ASTM D5090-20
(Practice)Standard Practice for Standardizing Ultrafiltration Permeate Flow Performance Data
Standard Practice for Standardizing Ultrafiltration Permeate Flow Performance Data
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 During the operation of a UF system, conditions including pressure and temperature can vary, causing permeate flow to change (see Note 1). To effectively evaluate system performance, it is necessary to compare permeate flow data at the same conditions. Since data may not always be obtained at the same conditions, it is necessary to convert the UF data obtained at actual conditions to a set of constant conditions, thereby standardizing the data. The user of this practice determines the standard conditions. This practice gives the procedure to standardize UF data on pure water only.
Note 1: Feed concentration, crossflow velocity, and both device and total system recovery will also influence permeate rate, especially when operating on other than pure water. This practice does not address those system conditions.
5.2 This practice can be used for systems which contain spiral-wound, tubular, plate and frame, and hollow fiber devices.
5.3 This practice can be used for a single-element or a multi-element system. However, if the UF system is staged, standardize the permeate flow and salt passage for each stage separately. This requires pressure readings at the feed inlet and concentrate outlet of each stage.
5.4 This practice is applicable for UF systems with no significant leaks between the feed/concentrate and permeate streams.
5.5 This practice assumes no significant osmotic pressure differential (Δπ) exists in the UF system under the actual operating conditions. Differential osmotic pressure will reduce the permeate rate relative to operation on pure water.
5.6 The user of this practice should be aware that fouled UF devices will produce less permeate flow than nonfouled devices, and may wish to perform flushing, chemical, or mechanical cleaning, or combination thereof, prior to determining the permeate flow performance of the device.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice covers the standardization of permeate flow for ultrafiltration (UF) systems.
1.2 This practice is applicable to natural waters including brackish waters, seawaters, and ultrapure waters including those used in power generation and microelectronics and pharmaceuticals production. It is not necessarily applicable to waste waters.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
General Information
- Status
- Published
- Publication Date
- 31-Oct-2020
- Technical Committee
- D19 - Water
- Drafting Committee
- D19.08 - Membranes and Ion Exchange Materials
Relations
- Effective Date
- 01-May-2020
- Effective Date
- 01-Jul-2019
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2010
- Effective Date
- 01-Feb-2010
- Effective Date
- 01-Sep-2006
- Effective Date
- 01-Sep-2006
- Effective Date
- 15-Feb-2006
- Effective Date
- 01-Jun-2005
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2004
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2004
- Effective Date
- 10-Aug-2003
- Effective Date
- 10-Mar-2003
- Effective Date
- 10-Jul-2002
- Effective Date
- 10-Jul-2002
- Effective Date
- 10-Feb-2002
Overview
ASTM D5090-20 outlines the standard practice for standardizing ultrafiltration (UF) permeate flow performance data. Developed by ASTM International, this practice addresses the need to compare permeate flow from UF systems under varying operational conditions by converting performance data to a consistent, user-defined set of standard conditions. Standardization is critical for evaluating and benchmarking UF system performance, particularly when reviewing results from different devices, operational setups, or periods.
Ultrafiltration permeate flow can be affected by factors such as pressure, temperature, and system cleanliness. Standardizing this data ensures accurate performance assessment and system optimization, making ASTM D5090-20 essential for industries relying on membrane filtration for water purification.
Key Topics
Scope & Applicability:
- Applies to the standardization of permeate flow for various UF systems.
- Suitable for systems treating natural waters (brackish, seawater, ultrapure) in industries including power generation, pharmaceuticals, and microelectronics.
- Not intended for standardizing data from wastewater applications.
System Types Covered:
- Spiral-wound, tubular, plate and frame, and hollow fiber UF devices.
- Both single-element and multi-element (including staged) systems are addressed.
Operating Conditions:
- Data standardization is based on pure water testing.
- Pressure, temperature, and system recovery are considered, with standardized permeate flow calculations requiring accurate readings of these parameters.
- Assumes no significant leaks or osmotic pressure differential in the system.
- Proper cleaning and maintenance are advised for accurate permeate readings.
Standardization Process:
- User sets standard conditions for comparison.
- Calculations correct data for differences in operating pressure and temperature.
- Temperature correction factors may be provided by device suppliers or calculated as necessary.
- Staged systems require separate standardization for each stage using relevant feed and concentrate pressure data.
Applications
The application of ASTM D5090-20 brings practical value in a range of sectors by enabling:
Consistent Performance Benchmarking:
- Facilitates reliable comparisons over time, between different system designs or operational runs.
- Essential for vendors, operators, and engineers to assess membrane condition and system efficiency.
Research and Development:
- Allows membrane manufacturers and system designers to evaluate and optimize UF module designs under controlled, comparable conditions.
Process Optimization:
- Supports maintenance decisions, such as identifying membrane fouling and the effectiveness of cleaning procedures.
- Aids in troubleshooting process variations related to temperature or pressure fluctuations.
Regulatory and Quality Assurance:
- Provides validated, traceable data for audits, compliance, and quality control within regulated environments.
Related Standards
- ASTM D1129: Terminology relating to water, which includes key definitions relevant to water treatment.
- ASTM D6161: Terminology used for microfiltration, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, and reverse osmosis membrane processes.
- Other relevant standards may include ASTM practices and test methods concerning membrane processes, water quality, and laboratory testing procedures.
By following ASTM D5090-20, organizations can ensure their ultrafiltration permeate flow data is accurate, comparable, and suitable for informed decision-making across a variety of critical water treatment applications. For further information or to access the full text, visit the official ASTM website.
Buy Documents
ASTM D5090-20 - Standard Practice for Standardizing Ultrafiltration Permeate Flow Performance Data
Get Certified
Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard
BSMI (Bureau of Standards, Metrology and Inspection)
Taiwan's standards and inspection authority.
Sponsored listings
Frequently Asked Questions
ASTM D5090-20 is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Practice for Standardizing Ultrafiltration Permeate Flow Performance Data". This standard covers: SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 During the operation of a UF system, conditions including pressure and temperature can vary, causing permeate flow to change (see Note 1). To effectively evaluate system performance, it is necessary to compare permeate flow data at the same conditions. Since data may not always be obtained at the same conditions, it is necessary to convert the UF data obtained at actual conditions to a set of constant conditions, thereby standardizing the data. The user of this practice determines the standard conditions. This practice gives the procedure to standardize UF data on pure water only. Note 1: Feed concentration, crossflow velocity, and both device and total system recovery will also influence permeate rate, especially when operating on other than pure water. This practice does not address those system conditions. 5.2 This practice can be used for systems which contain spiral-wound, tubular, plate and frame, and hollow fiber devices. 5.3 This practice can be used for a single-element or a multi-element system. However, if the UF system is staged, standardize the permeate flow and salt passage for each stage separately. This requires pressure readings at the feed inlet and concentrate outlet of each stage. 5.4 This practice is applicable for UF systems with no significant leaks between the feed/concentrate and permeate streams. 5.5 This practice assumes no significant osmotic pressure differential (Δπ) exists in the UF system under the actual operating conditions. Differential osmotic pressure will reduce the permeate rate relative to operation on pure water. 5.6 The user of this practice should be aware that fouled UF devices will produce less permeate flow than nonfouled devices, and may wish to perform flushing, chemical, or mechanical cleaning, or combination thereof, prior to determining the permeate flow performance of the device. SCOPE 1.1 This practice covers the standardization of permeate flow for ultrafiltration (UF) systems. 1.2 This practice is applicable to natural waters including brackish waters, seawaters, and ultrapure waters including those used in power generation and microelectronics and pharmaceuticals production. It is not necessarily applicable to waste waters. 1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 During the operation of a UF system, conditions including pressure and temperature can vary, causing permeate flow to change (see Note 1). To effectively evaluate system performance, it is necessary to compare permeate flow data at the same conditions. Since data may not always be obtained at the same conditions, it is necessary to convert the UF data obtained at actual conditions to a set of constant conditions, thereby standardizing the data. The user of this practice determines the standard conditions. This practice gives the procedure to standardize UF data on pure water only. Note 1: Feed concentration, crossflow velocity, and both device and total system recovery will also influence permeate rate, especially when operating on other than pure water. This practice does not address those system conditions. 5.2 This practice can be used for systems which contain spiral-wound, tubular, plate and frame, and hollow fiber devices. 5.3 This practice can be used for a single-element or a multi-element system. However, if the UF system is staged, standardize the permeate flow and salt passage for each stage separately. This requires pressure readings at the feed inlet and concentrate outlet of each stage. 5.4 This practice is applicable for UF systems with no significant leaks between the feed/concentrate and permeate streams. 5.5 This practice assumes no significant osmotic pressure differential (Δπ) exists in the UF system under the actual operating conditions. Differential osmotic pressure will reduce the permeate rate relative to operation on pure water. 5.6 The user of this practice should be aware that fouled UF devices will produce less permeate flow than nonfouled devices, and may wish to perform flushing, chemical, or mechanical cleaning, or combination thereof, prior to determining the permeate flow performance of the device. SCOPE 1.1 This practice covers the standardization of permeate flow for ultrafiltration (UF) systems. 1.2 This practice is applicable to natural waters including brackish waters, seawaters, and ultrapure waters including those used in power generation and microelectronics and pharmaceuticals production. It is not necessarily applicable to waste waters. 1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
ASTM D5090-20 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 17.060 - Measurement of volume, mass, density, viscosity. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.
ASTM D5090-20 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM D1129-13(2020)e2, ASTM D6161-19, ASTM D1129-10, ASTM D6161-10, ASTM D1129-06ae1, ASTM D1129-06a, ASTM D1129-06, ASTM D6161-05, ASTM D1129-04e1, ASTM D1129-04, ASTM D1129-03a, ASTM D1129-03, ASTM D1129-01, ASTM D1129-02a, ASTM D1129-99a. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.
ASTM D5090-20 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.
Standards Content (Sample)
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: D5090 −20
Standard Practice for
Standardizing Ultrafiltration Permeate Flow Performance
Data
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D5090; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 3.2.1 concentrate, reject, or brine, n—that portion of feed
which does not pass through the membrane.
1.1 This practice covers the standardization of permeate
3.2.2 device pressure drop (∆P), n—the difference between
flow for ultrafiltration (UF) systems.
the feed pressure and the concentrate pressure.
1.2 This practice is applicable to natural waters including
3.2.3 feed, n—the fluid that enters the device.
brackish waters, seawaters, and ultrapure waters including
those used in power generation and microelectronics and
3.2.4 permeate, n—that portion of the feed which passes
pharmaceuticals production. It is not necessarily applicable to
through the membrane.
waste waters.
3.2.5 permeate flow rate, n—the quantity of permeate pro-
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the
duced per unit time.
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
3.2.6 recovery or conversion, n—the ratio of permeate flow
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
rate to total feed flow rate, expressed as a percent.
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
3.2.7 stage, n—a device or group of devices, several of
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
which may be included in a system, which share common
1.4 This international standard was developed in accor-
manifolds on the feed, concentrate and permeate stream
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
plumbing.
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
3.2.7.1 Discussion—The concentrate from one stage be-
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
comes the feed to the following stage.
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
3.2.8 ultrafiltration device, n—a single housing (vessel),
comprising or containing an ultrafiltration element or multiple
2. Referenced Documents
elements and supporting materials.
2.1 ASTM Standards:
4. Summary of Practice
D1129 Terminology Relating to Water
4.1 This practice consists of calculating the permeate flow
D6161 Terminology Used for Microfiltration, Ultrafiltration,
of UF systems at a standard set of conditions using data
Nanofiltration,andReverseOsmosisMembraneProcesses
obtained at actual operating conditions.
3. Terminology
5. Significance and Use
3.1 Definitions:
5.1 During the operation of a UF system, conditions includ-
3.1.1 For definitions of terms used in this standard, refer to
ing pressure and temperature can vary, causing permeate flow
Terminologies D1129 and D6161.
to change (see Note 1). To effectively evaluate system
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
performance, it is necessary to compare permeate flow data at
the same conditions. Since data may not always be obtained at
the same conditions, it is necessary to convert the UF data
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D19 on Water and
obtained at actual conditions to a set of constant conditions,
is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D19.08 on Membranes and Ion
thereby standardizing the data. The user of this practice
Exchange Materials.
determines the standard conditions. This practice gives the
Current edition approved Nov. 1, 2020. Published November 2020. Originally
approved in 1990. Last previous edition approved in 2007 as D5090 – 07 which was procedure to standardize UF data on pure water only.
withdrawn July 2020 and reinstated in November 2020. DOI: 10.1520/D5090-20.
NOTE 1—Feed concentration, crossflow velocity, and both device and
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
total system recovery will also influence permeate rate, especially when
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on operating on other than pure water. This pr
...




Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...