ASTM E106-83(2004)
(Test Method)Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Copper-Beryllium Alloys (Withdrawn 2011)
Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Copper-Beryllium Alloys (Withdrawn 2011)
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
These test methods for the chemical analysis of metals and alloys are primarily intended to test such materials for compliance with compositional specifications. It is assumed that all who use these test methods will be trained analysts capable of performing common laboratory procedures skillfully and safely. It is expected that work will be performed in a properly equipped laboratory.
SCOPE
1.1 These test methods cover procedures for the chemical analysis of copper-beryllium alloys having chemical compositions within the following limits: ElementConcentrationRange,%Copper97 to 98Beryllium0.4 to 2.05Nickel0.0 to 0.30Cobalt0.0 to 0.3Iron0.0 to 0.30
1.2 The analytical procedures appear in the following order:SectionsCopper by the Electrolytic MethodBeryllium:Phosphate Gravimetric MethodAluminon (Photometric) MethodNickel by the Dimethylglyoxime (Photometric) MethodCobalt by the Nitroso-R-Salt (Photometric) MethodIron by the Thiocyanate (Photometric) Method
1.3 This test method covers the determination of beryllium in concentrations from 0.1 to 3.0 %.
WITHDRAWN RATIONALE
These test methods cover procedures for the chemical analysis of copper-beryllium alloys having chemical compositions within specific limits.
Formerly under the jurisdiction of Committee E01 on Analytical Chemistry for Metals, Ores, and Related Materials, these test methods were withdrawn in January 2011. This standard was withdrawn without replacement due to its limited use by industry.
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation:E106–83(Reapproved2004)
Standard Test Methods for
1
Chemical Analysis of Copper-Beryllium Alloys
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E106; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope E76 Test Methods for ChemicalAnalysis of Nickel-Copper
3
Alloys
1.1 These test methods cover procedures for the chemical
E173 Practice for Conducting Interlaboratory Studies of
analysis of copper-beryllium alloys having chemical composi-
3
Methods for Chemical Analysis of Metals
tions within the following limits:
Concentration
3. Significance and Use
Element Range,%
3.1 These test methods for the chemical analysis of metals
Copper 97 to 98
and alloys are primarily intended to test such materials for
Beryllium 0.4 to 2.05
compliance with compositional specifications. It is assumed
Nickel 0.0 to 0.30
Cobalt 0.0 to 0.3
that all who use these test methods will be trained analysts
Iron 0.0 to 0.30
capable of performing common laboratory procedures skill-
1.2 The analytical procedures appear in the following order:
fully and safely. It is expected that work will be performed in
a properly equipped laboratory.
Sections
Copper by the Electrolytic Method 8-12
4. Apparatus, Reagents, and Photometric Practice
Beryllium:
4.1 Apparatus and reagents required for each determination
Phosphate Gravimetric Method 13-19
Aluminon (Photometric) Method 20-27
are listed in separate sections preceding the procedure. The
Nickel by the Dimethylglyoxime (Photometric) Method 28-36
apparatus, standard solutions, and certain other reagents used
Cobalt by the Nitroso-R-Salt (Photometric) Method 37-44
Iron by the Thiocyanate (Photometric) Method 45-52 in more than one procedure are referred to by number and shall
conform to the requirements prescribed in Practices E50,
2. Referenced Documents
except that photometers shall conform to the requirements
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
prescribed in Practice E60.
E29 Practice for Using Significant Digits in Test Data to
4.2 Photometric practice prescribed in these methods shall
Determine Conformance with Specifications
conform to Practice E60.
E50 Practices for Apparatus, Reagents, and Safety Consid-
5. Safety Precautions
erations for Chemical Analysis of Metals, Ores, and
Related Materials
5.1 For precautions to be observed in these methods, refer-
E55 Practice for Sampling Wrought Nonferrous Metals and
ence shall be made to Practices E50. Both beryllium metal and
Alloys for Determination of Chemical Composition
its compounds may be toxic. Care should be exercised to
E60 Practice for Analysis of Metals, Ores, and Related
prevent contact of beryllium-containing materials with the
Materials by Molecular Absorption Spectrometry
skin. The inhalation of any beryllium-containing substance,
either as a volatile compound or as finely divided powder,
should be especially avoided. Beryllium-containing residues
1
These test methods are under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E01 on
(especially ignited oxide) should be carefully disposed of.
Analytical Chemistry for Metals, Ores, and Related Materials and are the direct
responsibility of Subcommittee E01.05 on Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd, Sn, Be, theirAlloys, and
6. Sampling
Related Metals.
CurrenteditionapprovedJune1,2004.PublishedJuly2004.Originallyapproved
6.1 Sampling shall conform to Practice E55.
in 1954. Last previous edition approved in 1996 as E106 – 83 (1996). DOI:
10.1520/E0106-83R04.
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
3
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on Withdrawn. The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced
the ASTM website. on www.astm.org.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
E106–83 (2004)
7. Rounding Off Calculated Values 12. Precision and Bias
7.1 Calculated values shall be rounded off to the desired
12.1 This test method was originally approved for publica-
number of places in accordance with the rounding-off method
tion before the inclusion of precision and bias statements
given in 3.4 and 3.5 of Practice E29.
within standards was mandated. The original interlaboratory
test data for this test method are no longer available. The user
COPPER BY THE ELECTROLYTIC TEST METHOD
is cautioned to verify by the use of reference materials, if
available, that the precision and bias of this test method are
8. Apparatus
adequate fo
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.