Standard Specification for Developing and Validating Prediction Equation(s) or Model(s) Used in Connection with Livestock, Meat, and Poultry Evaluation Device(s) or System(s) to Determine Value

ABSTRACT
This specification covers the standard procedures used to collect and analyze data, document the results, and make predictions for any characteristic used to quantify the value of any livestock, meat, and poultry species as measured by appropriate evaluation devices or systems. The procedures described here shall be used particularly when new prediction equations or models are established, or when a change is experienced that could affect the performance of existing equations.
SCOPE
1.1 This specification covers methods to collect and analyze data, document the results, and make predictions by any objective method for any characteristic used to determine value in any species using livestock, meat, and poultry evaluation devices or systems.
1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory requirements prior to use.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
31-Aug-2010
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Technical specification
ASTM F2340-05(2010) - Standard Specification for Developing and Validating Prediction Equation(s) or Model(s) Used in Connection with Livestock, Meat, and Poultry Evaluation Device(s) or System(s) to Determine Value
English language
3 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation:F2340 −05(Reapproved 2010)
Standard Specification for
Developing and Validating Prediction Equation(s) or
Model(s) Used in Connection with Livestock, Meat, and
Poultry Evaluation Device(s) or System(s) to Determine
1
Value
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F2340; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 3.2.3 coeffıcient of determination, n—percentageofvariabil-
ity in the response (dependent) variable that can be explained
1.1 Thisspecificationcoversmethodstocollectandanalyze
by the prediction equation.
data, document the results, and make predictions by any
2
objectivemethodforanycharacteristicusedtodeterminevalue
~y 2 yˆ!
(
2
R 51 2
in any species using livestock, meat, and poultry evaluation 2
y 2 y¯
~ !
(
devices or systems.
3.2.4 root mean square error for calibration, n—squareroot
1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the
of the sum of squared residuals divided by n −(k+1), where
c
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
n is the sample size for the calibration data set, and k is the
c
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
number of explanatory variables in the prediction equation.
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
2
bility of regulatory requirements prior to use. ~y 2 yˆ!
(
Œ
n 2 k11
~ !
c
2. Referenced Documents
3.2.5 root mean square error for validation, n—square root
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
of the sum of squared residuals divided by n , where n is the
y y
F2463Terminology for Livestock, Meat, and Poultry Evalu-
sample size for the validation data set.
ation Systems
2
y 2 yˆ
~ !
(
3. Terminology
Œ
n
v
3.1 For definitions of terms used in this specification, refer
3.2.6 validation data set, n—the data set used to test the
to Terminology F2463.
predictive accuracy of the equations developed from the
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
calibration data set.
3.2.1 accuracy, n—statement of the exactness with which a
3.2.7 value, commerce, n—measure of economic worth in
measurement approaches the true measure for that character-
commerce.
istic;accuracyiscontrastedwithprecision,whichisconcerned
with the repeatability of the measurements. Therefore, with a 4. Significance and Use
largebias,ameasurementmaybeofhighprecision,butoflow
4.1 Theproceduresinthisspecificationaretobeusedbyall
accuracy.
parties interested in predicting composition or quality, or both,
3.2.2 calibration data set, n—data set used to develop the
for the purpose of establishing value based upon device or
initial prediction equations; same as developmental or predic-
system measurements.Whenever new prediction equations are
tion data set.
established, or when a change is experienced that could affect
the performance of existing equations, these procedures shall
1
This specification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F10 on be used.
Livestock, Meat, and Poultry Evaluation Systems and is the direct responsibility of
Subcommittee F10.40 on Predictive Accuracy.
5. Procedure
Current edition approved Sept. 1, 2010. Published December 2010. Originally
5.1 Experimental Design:
approved in 2004. Last previous edition approved in 2005 as F2340–05. DOI:
10.1520/F2340-05R10.
5.1.1 Define the Population for Development of a Prediction
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Equation:
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
5.1.1.1 To establish the predictive ability and validity of an
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
the ASTM website. equation(s) using measures (independent variables) from an
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
F2340−05 (2010)
evaluation device or system, it is necessary to define the underthesameconditionsinwhichthedeviceorsystemwould
population on which the prediction model is intended to be be expected to operate. In particular, the validity of the
used. approach and the repeatability of the procedure must be
(1)Thespeciesonwhichmeasurementswillbemademust documented and demonstrated. For many of the common
be defined. characteristics to be predicted (such as percent lean), there are
(2)Thepopulationforscopeofusemustbeclearlydefined. a number of reference methods commonly accepted within the
This may include, but is not limited to, factors such as discipline.Where accepted methods exist, they should be used
geographical location, g
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.