ASTM F2157-09(2018)

Standard Specification for Synthetic Surfaced Running Tracks

ABSTRACT
This specification establishes the minimum performance requirements, classification, and test methods for synthetic surfaced running tracks. Even so, this specification does not imply that an injury cannot be incurred if the surface is found to be in compliance with this specification. The requirements for which newly installed synthetic surfaces shall be tested on and consequently comply to are imperfections, evenness, thickness, drainage, force reduction, modified vertical deformation, texture influence when wet, tensile properties, color in grey scale, weathering, spike resistance, and flammability.
SCOPE
1.1 This specification establishes the minimum performance requirements and classification when tested in accordance with the procedures outlined within this specification. All documents referencing this specification must include classification required.  
1.2 This specification does not imply that an injury cannot be incurred if the surface is found to be in compliance with this specification.  
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

General Information

• Status: Published
• Publication Date: 30-Jun-2018
• ICS: 97.220.10 - Sports facilities
• Technical Committee: F08 - Sports Equipment, Playing Surfaces, and Facilities
• Drafting Committee: F08.52 - Miscellaneous Playing Surfaces

Relations

• Replaces: ASTM F2157-09 - Standard Specification for Synthetic Surfaced Running Tracks
• Effective Date: 01-Jul-2018
• Refers: ASTM E1131-20 - Standard Test Method for Compositional Analysis by Thermogravimetry
• Effective Date: 15-Mar-2020
• Refers: ASTM D2616-19 - Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Visual Color Difference With a Gray Scale
• Effective Date: 01-Nov-2019
• Refers: ASTM D2859-15 - Standard Test Method for Ignition Characteristics of Finished Textile Floor Covering Materials
• Effective Date: 15-Nov-2015
• Refers: ASTM E177-14 - Standard Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in ASTM Test Methods
• Effective Date: 01-May-2014
• Refers: ASTM E691-13 - Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method
• Effective Date: 01-May-2013
• Refers: ASTM E177-13 - Standard Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in ASTM Test Methods
• Effective Date: 01-May-2013
• Refers: ASTM G154-12 - Standard Practice for Operating Fluorescent Ultraviolet (UV) Lamp Apparatus for Exposure of Nonmetallic Materials
• Effective Date: 01-Dec-2012
• Refers: ASTM D2616-12 - Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Visual Color Difference With a Gray Scale
• Effective Date: 01-Jul-2012
• Refers: ASTM E691-11 - Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method
• Effective Date: 01-Nov-2011
• Refers: ASTM D2859-06(2011) - Standard Test Method for Ignition Characteristics of Finished Textile Floor Covering Materials
• Effective Date: 01-Oct-2011
• Refers: ASTM E177-10 - Standard Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in ASTM Test Methods
• Effective Date: 01-Oct-2010
• Refers: ASTM D2950-09 - Standard Test Method for Density of Bituminous Concrete in Place by Nuclear Methods
• Effective Date: 01-Jun-2009
• Refers: ASTM E177-08 - Standard Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in ASTM Test Methods
• Effective Date: 01-Oct-2008
• Refers: ASTM E691-08 - Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method
• Effective Date: 01-Oct-2008

Overview

ASTM F2157-09(2018), Standard Specification for Synthetic Surfaced Running Tracks, is an internationally recognized standard developed by ASTM International for the quality and performance of synthetic running track surfaces. This specification addresses minimum performance requirements, testing procedures, and classification criteria to ensure safety, durability, and suitability for athletic competition and training. By providing clear guidelines for installation and material selection, ASTM F2157 supports the construction and maintenance of high-quality running facilities suitable for athletes of all levels.

Key Topics

• Performance Requirements: The standard sets criteria for surface imperfections, evenness, thickness, drainage, force reduction, vertical deformation, tensile properties, surface color, weathering, spike resistance, and flammability to ensure a safe and high-performing track.

• Test Methods: Guidance is provided on laboratory and on-site testing for compliance, including procedures for measuring surface friction, composition, thickness, and performance under environmental stress.

• Track Classification: Tracks are assigned classifications (A, B, or C), with "A" representing the highest performance and safety criteria. Classification depends on full compliance with all relevant requirements.

• Material Specifications: Requirements for materials such as EPDM and SBR rubber, binders, coatings, and construction layers are defined. Standards ensure surfaces are free from contaminants and structurally suitable for sustained athletic use.

Applications

The practical value of ASTM F2157 is realized in a wide range of applications, including:

• Track & Field Facility Construction: Contractors, architects, and facility managers use the standard to guide the design and installation of synthetic running tracks for schools, universities, and stadiums.

• Product Development and Procurement: Manufacturers of track surfacing products refer to this specification to meet industry benchmarks and ensure their products will perform reliably in the field.

• Maintenance and Safety Inspections: Facility operators use the standard's classification and testing criteria to evaluate surface wear and schedule maintenance or resurfacing, thereby extending the track's lifecycle and enhancing athlete safety.

• Regulatory and Competitive Requirements: Many sports governing bodies and public procurement processes require compliance with ASTM F2157 as a precondition for competition-level performance and public safety assurance.

Related Standards

For comprehensive track surfacing solutions and performance validation, reference the following related standards:

• ASTM D297: Test Methods for Rubber Products - Chemical Analysis
• ASTM D2859: Test Method for Ignition Characteristics of Finished Textile Floor Covering Materials
• ASTM D2616: Test Method for Evaluation of Visual Color Difference With a Gray Scale
• ASTM E303: Test Method for Measuring Surface Frictional Properties Using the British Pendulum Tester
• ASTM E1131: Test Method for Compositional Analysis by Thermogravimetry
• DIN 18035 Part 6: Standards for Sports Grounds, Synthetic Surfacings (Germany)
• IAAF Performance Specifications: For synthetic surfaces in athletic tracks (international athletics standard)

Conclusion

Implementing ASTM F2157-09(2018) ensures that synthetic running tracks are safe, resilient, and capable of withstanding demanding use and environmental conditions. Compliance with this standard provides confidence for athletes, facility owners, and regulatory bodies, supporting performance excellence and long-term value in athletic track construction and maintenance. For optimal results, always align your track surfacing project with ASTM F2157 and relevant related standards.

Standards Content (Sample)

This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: F2157 −09 (Reapproved 2018) An American National Standard
Standard Specification for
Synthetic Surfaced Running Tracks
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F2157; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
INTRODUCTION
There is a need to provide for the safety of athletes and durability of surfaces used for competition
running. There are a number of sources of injury with regard to the performance of a running track
surface and protection of athletes of all ages.
1. Scope D2950Test Method for Density of Bituminous Concrete in
Place by Nuclear Methods
1.1 Thisspecificationestablishestheminimumperformance
E177Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in
requirementsandclassificationwhentestedinaccordancewith
ASTM Test Methods
the procedures outlined within this specification. All docu-
E303Test Method for Measuring Surface Frictional Proper-
ments referencing this specification must include classification
ties Using the British Pendulum Tester
required.
E691Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to
1.2 This specification does not imply that an injury cannot
Determine the Precision of a Test Method
beincurredifthesurfaceisfoundtobeincompliancewiththis
E1131Test Method for CompositionalAnalysis by Thermo-
specification.
gravimetry
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as G154Practice for Operating Fluorescent Ultraviolet (UV)
Lamp Apparatus for Exposure of Nonmetallic Materials
standard. No other units of measurement are included in this
standard. 2.2 Other Standards:
DIN 18035 Part 6AStandard for Sports Grounds, Synthetic
1.4 This international standard was developed in accor-
Surfacings, Requirements, Test, Maintenance
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
IAAFPerformance Specifications for Synthetic Surfaced
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Athletics Tracks (Outdoors)
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
3. Terminology
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
3.1 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
3.1.1 compliance, n—a test result that falls within the
2. Referenced Documents
specified range, meets a stated minimum value or achieves a
2.1 ASTM Standards:
“pass” rating on a test with a pass/fail result.
D297Test Methods for Rubber Products—ChemicalAnaly-
3.1.2 “D” area, n—an integral part of the synthetic surfac-
sis
ing located within the oval.
D2616Test Method for Evaluation of Visual Color Differ-
ence With a Gray Scale 3.1.3 EPDM components, n—the residual elements of an
D2859Test Method for Ignition Characteristics of Finished EPDM rubber product once the fillers and plasticizers have
Textile Floor Covering Materials been eliminated.
3.1.4 EPDM rubber product, n—a product comprised of
organic and inorganic materials with a minimum of 20% and
This specification is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee F08 on Sports
a maximum of 26% of ethylene propylene-diene-saturated
Equipment, Playing Surfaces, and Facilitiesand is the direct responsibility of
polymethylene main chain along with other organic and
Subcommittee F08.52 on Miscellaneous Playing Surfaces.
Current edition approved July 1, 2018. Published August 2018. Originally
inorganic components.
approved in 2002. Last previous edition approved in 2009 as F2157–09. DOI:
10.1520/F2157-09R18.
2 3
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or Available from Beuth Verlag GmbH (DIN-- DIN Deutsches Institut fur
contact ASTM Customer Service at [e-mail]. For Annual Book of ASTM Normung e.V.), Burggrafenstrasse 6, 10787, Berlin, Germany.
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on Available from IAAF Headquarters, 17 rue Princesse Florestine—BP 359,
the ASTM website. MC-98007, Monaco Cedex. http://www.iaaf.org
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
F2157 − 09 (2018)
3.1.5 flat, n—an area that by design is to have a finished 5. Test Methods and Requirements for Asphalt Base
slope of 0.5% or less.
5.1 Type and Compaction:
3.1.6 recycled black EPDM rubber product, n—crumbs or
5.1.1 Description and Required Performance—The asphalt
granules manufactured through ambient or cryogenic grinding
base and asphalt wearing course (two layers) for the running
or crushing of post industrial scrap (typically automotive),
track shall conform to the mixes established for road traffic in
containing a mixture of types of rubber including EPDM
the jurisdiction and according to the synthetic surface manu-
rubber product and varying in size. The material must be free
facturers’ recommendation of the running track. The asphalt
of dust, metals, and other contaminants.
base and asphalt wearing course (two layers) shall be com-
3.1.7 recycled SBR rubber, n—crumbs, granules, or
pacted to a minimum of 95% density for machine finish and
buffings/strands manufactured through the ambient or cryo-
90% density for hand packed areas according to Test Method
genic grinding or crushing of car or truck tires or industrial
D2950. Laboratory tests are performed with local DOT proce-
scrap and varying in size. Must be free of dust, metals, and
dures. Hand-packed limited to areas not accessible by appro-
other contaminants.
priateequipment.Wheretheasphaltispermeabletowaterorof
an open type, vertical drainage is required.
3.1.8 SBR rubber product, n—styrene-butadienerubbersare
the general-purpose synthetic rubbers.
5.1.2 Test Method—Use test method as described in Test
Method D2950.
3.1.9 site report, n—a comprehensive report of the test
results obtained through site testing including site
5.2 Evenness:
identification, testing conditions, test standard identification,
5.2.1 Description and Required Performance—The running
testmethodology,testresultsinaverageandbytestpoint,asite
trackasphaltbaseshallbeinstalledsothatonalocalizedlevel,
plan locating test points and areas of deviation and a conclu-
there shall be no bumps or depressions beneath a 3-m straight-
sion stating the classification achieved by the surface from the
edgeexceeding6mmforaClassAandBsurfacesor8mmfor
testing.
ClassCsurfaces.Depressionsbeneatha1-mstraightedgeshall
3.1.10 site testing, n—a combination of on-site and labora-
not exceed 3 mm for ClassAand Class B surface or 4mm for
torytestingofsiteproducedsamplestoestablishcomplianceof
Class C. There shall be no step-like irregularities greater than
an installed surface within a classification or other specifica-
1 mm in height (see Table 1).
tions.
5.2.2 Test Method—Drag or regularly place the 3-m
3.1.11 suitability report, n—a report of the results from
straightedge, advancing by one half the length of the straight-
suitabilitytestingwhichmaybeusedasaguidelineforsurface
edge for each measurement, on the surface along the length of
product comparisons and as a general benchmark for installed
the odd numbered lanes and each runway as a minimum.
surfaces.
Additional locations may be tested at the discretion of the test
laboratory. Both ends of the straightedge should be in contact
3.1.12 suitability testing, n—a specific group of tests which
with the asphalt surface. At each location use visual observa-
are performed in the laboratory on an uninstalled surface
tion to determine if a gap exists under the straightedge. Should
sample. Such testing serves as a guideline for general surface
a gap exist, use a calibrated wedge to determine the actual size
compliance to the standard. It makes no inference about an
ofthegap.Forrunways,themeasurementisregularlytakenup
installed surface.
thecenteroftherunway.Whereagapisfound,thisisrecorded
3.1.13 track classification, n—a rating given to a surface
on a plan of the facility.
based on the test results of either the suitability testing or site
testing. Tracks are classified A to C in descending order. To
5.3 Drainage:
achieve a classification, a surface must comply with all of the
5.3.1 Description and Required Performance—Due to the
test specifications of that classification.
requirements for evenness, the drainage requirements for the
3.1.13.1 track classification A—a rating given to surfaces
asphalt surface shall be the same as the drainage requirements
that meet the specifications for the A level track surfaces as for the synthetic surface as specified in this standard.
specified herein.
5.3.2 Test Method—The asphalt surface is flooded with
water by any number of means, and the time is measured from
3.1.13.2 track classification B—a rating given to surfaces
thetimethefloodingstopsfor20min.Locationswithstanding
that meet the specifications for B level track surface as
specified herein. water are noted on a plan of the facility.
3.1.13.3 track classification C—a rating given to surfaces
6. Test Methods, Description, and Required Performance
that meet the specifications for C level track surface as
for Newly Installed Synthetic Surfaces
specified herein.
6.1 Imperfections:
4. Significance and Use
6.1.1 Description and Required Performance—The durabil-
ity and dynamic performance of the surface may be compro-
4.1 Data obtained from this specification are indicative of
the performance characteristics for the running track surface mised by imperfections such as bubbles, fissures, uncured
and can be used only for comparisons and establishing mini- areas,delamination,etc.Thesewillnotbeallowedandmustbe
mum requirements. corrected.
F2157 − 09 (2018)
TABLE 1 Performance Requirements for the Tests
Test Method Class A Class B Class C Suitability/
and Requirement Requirement Requirement Requirement Site Test
Imperfections No bubbles, fissures, uncured areas No bubbles, fissures, uncured areas No bubbles, fissures, uncured areas Site
A
delamination, etc delamination, etc. delamination, etc
Evenness Nodepressionsover6mmin3mor3 No depressions over 6 mm in3mor No depressions over 8 mm in3mor Site
mm/1 m; No step-like irregularities 3 mm/1 m; no step-like 4 mm/1 m; No step-like
A
greater than 1 mm irregularities greater than 1 mm irregularities greater than 1 mm
Thickness To comply with IAAF Product Min 12 mm avg; nowhere <10 mm Min 12 mm avg; Nowhere <10 mm Suitability site
Certificate/IAAF Product Report or
this Standard compliance report,
with no area under 80 % and with
compliance to Force Reduction and
Deformation requirements met.
Drainage No standing water above surface No standing water over 3 mm above No standing water over 3 mm above Site
texture after 20 min surface texture after 20 min; areas surface texture after 20 min; areas
under 5 % slope by designed under5 %slopebydesignexempt;
exempt; total puddles under 0.2 % total puddles under 0.2 % total syn
totalsynsurface;nosinglepuddles surface; no single puddles over 2
2 2
over 2 m in size m in size
A
Force reduction 35 to 50 % at 10 to 40°C 30 to 50 % 10 to 40°C 25 to 50 % 10 to 40°C Suitability site
A
Vertical deformation 0.6 to 2.5 mm 0.6 to 2.8 mm 0.5 to 3.0 mm Suitability site
A A A
Texture influence (wet) Not to exceed IAAF requirement Not to exceed IAAF requirement Not to exceed IAAF requirement Suitability site
Tensile properties Strength: porous—min 0.4 MPa; Strength: porous—min 0.4 MPa; Strength: porous—min 0.4 MPa; Suitability site
nonporous—min 0.5 MPa; nonporous—min 0.5 MPa; nonporous—min 0.5 MPa;
A
Elongationallsurfaces—min40 % elongation all surfaces—min 40 % elongation all surfaces—min 35 %
A
Color grey scale Even color Evencolororevenfadingifbydesign Evencolororevenfadingifbydesign Suitability site
Weathering Min 75 % of pre-exposure value for Min 75 % of pre-exposure value for Min 75 % of pre-exposure value for Suitability site
strength and elongation on break; strength and elongation on break; strength and elongation on break; (optional)
no visual imperfections no visual imperfections no visual imperfections
Spike resistance No visible signs of damage No visible signs of damage Max of 10 lasting penetrations, no Suitability site
tears or splits (optional)
Flammability Must receive a result of “Pass” Must receive a result of “Pass” Must receive a result of “Pass” Suitability site
A
IAAF requirement.
6.1.2 Test Method—A visual examination of the surface is two directions. Where a gap is found exceeding the maximum
conducted and imperfections noted on a plan of the facility.A for the class, this is recorded on a plan of the facility.
photographic record of imperfections may be used to enhance
6.3 Thickness:
the report.
6.3.1 Description and Required Performance—The durabil-
6.2 Evenness: ity of the surface and the safety of the athlete can be affected
6.2.1 Description and Required Performance—The running bythethicknessoftherunningtracksurface.Theuseofspikes
tracksurfaceshallbeinstalledsothatonalocalizedlevel,there enhancesthisrequirementforaminimumthickness.Therewill
shall be no bumps or depressions beneath a 3-m straightedge be specifically designed areas such as in the javelin runway or
exceeding 6mm for a Class A and B surfaces or 8 mm for other high stress areas where the safety of the athlete and the
ClassCsurfaces.Depressionsbeneatha1-mstraightedgeshall durability of the surface will dictate that the thickness be
not exceed 3 mm for ClassAand Class B surface or 4mm for greater than the minimum. This additional thickness shall not
Class C. There shall be no step-like irregularities greater than affecttheevennessofthesurface.Theaveragethicknessofthe
1mm in height. Particular attention is to be paid to seams and running track surface shall be at least 12 mm, and nowhere
joints in the running surface. The intent is to ensure the safety shall the thickness be less than 10 mm. For Class A the total
of the athlete and provide an even running surface. area with a thickness between 10 mm and 10.5 mm shall be no
6.2.2 Test Method—Drag or regularly place the 3-m greater than 5% of the total surface.
straightedge, advancing by one half the length of the straight- 6.3.2 Test Method:
edgeforeachmeasurement,onthesurface,alongthelengthof 6.3.2.1 A calibrated three-prong floor depth measuring
the odd-numbered lanes and centerline of each run-up and probeisusedtodeterminethethicknessoftherunningsurface.
approach area as a minimum. Additional locations may be Care must be taken not to penetrate the asphalt base of the
tested at the discretion of the test laboratory. Both ends of the running surface. This thickness is measured at a minimum of
straightedge should be in contact with the surface. At each 100 locations, starting at the finish line and moving in a
location use visual observation to determine if a gap exists counter-clockwise direction taking readings first in the even
underthestraightedge.Shouldagapexist,verifythatbothends lanes(2,4,6,8)andthentheoddlanes(1,3,5,7)inthecenter
ofthestraightedgerestonthesurface,movingthestraightedge of each lane and at regular intervals. For ClassA, the interval
if necessary, then use a calibrated wedge to determine the is set at every 10 m. Runways shall be probed at 5-m intervals
actual size of the gap. For runways, the measurement is taken centered along the length and the “D area” shall be probed on
up the center of the runway. For the high jump fan or “D” the a minimum of 15 locations evenly spaced throughout the area
measurement is taken at 5-m intervals along parallel axis in as a minimum for Class B and Class C, while for ClassA, the
F2157 − 09 (2018)
test must be performed at 5-m intervals along parallel axes in Therefore, the ability of the surface to reduce force is impor-
two directions. The measurements taken are recorded and the tant. The force reduction will be a maximum of 50% for all
test points listed in the test report. surfaces with a minimum of 35% for ClassA, 30% for Class
6.3.2.2 A core (10 to 25 mm in diameter) is removed and B and 25% for Class C surfaces. The temperature of the test
measured using the following method to make the final shall be to simulate the ambient temperature anticipated at a
determination as to the actual thickness.The surface texture of track meet; therefore, the range shall be within 10 to 40°C.
the core is abraded with a grade 60 abrasive for approximately 6.4.2 Test Method—This method utilizes the Berlin Artifi-
50% of the surface area of the core. The thickness of the cialAthlete (BAA) (Fig. 1).Amass of 20 kg is allowed to fall
abraded area of the core is measured using a thickness gauge onto an anvil, which transmits the load via a spring to a test
fitted with a 0.01-mm accuracy dial, a plunger flat measuring foot with a spherical base resting on the surface. The foot is
surface of 4-mm diameter, and a measurement force between fittedwithaforcetransducerthatenablesthepeakforceduring
0.8Nand1.0Nisapplied.Themeasurementisrecordedtothe the impact event to be recorded. The peak force is compared
nearest 0.1 mm.The difference in thickness between the actual with the result obtained on a rigid (concrete, 15 cm (6 in.) in
surfaceandtheabradedsurfaceiscalculatedandthedifference thickness) floor, and the percentage of force reduction calcu-
deducted from all of the actual probe measurements and these lated for the running surface. The force reduction is calculated
are recorded as the thickness of the running surface for the as follows:
purpose of this standard.
Forcereductionpercentage ~%! 5 ~1 2 Fs/Fc! 3100 (1)
6.4 Force Reduction:
where:
6.4.1 Description and Required Performance—The dy-
Fs = readings on synthetic surface, and
namic interaction between the athlete and the surface is
Fc = readings on concrete.
significant to the performance and safety of the athlete.
FIG. 1 Force Reduction Test Apparatus
1 = bars
2 = lifting/release facility
3 = drop weight
4 = guidance
5 = anvil
6 = spring
7 = tube
8 = support
9 = load cell
10 = foot of support
11 = test foot
12 = synthetic surface
13 = base
F2157 − 09 (2018)
6.4.2.1 The apparatus shall conform to the following re- 6.5.2 Test Method:
quirements:
6.5.2.1 This method utilizes the SAA(Fig. 2).Amass of 20
(1)Spring number 2000 N/mm 6 60;
kg is allowed to fall on a spring, which transmits the load to a
(2)Test foot radius 70 mm;
testfootwithaflatbaserestingonthesurface.Thefootisfitted
(3)Test foot shape radius 500 mm;
with a force transducer which enables the force arising during
(4)Drop height 55 mm;
the impact event to be recorded. Simultaneously, the deforma-
(5)Butterworth filter 120 Hz, 9-pole;
tion of the test foot is measured by means of deformation
(6)Weightoftestfootandloadcellandspring3.0kg 60.5 sensors mounted so that they read the deformation of the test
kg; and
foot.
(7)Electronic according to 6.5.2.2.
6.5.2.2 The apparatus is set vertically with the test foot
6.4.2.2 For a site test a minimum of 6 locations in the
resting directly on the synthetic running surface. The distance
running track will be tested and should be as follows:
between the drop weight and the top of the spring is adjusted
(1)At the center of lanes 1 and 3 in the center of the main
to 120 6 0.25 mm. The sensors are set as specified in 6.5.4.8.
straight of way,
The pre-load on the surface by the test foot assembly and
(2)At the location determined by the test laboratory in the
sensors as installed within the test device is the zero position.
first radius,
Activate the recording and release the drop weight. Record the
(3)At the center of lane 1 in the center of the back straight
deformation of the surface. Return the drop weight to the
of way,
holdingdeviceandadjustthedropheightasnecessary.Without
(4)At the location determined by the test laboratory in the
moving the test device repeat this for a total of 3 impacts with
final radius,
a resting time between impacts of 1 min 6 30 s. The
(5)At the location selected by the test laboratory, other
deformationforthetestpointshallbecalculatedastheaverage
than the high-jump take-off point, within the fan. Where there
result of Drop 2 + Drop 3.
are 2 high-jump fans, a test is performed in each fan, and
6.5.3 Test Temperature—The temperature(s) for this test
(6)At the location selected by the test laboratory in one of
shall be as follows:
the runways for Class B and Class C. For ClassA, all runways
6.5.3.1 During each test, a temperature probe inserted at
must be tested at a location selected by the test laboratory.
least halfway into the synthetic surface must be used to
6.4.2.3 Each location tested shall be recorded on a facility
determine and record the temperature of the running surface.
plan with the results recorded in the test documentation. Since
6.5.3.2 Product Compliance (Suitability) Testing—Forcom-
thetestisperformedwithinatemperaturerangeof10to40°C,
pliance tests (suitability) Class B and C, the submitted sample
a temperature probe must be used to determine and record the
shall be tested at 10, 22, and 40 6 2°C. For ClassAonly, test
temperature of the running surface.
temperaturesshallbeexpandedtoincludeallthosespecifiedby
6.4.2.4 For compliance tests (suitability) the submitted
IAAF.The test sections shall have been conditioned at the test
sample shall be tested at 10°C, 22°C, and 40°C, 6 2°C. The
temperature for a minimum of 8 h prior to testing. The sample
sample must comply at all temperatures.
mustcomplyatalltemperatureswithintherangeof10to40°C.
6.4.2.5 Climaticconditionsmaywarranttheneedfortesting
Climatic conditions may warrant the need for testing at
at additional temperatures outside the minimum recommended
additional temperatures outside the minimum recommended
range of 10 to 40°C.
range of 10 to 40°C.
6.4.2.6 Field testing is to be performed at ambient tempera-
6.5.3.3 Sample Size—Submittedsampleshallbeaminimum
ture; however, the surface temperature and ambient air tem-
of 1m .
perature are to be recorded.
6.5.3.4 Field Testing—Field testing is to be performed at
ambient temperature; however, the surface temperature and
6.5 Vertical Deformation:
ambient air temperature are to be recorded. For Class A
6.5.1 Description and Required Performance—The dy-
surfaces, testing is to be performed when the surface is within
namic interaction between the athlete and the surface is
the 10 to 40°C range. This may require testing during early
significant to the performance and safety of the athlete.
morning and evening hours during hot weather or postponing
Therefore the ability of the surface to deform under load is
testing until ambient conditions do comply with this
important. Too high a deformation can affect the safety of the
requirement, or both.
athlete through instability of the foot, while the inability of the
6.5.4 Equipment—The apparatus must meet the following
surface to deform can cause injuries due to impact forces.This
requirements:
test is performed with a Stuttgart Artificial Athlete (SAA)
6.5.4.1 Drop weight of 20 6 0.05 kg with a hardened
(different than for force reduction).The temperature of the test
striking surface, guided such that it falls vertically and
shall be to simulate the ambient surface temperature antici-
smoothly with a minimum of friction.
pated at a trac
...