iTeh StandardsiTeh Standards
EURUSD
Your shopping cart is empty.
ASTM

ASTM E1009-95(2000)

(Practice)

Standard Practice for Evaluating an Optical Emission Vacuum Spectrometer to Analyze Carbon and Low-Alloy Steel

Standard Practice for Evaluating an Optical Emission Vacuum Spectrometer to Analyze Carbon and Low-Alloy Steel

SCOPE
1.1 This practice covers evaluation of an optical emission vacuum spectrometer to analyze carbon and low-alloy steels. It covers instruments used for the analysis of solid samples taken from molten metal for production control or from products to confirm the composition. Both pre-installation and post-installation precision and accuracy are included in the evaluation.  
1.2 While Tables 1-3 are specific for plain carbon and low-alloy steel, they could be supplemented by similar tables for other materials.  
1.3  This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
31-Dec-1999
ICS
77.040.30 - Chemical analysis of metals
Technical Committee
E01 - Analytical Chemistry for Metals, Ores, and Related Materials
Drafting Committee
E01.01 - Iron, Steel, and Ferroalloys
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Replaced By
ASTM E1009-95(2006) - Standard Practice for Evaluating an Optical Emission Vacuum Spectrometer to Analyze Carbon and Low-Alloy Steel (Withdrawn 2015)
Effective Date
01-Jun-2006

Buy Standard

ASTM E1009-95(2000) - Standard Practice for Evaluating an Optical Emission Vacuum Spectrometer to Analyze Carbon and Low-Alloy SteelASTM E1009-95(2000) - Standard Practice for Evaluating an Optical Emission Vacuum Spectrometer to Analyze Carbon and Low-Alloy Steel
PreviousNext
Standard
ASTM E1009-95(2000) - Standard Practice for Evaluating an Optical Emission Vacuum Spectrometer to Analyze Carbon and Low-Alloy Steel
English language
4 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation:E1009 –95 (Reapproved 2000)
Standard Practice for
Evaluating an Optical Emission Vacuum Spectrometer to
Analyze Carbon and Low-Alloy Steel
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E 1009; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 3.2.1 accuracy—the closeness of a spectrochemical deter-
mination to an accepted reference; it is affected by imprecision
1.1 This practice covers evaluation of an optical emission
and bias.
vacuum spectrometer to analyze carbon and low-alloy steels. It
3.2.2 standard error (SE)—although primarily a calculation
covers instruments used for the analysis of solid samples taken
thatmeasureshowwellacalibrationhasbeendefined,standard
from molten metal for production control or from products to
error (SE) is used in this practice as an indicator of accuracy.
confirm the composition. Both pre-installation and post-
It is CRM-dependent and instrument-operator dependent.
installation precision and accuracy are included in the evalua-
Some expected maximum SE values are listed, but compari-
tion.
sons between instrument calibrations can strictly be done only
1.2 While Tables 1-3 are specific for plain carbon and
when identical suites of calibrants are used.
low-alloy steel, they could be supplemented by similar tables
for other materials.
4. Summary of Practice
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the
4.1 After the spectrometer is calibrated, use this practice to
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
evaluate the instrument and its calibration. Certified reference
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
materials are run as unknowns and precision is compared to
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
Table 1. Before comparing standard errors to those in Table 2,
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
ascertain that the calibration does not include unrealistic
2. Referenced Documents inflections. Values equal to or less than those in Tables 1 and 2
indicate that the instrument is acceptable.
2.1 ASTM Standards:
E 135 Terminology Relating to Analytical Chemistry for
5. Significance and Use
Metals, Ores, and Related Materials
5.1 Periodically throughout the useful life of an optical
E 305 Practice for Establishing and Controlling Spectro-
2 emission spectrometer it becomes necessary to evaluate its
chemical Analytical Curves
performance. This is especially true at manufacture and during
E 406 Practice for Using Controlled Atmospheres in Spec-
2 installation. The objective at this time is to establish whether
trochemical Analysis
the instrument meets design specifications and performs to
E 528 Practices for Grounding Basic Optical Emission
3 customer specifications. A manufacturer’s objective may be to
Spectrochemical Equipment
compare production line instruments. With data on many
E 876 Practice for Use of Statistics in the Evaluation of
2 instruments, such an evaluation procedure would be a valuable
Spectrometric Data
contribution to the manufacturer’s quality control plan.
3. Terminology 5.2 Use of this procedure at installation can tell the manu-
facturer or user whether there has been a significant change in
3.1 Definitions—For definitions of terms used in this prac-
performance due to faulty shipping or handling of the instru-
tice, refer to Terminology E 135 and Practice E 876.
ment. At this time, the procedure could be the beginning of a
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
quality control plan for the user. Once established, the data
from the procedure provide a base for comparison of future
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E01 on Analytical runs, enabling operators to detect changes in performance.
Chemistry for Metals, Ores and Related Materials and is the direct responsibility of
5.3 Data produced by this practice make possible a com-
Subcommittee E01.01 on Iron, Steel, and Ferroalloys.
parisonofdifferentinstruments,forexample,X-rayandoptical
Current edition approved March 15, 1995. Published May 1995. Originally
emission or optical emission and atomic absorption. While the
published as E 1009 – 90. Last previous edition E 1009 – 90.
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 03.05.
Discontinued 1999; see 1998 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 03.06.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
E1009
TABLE 1 (a) Revised Data
data in the Tables 1-3 are valid for optical emission spectrom-
eters, other instruments may produce better or worse perfor- Approximate Standard
Element
Concentration, % Deviation
mance values. In this manner, the data could be used by
C 0.015 0.0009
management to determine the suitability of a given instrument
C 1.03 0.012
to perform a given determination with an acceptable precision
MN 0.067 0.0006
and accuracy.
Mn 2.00 0.023
P 0.0032 0.0007
S 0.0024 0.0001
TABLE 1 Recommended Precision Requirements For Steel Using
Si 0.01 0.0002
A
An Optical Emission Vacuum Spectrometer
Ni 0.021 0.0004
Ni 2.00 0.005
Approximate Standard
CR 1.48 0.009
Element
Concentration, % Deviation
Mo 0.005 0.0004
Mo 0.50 0.002
C 0.06 60.002
Cu 0.015 0.0003
0.15 0.004
Cu 0.30 0.0007
0.50 0.010
Ti 0.0055 0.0004
0.90 0.015
Al 0.004 0.0004
Mn 0.35 0.007
Al 0.04 0.0007
0.60 0.015
Nb 0.01 0.0005
1.00 0.02
Nb 0.1 0.002
1.50 0.03
B 0.001 0.0001
P 0.006 0.0007
B 0.005 0.0001
0.04 0.0015
Zr 0.013 0.0007
S 0.005 0.0015
Pb 0.002 0.0004
0.04 0.002
As 0.01 0.0003
0.06 0.004
As 0.055 0.002
Si 0.02 0.004
0.30 0.006
A
0.50 0.010
These precisions were generated from data that were collected on newer
Ni 0.03 0.002
instruments than the original data.
0.10 0.003
0.70 0.007
1.60 0.03
Cr 0.04 0.002 5.4 While this practice is directed towards optical emission
0.30 0.007
vacuum spectrometers in the analysis of carbon and low-alloy
0.80 0.015
steel, its use is not restricted to that instrument or that matrix.
Sn 0.003 0.0006
0.02 0.0015
0.05 0.002 6. Instrumentation
V 0.01 0.0015
6.1 The vacuum spectrometer shall be equipped with an
0.03 0.002
0.25 0.007 argon-flushed sample stand for point-to-plane excitation.
Mo 0.03 0.003
6.2 The excitation parameters and radiations measured shall
0.30 0.008
be selected to meet the specified performance.
Cu 0.02 0.0007
0.15 0.003
NOTE 1—Ordinarily this selection is made by the vendor, or instrument
Ti 0.02 0.002
manufacturer, based on experience.
0.20 0.008
Al 0.006 0.002
6.3 Provision shall be made to compensate for spectral
0.02 0.003
interferences. More than one spectral line may be provided for
0.07 0.004
Nb 0.02 0.0015
an element, depending on element concentration or the exci-
0.07 0.003
tation used, but switching of lines shall be done automatically.
B 0.001 0.00015
0.07 0.003
7. Analysis Time
Zr 0.05 0.002
Pb 0.01 0.0015
7.1 Analysis time, excluding sample preparation, shall not
Se 0.02 0.002
exceed 30 s for single burns, or 60 s for multiple burns.
A
These precisions were generated from actual data in one laboratory; as such,
they represent what has been done with proven, homogeneous materials. NOTE 2—This requirement may be waived if speed of analysis is not
E1009
TABLE 2 Elements, Concentration Ranges, and Recommended
9. Purpose of Analytical Performance Tests
Acceptable Standard Error (SE) for Steel
9.1 Pre-Shipment Precision:
Approximate Concentration
Max Allowable Standard
9.1.1 Perform the tests in 10.1 to verify performance before
Element Range, %, as Covered by the
A
Error, %
Certified Standards
shipment so that any necessary adjustments can be made at the
C 0.02 to 1.00 0.009 factory. Preliminary calibration of the spectrometer is required
Mn 0.01 to 1.50 0.012
to assure that the concentration range specified for each
P 0.001 to 0.07 0.0
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

This May Also Interest You

ASTM
ASTM E352-23(Test Method)
Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Tool Steels and Other Similar Medium- and High-Alloy Steels

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 These test methods for the chemical analysis of metals and alloys are primarily intended as referee methods to test such materials for compliance with compositional specifications particularly those under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee A01 on Steel, Stainless Steel, and Related Alloys. It is assumed that all who use these test methods will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely. It is expected that work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory under appropriate quality control practices such as those described in Guide E882.
SCOPE
1.1 These test methods cover the chemical analysis of tool steels and other similar medium- and high-alloy steels having chemical compositions within the following limits:    
Element  
Composition Range, %  
Aluminum  
0.005 to 1.5  
Boron  
0.001 to 0.10  
Carbon  
0.03 to 2.50  
Chromium  
0.10 to 14.0  
Cobalt  
0.10 to 14.0  
Copper  
0.01 to 2.0  
Lead  
0.001 to 0.01  
Manganese  
0.10 to 15.00  
Molybdenum  
0.01 to 10.00  
Nickel  
0.02 to 4.00  
Nitrogen  
0.001 to 0.20  
Phosphorus  
0.002 to 0.05  
Silicon  
0.10 to 2.50  
Sulfur  
0.002 to 0.40  
Tungsten  
0.01 to 21.00  
Vanadium  
0.02 to 5.50  
1.2 The test methods in this standard are contained in the sections indicated below:    
Sections  
Carbon, Total, by the Combustion—
Thermal Conductivity Method—
Discontinued 1986  
125–135  
Carbon, Total, by the Combustion Gravimetric
Method—Discontinued 2012  
78–88  
Chromium by the Atomic Absorption
Spectrometry Method  
(0.006 % to 1.00 %)  
174–183  
Chromium by the Peroxydisulfate
Oxidation—Titration Method  
(0.10 % to 14.00 %)  
184–192  
Chromium by the Peroxydisulfate-Oxidation
Titrimetric Method—Discontinued 1980  
117–124  
Cobalt by the Ion-Exchange—
Potentiometric Titration Method  
(2 % to 14 %)  
52–59  
Cobalt by the Nitroso-R-Salt
Spectrophotometric Method  
(0.10 % to 5.0 %)  
60–69  
Copper by the Neocuproine
Spectrophotometric Method  
(0.01 % to 2.00 %)  
89–98  
Copper by the Sulfide Precipitation-
Electrodeposition Gravimetric Method  
(0.01 % to 2.0 %)  
70–77  
Lead by the Ion-Exchange—Atomic
Absorption Spectrometry Method  
(0.001 % to 0.01 %)  
99–108  
Manganese by the Periodate
Spectrophotometric Method  
(0.10 % to 5.00 %)  
9–18  
Molybdenum by the Ion Exchange–
8-Hydroxyquinoline Gravimetric Method  
203–210  
Molybdenum by the Thiocyanate Spectrophotometric Method  
(0.01 % to 1.50 %)  
162–173  
Nickel by the Dimethylglyoxime
Gravimetric Method  
(0.1 % to 4.0 %)  
144–151  
Phosphorus by the Alkalimetric Method  
(0.01 % to 0.05 %)  
136–143  
Phosphorus by the Molybdenum Blue
Spectrophotometric Method  
(0.002 % to 0.05 %)  
19–29  
Silicon by the Gravimetric Method  
(0.10 % to 2.50 %)  
45–51  
Sulfur by the Gravimetric
Method—Discontinued 1988  
29–35  
Sulfur by the Combustion-Iodate
Titration Method—Discontinued 2012  
36–44  
Sulfur by the Chromatographic
Gravimetric Method—Discontinued 1980  
109–116  
Tin by the Solvent Extraction—
Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Method  
(0.002 % to 0.10 %)  
152–161  
Vanadium by the Atomic
Absorption Spectrometry Method  
(0.006 % to 0.15 %)  
193–202  
1.3 Test methods for the determination of carbon and sulfur not included in this standard can be found in Test Methods E1019.  
1.4 Some of the composition ranges given in 1.1 are too broad to be covered by a single test method and therefore this standard contains multiple test methods for some elements. The user must select the proper test method by matching the information given in the Scope and Interference sections of each test method with the composition of the alloy to be analy...

  • Standard
    38 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    38 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E350-23(Test Method)
Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Carbon Steel, Low-Alloy Steel, Silicon Electrical Steel, Ingot Iron, and Wrought Iron

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 These test methods for the chemical analysis of metals and alloys are primarily intended as referee methods to test such materials for compliance with compositional specifications, particularly those under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committees A01 on Steel, Stainless Steel, and Related Alloys and A04 on Iron Castings. It is assumed that all who use these test methods will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely. It is expected that work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory under appropriate quality control practices such as those described in Guide E882.
SCOPE
1.1 These test methods cover the chemical analysis of carbon steels, low-alloy steels, silicon electrical steels, ingot iron, and wrought iron having chemical compositions within the following limits:    
Element  
Composition Range, %  
Aluminum  
0.001 to 1.50  
Antimony  
0.002 to 0.03  
Arsenic  
0.0005 to 0.10  
Bismuth  
0.005 to 0.50  
Boron  
0.0005 to 0.02  
Calcium  
0.0005 to 0.01  
Cerium  
0.005 to 0.50  
Chromium  
0.005 to 3.99  
Cobalt  
0.01 to 0.30  
Columbium (Niobium)  
0.002 to 0.20  
Copper  
0.005 to 1.50  
Lanthanum  
0.001 to 0.30  
Lead  
0.001 to 0.50  
Manganese  
0.01 to 2.50  
Molybdenum  
0.002 to 1.50  
Nickel  
0.005 to 5.00  
Nitrogen  
0.0005 to 0.04  
Oxygen  
0.0001 to 0.03  
Phosphorus  
0.001 to 0.25  
Selenium  
0.001 to 0.50  
Silicon  
0.001 to 5.00  
Sulfur  
0.001 to 0.60  
Tin  
0.002 to 0.10  
Titanium  
0.002 to 0.60  
Tungsten  
0.005 to 0.10  
Vanadium  
0.005 to 0.50  
Zirconium  
0.005 to 0.15  
1.2 The test methods in this standard are contained in the sections indicated as follows:    
Sections  
Aluminum, Total, by the 8-Quinolinol Gravimetric
Method (0.20 % to 1.5 %)  
124–131  
Aluminum, Total, by the 8-Quinolinol
Spectrophotometric Method
(0.003 % to 0.20 %)  
76–86  
Aluminum, Total or Acid-Soluble, by the Atomic
Absorption Spectrometry Method
(0.005 % to 0.20 %)  
308–317  
Antimony by the Brilliant Green Spectrophotometric
Method (0.0002 % to 0.030 %)  
142–151  
Bismuth by the Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
Method (0.02 % to 0.25 %)  
298–307  
Boron by the Distillation-Curcumin
Spectrophotometric Method
(0.0003 % to 0.006 %)  
208–219  
Calcium by the Direct-Current Plasma Atomic
Emission Spectrometry Method
(0.0005 % to 0.010 %)  
289–297  
Carbon, Total, by the Combustion Gravimetric Method
(0.05 % to 1.80 %)—Discontinued 1995  
Cerium and Lanthanum by the Direct Current Plasma
Atomic Emission Spectrometry Method
(0.003 % to 0.50 % Cerium, 0.001 % to 0.30 %
Lanthanum)  
249–257  
Chromium by the Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
Method (0.006 % to 1.00 %)  
220–229  
Chromium by the Peroxydisulfate Oxidation-Titration
Method (0.05 % to 3.99 %)  
230–238  
Cobalt by the Nitroso-R Salt Spectrophotometric
Method (0.01 % to 0.30 %)  
53–62  
Copper by the Sulfide Precipitation-Iodometric
Titration Method (Discontinued 1989)  
87–94  
Copper by the Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
Method (0.004 % to 0.5 %)  
279–288  
Copper by the Neocuproine Spectrophotometric
Method (0.005 % to 1.50 %)  
114–123  
Lead by the Ion-Exchange—Atomic Absorption
Spectrometry Method
(0.001 % to 0.50 %)  
132–141  
Manganese by the Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
Method (0.005 % to 2.0 %)  
269–278  
Manganese by the Metaperiodate Spectrophotometric
Method (0.01 % to 2.5 %)  
9–18  
Manganese by the Peroxydisulfate-Arsenite Titrimetric
Method (0.10 % to 2.50 %)  
164–171  
Molybdenum by the Thiocyanate Spectrophotometric
Method (0.01 % to 1.50 %)  
152–163  
Nickel by the Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
Method (0.003 % to 0.5 %)  
318–327  
Nickel by the Dimethylglyoxim...

  • Standard
    64 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    64 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E363-23(Test Method)
Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Chromium and Ferrochromium

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 These test methods for the chemical analysis of chromium metal and ferrochromium alloy are primarily intended to test such materials for compliance with compositional specifications such as Specifications A101 and A481. It is assumed that all who use these test methods will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely. It is expected that work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory.
SCOPE
1.1 These test methods cover the chemical analysis of chromium and ferrochromium having chemical compositions within the following limits:    
Element  
Composition, %  
Aluminum  
0.25 max  
Antimony  
0.005 max  
Arsenic  
0.005 max  
Bismuth  
0.005 max  
Boron  
0.005 max  
Carbon  
9.00 max  
Chromium  
51.0 to 99.5  
Cobalt  
0.10 max  
Columbium  
0.05 max  
Copper  
0.05 max  
Lead  
0.005 max  
Manganese  
0.75 max  
Molybdenum  
0.05 max  
Nickel  
0.50 max  
Nitrogen  
6.00 max  
Phosphorus  
0.03 max  
Silicon  
12.00 max  
Silver  
0.005 max  
Sulfur  
0.07 max  
Tantalum  
0.05 max  
Tin  
0.005 max  
Titanium  
0.50 max  
Vanadium  
0.50 max  
Zinc  
0.005 max  
Zirconium  
0.05 max  
1.2 The analytical procedures appear in the following order:    
Sections  
Arsenic by the Molybdenum Blue Spectrophotometric Test Method
[0.001 % to 0.005 %]  
10 – 20  
Lead by the Dithizone Spectrophotometric Test Method
[0.001 % to 0.05 %]  
21 – 31  
Chromium by the Sodium Peroxide Fusion-Titrimetric Test Method
[50.0 % to 99.5 %]  
32 – 38  
1.3 Units—The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific hazard statements are given in Section 6 and in special “Warning” paragraphs throughout these test methods.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    8 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    8 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E439-23(Test Method)
Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Beryllium

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 These test methods for the chemical analysis of beryllium metal are primarily intended as referee methods to test such materials for compliance with compositional specifications. It is assumed that all who use these test methods will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely. It is expected that work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory.
SCOPE
1.1 These test methods cover the chemical analysis of beryllium having chemical compositions within the following limits:    
Element  
Range, %  
Aluminum  
0.05 to 0.30  
Beryllium  
97.5 to 100    
Beryllium Oxide  
0.3 to 3    
Carbon  
0.05 to 0.30  
Copper  
0.005 to 0.10  
Chromium  
0.005 to 0.10  
Iron  
0.05 to 0.30  
Magnesium  
0.02 to 0.15  
Nickel  
0.005 to 0.10  
Silicon  
0.02 to 0.15  
1.2 The test methods in this standard are contained in the sections as follows.    
Sections  
Chromium by the Diphenylcarbazide Spectrophotometric Test Method
[0.004 % to 0.04 %]  
10 – 19  
Iron by the 1,10-Phenanthroline Spectrophotometric Test Method
[0.05 % to 0.25 %]  
20 – 29  
Manganese by the Periodate Spectrophotometric Test Method
[0.008 % to 0.04 %]  
30 – 39  
Nickel by the Dimethylglyoxime Spectrophotometric Test Method
[0.001 % to 0.04 %]  
40 – 49  
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    8 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    8 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E2824-23(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Determination of Beryllium in Copper-Beryllium Alloys by Phosphate Gravimetry

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This test method for the chemical analysis of metals and alloys is primarily intended to test such materials for compliance with compositional specifications. It is assumed that all who use these test methods will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely. It is expected that work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method describes the determination of beryllium in copper-beryllium alloys in percentages from 0.1 % to 3.0 % by phosphate gravimetry.  
1.2 Units—The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific hazard statements are given in Section 9.  
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    3 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    3 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E55-23(Practice)
Standard Practice for Sampling Wrought Nonferrous Metals and Alloys for Determination of Chemical Composition

ABSTRACT
This practice covers the sampling, for the determination of chemical composition of nonferrous metals and alloys that have been reduced to their final form by mechanical working; that is, by such means as rolling, drawing, and extruding. The portion selection, sample preparation, sampling details, sample size and storage, and resampling are also detailed.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice covers the sampling, for the determination of chemical composition (Note 1), of nonferrous metals and alloys that have been reduced to their final form by mechanical working; that is, by such means as rolling, drawing, and extruding.  
1.1.1 Refer to Practice E255 for copper and copper alloys.  
Note 1: The selection of correct portions of material and the preparation of a representative sample from such portions are necessary prerequisites to every analysis, the analysis being of no value unless the sample actually represents the average composition of the material from which it was selected.  
1.2 In special cases, when agreed upon by the purchaser and the manufacturer, the heat analysis may be accepted as representative of the composition of the finished product. In such cases, the identity of each heat of metal should be maintained through each stage of the manufacturing process to the final form. This method of sampling is not intended to apply under these conditions.  
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    3 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    3 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E255-23(Practice)
Standard Practice for Sampling Copper and Copper Alloys for the Determination of Chemical Composition

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 This practice is intended primarily for the sampling of copper and copper alloys for compliance with compositional specification requirements.  
4.2 The selection of correct test pieces and the preparation of a representative sample from such test pieces are necessary prerequisites to every analysis. The analytical results will be of little value unless the sample represents the average composition of the material from which it was prepared.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice describes the sampling of copper (except electrolytic cathode) and copper alloys in either cast or wrought form for the determination of composition.  
1.2 Cast products may be in the form of cake, billet, wire bar, ingot, ingot bar, or casting.  
1.3 Wrought products may be in the form of flat, pipe, tube, rod, bar, shape, or forging.  
1.4 This practice is not intended to supersede or replace existing specification requirements for the sampling of a particular material.  
1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. The values in parentheses are given for information only.  
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. A specific precautionary statement appears in Appendix X4.  
1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    6 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1277-23(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Analysis of Zinc-5 % Aluminum-Mischmetal Alloys by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This test method for the chemical analysis of metals and alloys is primarily intended to test such materials for compliance with compositional specifications. It is assumed that all those who use this test method will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely. It is expected that work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the chemical analysis of zinc alloys having chemical compositions within the following limits:    
Element  
Composition Range, %  
Aluminum  
3.0–8.0  
Antimony  
0.002 max  
Cadmium  
0.025 max  
Cerium  
0.03–0.10  
Copper  
0.10 max  
Iron  
0.10 max  
Lanthanum  
0.03–0.10  
Lead  
0.026 max  
Magnesium  
0.05 max  
Silicon  
0.015 max  
Tin  
0.002 max  
Titanium  
0.02 max  
Zirconium  
0.02 max  
1.2 Units—The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.3 Included are procedures for elements in the following composition ranges:    
Element  
Composition Range, %  
Aluminum  
3.0–8.0  
Cadmium  
0.0016–0.025  
Cerium  
0.005–0.10  
Iron  
0.0015–0.10  
Lanthanum  
0.009–0.10  
Lead  
0.002–0.026  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific safety hazards statements are given in Section 8, 11.2, and 13.1.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E3346-22(Guide)
Standard Guide for Combustion, Inert Gas Fusion and Hot Extraction Instruments for use in Analyzing Metals, Ores, and Related Materials

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 The chemical measurement processes covered by this guide are used for determination of Carbon, Sulfur, Nitrogen, Oxygen and Hydrogen in metals, ores and related materials. A test method utilizing this guidance is used to test such materials, and also form the basis for quality assurance of these materials. Thus, it is economically and scientifically critical that these instruments be understood by the laboratories that use them.  
5.2 It is assumed that all who use this guide will be trained analysts, capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully, and safely. It is expected that any work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory.  
5.3 It is expected that the laboratory will prepare their own work procedures for any of the information described in this guide.  
5.4 This guide contains numerous references to “manufacturer’s recommendations”. The user of this guide is expected to refer to the instrument operation manual for the specific instrument being used or consult directly with the manufacturer to obtain instructions or recommendations.  
5.5 This guide stresses the conservation of certified reference materials (CRMs). CRMs should not be used for drift checks or conditioning measurments. Other materials should be developed and used for these operations.
SCOPE
1.1 This guide covers information for using Combustion, Inert Gas Fusion and Hot Extraction instruments to determine the mass fraction of the non-metallic elements Carbon, Sulfur, Nitrogen, Oxygen and Hydrogen in metals, ores and related materials.  
1.2 This guide does not specify all the operating conditions because of the differences among different manufacturer’s instruments. Laboratories should follow instructions provided by the manufacturer of the instrument.  
1.3 Units—The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.5 The information in this guide is contained in the sections indicated as follows:    
Sections  
Carbon/Sulfur by Combustion/Infrared Detection  
14 – 19  
Nitrogen/Oxygen by Inert Gas Fusion/Thermal Conductivity and Infrared Detection  
20 – 25  
Hydrogen by Inert Gas Fusion Instrumental Measurement and Hot Extraction/Various Detection Cell Technology  
26 – 31  
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Guide
    10 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1085-22(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Analysis of Low-Alloy Steels by Wavelength Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This test method is suitable for manufacturing control and for verifying that a product meets specifications. This test method provides rapid, multi-element determinations with sufficient accuracy to ensure product quality and to minimize production delays. The analytical performance data may be used as a benchmark to determine if similar X-ray spectrometers provide equivalent precision and accuracy, or if the performance of a particular X-ray spectrometer has changed.  
5.2 Calcium is sometimes added to steel to affect inclusion shape which enhances certain mechanical properties of steel. This test method is useful for determining the residual calcium in the steel after such treatment.  
5.2.1 Because calcium occurs primarily in inclusions, the precision of this test method is a function of the distribution of the calcium-bearing inclusions in the steel. The variation of determinations on freshly prepared surfaces will give some indication of the distribution of these inclusions.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence analysis of low-alloy steels for the following elements:    
Element  
Mass Fraction
Range, %  
Calcium  
0.001 to 0.007  
Chromium  
0.04 to 2.5  
Cobalt  
0.03 to 0.2  
Copper  
0.03 to 0.6  
Manganese  
0.04 to 2.5  
Molybdenum  
0.005 to 1.5  
Nickel  
0.04 to 3.0  
Niobium  
0.002 to 0.1  
Phosphorus  
0.010 to 0.08  
Silicon  
0.06 to 1.5  
Sulfur  
0.009 to 0.1  
Vanadium  
0.012 to 0.6  
1.1.1 Unless exceptions are noted, mass fraction ranges can be extended and additional elements can be included by the use of suitable reference materials and measurement conditions. Deviations from the published scope must be validated by experimental means. See Guide E2857 for information on validation options.  
1.2 The values stated in the International System of Units (SI) are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to other units that are provided for information only, because they may be used in older software and laboratory procedures.  
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific precautionary statements are given in Section 10.  
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    6 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    6 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off