Comparison of worldwide lift safety standards — Part 1: Electric lifts (elevators) — Amendment 1: References to Japanese standards

Comparaison des normes mondiales de sécurité des ascenseurs — Partie 1: Ascenseurs électriques — Amendement 1: Références aux normes japonaises

General Information

Status
Withdrawn
Publication Date
21-Apr-1999
Withdrawal Date
21-Apr-1999
Current Stage
9599 - Withdrawal of International Standard
Completion Date
08-Jul-2004
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Technical report
ISO/TR 11071-1:1990/Amd 1:1999 - Comparison of worldwide lift safety standards — Part 1: Electric lifts (elevators) — Amendment 1: References to Japanese standards Released:4/22/1999
English language
35 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

TECHNICAL
ISO/TR
11071-1
REPORT
First edition
1990-12-01
AMENDMENT 1
1999-04-15
Comparison of worldwide lift safety
standards —
Part 1:
Electric lifts (elevators)
AMENDMENT 1: References to Japanese
standards
Comparaison des normes mondiales de sécurité des ascenseurs —
Partie 1: Ascenseurs électriques
AMENDEMENT 1: Références aux normes japonaises
a
Reference number
ISO/TR 11071-1:1990/Amd.1:1999(E)

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
ISO/TR 11071-1:1990/Amd.1:1999(E)
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization, is a worldwide
federation of national standards bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of
preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO
technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which
a technical committee has been established has the right to be represented
on that committee. International organizations, governmental and non-
governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO
collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission
(IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
The main task of ISO technical committees is to prepare International
Standards. In exceptional circumstances a technical committee may
propose the publication of a Technical Report of one of the following types:
 type 1, when the required support cannot be obtained for the
publication of an International Standard, despite repeated efforts;
 type 2, when the subject is still under technical development or where
for any other reason there is the future but not immediate possibility of
an agreement on an International Standard;
 type 3, when a technical committee has collected data of a different
kind from that which is normally published as an International Standard
(«state of the art», for example).
Technical Reports of types 1 and 2 are subject to review within three years
of publication, to decide whether they can be transformed into International
Standards. Technical Reports of type 3 do not necessarily have to be
reviewed until the data they provide are considered to be no longer valid or
useful.
Amendment 1 to ISO/TR 11071-1, which is a Technical Report of type 3,
was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 178, Lifts, escalators,
passenger conveyors, Working Group 4.
ISO/TR 11071 consists of the following parts, under the general title
Comparison of worldwide lift safety standards:
 Part 1: 1990, Electric lifts (elevators)
 Part 2: 1996, Hydraulic lifts (elevators)
NOTE It is intended that an amendment 1 to Part 2 will provide similar
references to Japanese and Australian standards.
©  ISO 1999
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced
or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and
microfilm, without permission in writing from the publisher.
International Organization for Standardization
Case postale 56 • CH-1211 Genève 20 • Switzerland
Internet iso@iso.ch
Printed in Switzerland
ii

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
©
ISO ISO/TR 11071-1:1990/Amd.1:1999(E)
Introduction
Technical report ISO/TR 11071-1:1990 consists of a comparison of the
requirements of lifts (elevators) as covered by the following safety
standards for electric lifts that were used in various countries or regions at
the end of 1989:
a) CEN - European Standard EN 81: Part 1, Lifts and service lifts [Edition
1985 - as presented in BS 5655-1:1986 (excluding national Appendix)];
b) ASME - ASME/ANSI A17.1
Safety code for elevators and escalators
(Edition 1987 including the A17.1a-1988 and A17.1b-1989 addenda);
c) CSA - CSA Standard CAN3-B44 Safety code for elevators (Edition
1985, including Supplement 1-1987);
d) USSR - USSR Elevator design and safe operation code (Edition
NEDRA, 1971 as presented in English version NEDRA 1972);
e) CMEA - Elevator safety regulations of the Council for Mutual Economic
Assistance.
The intention of the Technical Report was to provide reference information
to assist national committees when reviewing and revising individual
standards. This process was expected to initiate a gradual convergence of
the technical requirements.
The original Technical Report did not include the safety requirements and
standards used in Japan.
At the initiative of Technical Committee ISO/TC 178, experts from the
Japanese Elevator Association provided ISO/TC 178 Working Group 4 with
comprehensive reports on the Japanese safety standards system and with
tables comparing their requirements with those in the five listed safety
standards. It should be noted that since the publication of ISO/TR 11071-1,
the CMEA has been put out of use and USSR [NEDRA, 1971] standard
withdrawn and replaced with a new code for the Russian Federation
[PUBEL:1992]. Furthermore, the ASME and CSA standards have been
revised and new editions published.
By Resolution No. 1995/117; however, ISO/TC 178 asked WG 4 to review
the material prepared by Japanese experts with the intention of publishing
it as an amendment to ISO/TR 11071-1:1990, rather than revising and
updating the whole 1990 edition.
This amendment does not replace compared safety standards from the
1990 edition. The information contained in this Technical Report does not
necessarily represent the opinions of the standards-writing organizations
responsible for the development of the safety standards being compared,
and they should be consulted regarding interpretations of their
requirements.
NOTE  ISO/TR 11071-1 and this amendment do not deal with lift rated loads and
suspension ropes. The subjects are, however, covered in ISO/TR 11071-2,
published in 1996, in clauses 7 and 8, which include tables and analysis of
corresponding requirements in CEN, ASME and CSA standards as related to both
electric and hydraulic lifts (elevators).
III

---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
©
ISO ISO/TR 11071-1:1990/Amd.1:1999(E)
Comparison of worldwide lift safety standards —
Part 1:
Electric lifts (elevators)
AMENDMENT 1: References to Japanese standards
This amendment illustrates Japanese lift safety requirements in relation to the requirements of all standards covered
in the original Technical Report, ISO/TR 11071-1:1990.
This amendment consists of the following:
a) reproduction of the original 1990 tables, with the addition of the Japanese requirements in new columns in
tables 3.3.2.3, 3.9.2 and 3.10.2 of clause 3;
b) additions to the previous annex A, reproducing the original 1990 tables but incorporating a new column
«JAPAN»;
c) addition of a new annex D containing information on the Japanese safety standards system with regard to lifts.
These tables may therefore be inserted to replace the original tables in ISO/TR 11071-1:1990.
This amendment does not constitute a general review of ISO/TR 11071-1:1990.
Table 3.3.2.3: Comparison of Components’ Ratings (Percentage of Rated Load)
Component CEN ASME CSA USSR CMEA JAPAN
Rope traction Dynamic: Dynamic: Dynamic: Dynamic: Dynamic: Dynamic:
125 % 125 % 125 % 110 % 110 % 125 % (passenger)
(9-Notes) (208.2) (3.10.2.2) (7.3.10) (3.3) 120 % (freight)
[BSLJ-EO-129.9(6)]
Static: Static: Static:
200 % 200 % 125 % (passenger)
(7.3.9b) (3.3) 120 % (freight)
[BSLJ-EO-129.9(6)]
Mechanical 125 % * 125 % 110 % 110 % 125 % (passenger)
brake alone (12.4.2.1) (208.8) (3.10.8.2) (7.3.10) (4.4.4) 120 % (freight)
from rated [BSLJ-EO-129.9(6)]
speed
Safety gear** 100 % 125 % 125 % 110 % Not available 100 %
(9.8.1.1) (205.3) (3.7.4.1) (7.3.10) [JIS A4302-4.2.1(6)]
* Holding capacity for 125 %. There are no requirements in ASME for deceleration from any speed at any load.
** CEN and USSR safety gear is tested in free-fall, ASME and CSA in overspeed with 100 % rated load.
1

---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
©
ISO/TR 11071-1:1990/Amd.1:1999(E) ISO
Table 3.9.2: Assumption 7 as applied in current standards
Assumption CEN ASME CSA USSR CMEA JAPAN
Static force
Landing Doors 300 N 1110 N 2500 N No spec. No spec. No spec.
(7.2.3) [110.11e(7)] (2.11.10.4.7)
Car Enclosure 300 N 334 N 330 N No spec. No spec. No spec.
(8.3.2.1) (204.1c) (3.6.1.3)
Impact No spec. No spec. 5000 N No spec. No spec. No spec.
(2.11.10.5)
Force distribution No spec. No spec. No spec. No spec. No spec. No spec.
Table 3.10.2: Assumption 8 as applied in current standards
Assumption CEN ASME CSA USSR CMEA JAPAN
Average retardation*
Safety gear 1 g 1 g 1 g 1 g Not available 1 g
(9.8.4) (205.8b) (3.7.9.2) (4.9.1) (JIS A 4302)
Buffers 1 g 1 g 1 g No spec. Not available 1 g
(10.4.3.3) (201.4b) (3.3.5.2) [BSLJ-EO-
129.9(9)]
Maximum retardation
Safety gear No spec. No spec. No spec. 2,5 g 2,5 g No spec.
0,04 s 0,04 s
(4.7.5) (3.3)
Buffers duration 2,5 g 2,5 g 2,5 g 2,5 g No spec. 2,5 g
0,04 s 0,04 s 0,04 s 0,04 s 0,04 s
(10.4.3.3) (201.4b) (3.3.5.2) (4.0.1) [BSLJ-EO-
129.9(9)]
* Average retardation levels exceeding 1g can occur with a lightly loaded car during safety or buffer application.
NOTE: 1g = 9,81 m/s².
2

---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
©
ISO ISO/TR 11071-1:1990/Amd.1:1999(E)
After Annex A, page 23, of the original report: Insert the following explanatory text below the existing notes and
Legend, and insert the replacement tables.
(1) Column «JAPAN» is added based on the requirements in the following laws and standards.
BSLJ . Building Standard Law of Japan
BSLJ-EO. Building Standard Law Enforcement Order
Explanation of technical standard for elevators and escalators
JIS. Japanese Industrial Standard
JEAS. Japan Elevator Association Standard
GUIDELINE. Guideline for design and construction of elevators, escalators
and play facilities
ELEC Technical standard concerning electric installation
(2) In other columns, the bracketed numbers cross-reference rules in individual standards CEN, ASME etc
(see Introduction).
(3) The following abbreviations and symbols are used in the tables.
Notation Meaning
No Spec There is no rule covering the specific subject
N/A The question is not applicable to the specific standard for
various reasons
- Same as «No spec» or «N/A»
? The requirement in the standard is not clear, or the data were
not available at the time of publication of the report
> Greater than
< Less than
£Up to (less or equal)
The following lift safety requirements are not covered in the tables, but specific Japanese requirements exist.
(a) Earthquake requirements
A seismic sensor is required to be set up in the machine room to control the operation of elevators. When an
earthquake occurs, the car should be stopped at the nearest floor. Item 129 Article 7 of the Building Standard Law
Enforcement Order provides that the following should be considered according to structural earthquake-proof
standards:
— the stress and deflection in the equipment and the material of each elevator part caused by earthquakes
should be within the allowable stress of the material and fixed tolerances of the equipment (e.g. strength of
guide rail and rail bracket);
— elevator equipment should be securely fixed so as to not, be moved, fall down, or be damaged by
earthquakes (e.g., derailment-restraint of counterweight and earthquake-proof fixings of machine room
equipment);
— traction sheaves should be so constructed as to keep ropes in place in the case of earthquakes (e.g.,
provision of deep-grooved sheaves and installation of retaining guards for ropes);
— travelling cables should be guarded from damage by projections in hoistway during the earthquake.
(b) Fire emergency elevators
Fire emergency elevators are required to be installed in buildings exceeding 31 m in height, according to Item 2 of
Article 34 of the Building Standards Law of Japan.
Regulations prescribe the details for fire emergency elevators, such as necessary units, location in the building,
structure of hoistway, machine room, elevator hall, and the operation.
3

---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
©
ISO/TR 11071-1:1990/Amd.1:1999(E) ISO
4

---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
©
ISO ISO
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.