Standard Index Test Method for Determination of Unvegetated Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Ability to Protect Soil from Rain Splash and Associated Runoff Under Bench-Scale Conditions

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This index test method indicates a unvegetated RECP’s ability to reduce rainsplash-induced erosion under bench-scale conditions. This test method may also assist in identifying physical attributes of RECPs that contribute to their erosion-control performance.  
5.2 This test method is bench-scale and therefore, appropriate as an index test for initial indication of product performance, for general comparison of unvegetated RECP capabilities, and for product quality assurance/conformance testing. The results of this test are not indicative of an RECP’s actual field performance.Note 2—The quality of the result produced by this standard is dependent on the competence of the personnel performing it, and the suitability of the equipment and facilities used. Agencies that meet the criteria of Practice D3740 are generally considered capable of competent and objective testing/sampling/inspections/etc. Users of this standard are cautioned that compliance with Practice D3740 does not itself assure reliable results. Reliable results depend on many factors; Practice D3740 provides a means of evaluating some of those factors.
SCOPE
1.1 This index test method establishes the guidelines, requirements and procedures for evaluating the ability of unvegetated rolled erosion control products (RECPs) to protect soils from simulated rainfall (rain splash) and minimal runoff induced erosion. The critical element of this protection is the ability of the unvegetated RECP to absorb the impact force of raindrops, thereby reducing soil particle loosening through “splash” mechanisms, and limiting the ability of runoff to carry the loosened soil particles.  
1.2 This index test method utilizes bench-scale testing procedures and is not indicative of unvegetated RECP performance in conditions typically found in the field.Note 1—The values obtained with this bench scale procedure are for initial performance indication, general product comparison and conformance purposes only. These values should not be used in estimating RECP soil protection in actual field use with such calculations as the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) or Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) without verification from qualified, large-scale tests.  
1.3 This index test is not intended to replace full-scale simulation or field testing in acquisition of performance values that are required in the design of erosion control measures utilizing unvegetated RECPs.  
1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to inch-pound units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.  
1.5 All observed and calculated values shall conform to the guidelines for significant digits and rounding established in Practice D6026, unless superseded by this standard.  
1.5.1 The procedures used to specify how data are collected/recorded or calculated in this standard are regarded as the industry standard. In addition, they are representative of the significant digits that generally should be retained. The procedures used do not consider material variation, purpose for obtaining the data, special purpose studies, or any considerations for the user’s objectives, and it is common practice to increase or reduce significant digits of reported data to be commensurate with these considerations. It is beyond the scope of this index test method to consider significant digits used in analytical methods for engineering design.  
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use and may involve use of hazardous materials, equipment, and operations. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Also, the user must comply with prevalent regulatory codes, such as OSHA (Occupationa...

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
14-Jun-2013
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM D7101-13 - Standard Index Test Method for Determination of Unvegetated Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Ability to Protect Soil from Rain Splash and Associated Runoff Under Bench-Scale Conditions
English language
7 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview
Standard
REDLINE ASTM D7101-13 - Standard Index Test Method for Determination of Unvegetated Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Ability to Protect Soil from Rain Splash and Associated Runoff Under Bench-Scale Conditions
English language
7 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: D7101 − 13
Standard Index Test Method for
Determination of Unvegetated Rolled Erosion Control
Product (RECP) Ability to Protect Soil from Rain Splash and
1
Associated Runoff Under Bench-Scale Conditions
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D7101; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope* dures used do not consider material variation, purpose for
obtaining the data, special purpose studies, or any consider-
1.1 This index test method establishes the guidelines, re-
ations for the user’s objectives, and it is common practice to
quirements and procedures for evaluating the ability of unveg-
increase or reduce significant digits of reported data to be
etated rolled erosion control products (RECPs) to protect soils
commensuratewiththeseconsiderations.Itisbeyondthescope
from simulated rainfall (rain splash) and minimal runoff
of this index test method to consider significant digits used in
induced erosion. The critical element of this protection is the
analytical methods for engineering design.
ability of the unvegetated RECP to absorb the impact force of
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the
raindrops, thereby reducing soil particle loosening through
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use and may involve
“splash”mechanisms,andlimitingtheabilityofrunofftocarry
useofhazardousmaterials,equipment,andoperations.Itisthe
the loosened soil particles.
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
1.2 This index test method utilizes bench-scale testing
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
procedures and is not indicative of unvegetated RECP perfor-
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use. Also, the user must
mance in conditions typically found in the field.
comply with prevalent regulatory codes, such as OSHA (Oc-
NOTE 1—The values obtained with this bench scale procedure are for
cupational Health and SafetyAdministration) guidelines, while
initial performance indication, general product comparison and confor-
using the index test method.
mancepurposesonly.ThesevaluesshouldnotbeusedinestimatingRECP
soil protection in actual field use with such calculations as the Universal
2. Referenced Documents
Soil Loss Equation (USLE) or Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation
2
(RUSLE) without verification from qualified, large-scale tests.
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D653 Terminology Relating to Soil, Rock, and Contained
1.3 This index test is not intended to replace full-scale
Fluids
simulation or field testing in acquisition of performance values
D698 Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Character-
that are required in the design of erosion control measures
3
istics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12 400 ft-lbf/ft (600
utilizing unvegetated RECPs.
3
kN-m/m ))
1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as
D6026 Practice for Using Significant Digits in Geotechnical
standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical
Data
conversions to inch-pound units that are provided for informa-
D3740 Practice for Minimum Requirements for Agencies
tion only and are not considered standard.
Engaged in Testing and/or Inspection of Soil and Rock as
1.5 All observed and calculated values shall conform to the
Used in Engineering Design and Construction
guidelines for significant digits and rounding established in
D6459 Test Method for Determination of Rolled Erosion
Practice D6026, unless superseded by this standard.
Control Product (RECP) Performance in Protecting Hill-
1.5.1 Theproceduresusedtospecifyhowdataarecollected/
slopes from Rainfall-Induced Erosion
recorded or calculated in this standard are regarded as the
D6475 Test Method for Measuring Mass Per Unit Area of
industry standard. In addition, they are representative of the
Erosion Control Blankets
significant digits that generally should be retained. The proce-
D6566 Test Method for Measuring Mass per Unit Area of
Turf Reinforcement Mats
1
ThistestmethodisunderthejurisdictionofASTMCommitteeD18onSoiland
Rock and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D18.25 on Erosion and
2
Sediment Control Technology. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Current edition approved June 15, 2013. Published July 2013. Originally contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
approved in 2007. Last previous edition approved in 2008 as D7101 – 08. DOI: Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
10.1520/D7101-13. the ASTM website.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of thi
...

This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: D7101 − 08 D7101 − 13
Standard Index Test Method for
Determination of Unvegetated Rolled Erosion Control
Product (RECP) Ability to Protect Soil from Rain Splash and
1
Associated Runoff Under Bench-Scale Conditions
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D7101; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope*
1.1 This index test method establishes the guidelines, requirements and procedures for evaluating the ability of unvegetated
rolled erosion control products (RECPs) to protect soils from simulated rainfall (rain splash) and minimal runoff induced erosion.
The critical element of this protection is the ability of the unvegetated RECP to absorb the impact force of raindrops, thereby
reducing soil particle loosening through “splash” mechanisms, and limiting the ability of runoff to carry the loosened soil particles.
1.2 This index test method utilizes bench-scale testing procedures and is not indicative of unvegetated RECP performance in
conditions typically found in the field.
NOTE 1—The values obtained with this bench scale procedure are for initial performance indication, general product comparison and conformance
purposes only. These values should not be used in estimating RECP soil protection in actual field use with such calculations as the Universal Soil Loss
Equation (USLE) or Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) without verification from qualified, large-scale tests.
1.3 This index test is not intended to replace full-scale simulation or field testing in acquisition of performance values that are
required in the design of erosion control measures utilizing unvegetated RECPs.
1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.
mathematical conversions to inch-pound units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.
1.5 All observed and calculated values shall conform to the guidelines for significant digits and rounding established in Practice
D6026, unless superseded by this standard.
1.5.1 The procedures used to specify how data are collected/recorded or calculated in this standard are regarded as the industry
standard. In addition, they are representative of the significant digits that generally should be retained. The procedures used do not
consider material variation, purpose for obtaining the data, special purpose studies, or any considerations for the user’s objectives,
and it is common practice to increase or reduce significant digits of reported data to be commensurate with these considerations.
It is beyond the scope of this index test method to consider significant digits used in analytical methods for engineering design.
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use and may involve use of
hazardous materials, equipment, and operations. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety
and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Also, the user must comply with
prevalent regulatory codes, such as OSHA (Occupational Health and Safety Administration) guidelines, while using the index test
method.
2. Referenced Documents
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D653 Terminology Relating to Soil, Rock, and Contained Fluids
3 3
D698 Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12 400 ft-lbf/ft (600 kN-m/m ))
D6026 Practice for Using Significant Digits in Geotechnical Data
D3740 Practice for Minimum Requirements for Agencies Engaged in Testing and/or Inspection of Soil and Rock as Used in
Engineering Design and Construction
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D18 on Soil and Rock and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D18.25 on Erosion and Sediment
Control Technology.
Current edition approved Jan. 1, 2008June 15, 2013. Published February 2008July 2013. Originally approved in 2007. Last previous edition approved in 20072008 as
D7101 – 07.D7101 – 08. DOI: 10.1520/D7101-08.10.1520/D7101-13.
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the sta
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.