Plastics — Determination of tension-tension fatigue crack propagation — Linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) approach

ISO 15850 specifies a method for measuring the propagation of a crack in a notched specimen subjected to a cyclic tensile load varying between a constant positive minimum and a constant positive maximum value. The test results include the crack length as a function of the number of load cycles and the crack length increase rate as a function of the stress intensity factor and energy release rate at the crack tip. The possible occurrence of discontinuities in crack propagation is detected and reported. The method is suitable for use with the following range of materials: rigid and semi-rigid thermoplastic moulding and extrusion materials (including filled and short-fibre-reinforced compounds) plus rigid and semi-rigid thermoplastic sheets; rigid and semi-rigid thermosetting materials (including filled and short-fibre-reinforced compounds) plus rigid and semi-rigid thermosetting sheets.

Plastiques — Détermination de la propagation de fissure par fatigue en traction — Approche de la mécanique linéaire élastique de la rupture (LEFM)

General Information

Status
Withdrawn
Publication Date
19-Jun-2002
Withdrawal Date
19-Jun-2002
Current Stage
9599 - Withdrawal of International Standard
Completion Date
04-Feb-2014
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ISO 15850:2002 - Plastics -- Determination of tension-tension fatigue crack propagation -- Linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) approach
English language
17 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 15850
First edition
2002-06-15

Plastics — Determination of
tension-tension fatigue crack
propagation — Linear elastic fracture
mechanics (LEFM) approach
Plastiques — Détermination de la propagation de fissure par fatigue en
traction — Approche de la mécanique linéaire élastique de la rupture
(LEFM)




Reference number
ISO 15850:2002(E)
©
ISO 2002

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
ISO 15850:2002(E)
PDF disclaimer
This PDF file may contain embedded typefaces. In accordance with Adobe's licensing policy, this file may be printed or viewed but shall not
be edited unless the typefaces which are embedded are licensed to and installed on the computer performing the editing. In downloading this
file, parties accept therein the responsibility of not infringing Adobe's licensing policy. The ISO Central Secretariat accepts no liability in this
area.
Adobe is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated.
Details of the software products used to create this PDF file can be found in the General Info relative to the file; the PDF-creation parameters
were optimized for printing. Every care has been taken to ensure that the file is suitable for use by ISO member bodies. In the unlikely event
that a problem relating to it is found, please inform the Central Secretariat at the address given below.


©  ISO 2002
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic
or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from either ISO at the address below or ISO's member body
in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
Case postale 56 • CH-1211 Geneva 20
Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11
Fax + 41 22 749 09 47
E-mail copyright@iso.ch
Web www.iso.ch
Printed in Switzerland

ii © ISO 2002 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
ISO 15850:2002(E)
Contents Page
Foreword.iv
1 Scope .1
2 Normative references.1
3 Terms and definitions .1
4 Principle.4
5 Significance and use.4
6 Test specimens.5
7 Apparatus .9
8 Test procedure.14
9 Calculation and interpretation of results .14
10 Test report .16
Bibliography.17

© ISO 2002 – All rights reserved iii

---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
ISO 15850:2002(E)
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies (ISO
member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO technical
committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been established has
the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in
liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical
Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 3.
The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International Standards adopted
by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an International
Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this International Standard may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
ISO 15850 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 61, Plastics, Subcommittee SC 2, Mechanical
properties.
iv © ISO 2002 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 15850:2002(E)

Plastics — Determination of tension-tension fatigue crack
propagation — Linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) approach
1 Scope
This International Standard specifies a method for measuring the propagation of a crack in a notched specimen
subjected to a cyclic tensile load varying between a constant positive minimum and a constant positive maximum
value. The test results include the crack length as a function of the number of load cycles and the crack length
increase rate as a function of the stress intensity factor and energy release rate at the crack tip. The possible
occurrence of discontinuities in crack propagation is detected and reported.
The method is suitable for use with the following range of materials:
 rigid and semi-rigid thermoplastic moulding and extrusion materials (including filled and short-fibre-reinforced
compounds) plus rigid and semi-rigid thermoplastic sheets;
 rigid and semi-rigid thermosetting materials (including filled and short-fibre-reinforced compounds) plus rigid
and semi-rigid thermosetting sheets.
2 Normative references
The following normative documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of
this International Standard. For dated references, subsequent amendments to, or revisions of, any of these
publications do not apply. However, parties to agreements based on this International Standard are encouraged to
investigate the possibility of applying the most recent editions of the normative documents indicated below. For
undated references, the latest edition of the normative document referred to applies. Members of ISO and IEC
maintain registers of currently valid International Standards.
ISO 291, Plastics — Standard atmospheres for conditioning and testing
ISO 527 (all parts), Plastics — Determination of tensile properties
ISO 2818, Plastics — Preparation of test specimens by machining
ISO 13586, Plastics — Determination of fracture toughness (G and K ) — Linear elastic fracture mechanics
IC IC
(LEFM) approach
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this International Standard, the following terms and definitions apply.
3.1
cycle
smallest segment of a load-time or stress-time function which is repeated periodically
NOTE The terms fatigue cycle, load cycle and stress cycle are also commonly used.
© ISO 2002 – All rights reserved 1

---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
ISO 15850:2002(E)
3.2
number of cycles completed
N
number of load cycles since the beginning of a test
3.3
waveform
shape of the load-time curve within a single cycle
3.4
maximum load
P
max
highest value of the load during a cycle
NOTE 1 It is expressed in newtons.
NOTE 2 Only positive, i.e. tensile, loads are used in this test method.
3.5
minimum load
P
min
lowest value of the load during a cycle
NOTE 1 It is expressed in newtons.
NOTE 2 Only positive, i.e. tensile, loads are used in this test method.
3.6
load range
∆P
difference between the maximum and the minimum loads in one cycle, given by:
∆P = P − P
max min
3.7
load ratio
stress ratio
R
ratio of the minimum to the maximum load in one cycle, i.e.:
R = P /P
min max
3.8
stress intensity factor
K
limiting value of the product of the stress σ (r) perpendicular to the crack area at a distance r from the crack tip and
of the square root of 2πr, as r tends to zero:
K =limσπ(rr) 2
r→0
1/2
NOTE 1 It is expressed in pascal root metres (Pa⋅m ).
NOTE 2 The term factor is used here because it is in common usage, even though the quantity has dimensions.
[ISO 13586]
3.9
maximum stress intensity factor
K
max
highest value of the stress intensity factor in one cycle
2 © ISO 2002 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
ISO 15850:2002(E)
3.10
minimum stress intensity factor
K
min
lowest value of the stress intensity factor in one cycle
3.11
stress intensity factor range
∆K
difference between the maximum and minimum stress intensity factors in one cycle, given by:
∆K = K − K
max min
3.12
energy release rate
G
difference between the external work δU done on a body to enlarge a cracked area by an amount δA and the
ext
corresponding change in strain energy δU :
S
δδUU
ext S
G = −
δδA A
NOTE 1 It is expressed in joules per square metre.
NOTE 2 Assuming linear elastic behaviour, the following relationship between the stress intensity factor K and the energy
release rate G holds:
2
K
G =
E'
where
E
E' = E for plane stress, and E' = for plane strain conditions;
2
1−ν
E and ν are the tensile modulus and Poisson's ratio respectively.
3.13
maximum energy release rate
G
max
highest value of the energy release rate in one cycle
3.14
minimum energy release rate
G
min
lowest value of the energy release rate in one cycle
3.15
energy release rate range
∆G
difference between the maximum and minimum energy release rates in one cycle, given by:
∆G = G – G
max min
3.16
notch
sharp indentation made in the specimen, generally using a razor blade or a similar sharp tool, before a test and
intended as the starting point of a fatigue-induced crack
© ISO 2002 – All rights reserved 3

---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
ISO 15850:2002(E)
3.17
initial crack length
a
0
length of the notch (3.16)
NOTE 1 It is expressed in metres.
NOTE 2 For compact tensile (CT) specimens, it is measured from the line joining the load-application points (i.e. the line
through the centres of the loading-pin holes) to the notch tip (see Figure 2). For single-edge-notched tensile (SENT) specimens,
it is measured from the edge of the specimen to the notch tip. Details of the measurement procedure are given in 7.3.
3.18
crack length
a
total crack length at any time during a test, given by the initial crack length a plus the crack length increment due
0
to fatigue loading
NOTE It is expressed in metres.
3.19
fatigue crack growth rate
da/dN
rate of crack extension caused by fatigue loading and expressed in terms of average crack extension per cycle
NOTE It is expressed in metres per cycle.
3.20
stress intensity calibration
mathematical expression, based on empirical or analytical results, that relates the stress intensity factor to load and
crack length for a specific specimen geometry
3.21
gauge length
L
0
〈single-edge-notched tensile (SENT) specimen〉 free distance between the upper and lower grips after the
specimen has been mounted in the test machine
NOTE It is expressed in metres.
4 Principle
A constant-amplitude cyclic tensile load is imposed on a specimen under suitable test conditions (specimen shape
and size, notching, maximum and minimum loads, load cycle frequency, etc.), causing a crack to start from the
notch and propagate.
The crack length a is monitored during the test and recorded as a function of the number N of load cycles
completed.
Numerical differentiation of the experimental function a(N) provides the fatigue crack growth rate da/dN which is
reported as a function of stress intensity factor and energy release rate at the crack tip.
5 Significance and use
Fatigue crack propagation, particularly when expressed as the fatigue crack growth rate da/dN as a function of
crack-tip stress intensity factor range ∆K or energy release rate range ∆G characterizes a material’s resistance to
stable crack extension under cyclic loading. Background information on the fatigue behaviour of plastics and on the
fracture mechanics approach to fatigue for these materials is given in [1] and [2] (see the Bibliography).
4 © ISO 2002 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
ISO 15850:2002(E)
Expressing da/dN as a function of ∆K or ∆G provides results that are independent of specimen geometry, thus
enabling exchange and comparison of data obtained with a variety of specimen configurations and loading
conditions. Moreover, this feature enables da/dN versus ∆K or ∆G data to be utilized in the design and evaluation of
engineering structures. The concept of similitude is assumed, which implies that cracks of differing lengths
subjected to the same nominal ∆K or ∆G will advance by equal increments of crack extension per cycle.
Fatigue crack propagation data are not geometry-independent in the strict sense since thickness effects generally
occur. The potential effects of specimen thickness have to be considered when generating data for research or
design.
Anisotropy in the molecular orientation or in the structure of the material, and the presence of residual stresses,
can have an influence on fatigue crack propagation behaviour. The effect can be significant when test specimens
are removed from semi-finished products (e.g. extruded sheets) or finished products. Irregular crack propagation,
namely excessive crack front curvature or out-of-plane crack growth, generally indicates that anisotropy or residual
stresses are affecting the test results.
This test method can serve the following purposes:
a) to estabilish the influence of fatigue crack propagation on the lifetime of components subjected to cyclic
loading, provided data are generated under representative conditions and combined with appropriate fracture
toughness data (see ISO 13586) and stress analysis information;
b) to establish material-selection criteria and inspection requirements for damage-tolerant applications;
c) to establish, in quantitative terms, the individual and combined effects of the material’s structure, the
processing conditions and the loading variables on fatigue crack propagation.
6 Test specimens
6.1 Shape and size
6.1.1 Standard specimens
Two different types of specimen can be used: single-edge-notched tensile (SENT) and compact tensile (CT).
Figures 1 and 2 describe their geometrical characteristics.
6.1.2 Thickness and width
When the specimen thickness h is too small compared to the width w, it is difficult to avoid lateral deflections or out-
of-plane bending of the specimen. Conversely, with very thick specimens, through-thickness crack curvature
corrections are often necessary and difficulties may be encountered in meeting the through-thickness straightness
requirement of 8.1.
On the basis of these considerations, the following limits are recommended for h and w:
a) for CT specimens, w/10 u h u w/2;
b) for SENT specimens, w/20 u h u w/4.
It should be noted that the test results are in general thickness-dependent: specimens obtained from the same
material but having different thicknesses are likely to give different responses.
It is usually convenient to make the thickness h of specimens equal to the thickness of the sheet sample from
which the specimens are cut.
© ISO 2002 – All rights reserved 5

---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
ISO 15850:2002(E)

Key
w Width w/20 u h u w/4 (recommended)
l Length l > 2,5w
1 1
h Thickness
a Initial crack length
0
The notch shall be within ± 0,01w of the specimen centreline.
Figure 1 — Standard single-edge-notched tensile (SENT) specimen for fatigue crack propagation testing
6 © ISO 2002 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
ISO 15850:2002(E)

Key
w Effective width w/10 u h u w/2 (recommended)
W Overall width W = 1,25w ± 0,01w
l Length l = 1,2w ± 0,01w
1 1
l Distance between centres of loading-pin holes located l = 0,55w ± 0,005w
2
2
symmetrically to the crack plane to within ± 0,005w
R Radius of loading-pin hole R = 0,125w ± 0,005w
h Thickness
a Initial crack length a W 0,2w
0 0
The notch shall be within ± 0,01w of the specimen centreline.
Figure 2 — Standard compact tensile (CT) specimen for fatigue crack propagation testing
6.1.3 Size requirements
In order for the results obtained by this test method to be valid, it is required that the material behaviour be
predominantly linear elastic at all values of applied load and crack length. Deviations may arise from either
viscoelastic behaviour of the material or large-scale plasticity ahead of the crack tip. The former may result in
significant non-linearity of the mechanical behaviour, possibly aggravated by a progressive rise of the specimen
temperature during the test. The test procedure outlined in this International Standard is therefore recommended
only for materials exhibiting very limited viscoelasticity under the loading frequency used and for the expected test
duration. Large-scale plasticity of the ligament can be avoided by ensuring that the plastic zone around the crack
tip is small compared with the size of the uncracked ligament (w − a). On the basis of previous experience with
[3]
metallic materials , it is required that the following size limits be satisfied in order for the test results to be valid:
2
wa−πW 4 K σ (1)
() ()
()
max y
where
w − a is the uncracked-specimen ligament width;
σ is the tensile-yield stress measured in accordance with the relevant part of ISO 527.
y
© ISO 2002 – All rights reserved 7

---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------
ISO 15850:2002(E)
The same size limits are expressed in graphical form in Figure 3, where the dimensionless quantities
K / σ w and a/w are plotted against each other. All combinations of specimen size, crack length, material
max()y
yield stress and stress intensity factor which lie below the curve in Figure 3 satisfy the specimen size requirements
of this test method.

Figure 3 — Size requirements for standard fatigue crack propagation specimens
(Values which lie below the curve satisfy the specimen size requirements of this method)
6.2 Preparation
Prepare specimens in accordance with the relevant materials specification and in accordance with ISO 2818. In the
case of anisotropic materials, take care to indicate the reference direction on each specimen.
6.3 Notching
Produce a sharp notch or, when feasible, a natural crack, intended as the starting point of the fatigue-induced
crack, in the specimen at the locations depicted in Figures 1 and 2, either in a single step or by sharpening the tip
of a blunt slot or notch made by machining.
It is required that the initial crack length a in the CT specimen be at least 0,2w so that K-calibration is not
0
influenced by small variations in the location and dimensions of the loading-pin holes. The notch length in CT
specimens shall be chosen accordingly (see 7.3 for details of measurement of initial crack length a ).
0
The notch in both the CT and SENT specimens shall be within ± 0,01w of the specimen centreline.
When sharpening a blunt notch produced by machining, the length of the sharp notch shall be more than four times
the blunt notch tip radius. Method a), b), c) or d) can be used to create a natural crack or a sharp notch:
a) Machine a sharp notch in the specimen and then generate a natural crack by tapping on a new razor blade
placed in the notch (it is essential to practice this since, in brittle specimens, a natural crack can be generated
by this process but some skill is required in avoiding too long a crack or local damage).
8 © ISO 2002 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------
ISO 15850:2002(E)
b) If control is difficult or repeatability problems are experienced with method a), it is possible with some brittle
specimens to generate a sharp notch by simply pressing the razor blade against the specimen at a
temperature close to, but lower than, the glass-transition temperature of the material. With this notching
procedure, proper handling of the specimen and correct choice of temperature are essential to avoid
deformation of, or damage to, the specimen. Use a new razor blade for each specimen.
c) If a natural crack cannot be generated, as in tough specimens, then sharpen the notch by sliding a razor blade
across the notch. Use a new razor blade for each specimen.
d) With tough materials, cooling the specimen and then tapping with a razor blade is sometimes successful.
It may be useful to check the effectiveness of the notching procedure by performing preliminary tests at a constant
displacement or constant loading rate on specimens notched using different methods. The best notching method is
the one which gives the lowe
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.