT- Spécpcation des suite de tests abstraite.
ISO/CEI 9646-2: 199 1, Technologies de l'information - Interconnexion de syst2mes ouverts - Cadre
général et méthodologie des tests de conformité OSI - Partie 2: Spécijïcation des suites de tests
abstraites.
-
Recommandation UIT-T X.2962), Cadre général et méthodologie des tests de conformité OSI pour les
Recommandations sur les protocoles pour les applications de 1'UIT-T - Déclarations de conformité
d'instances.
ISO/CEI 9646-72), Technologies de l'information - Interconnexion de syst2mes ouverts - Méthodologie
générale et procédures - Partie 7: Déclarations de conformité des instances.>>
Ensuite, ajouter la note de bas de page suivante:
ce2) Actuellement h Mat de projet.*
Au paragraphe 3.4, faire les modifications suivantes:
4)
Remplacer etconformitt? induitem par ecd6claration de conformit6 d'objet g6rd (MOCS)>>.
Remplacer etconformit6 g6nBralew par tedeclmation de conformit6 d'information de gestion (MICS),.
Les pointsf) à i) deviennent les points h) à k). Insérer les nouveauxpoints suivants:
ccf) formulaire MICS;
g) formulaire M0CS;a
Au paragraphe 3.7, faire les modifications suivantes:
5)
Remplacer ccddclaration de conformit6 du systbme>> par:
cca) formulaire PICS;
d6claration de conformiti5 d'instance de protocole;
b)
declaration de conformit6 du systkme.,
c)
1
Rec. UIT-T X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 F)
---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
ISOICEI 10164-6:1993/Amd.l:1996(F)
Le paragraphe 3.8 devient 3.9. Insérer le nouveau paragraphe suivant:
6)
~3.8 Définition des formulaires de déclaration de conformité d'instance
La prksente Recommandation I Norme internationale utilise les termes suivants definis par la Rec. UIT-T X.724 I
ISO/CEI 10165-6:
declaration de conformite de relation g6r6e (MRCS);
a)
recapitulatif de conformitt de gestion (MCS);
b)
c) formulaire MCS;
d) formulaire MRCS.
A l'article 4, ajouter les abréviations suivantes:
7)
aICS Declaration de conformite d'instance (implementation conformance statement)
Recapitulatif de conformit6 de gestion (management conformance summary)
MCS
MICS Déclaration de conformite d'information de gestion (management information conformance
statement)
MOCS Declaration de conformite d'objet g6r6 (managed object conformance statement)
MRCS Dkclaration de conformit6 de relation gerbe (managed relationship conformance statement)
PICS Declaration de conformit6 d'instance de protocole (protocol implementation conformance
statement),
Remplacer 1 'article 13 par ce qui suit:
8)
<<13 Conformité
Les instances qui se veulent conformes B la presente Recommandation I Norme internationale doivent satisfaire aux
prescriptions de conformit6 definies aux paragraphes suivants.
13.1 Conformité statique
L'instance doit satisfaire aux prescriptions de conformitd de la pr6sente Recommandation I Norme internationale dans
son rôle de gestionnaire, son rôle d'agent, ou dans les deux rôles. Une declaration de conformitd B l'un des rôles au moins
sera faite au Tableau A. 1.
Si une declaration de conformit6 est faite pour la prise en charge du rôle de gestionnaire, l'instance doit prendre
encharge au moins l'une des notifications ou l'une des opkrations de gestion de l'objet g6r6 journal ou l'une des
operations de gestion d'une sous-classe de l'objet g6r6 enregistrement de journalisation spécifiees dans la pr6sente
Recommandation I Norme internationale. Les prescriptions de conformitd du rôle de gestionnaire B ces operations et
notifications de gestion sont identifids au Tableau A.3 et dans d'autres tableaux r6ferencts dans l'Annexe A.
Si une déclaration de conformit4 est faite pour la prise en charge du rôle d'agent, l'instance doit prendre en charge l'une
au moins des instances de la classe d'objet g6r6 journal identifiee au Tableau A.4. Le rôle d'agent peut aussi etre dCclar6
conforme aux sous-classes d'objet ger6 enregistrement de journalisation.
L'instance doit prendre en charge la syntaxe de transfert obtenue B partir des r&gles de codage specifides dans la
Rec. X.209 du CCITT I ISOICEI 8825 appelde {joint-iso-ccitt asnl(1) basicEncoding(l)} pour les types abstraits de
donnees rdferencés par les d6finitions que l'instance veut prendre en charge.
NOTE - Avant publication du pr6sent amendement, la prbente Recommandation I Nome intemationale identifiait des
classes de conformit6 g6n6rale et induite. Une dkclaration de conformit6 semblable h celle de la classe de conformit6 g6nCrale peut
en d6clarant la prise en charge par le rôle de gestionnaire, le rôle d'agent ou par les deux rôles, de l'unit6 fonctionnelle
être faite
commande de journalisation du Tableau A.2. Une d6claration de conformit6 semblable celle de la classe de conformit6 induite peut
être faite en declarant la prise en charge de l'un au moins des 616ments des Tableaux A.3 et A.4.
Rec. UIT-T X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 F)
2
---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
ISOICEI 10164-6: 1993/Amd.l: 1996(F)
13.2 Conformité dynamique
Les instances qui se veulent conformes B la prdsente Recommandation I Norme internationale doivent prendre en charge
les dléments de proCCdure et les definitions sBmantiques correspondant aux dkfinitions qu’elles veulent prendre en
charge.
13.3 Prescriptions de déclaration de conformité d’information de gestion
Un formulaire MCS, MICS, MOCS ou MRCS conforme B la prdsente Recommandation I Norme internationale doit être
identique, dans son texte, aux formulaires correspondants specifies dans les Annexes A, B, C ou D, doit conserver la
numCrotation des tableaux et les numeros d’index des diffkrents dlements et ne peut diffdrer de ces formulaires que par la
pagination et les en-têtes de page.
Le fournisseur dune instance qui se veut conforme B la prdsente Recommandation I Norme internationale doit compldter
un formulaire rdcapitulatif de conformitd de gestion (MCS) fourni dans l’Annexe A, ce qui fait partie des prescriptions
de conformite, de même que tout autre formulaire ICS rdfkrenc6 qui est applicable d’aprh le MCS. Un ICS qui se veut
conforme B la prksente Recommandation I Norme internationale:
-
dCcrit une instance conforme B la presente Recommandation I Norme internationale;
- est rempli conformdment aux instructions donnees B cet effet dans la Rec. UIT-T X.724 I
ISOKEI 10165-6;
-
contient les renseignements necessaires pour identifier sans ambiguïtd le fournisseur et l’instance.,
3
Rec. UIT-T X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 F)
---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
ISO/CEI 10164-6: 1993/Amd.l: 1996(F)
Les Annexes A er B deviennent les Annexes E er F. Insérer les annexes suivantes:
9)
Annexe A
Formulaire MCS3)
(Cette annexe fait partie integrante de la prdsente Recommandation I Norme internationale)
A.1 Introduction
A.l.l Purpose and structure
The Management Conformance Summary (MCS) is a statement by a supplier that identifies an implementation and
provides information on whether the implementation claims conformance to any of the listed set of documents that
specify conformance requirements to OS1 management.
The MCS proforma is a document in the form of a questionnaire that when completed by the supplier of an
implementation becomes the MCS.
A.1.2 Instructions for completing the MCS proforma to produce a MCS
The supplier of the implementation shall enter an explicit statement in each of the boxes provided. Specific instruction is
provided in the text which precedes each table.
A.1.3 Symbols, abbreviations and terms
For all annexes of this Recommendation 1 International Standard, the following common notations, defined in CCITT
Rec. X.291 I ISO/IEC 9646-2 and ITU-T Rec. X.296 I ISO/IEC 9646-7, are used for the Status column:
m Mandatory;
O Optional;
C Conditional;
X Prohibited;
-
Not applicable or out of scope.
NOTES
1 ‘c’, ‘m’, and ’O’ are prefixed by “c:” when nested under a conditional or optional item of the same table;
2 ‘O’ may be suffixed by “.N’ (where N is a unique number) for selectable options among a set of status values.
Support of at least one of the choices (from the items with the same value of N) is required.
For all annexes of this Recommendation I International Standard, the following common notations, defined in CCITT
Rec. X.291 I ISO/IEC 9646-2 and ITU-T Rec. X.296 I ISO/IEC 9646-7, are used for the Support column:
Y Implemented;
N Not implemented;
- No answer required;
The item is ignored (i.e. processed syntactically but not semantically).
Ig
A.1.4 Table format
Some of the tables in this Recommendation I International Standard have been split because the information is too wide
to fit on the page, Where this occurs, the index number of the first block of columns are the index numbers of the
corresponding rows of the remaining blocks of columns. A complete table reconstructed from the constituent parts
should have the following layout:
I Index I First block of columns I Second block of columns I Etc. I
3, Les utilisateurs de la pr6sente Recommandation I Norme internationale sont autorisds B reproduire le formulaire MCS de la
prksente annexe pour utiliser celui-ci conformtment B son objet. Ils sont tgalement autorisks zi publier le formulaire une fois
celui-ci complkt6. Les instructions pour le formulaire MCS sont spkcifikes dans la Rec. UIT-T X.724 I ISO/CEI 10165-6.
Rec. UIT-T X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 F)
4
---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
ISO/CEI 10164-6:1993/Amd,l:1996(F)
In this Recommendation I International Standard the constituent parts of the table appear consecutively, starting with the
first block of columns.
When a table with sub-rows is too wide to fit on a page, the continuation table(s) have been constructed with index
numbers identical to the index numbers in the corresponding rows of the first table, and with sub-index numbers
corresponding to the sub-rows within each indexed row. For example, if Table X.1 has 2 rows and the continuation of
Table X.1 has 2 sub-rows for each row, the tables are presented as follows:
Table X.l- Title
Table X.1 (concluded) - Title
I Index I Sub-index I H I I I J I K 1 -L I
I 1 I 1.1
1.2 h i j
2
2.1 h i j
2.2 h i j
A complete table reconstructed from the constituent parts should have the following layout:
support
Index A B C D E F G Sub-index H I JKL
1 ab- 1.1 h ij
1.2 hij
2 ab- 2.1 h ij
I IIIIIII-2.2 h i j
References made to cells within tables shall be interpreted as references within reconstructed tables. In the example
above, the reference X.l/ld corresponds to the blank cell in column G for row with Index 1, and X.1/1.2b corresponds to
the blank cell in column L for row with Sub-index 1.2.
A.2 Identification of the implementation
A.2.1 Date of statement
The supplier of the implementation shall enter the date of this statement in the box below. Use the format DD-MM-
YYYY.
Date of statement
Rec. UIT-T X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 F) 5
I
---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
ISO/CEI 10164-6:1993/Amd.l:1996(F)
A.2.2 Identification of the implementation
The supplier of the implementation shall enter information necessary to uniquely identify the implementation and the
system(s) in which it may reside, in the box below.
A.2.3 Contact
The supplier of the implementation shall provide information on whom to contact if there are any queries concerning the
contents of the MCS or any referenced implementation conformance statement, in the box below.
A.3 Identification of the Recommendations I International Standards in which the management
information is defined
The supplier of the implementation shall enter the title, reference number and date of the publication of the
Recommendations I International Standards which specify the management information to which conformance is
claimed, in the box below.
Recommendations I Intemational Standards to which conformance is claimed
A.3.1 Technical corrigenda implemented
The supplier of the implementation shall enter the reference numbers of implemented technical corrigenda which modify
the identified Recommendations I International Standards, in the box below.
A.3.2 Amendments implemented
The supplier of the implementation shall state the titles and reference numbers of implemented amendments to the
identified Recommendations I International Standards, in the box below.
Rec. UIT-T X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 F)
6
---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
ISO/CEI 10164-6:1993/Amd.l:1996(F)
A.4 Management conformance summary
The supplier of the implementation shall state the capabilities and features supported and provide a summary of
conformance claims to Recommendations I International Standards using the tables in this annex.
The supplier of the implementation shall specify the roles that are supported, in Table A. 1.
Table A.l- Roles
Index
Roles supported Status Support Additional information
1 Manager role support o. 1
2
Agent role support o. 1
The supplier of the implementation shall specify support for the systems management functional units, in Table A.2.
Table A.2 - Systems management functional units
I Manager I Agent I
Index Systems management functional unit name Status Support Status Support Additional information
1 log control functional unit cl c2
2 I monitor log functional unit 1. cl I I c2 I
I
CI: if A.l/la then o else -.
c2: if A. 1/2a then O else -.
The supplier of the implementation shall specify support for management information in the manager role, in Table A.3.
Table A.3 - Manager role minimum conformance requirement
/ Index I Item I Status I support I Additional information
~~
c3
1 Operations on managed objects
c4
2 State change notification for log managed objects
c4
3 Object creation notification for log managed objects
c4
4 Object deletion notification for log managed objects
C4
5 Attribute value change notification for log managed objects
c4
6 Processing error alarm notification for log managed objects
The supplier of the implementation shall specify support for management information in the agent role, in Table A.4. If
additional subclasses of log records are supported, the supplier of the implementation shall list the classes in the
Additional information column.
7
Rec. UIT-T X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 F)
---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
ISO/CEI 10164-6:1993/Amd.l: 1996(F)
Table A.4 - Agent role minimum conformance requirement
Index
Item status support Additional information
1
Log managed object class c5
2
Sub-classes of log records associated with notifications c6
emitted by the log managed object
3
Additional sub-classes of log records c7
Table AS - Logging of event records
...
lSO/CEI
NORME
10164-6
INTERNATIONALE
Première édition
1993-06-I 5
AMENDEMENT 1
1996-05-I 5
Technologies de l’information -
Interconnexion de systèmes ouverts
(OSI) - Gestion-systèmes: Fonction de
commande des registres de consignation
AMENDEMENT 1: Formulaires de déclaration
de conformité d’instance
Information technolog y - Open Systems In terconnection - Sys tems
Management: Log control function
AMENDMENT 1: Implementation conformance statement proformas
Numéro de référence
ISO/CEI 10164-6:1993/Amd.l:1996(F)
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
ISO/CEI l0164~6:1993/Amd.l:1996(F)
Avant-propos
LIS0 (Organisation internationale de normalisation) et la CE1 (Commission
électrotechnique internationale) forment ensemble un système consacré à la
normalisation internationale considérée comme un tout. Les organismes nationaux
membres de I’ISO ou de la CE1 participent au développement de Normes inter-
nationales par l’intermédiaire des comités techniques créés par l’organisation
concernée afin de s’occuper des différents domaines particuliers de l’activité
technique. Les comités techniques de I’ISO et de la CE1 collaborent dans des
domaines d’intérêt commun. D’autres organisations internationales, gouverne-
mentales ou non gouvernementales, en liaison avec I’ISO et la CE1 participent
également aux travaux.
Dans le domaine des technologies de l’information, 1’ISO et la CE1 ont créé un
comité technique mixte, l’ISO/CEI JTC 1. Les projets de Normes internationales
adoptés par le comité technique mixte sont soumis aux organismes nationaux pour
approbation, avant leur acceptation comme Normes internationales. Les Normes
internationales sont approuvées conformément aux procédures qui requièrent
l’approbation de 75 % au moins des organismes nationaux votants.
L’Amendement 1 à la Norme internationale ISOKEI 10164-6: 1993 a été élaboré par
le comité technique mixte ISOKEI JTC 1, Technologies de l’informution, sous-
comité SC 21, Interconnexion des systèmes ouverts, gestion des données et
traitement distribué ouvert, en collaboration avec l’UIT-T. Le texte identique est
publié en tant que Recommandation UIT-T X.73YAmd. 1.
0 ISOKEI 1996
Droits de reproduction réservés. Sauf prescription différente, aucune partie de cette publication ne peut
être reproduite ni utilisée sous quelque forme que ce soit et par aucun procédé, électronique ou
mécanique, y compris la photocopie et les microfilms, sans l’accord écrit de l’éditeur.
ISOKEI Copyright Office l Case postale 56 l CH-l 211 Genève 20 l Suisse
Imprimé en Suisse
ii
---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
@ ISOKEI ISOKEI 10164-6:1993/Amd.l:1996(F)
Introduction
Le présent amendement contient les tableaux qui indiquent les informations de gestion obligatoires et facultatives
propres à la fonction de gestion de commande de journalisation. Il sera utilisé par les spécificateurs de profils, par
exemple ceux qui élaborent des profils normalisés internationaux (ISP) (international standardized profiles), quand ils
spécifient un sous-ensemble explicite de capacités afin d’assurer l’interopérabilité des applications. Les tableaux
comportent aussi une colonne dans laquelle les fournisseurs d’équipements indiqueront les capacités de leurs produits en
termes de profils ou de spécifications de base. La structure des tableaux est conforme aux lignes directrices contenues
dans la Rec. UIT-T X.724 I ISOKEI 10165-6 pour l’établissement des formulaires de déclaration de conformité des
instances de protocole.
. . .
111
---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
Page blanche
---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
ISOKEI 10164=6:1993/Amd.1:1996(F)
NORME INTERNATIONALE
RECOMMANDATION UIT-T
TECHNOLOGIES DE L’INFORMATION - INTERCONNEXION DE SYSTÈMES
OUVERTS (OSI) - GESTION-SYSTÈMES: FONCTION DE COMMANDE
DES REGISTRES DE CONSIGNATION
AMENDEMENT 1
Formulaires de déclaration de conformité d’instance
Au paragraphe 2. I, ajouter la note de bas de page suivante au premier élément de la liste:
1)
Au paragraphe 2.1, ajouter la référence suivante:
2)
«- Recommandation UIT-T X.724 (1993) I ISOKEI 101656: 1994, Technologie de l’information -
Interconnexion des systèmes ouverts - Structure de l’information de gestion: Spécifications et directives
pour l’établissement des formulaires de déclaration de conformité d’instances de protocole associés à la
gestion OSI. »
Au paragraphe 2.2, ajouter les références suivantes:
3
«- Recommandation X.291 du CCITT (1992), Cadre général et méthodologie des tests de conformité
d’interconnexion des systèmes ouverts pour les Recommandations sur les protocoles pour les applications
du CCITT- Spécification des suite de tests abstraite.
ISOICEI 9646-2: 199 1, Technologies de l’information - Interconnexion de systèmes ouverts - Cadre
général et méthodologie des tests de conformité OSI - Partie 2: Spécification des suites de tests
abstraites.
-
Recommandation UIT-T X.2962), Cadre général et méthodologie des tests de conformité OSI pour les
Recommandations sur les protocoles pour les applications de I’UIT-T - Déclarations de conformité
d’instances.
ISOICEI 9646-72), Technologies de l’information - Interconnexion de systèmes ouverts - Méthodologie
générale et procédures - Partie 7: Déclarations de conformité des instances.»
Ensuite, ajouter la note de bas de page suivante:
«2) Actuellement à l’état de projet.»
Au paragraphe 3.4, faire les modifications suivantes:
4)
Remplacer «conformité induite» par «déclaration de conformité d’objet g&+ (MOCS)».
Remplacer «conformité générale» par «déclaration de conformité d’information de gestion (MICS)».
Les points f) à i) deviennent les points h) à k). Insérer les nouveaux points suivants:
«f) formulaire MICS;
g) formulaire MOCS;»
Au paragraphe 3.7, faire les modifications suivantes:
5)
Remplacer «déclaration de conformité du système» par:
«a) formulaire PICS;
b) déclaration de conformité d’instance de protocole;
déclaration de conformité du système.»
C)
Rec. UIT-T X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 F)
---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
ISOKEI 10164-6:1993/Amd.l: 1996(F)
Le paragraphe 3.8 devient 3.9. Insérer le nouveau paragraphe suivant:
6)
«3.8 Définition des formulaires de déclaration de conformité d’instance
La présente Recommandation I Norme internationale utilise les termes suivants définis par la Rec. UIT-T X.724 I
ISO/CEI 10165-6:
a) declaration de conformité de relation gérée (MRCS);
b) récapitulatif de conformité de gestion (MCS);
c) formulaire MCS;
d) formulaire MRCS.
A l’article 4, ajouter les abréviations suivantes:
7)
«ICS Déclaration de conformité d’instance (implementation conformance statement)
Récapitulatif de conformité de gestion (management conformance summary)
MCS
MICS Déclaration de conformité d’information de gestion (management information conformance
statement)
Déclaration de conformite d’objet géré (managed abject conformance statement)
MOCS
Déclaration de conformité de relation gérée (managed relationship conformance statement)
MRCS
PICS Déclaration de conformité d’instance de protocole (protocol implementation conformance
statement)»
Remplacer l’article 13 par ce qui suit:
8)
43 Conformité
Les instances qui se veulent conformes à la présente Recommandation I Norme internationale doivent satisfaire aux
prescriptions de conformité définies aux paragraphes suivants.
Conformité statique
13.1
L’instance doit satisfaire aux prescriptions de conformité de la présente Recommandation 1 Norme internationale dans
son rôle de gestionnaire, son rôle d’agent, ou dans les deux rôles. Une déclaration de conformité à l’un des rôles au moins
sera faite au Tableau A. 1.
Si une déclaration de conformité est faite pour la prise en charge du rôle de gestionnaire, l’instance doit prendre
en charge au moins l’une des notifications ou l’une des opérations de gestion de l’objet géré journal ou l’une des
opérations de gestion d’une sous-classe de l’objet géré enregistrement de journalisation spécifiées dans la présente
Recommandation I Norme internationale. Les prescriptions de conformité du rôle de gestionnaire à ces opérations et
notifications de gestion sont identifiés au Tableau A.3 et dans d’autres tableaux référencés dans 1’Annexe A.
Si une déclaration de conformité est faite pour la prise en charge du rôle d’agent, l’instance doit prendre en charge l’une
au moins des instances de la classe d’objet géré journal identifiée au Tableau A.4. Le rôle d’agent peut aussi être déclaré
conforme aux sous-classes d’objet géré enregistrement de journalisation.
L’instance doit prendre en charge la syntaxe de transfert obtenue à partir des règles de codage spécifiées dans la
Rec. X.209 du CCITT I ISOKEI 8825 appelée {joint-iso-ccitt asnl( 1) basicEncoding( 1)) pour les types abstraits de
données référencés par les définitions que l’instance veut prendre en charge.
NOTE - Avant publication du présent amendement, la présente Recommandation I Norme internationale identifiait des
classes de conformite générale et induite. Une déclaration de conformité semblable à celle de la classe de conformité générale peut
être faite en declarant la prise en charge par le rôle de gestionnaire, le rôle d’agent ou par les deux rôles, de l’unité fonctionnelle
commande de joumalisation du Tableau A.2. Une déclaration de conformité semblable à celle de la classe de conformité induite peut
être faite en declarant la prise en charge de l’un au moins des éléments des Tableaux A.3 et A.4.
2 Rec. UIT-T X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 F)
---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
ISOKEI 10164~6:1993/Amd.l:1996(F)
13.2 Conformité dynamique
Les instances qui se veulent conformes à la présente Recommandation I Norme internationale doivent prendre en charge
les éléments de procédure et les définitions sémantiques correspondant aux définitions qu’elles veulent prendre en
charge.
13.3 Prescriptions de déclaration de conformité d’information de gestion
Un formulaire MCS, MICS, MOCS ou MRCS conforme à la présente Recommandation I Norme internationale doit être
identique, dans son texte, aux formulaires correspondants spécifiés dans les Annexes A, B, C ou D, doit conserver la
numérotation des tableaux et les numéros d’index des différents cléments et ne peut differer de ces formulaires que par la
pagination et les en-têtes de page.
Le fournisseur d’une instance qui se veut conforme a la présente Recommandation I Norme internationale doit compléter
un formulaire récapitulatif de conformité de gestion (MCS) fourni dans 1’Annexe A, ce qui fait partie des prescriptions
de conformité, de même que tout autre formulaire ICS référencé qui est applicable d’après le MCS. Un ICS qui se veut
conforme à la présente Recommandation I Norme internationale:
-
décrit une instance conforme a la présente Recommandation I Norme internationale;
-
est rempli conformément aux instructions données à cet effet dans la Rec. UIT-T X.724 I
ISOKEI 101656;
contient les renseignements nécessaires pour identifier sans ambiguïté le fournisseur et l’instance.»
Rec. UIT-T X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 F) 3
---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
ISOKEI 10164-6:1993/Amd.l:1996(F)
Les Annexes A et B deviennent les Annexes E et F. Insérer les annexes suivantes:
9
Annexe A
Formulaire MCW
(Cette annexe fait partie intégrante de la présente Recommandation I Norme internationale)
Al . Introduction
A.l.1 Purpose and structure
The Management Conformance Summary (MCS) is a statement by a supplier that identifies an implementation and
provides information on whether the implementation claims conformance to any of the listed set of documents that
specify conformance requirements to OS1 management.
The MCS proforma is a document in the for-m of a questionnaire that when completed by the supplier of an
implementation becomes the MCS.
Instructions for completing the MCS proforma to produce a MCS
A.l.2
provided. Specific instruction is
The supplier of the implementation shall enter an explicit statement in each of the boxes
which each table.
provided in the text precedes
Symbols, abbreviations and terms
A.l.3
For a11 annexes of this Recommendation I International Standard, the following common notations, defined in CCITT
Rec. X.291 I ISO/IEC 9646-2 and ITU-T Rec. X.296 I ISO/IEC 9646-7, are used for the Status column:
Mandatory;
m
Optional;
0
C Conditional;
Prohibited;
X
-
Not applicable or out of scope.
NOTES
1 ‘C’, ‘m’, and ‘0’ are prefixed by “c:” when nested under a conditional or optional item of the same table;
2 ‘0’ may be suffixed by “.N” (where N is a unique number) for selectable options among a set of status values.
Support of at least one of the choices (from the items with the same value of N) is required.
For a11 annexes of this Recommendation I International Standard, the following common notations, defined in CCITT
Rec. X.291 I ISO/IEC 9646-2 and ITU-T Rec. X.296 I ISO/IEC 9646-7, are used for the Support column:
Y Implemented;
N Not implemented;
-
No answer required;
The item is ignored (i.e. processed syntactically but not semantically).
Ig
AS.4 Table format
Some of the tables in this Recommendation I International Standard have been split because the information is too wide
to fit on the page. Where this occurs, the index number of the first block of columns are the index numbers of the
corresponding rows of the remaining blocks of columns. A complete table reconstructed from the constituent parts
should have the following layout:
Index First block of columns Second block of columns Etc.
3, Les utilisateurs de la présente Recommandation I Norme internationale sont autorisés à reproduire le formulaire MCS de la
présente annexe pour utiliser celui-ci conformément à son objet. Ils sont également autorisés à publier le formulaire une fois
celui-ci complété. Les instructions pour le formulaire MCS sont spécifiées dans la Rec. UIT-T X.724 I ISOKEI 101656.
Rec. UIT-T X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 F)
---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
ISOKEI 10164~6:1993/Amd.l:1996(F)
In this Recommendation I International Standard the constituent parts of the table appear consecutively, starting with the
first block of columns.
When a table with sub-rows is too wide to fit on a page, the continuation table(s) have been constructed with index
numbers identical to the index numbers in the corresponding rows of the first table, and with sub-index numbers
corresponding to the sub-rows within each indexed row. For example, if Table X.1 has 2 rows and the continuation of
Table X. 1 has 2 sub-rows for each row, the tables are presented as follows:
Table X.1 - Title
SuPPofi 1
I
I
Index A B C D E F G
1 a b -
2 a b -
Table X.1 (concluded) - Title
Index Sub-index H 1 J K L
h i j
1 1.1
1.2 h i j
2 2.1 h i j
2.2 h i
j
A complete table reconstructed fi-om the constituent parts should have the following layout:
Index A B C D E F G Sub-index H 1 J K L
1 a b - 1.1 h i
j
,
1.2 h i
j
2 a b - 2.1 h i
j
.
I I I I I I
I I I 22 Ihliljl I I
References made to cells within tables shall be interpreted as references within reconstructed tables. In the example
above, the reference X.l/ld corresponds to the blank ce11 in column G for row with Index 1, and X.1/1.2b corresponds to
the blank ce11 in column L for row with Sub-index 1.2.
A.2 Identification of the implementation
A.2.1 Date of statement
The supplier of the implementation shall enter the date of this statement in the box below. Use the format DD-MM-
YYYY.
Date of statement
I
Rec. UIT-T X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 F)
---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
ISOKEI 10164-6:1993/Amd.1:1996(F)
A.2.2 Identification of the implementation
The supplier of the implementation shall enter information necessary to uniquely identify the implementation and the
system(s) in which it may reside, in the box below.
A.2.3 Contact
The supplier of the implementation shall provide information on whom to contact if there are any queries concerning the
contents of the MCS or any referenced implementation conformance statement, in the box below.
A3 0 Identification of the Recommendations I International Standards in which the management
information is defined
The supplier of the implementation shall enter the title, reference number and date of the publication of the
Recommendations I International Standards which specify the management information to which conformance is
claimed, in the box below.
Recommendations I International Standards to which conformance is claimed
I I
A.3.1 Technical corrigenda implemented
The supplier of the implementation shall enter the reference numbers of implemented technical corrigenda which modify
the identified Recommendations l International Standards, in the box below.
Amendments implemented
A.3.2
The supplier of the implementation shall state the titles and reference numbers of implemented amendments to the
identified Recommendations I International Standards, in the box below.
6 Rec. UIT-T X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 F)
---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
ISOKEI 10164-6: 1993/Amd.l: 1996(F)
Management conformance summary
A.4
The supplier of the implementation shall state the capabilities and features supported and provide a summary of
conformance claims to Recommendations l International Standards using the tables in this annex.
The supplier of the implementation shall specify the roles that are supported, in Table A. 1.
Table A.1 - Roles
Roles supported Status Support
Index Additional information
1 Manager role support 0.1
0.1
2 Agent role support
The supplier of the implementation shall specify support for the systems management functional units, in Table A.2.
Table A.2 - Systems management functional units
Manager Agent
Index Systems management functional unit name Status Support Status Support Addi tional information
1 log control functional unit cl c2
2 monitor log functional unit < cl c2
cl: if A.l/la then o else -.
c2: if A. 1/2a then o else -.
The supplier of the implementation shall specify support for management information in the manager role, in Table A.3.
Table A.3 - Manager role minimum conformance requirement
Index Item Status support Additional information
c3
1 Operations on managed abjects
c4
2 State change notification for log managed abjects
Object creation notification for log managed abjects c4
3
c4
4 Object deletion notification for log managed abjects
5 Attribute value change notification for log managed abjects ~4
6 Processing error alarm notification for log managed abjects ~4
c3: if A.Ula or A.2/2a then m else (if A.l/la then 0.2 else -).
\
c4: if AZla then m else (if A.2/2a then 0.2 else (if A.l/la then 0.2 else -)).
NOTE - Manager role minimum conformance requires support for at least one of the items identified in this table. Support for
either of the functional units identifkd in Table A.2 mandates support for some of those items. Conditions c3 and c4 express both
of these requirements.
The supplier of the implementation shall specify support for management information in the agent role, in Table A.4. If
additional subclasses of log records are supported, the supplier of the implementation shall list the classes in the
Additional information column.
Rec. UIT-T X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 F)
7
---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------
ISOKEI 10164-6:1993/Amd.l:1996(F)
Table A.4 - Agent role minimum conformance requirement
Additional information
Index Item Status
SUPpofi
1 Log managed abject class C5
2 Sub-classes of log records associated with notifications c6
emitted by the log managed abject
3 Additional sub-classes of log records c7
c5: if A.l/2a then m else -.
c6: if A.l/2a and ASlla then m else -.
c7: if A.ll2a then o else -.
NOTE - Condition c6 makes it mandatory, if logging is supported, to support the event log records associated with the
notifications supported.
Table A.5 - Logging of event records
Additional
Index Status Support
information
,
1 Does the implementation support logging of event records in agent role? Cf.4
1
c8: if A. 1/2a then o else -.
The supplier of the implementation shall provide information on claims of conformance to any of the Recommendations
I International Standards summarized in Tables A.6 to A.9. For each Recommendation I International Standard that the
supplier of the implementation claims conformance to, the corresponding conformance statement(s) shah be completed,
or referenced by, the MCS. The supplier of the implementation shall complete the Support, Table numbers and
Additional information columns.
In Tables A.6 to A.9, the Status column is used to indicate whether the supplier of the implementation is required to
complete the referenced tables or referenced items. Conformance requirements are as specified in the referenced tables
or referenced items and are not changed by the value of the MCS Status column. Similarly, the Support column is used
by the supplier of the implementation to indicate completion of the referenced tables or referenced items.
Table A.6 - PICS support summary
Table
Identification of the Table
numbers Constraints Addi tional
Index document that includes of pIcs Description Status Support numbers
and values information
the PICS proforma of PICS
proforma
1 CCITT Rec. X.730 I Annex E SM application context OBJECT m
ISO/IEC 10164-l a11 tables IDENTIFIER
NOTE - Conformance to the MAPDUs defined in this Recommendation I International Standard cari be claimed by
completing the corresponding tables in the MICS and MOCS annexes of the referenced Recommendations I International Standards.
8 Rec. UIT-T X.735 (1992)/Amd.l(1995 F)
---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------
ISOKEI 10164=6:1993/Amd.l:1996(F)
Table A.7 - MOCS support summary
Table
Identification of the
Table
numbers Constraints
Additional
Index document that includes Description Status numbers
Support
of MOCS and values information
the MOCS proforma
of MOCS
proforma
1 CCITT Rec. X.730 I Annex C objectcreation,
c9
ISO/IEC 10164-i a11 tables objectDeletion and
attributeva
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.