iTeh StandardsiTeh Standards
EURUSD
Your shopping cart is empty.
ASTM

ASTM F2067-13

(Practice)

Standard Practice for Development and Use of Oil-Spill Trajectory Models

Standard Practice for Development and Use of Oil-Spill Trajectory Models

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
3.1 Trajectory models are used to predict the future movement and fate of oil (forecast mode) in contingency planning, in exercises and during real spill events. This information is used for planning purposes to position equipment and response personnel in order to optimize a spill response. Oil-spill trajectory models are used in the development of scenarios for training and exercises. The use of models allows the scenario designer to develop incidents and situations in a realistic manner.  
3.2 Oil-spill trajectory models can be used in a statistical manner (stochastic mode) to identify the areas that may be impacted by oil spills.  
3.3 In those cases where the degree of risk at various locations from an unknown source is needed, trajectory models can be used in an inverse mode to identify the sources of the pollution (hindcast mode).  
3.4 Models can also be used to examine habitats, shorelines, or areas to predict if they would be hit with oil from a given source (receptor mode).
SCOPE
1.1 This practice describes the features and processes that should be included in an oil-spill trajectory and fate model.  
1.2 This practice applies only to oil-spill models and does not consider the broader need for models in other fields. This practice considers only computer-based models, and not physical modeling of oil-spill processes.  
1.3 This practice is applicable to all types of oil in oceans, lakes, and rivers under a variety of environmental and geographical conditions.  
1.4 This practice applies to two-dimensional models. There are three-dimensional models in the marketplace.  
1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
31-Mar-2013
ICS
75.180.10 - Exploratory, drilling and extraction equipment
Technical Committee
F20 - Hazardous Substances and Oil Spill Response
Drafting Committee
F20.16 - Surveillance and Tracking
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Replaces
ASTM F2067-07 - Standard Practice for Development and Use of Oil-Spill Trajectory Models
Effective Date
01-Apr-2013

Buy Standard

ASTM F2067-13 - Standard Practice for Development and Use of Oil-Spill Trajectory ModelsASTM F2067-13 - Standard Practice for Development and Use of Oil-Spill Trajectory Models
PreviousNext
Standard
ASTM F2067-13 - Standard Practice for Development and Use of Oil-Spill Trajectory Models
English language
3 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview
REDLINE ASTM F2067-13 - Standard Practice for Development and Use of Oil-Spill Trajectory ModelsREDLINE ASTM F2067-13 - Standard Practice for Development and Use of Oil-Spill Trajectory Models
PreviousNext
Standard
REDLINE ASTM F2067-13 - Standard Practice for Development and Use of Oil-Spill Trajectory Models
English language
3 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: F2067 − 13
Standard Practice for
1
Development and Use of Oil-Spill Trajectory Models
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F2067; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope trajectory models are used in the development of scenarios for
training and exercises. The use of models allows the scenario
1.1 This practice describes the features and processes that
designer to develop incidents and situations in a realistic
should be included in an oil-spill trajectory and fate model.
manner.
1.2 This practice applies only to oil-spill models and does
3.2 Oil-spill trajectory models can be used in a statistical
not consider the broader need for models in other fields. This
manner (stochastic mode) to identify the areas that may be
practice considers only computer-based models, and not physi-
impacted by oil spills.
cal modeling of oil-spill processes.
3.3 In those cases where the degree of risk at various
1.3 This practice is applicable to all types of oil in oceans,
locations from an unknown source is needed, trajectory models
lakes, and rivers under a variety of environmental and geo-
can be used in an inverse mode to identify the sources of the
graphical conditions.
pollution (hindcast mode).
1.4 This practice applies to two-dimensional models. There
3.4 Models can also be used to examine habitats, shorelines,
are three-dimensional models in the marketplace.
or areas to predict if they would be hit with oil from a given
1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as
source (receptor mode).
standard. No other units of measurement are included in this
standard. 4. Modelling Methods
4.1 Models simulate the movement of oil on water, calcu-
2. Terminology
lates the various weathering processes and considers the
2.1 Definitions:
interaction of the oil with the shoreline. The input data needed
2.1.1 trajectory model—a computer-based program that pre-
by the model includes area maps, oil properties, and spatial and
dicts the motion and fate of oil on water as a function of time.
temporal vectors of wind and ocean currents. In some models,
2.1.1.1 Discussion—Input parameters include oil properties,
there are separate programs for advection and fate. In some
weather, and oceanographic information. There are four differ-
cases, the fate models calculate weathering on the total mass of
ent modes: forecast, hindcast, stochastic, and receptor.
the oil rather than on individual particles. Some models include
response strategies (skimming, burning, dispersing, and so
2.1.2 contingency planning—planning of several types to
forth) and the effect of these on the mass balance.
prepare for oil spills.
2.1.2.1 Discussion—This planning can include modeling
4.2 Thecomputermodelcalculatesthesurfacefateoftheoil
such as described in this guide, to predict where oil spills might
using physical and chemical properties of the oil and weath-
go and what the fate and properties of that oil would be.
ering algorithms.
4.3 The output of a model is a map showing oil-slick
3. Significance and Use
locations as a function of time, and graphs and tables of the
3.1 Trajectory models are used to predict the future move-
weathering of the oil and mass balance.
ment and fate of oil (forecast mode) in contingency planning,
4.4 The output of the model is subject to uncertainties,
in exercises and during real spill events. This information is
primarily caused by uncertainties in the input data from
used for planning purposes to position equipment and response
forecast winds and predicted ocean currents. The model should
personnel in order to optimize a spill response. Oil-spill
include an estimate of the magnitude of these uncertainties. It
should be recognized that models are only a tool and thus
1 outputs should always be confirmed by ground-truthing.
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F20 on Hazardous
Substances and Oil Spill Response and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee
F20.16 on Surveillance and Tracking. 5. Input Modelling Parameters
Current edition approved April 1, 2013. Published April 2013. Originally
5.1 In order to generate a georeferenced output, it is
approved in 2000. Last previous edition approved in 2007 as F2067 – 07. DOI:
10.1520/F2067–13. necessary to have a suitable base map. This map should have
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
F2067 − 13
a resolution in the order of 100 m near shore and 1 km in the 5.4.5 Th
...

This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: F2067 − 07 F2067 − 13
Standard Practice for
1
Development and Use of Oil-Spill Trajectory Models
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F2067; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope
1.1 This practice describes the features and processes that should be included in an oil-spill trajectory and fate model.
1.2 This practice applies only to oil-spill models and does not consider the broader need for models in other fields. This practice
considers only computer-based models, and not physical modeling of oil-spill processes.
1.3 This practice is applicable to all types of oil in oceans, lakes, and rivers under a variety of environmental and geographical
conditions.
1.4 This practice does not address issues of computer operation. It is assumed that the user of this practice is familiar with the
use of a computer and its operating systems.applies to two-dimensional models. There are three-dimensional models in the
marketplace.
1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.
2. Terminology
2.1 Definitions:
2.1.1 trajectory model—a computer-based program that predicts the motion and fate of oil on water as a function of time. Input
parameters include oil properties, weather, and oceanographic information. There are four different modes: forecast, hind cast,
stochastic, and receptor.
1
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F20 on Hazardous Substances and Oil Spill Response and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee F20.16
on Surveillance and Tracking.
Current edition approved April 1, 2007April 1, 2013. Published April 2007 April 2013. Originally approved in 2000. Previously Last previous edition approved in
20062007 as F2067 – 00 (2006).F2067 – 07. DOI: 10.1520/F2067-07.10.1520/F2067–13.
2.1.1.1 Discussion—
Input parameters include oil properties, weather, and oceanographic information. There are four different modes: forecast, hindcast,
stochastic, and receptor.
2.1.2 contingency planning—planning of several types to prepare for oil spills.
2.1.2.1 Discussion—
This planning can include modeling such as described in this guide, to predict where oil spills might go and what the fate and
properties of that oil would be.
3. Significance and Use
3.1 During an oil-spill response, trajectory Trajectory models are used to predict the future movement and fate of oil (forecast
mode). mode) in contingency planning, in exercises and during real spill events. This information is used for planning purposes
to position equipment and response personnel in order to optimize a spill response. Oil-spill trajectory models are used in the
development of scenarios for training and exercises. The use of models allows the scenario designer to develop incidents and
situations in a realistic manner.
3.2 Oil-spill trajectory models can be used in a statistical manner (stochastic mode) to identify the areas that may be impacted
by oil spills.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
F2067 − 13
3.3 In those cases where the degree of risk at various locations from an unknown source is needed, trajectory models can be
used in an inverse mode to identify possiblethe sources of the pollution (receptor(hindcast mode).
3.4 Oil-spill trajectory models are used in the development of scenarios for training and exercises. The use of models allows
the scenario designer to develop incidents and situations in a realistic manner.Models can also be used to examine habitats,
shorelines, or areas to predict if they would be hit with oil from a given source (receptor mode).
4. Modelling Methods
4.1 A typical model simulates the motionModels simulate the movement of oil on water, calculates the various weathering
processes and considers the interaction of the oil with the shoreline. The input data needed by the model includes area maps, oil
properties, and spatial and temporal vectors of wind and ocean currents. In some models, there are separate programs for advection
and fate. In some cases, the fate models calculate weathering on the total mass of the oil rather than on individual particles. Some
models
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

This May Also Interest You

ASTM
ASTM F1990-23(Guide)
Standard Guide for In-Situ Burning of Spilled Oil: Ignition Devices

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 This guide describes the requirements for igniting oil for the purpose of in-situ burning. It is intended to aid decision-makers and spill-responders in contingency planning, spill response, and training, and to aid manufacturers in developing effective ignition devices.  
4.2 This guide describes criteria for the design and selection of ignition devices for in-situ burning applications.  
4.3 This guide is not intended as a detailed operational manual for the ignition and burning of spilled oil.
SCOPE
1.1 This guide relates to the use of in-situ burning of spilled oil. The focus of the guide is in-situ burning of oil on water, but the ignition techniques and devices described in the guide are generally applicable to in-situ burning of oil spilled on land as well.  
1.2 The purpose of this guide is to provide information that will enable oil-spill responders to select the appropriate techniques and devices to successfully ignite oil spilled on water.  
1.3 This guide is one of four related to in-situ burning of oil spills. Guide F1788 addresses environmental and operational considerations. Guide F2152 addresses fire-resistant booms, and Guide F2230 addresses burning in ice conditions.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  In particular, the storage, transport, and use of ignition devices may be subject to regulations that will vary according to the jurisdiction. While guidance of a general nature is provided herein, users of this guide should determine regulations that apply to their situation.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Guide
    7 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Guide
    7 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM F2067-22(Practice)
Standard Practice for Development and Use of Oil-Spill Trajectory Models

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
3.1 Trajectory models are used to predict the future movement and fate of oil (forecast mode) in contingency planning, in exercises and during real spill events. This information is used for planning purposes to position equipment and response personnel in order to optimize a spill response. Oil-spill trajectory models are used in the development of scenarios for training and exercises. The use of models allows the scenario designer to develop incidents and situations in a realistic manner.  
3.2 Oil-spill trajectory models can be used in a statistical manner (stochastic mode) to identify the areas that may be impacted by oil spills.  
3.3 In those cases where the degree of risk at various locations from an unknown source is needed, trajectory models can be used in an inverse mode to identify the sources of the pollution (hindcast mode).  
3.4 Models can also be used to examine habitats, shorelines, or areas to predict if they would be hit with oil from a given source (receptor mode).
SCOPE
1.1 This practice describes the features and processes that should be included in an oil-spill trajectory and fate model.  
1.2 This practice applies only to oil-spill models and does not consider the broader need for models in other fields. This practice considers only computer-based models, and not physical modeling of oil-spill processes.  
1.3 This practice is applicable to all types of oil in oceans, lakes, and rivers under a variety of environmental and geographical conditions.  
1.4 This practice applies primarily to two-dimensional models. Consideration is given to three-dimensional models for complex flow regimes.  
1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    3 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    3 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM F1990-23(Guide)
Standard Guide for In-Situ Burning of Spilled Oil: Ignition Devices

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 This guide describes the requirements for igniting oil for the purpose of in-situ burning. It is intended to aid decision-makers and spill-responders in contingency planning, spill response, and training, and to aid manufacturers in developing effective ignition devices.  
4.2 This guide describes criteria for the design and selection of ignition devices for in-situ burning applications.  
4.3 This guide is not intended as a detailed operational manual for the ignition and burning of spilled oil.
SCOPE
1.1 This guide relates to the use of in-situ burning of spilled oil. The focus of the guide is in-situ burning of oil on water, but the ignition techniques and devices described in the guide are generally applicable to in-situ burning of oil spilled on land as well.  
1.2 The purpose of this guide is to provide information that will enable oil-spill responders to select the appropriate techniques and devices to successfully ignite oil spilled on water.  
1.3 This guide is one of four related to in-situ burning of oil spills. Guide F1788 addresses environmental and operational considerations. Guide F2152 addresses fire-resistant booms, and Guide F2230 addresses burning in ice conditions.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  In particular, the storage, transport, and use of ignition devices may be subject to regulations that will vary according to the jurisdiction. While guidance of a general nature is provided herein, users of this guide should determine regulations that apply to their situation.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Guide
    7 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Guide
    7 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E2928/E2928M-23(Practice)
Standard Practice for Examination of Drillstring Threads Using the Alternating Current Field Measurement Technique

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 The purpose of the alternating current field measurement method is to evaluate threads for surface breaking discontinuities such as fatigue cracks running along the thread root. The examination results may then be used to determine the fate of the test piece. This may involve re-examination by an alternative technique, immediate scrapping of the test piece, or reworking to remove discontinuities (beyond the scope of this practice). This practice is not intended for the examination of threads for non-surface breaking discontinuities.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice describes procedures to be followed during alternating current field measurement examination of drillstring threads on tubulars used for oil and gas exploration and production for detection and, if required, sizing of service-induced surface breaking discontinuities transverse to the pipe.  
1.2 This practice is intended for use on threads in any metallic material.  
1.3 This practice does not establish acceptance criteria. Typical industry practice is to reject these connections on detection of a confirmed crack.  
1.4 While the alternating current field measurement technique is capable of detecting discontinuities in these connections, supplemental surface NDT methods such as magnetic particle testing for ferrous metals and penetrant testing for non-ferrous metals may detect additional discontinuities.  
1.5 Units—The values stated in either inch-pound units or SI units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system might not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from both systems may result in nonconformance with the standard.  
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    10 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    10 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM F2067-22(Practice)
Standard Practice for Development and Use of Oil-Spill Trajectory Models

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
3.1 Trajectory models are used to predict the future movement and fate of oil (forecast mode) in contingency planning, in exercises and during real spill events. This information is used for planning purposes to position equipment and response personnel in order to optimize a spill response. Oil-spill trajectory models are used in the development of scenarios for training and exercises. The use of models allows the scenario designer to develop incidents and situations in a realistic manner.  
3.2 Oil-spill trajectory models can be used in a statistical manner (stochastic mode) to identify the areas that may be impacted by oil spills.  
3.3 In those cases where the degree of risk at various locations from an unknown source is needed, trajectory models can be used in an inverse mode to identify the sources of the pollution (hindcast mode).  
3.4 Models can also be used to examine habitats, shorelines, or areas to predict if they would be hit with oil from a given source (receptor mode).
SCOPE
1.1 This practice describes the features and processes that should be included in an oil-spill trajectory and fate model.  
1.2 This practice applies only to oil-spill models and does not consider the broader need for models in other fields. This practice considers only computer-based models, and not physical modeling of oil-spill processes.  
1.3 This practice is applicable to all types of oil in oceans, lakes, and rivers under a variety of environmental and geographical conditions.  
1.4 This practice applies primarily to two-dimensional models. Consideration is given to three-dimensional models for complex flow regimes.  
1.5 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    3 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    3 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM F3257-17(2022)(Guide)
Standard Guide for Design, Construction, and Operation of Vessels Providing Accommodation Service to Offshore Installations

SCOPE
1.1 Objectives—Guidelines are provided for the design, construction, and operation of an Accommodation Service Vessel (ASV) intended to provide accommodation services to an offshore installation. The goal of these guidelines is to focus attention on the safety aspects of design. These guidelines are recommended for each vessel providing accommodation service to an offshore installation for more than 36 persons.  
1.2 Relationship with Regulatory and Classification Standards—This guide covers information for designing, constructing and operating ASVs and includes considerations not generally addressed in classification or statutory requirements intended for traditional cargo or passenger ships. While portions of this guide may refer to standards, it is not intended to supersede any classification or statutory requirements.  
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Guide
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM A1099/A1099M-20(Specification)
Standard Specification for Modified Alloy Steel Forgings, Forged Bar, and Rolled Bar Commonly Used in Oil and Gas Pressure Vessels

ABSTRACT
This specification covers modified high-strength alloy steel forgings and rolled and forged bar commonly used in oil and gas pressure vessels and oilfield equipment. Oil and gas product specifications for which this material is intended include, but are not limited to, the following: specification for wellhead and Christmas tree equipment and errata, recommended practice for repair and remanufacture of wellhead and Christmas tree equipment, specification for drill-through equipment, specification for marine drilling riser couplings, specification for subsea wellhead and tree equipment and errata, and specification for drilling and production hoisting equipment.
This specification covers requirements for melting, hot working, heat treatment, chemical composition, mechanical properties and testing, rework and retreatment, inspection, certification, product marking, and workmanship, finish, and appearance, as well as metallurgical requirements and nondestructive examination (NDE) requirements.
SCOPE
1.1 This specification covers modified high-strength alloy steel forgings and rolled and forged bar for oil and gas pressure vessels and oilfield equipment. See Appendix X1. Oil and gas product specifications for which this material is intended include, but are not limited to, the following:  
1.1.1 API 6A Specification for Wellhead and Christmas Tree Equipment and Errata,  
1.1.2 API RP 6AR Recommended Practice for Repair and Remanufacture of Wellhead and Christmas Tree Equipment,  
1.1.3 API 16A Specification for Drill-Through Equipment,  
1.1.4 API 16R Specification for Marine Drilling Riser Couplings,  
1.1.5 API 17D Specification for Subsea Wellhead and Tree Equipment and Errata,  
1.1.6 API 8C Specification for Drilling and Production Hoisting Equipment.  
1.2 Supplementary requirements are provided for use when additional testing or inspection is desired. These shall apply only when specified individually by the purchaser in the order.  
1.3 In the case of conflict between a requirement of this specification and a requirement of referenced general specifications, this specification takes precedence. In the case of conflict between a requirement of the product specification or a requirement of this specification and a more stringent requirement of the purchase order or contract, the purchase order or contract take precedence. The purchase order or contract requirements shall not take precedence if they, in any way, violate the requirements of the product specification or this specification, for example, by the waiving of a test requirement or by making a test requirement less stringent. In the case of conflict in terminology between API standards and Terminology A941, Terminology A941 definitions shall be applied.  
1.4 Units—The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in nonconformance with the standard.  
1.5 This specification is expressed in both inch-pound units and in SI units; however, unless the purchase order or contract specifies the applicable M specification designation (SI units), the inch-pound units shall apply.  
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Technical specification
    9 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Technical specification
    9 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1739-95(2015)(Guide)
Standard Guide for Risk-Based Corrective Action Applied at Petroleum Release Sites

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 The allocation of limited resources (for example, time, money, regulatory oversight, qualified professionals) to any one petroleum release site necessarily influences corrective action decisions at other sites. This has spurred the search for innovative approaches to corrective action decision making, which still ensures that human health and the environment are protected.  
4.2 The RBCA process presented in this guide is a consistent, streamlined decision process for selecting corrective actions at petroleum release sites. Advantages of the RBCA approach are as follows:  
4.2.1 Decisions are based on reducing the risk of adverse human or environmental impacts,  
4.2.2 Site assessment activities are focussed on collecting only that information that is necessary to making risk-based corrective action decisions,  
4.2.3 Limited resources are focussed on those sites that pose the greatest risk to human health and the environment at any time,  
4.2.4 The remedial action achieves an acceptable degree of exposure and risk reduction,  
4.2.5 Compliance can be evaluated relative to site-specific standards applied at site-specific point(s) of compliance,  
4.2.6 Higher quality, and in some cases faster, cleanups than are currently realized, and  
4.2.7 A documentation and demonstration that the remedial action is protective of human health, safety, and the environment.  
4.3 Risk assessment is a developing science. The scientific approach used to develop the RBSL and SSTL may vary by state and user due to regulatory requirements and the use of alternative scientifically based methods.  
4.4 Activities described in this guide should be conducted by a person familiar with current risk and exposure assessment methodologies.  
4.5 In order to properly apply the RBCA process, the user should avoid the following:  
4.5.1 Use of Tier 1 RBSLs as mandated remediation standards rather than screening levels,  
4.5.2 Restriction of the RBCA process to Tier 1 evaluation ...
SCOPE
1.1 This is a guide to risk-based corrective action (RBCA), which is a consistent decision-making process for the assessment and response to a petroleum release, based on the protection of human health and the environment. Sites with petroleum release vary greatly in terms of complexity, physical and chemical characteristics, and in the risk that they may pose to human health and the environment. The RBCA process recognizes this diversity, and uses a tiered approach where corrective action activities are tailored to site-specific conditions and risks. While the RBCA process is not limited to a particular class of compounds, this guide emphasizes the application of RBCA to petroleum product releases through the use of the examples. Ecological risk assessment, as discussed in this guide, is a qualitative evaluation of the actual or potential impacts to environmental (nonhuman) receptors. There may be circumstances under which a more detailed ecological risk assessment is necessary (see Ref (1).2  
1.2 The decision process described in this guide integrates risk and exposure assessment practices, as suggested by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), with site assessment activities and remedial measure selection to ensure that the chosen action is protective of human health and the environment. The following general sequence of events is prescribed in RBCA, once the process is triggered by the suspicion or confirmation of petroleum release:  
1.2.1 Performance of a site assessment;  
1.2.2 Classification of the site by the urgency of initial response;  
1.2.3 Implementation of an initial response action appropriate for the selected site classification;  
1.2.4 Comparison of concentrations of chemical(s) of concern at the site with Tier 1 Risk Based Screening Levels (RBSLs) given in a look-up table;  
1.2.5 Deciding whether further tier evaluation is warranted, if implementation of interim remedial ...

  • Guide
    53 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM B637-23(Specification)
Standard Specification for Precipitation-Hardening and Cold Worked Nickel Alloy Bars, Forgings, and Forging Stock for Moderate or High Temperature Service

ABSTRACT
This specification covers hot- and cold-worked precipitation-hardenable nickel alloy rod, bar, forgings, and forging stock for high-temperature service. Chemical analysis shall be performed on the alloy and shall conform to the chemical composition requirement in carbon, manganese, silicon, phosphorus, sulfur, chromium, cobalt, molybdenum, columbium, tantalum, titanium, aluminum, zirconium, boron, iron, copper, and nickel. The material shall follow recommended annealing treatment, solution treatment, stabilizing treatment, and precipitation hardening treatment. Tension testing, hardness testing and stress-rupture testing shall be performed on the material and shall comply to the required tensile strength, yield strength, elongation, reduction in area, and Brinell hardness.
SCOPE
1.1 This specification2 covers hot- and cold-worked precipitation-hardenable nickel alloy rod, bar, forgings, and forging stock for moderate or high temperature service (Table 1).  
1.2 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.  
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to become familiar with all hazards including those identified in the appropriate Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for this product/material as provided by the manufacturer, to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices, and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Technical specification
    7 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Technical specification
    7 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM C596-23(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Drying Shrinkage of Mortar Containing Hydraulic Cement

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 This test method establishes a selected set of conditions of temperature, relative humidity and rate of evaporation of the environment to which a mortar specimen of stated composition shall be subjected for a specified period of time during which its change in length is determined and designated “drying shrinkage.”  
4.2 The drying shrinkage of mortar as determined by this test method has a linear relation to the drying shrinkage of concrete made with the same cement and exposed to the same drying conditions.4 Hence this test method may be used when it is desired to develop data on the effect of a hydraulic cement on the drying shrinkage of concrete made with that cement.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method determines the change in length on drying of mortar bars containing hydraulic cement and graded standard sand.  
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. When combined standards are referenced, the selection of measurement system is at the user’s discretion subject to the requirements of the referenced standard.  
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Warning—Fresh hydraulic cementitious mixtures are caustic and may cause chemical burns to skin and tissue upon prolonged exposure).2  
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    4 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    4 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off