Extended application of test results for fire resistance for doorsets and shutter assemblies - Part 3: Timber hinged and pivoted doorsets

This document covers hinged or pivoted, doorsets with timber based leaves. It prescribes the methodology for extending the application of test results obtained from test(s) conducted in accordance with EN 1634-1.
Subject to the completion of the appropriate test or tests selected from those identified in Clause 5 the extended application may cover all or some of the following:
- uninsulated (E), radiation (EW) or insulated (EI1 or EI2) classifications;
- glazed elements, louvres and/or vents;
- side, transom or overpanels;
- items of building building hardware;
- decorative finishes;
- intumescent, smoke, draught or acoustic seals;
- alternative supporting construction(s);

Erweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen zur Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit von Türen, Toren und Klappen - Teil 3: Drehflügeltüreinheiten aus Holz

Dieses Dokument behandelt Drehflügeltüreinheiten mit einem Flügel aus Holz bzw. Holzwerkstoff. Es beschreibt die Methodologie zur Erweiterung der Anwendung von Prüfergebnissen auf der Basis von Prüfungen nach EN 1634-1.
In Abhängigkeit von der Durchführung der entsprechenden Prüfung oder Prüfungen, die in Abschnitt 5 aufgeführt sind, kann der erweiterte Anwendungsbereich einige oder alle der folgenden Bereiche abdecken:
-   Klassifizierungen von nichtwärmegedämmten Türeinheiten (E), sowie solchen mit Anforderungen an die Strahlung (EW) oder wärmegedämmten Türeinheiten (EI1 oder EI2);
-   verglaste Teilbereiche, Lüftungsgitter und/oder Ventilationsöffnungen;
-   Seitenteile, Oberteile oder obere Türblenden;
-   Türbeschläge;
-   dekorative Beschichtungen;
-   dämmschichtbildende Dichtungen, sowie Dichtungen zur Behinderung von Rauchdurchtritt, Durchzug oder der Schallübertragung;
alternative Tragkonstruktionen

Application élargie des résultats d'essais de résistance au feu des blocs-portes et blocs-fermetures - Pour portes et fermetures - Partie 3 : Blocs-portes et blocs-fermetures en bois, pivotants ou battants

Razširjena uporaba rezultatov preskusov požarne odpornosti za vrata in zaporne elemente - 3. del: Lesena krilna vrata

General Information

Status
Not Published
Technical Committee
Current Stage
98 - Abandoned project (Adopted Project)
Start Date
11-Oct-2013
Due Date
16-Oct-2013
Completion Date
11-Oct-2013

Buy Standard

Draft
oSIST prEN 15269-3:2005
English language
59 pages
sale 10% off
Preview
sale 10% off
Preview

e-Library read for
1 day

Standards Content (sample)

SLOVENSKI oSIST prEN 15269-3:2005
PREDSTANDARD
oct 2005
Razširjena uporaba rezultatov preskusov požarne odpornosti za vrata in
zaporne elemente - 3. del: Lesena krilna vrata

Extended application of test results for fire resistance for doorsets and shutter

assemblies - Part 3: Timber hinged and pivoted doorsets
ICS 13.220.50; 91.060.50 Referenčna številka
oSIST prEN 15269-3:2005(en)

© Standard je založil in izdal Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje ali kopiranje celote ali delov tega dokumenta ni dovoljeno

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
EUROPEAN STANDARD
DRAFT
prEN 15269-3
NORME EUROPÉENNE
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
August 2005
ICS
English Version
Extended application of test results for fire resistance for
doorsets and shutter assemblies - Part 3: Timber hinged and
pivoted doorsets
Application élargie des résultats d'essais de résistance au
feu des blocs-portes et blocs-fermetures - Pour portes et
fermetures - Partie 3 : Blocs-portes et blocs-fermetures en
bois, pivotants ou battants

This draft European Standard is submitted to CEN members for enquiry. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee CEN/TC 127.

If this draft becomes a European Standard, CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which

stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration.

This draft European Standard was established by CEN in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language

made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the Management Centre has the same

status as the official versions.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France,

Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia,

Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom.

Recipients of this draft are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are aware and to

provide supporting documentation.

Warning : This document is not a European Standard. It is distributed for review and comments. It is subject to change without notice and

shall not be referred to as a European Standard.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION
EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
Management Centre: rue de Stassart, 36 B-1050 Brussels

© 2005 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. prEN 15269-3:2005: E

worldwide for CEN national Members.
---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
prEN 15269-3:2005 (E)
Contents Page

Foreword............................................................................................................................................................. 3

1 Scope...................................................................................................................................................... 4

2 Normative references ........................................................................................................................... 4

3 Definitions.............................................................................................................................................. 4

4 Determination of the field of extended application ........................................................................... 5

5 Extended application report ................................................................................................................ 7

6 Classification report ............................................................................................................................. 7

Annex A (normative) Construction Parameter Variations ............................................................................ 8

Annex B Arrangements for Doorsets Incorporating Side and/or Overpanels........................................... 56

---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
prEN 15269-3:2005 (E)
Foreword

This document (prEN 15269-3:2005) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 127 “Fire

safety in buildings”, the secretariat of which is held by BSI.
This document is currently submitted to the CEN Enquiry.

This document is one of a series of Standards intended to be used by experts or competent bodies

for the purpose of producing an extended application report (EXAP). It is not intended to be used for

the interpretation of test results by non-fire experts.

NOTE Clarification is needed to establish if such experts are Bodies Notified for either testing and/or

Certification

prEN 15269 ‘Extended application of test results for fire resistance for doorsets and shutter

assemblies – For doors and shutters’ consists of the following:
Part 1 General requirements
2 Steel hinged and pivoted doorsets
3 Timber hinged and pivoted doorsets
4 Glass hinged and pivoted doorsets
5 Aluminium hinged and pivoted doorsets
6 Timber sliding doorsets
7 Steel sliding doorsets
8 Timber horizontally folding doorsets
9 Steel horizontally folding doorsets
---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
prEN 15269-3:2005 (E)
1 Scope

This document covers hinged or pivoted, doorsets with timber based leaves. It prescribes the

methodology for extending the application of test results obtained from test(s) conducted in

accordance with EN 1634-1.

Subject to the completion of the appropriate test or tests selected from those identified in Clause 5 the

extended application may cover all or some of the following:
 uninsulated (E), radiation (EW) or insulated (EI or EI ) classifications;
1 2
 glazed elements, louvres and/or vents;
 side, transom or overpanels;
 items of building building hardware;
 decorative finishes;
 intumescent, smoke, draught or acoustic seals;
 alternative supporting construction(s);
2 Normative references

The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated

references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced

document (including any amendments) applies.
EN 1363-1, Fire resistance tests — Part 1: General requirements

EN 1634-1, Fire resistance tests for door and shutter assemblies — Part 1: Fire doors and shutters

prEN 1634-2, Fire resistance tests for door and shutter assemblies — Part 2: Fire door hardware

EN 13501-2, Fire classification of construction products and building elements — Part 2: Classification

using test data from fire resistance tests excluding ventilation services
EN ISO 13943, Fire safety — Vocabulary

prEN EXAP 15269, Extended application of test results for fire resisting and smoke control doorsets

and shutter assemblies, Part 1 — General requirements for fire resistance
3 Definitions

For the purposes of this part, the definitions given in EN1363-1, ISO 13943, EN 1634-1, prEN 1634-2

and EXAP prEN 15269-1 together with the following apply:
3.1
coniferous

wood or tree of the order of coniferales, typically bearing cones and needle-like leaves

---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
prEN 15269-3:2005 (E)
3.2
core

material fitted centrally within the thickness of a door leaf. It may consist of a single sheet of material

or a combination either of sheets of the same material or layers of different materials

3.3
deciduous
tree shedding its leaves annually
3.4
effective rebate depth

the dimension of the door leaf thickness of overlapping adjacent edges of door leaf relative to the door

frame, transom or side panel or flush overpanel. At the meeting edges and for rebated leaves the

dimension shall be the depth of the largest rebate or the rebate where the intumescent seal is fitted

3.5
leaf symmetry

the construction of a door leaf, without consideration of any leaf edge rebates, viewed either side of

an imaginary line drawn centrally in the thickness of the leaf. A symmetrical doorleaf will be identical

either side of this imaginary line, whilst an asymmetrical door leaf will differ
4 Determination of the field of extended application
4.1 General

4.1.1 Before there can be any consideration for extended application the doorset must have been

tested and classified in accordance with EN1634-1 and EN 13501-2 respectively in order to establish

a classification for the doorset.
4.1.2 Evaluation to a higher classification is not possible.

4.1.3 All evaluations shall be made on the basis of retaining the classification obtained from testing

to EN1634-1.

4.1.4 If, by following the ensuing procedure, any part of the classification cannot be achieved by

extended application theory, that element of classification shall be omitted from the subsequent

extended application report and classification report.
4.2 Procedure for Evaluation

4.2.1 Identify the variations from the original test specimen(s) which are required to be covered by

an extended application report.

4.2.2 Locate the variations in the appropriate parameter variation by reference to columns (1) and

(2) of annex A.

4.2.3 Review the type of classification to be retained from column (3) and establish from the

contents of column (4) whether any extended application is available beyond the direct application

rules in EN 1634-1 without the need for further testing.

4.2.4 Where this is deemed to be possible this can be recorded in the extended application report

together with any appropriate restrictions and the stated rules from column (4).

4.2.5 Where the variations required can only be achieved from additional testing, the additional test

can be made on a similar specimen type (e.g. single-leaf doorset) to the original test against which the

extended application is sought. Alternatively, column (5) identifies an option for alternative testing and

relevant test parameters.
---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
prEN 15269-3:2005 (E)

4.2.6 It is a requirement of this document that all items of building hardware are in accordance with

the relevant product standard and that the door assembly onto which the building hardware will be

fitted is appropriate to that class of use. When considering a change in a parameter of building

hardware, the effect on the durability of self-closing must be considered.
4.3 Procedure for maximum field of extended application

4.3.1 It is possible to provide an entended field of application from a single test. However, where a

manufacturer envisages to manufacture a range of doors incorporating single doors and also double

doors with or without side, transom or over panels, with or without glazing, louvres or ventilation grilles,

with alternative element of builders building hardware, etc., it is recommended that careful

consideration is given to the complete range of doorset designs and options in order to minimise the

testing required before testing commences.

4.3.2 Establish all the parameter variations which are required to be part of the product range, and

in particular for single leaf hinged or pivoted timber based doorsets into rebated frames.

4.3.3 Determine which are the most important specification requirements and incorporate as many

as possible into the specimen(s) for the first tests in the series.

4.3.4 Complete the first test or a series of tests and prepare a field of direct application and a

classification report from the results of the test(s).

4.3.5 Establish which of the original desired parameter variations have not been covered by the

direct application classification report.

4.3.6 Identify these parameter variations in annex A and establish if any extended application is

possible without further testing.

4.3.7 Record this for the extended application report together with any restrictions and rules given

in column (5).

4.3.8 Evaluate which, if any, of the desired parameter variations have not been covered by the field

of direct application or the initial field of extended application derived from 4.3.6. above.

4.3.9 Determine if the product range is to include only single leaf doorsets or if the range is to also

include double leaf configurations. Where only single doorsets are to be part of the product range then

the outstanding construction parameter variations shall only be incorporated into specimens for the

single leaf doorset. Where single leaf and double leaf doorsets are to be included in the product range,

the outstanding construction parameter variations for the extended application of single leaf doorsets

may be incorporated into either repeated single leaf doorset tests or in the weakest option double leaf

doorset configurations.

4.3.10 Select the required outstanding parameter variations from column (1) and column (2) of

annex A and observe from column (5) which are the most appropriate weakest specimen options for

further testing.

If the complete selection of required parameter variations have not been covered by the tests

completed in accordance with 4.3.9 and 4.3.10 above, then an appropriate test or tests may be

repeated with the additional product variations incorporated.
4.4 Interpretation of Test Results

4.4.1 In order to maximise the field of extended application, it is important that the test reports shall

record details of any premature integrity and/or insulation failure.
---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
prEN 15269-3:2005 (E)

4.4.2 Where a series of tests have been conducted, the field of extended application shall be based

on the lowest performance achieved from the complete series of tests unless premature failure has

been attributed to one or more specific construction parameter variation.

4.4.3 Where it has been possible, to identify specific parameter failures, the extended application

for all other construction parameter variations can be based on the performance achieved after

isolating the premature failure(s).
5 Extended application report

5.1 Prepare an extended application report in accordance with the requirements of Clause 5 of

EXAP prEN 15269-1, based on the results of evaluations in accordance with the above.

6 Classification report

6.1 The classification report shall be determined from the results of the extended application report

and presented in accordance with EN 13501-2.
---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
prEN 15269-3:2005 (E)
Annex A
(normative)
Construction Parameter Variations

This table is designed to be used by competent experts in the field of fire resistance testing of hinged

or pivoted doorsets with timber based leaves.

The table shall only be used to evaluate a field of extended application when at least one positive fire

resistance test to EN 1634-1 has resulted in a classification according to EN 13501-2.

The first two columns identify possible variations to the construction details of the specimen tested.

The type of classification achieved from the test can be identified as the ‘Type’ section of column 3 as

insulated, radiation control or integrity only. For some parameters, it is necessary to evaluate whether

the specimen displayed a high, medium or low level of distortion during the test. Where this is the

case the following levels should be used to provide high, medium and low distortion doorsets as

measured using the maximum relative movement at any position between the edge of the door leaf

and door frame or between the meeting edges of door leaves or the relative movement of the framing

members for panelled systems from the start of the test at any time during the complete required

classification period (suggested measuring positions are given in EN 1634-1):
 low <40 % of effective rebate depth
 medium >40 % and <85 % of effective rebate depth
 high >85 % of effective rebate depth

The effect of the change in each parameter is evaluated for each characteristic in column 3 under E

for effects on integrity, I for effects on insulation (whether an I or I class) and W for the effects on

1 2
radiation control for EW doors.

These evaluations lead to the judgement of the possibility of the extension of the field of application

the results of which are given in column 4. In certain cases in Column 4, it is a requirement to acheive

Category B, the requirements for this are given in EN1634-1.

Where additional tests are deemed to be necessary the type of specimen approved for incorporation

of the changed parameter is defined in column 5. Where it is possible to use information from tests

performed on one configuration for evidence on a different configuration , this allowance has been

made in order to reduce the overall number of tests required for extended application evaluation e.g.

single action doorsets to double action doorsets

In order to maximise the possible field of extended application from a minimum number of tests the

parameter changes have been spread over a series of test specimens. The recommended tests for

each parameter are dependant on the classification required and the preferred options.

In all cases following the evaluation, the relationship between the leaf and the frame (e.g. gaps) must

remain the same as must the relationship between intumescent material and the faces and/or edges

of the leaf i.e. the distance between the edges of the intumescent material and the leaf face must not

change, nor must the distance between the intumescent material and the leaf edge.

---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
prEN 15269-3:2005 (E)
Group Type of timber medium density
Nr. [kg/m ]
Solid timber can be replaced by other solid
timber of the same group of equal or higher
1 Coniferous and < 450 (regardless of
density or solid timber of a higher group. Glued
Beech density for Beech)
timber with solid pieces of min. 10 mm thickness
may be used as solid timber. Composite wood
2 Deciduous excluding < 450
products (mdf etc.) may not be replaced with
Beech
other materials or composites.
3 Coniferous ≥ 450
Each construction parameter variation may only
be applied in isolation from other variations. If
4 Deciduous excluding ≥ 450
after consideration of a specific variation,
Beech
additional changes are required to be made to
the specimen, these may be made providing the

implications on other variations are also taken into account. (see Clause 4.4 above)

---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
prEN 15269-3:2005 (E)

Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence

on performance Required
h ti ti
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
E I W
A Door leaf.

In certain cases, the rules given in Section A are also appropriate to side and overpanels or the door frame; where this is the case it is clearly indicated in column (1). For double leaf doorsets, both

leaves shall be of the same basic construction.
A.1 General

A.1.1 number of leaves Single leaf from double door = = = Possible for doorsets with exposed intumescent seals only

test and when the distortion of the leaf is low. In doorsets
where there is an inactive and an active leaf, only the
construction and parameters of the active leaf may be
used for the single leaf doorset otherwise not possible
without additional test.

A.1.2 number of leaves Double leaf from single leaf < = = Not possible (see Section A2 for suggested test Additional test…

door test configuration)

A.1.3 intumescent seals (fitted at leaf to Location towards the frame < = = not possible without additional test Additional test to include seal

frame interface) – See Figure 1 rebate fitted in the required position.
Test can be single or double
leaf

A.1.4 intumescent seals (fitted at leaf to location away from the frame < = = not possible without additional test Additional test to include seal

frame interface) – See Figure 2 rebate fitted in the required position.
Test can be single or double
leaf
---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------
prEN 15269-3:2005 (E)

Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence

on performance Required
h ti ti
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
E I W

A.1.5 intumescent seals (fitted in meeting Location change < = = Possible to change the tested seal arrangement from the

edges) leaf in which it was tested to the opposite leaf providing
the leaves were low distortion and the seal arrangement
is replicated and the minimum tested length of
intumescent seal is retained (including at building
hardware positions) otherwise not possible without
additional test.

A.1.6 non intumescent seals (draught / Location change < = = Possible to change from leaf to frame and vice versa and Additional test to include seal

smoke / acoustic etc.) – Euroclass A1, from one leaf to the opposing leaf at the meeting edges fitted in the required position.

e.g. ceramic products (fitted in leaf or providing the seal arrangement is replicated, otherwise not Test can be single or double

frame) possible without additional test. leaf

A.1.7 non intumescent seals (draught Location change < = = Possible to change from leaf to frame and vice versa and Additional test to include seal

/smoke / acoustic etc.) – , < Euroclass A1 from one leaf to the opposing leaf at the meeting edges fitted in the required position.

(fitted in leaf or frame) providing the seal arrangement is replicated, otherwise not Test can be single or double

possible without additional test. leaf

A.1.8 non intumescent seals (draught / Add >=< = = Possible providing the gap is not increased and the Additional test to include seal

smoke / acoustic etc.) - Euroclass A1, reaction of the intumescent seal is not affected otherwise fitted in the required position.

e.g. ceramic products (fitted in leaf or not possible without additional test. Test can be single or double

frame) leaf

A.1.9 non intumescent seals (draught / Remove < = = not possible without additional test |Further test to prove the leaf to

smoke / acoustic etc.) - Euroclass A1, frame detail with no seal fitted.
e.g. ceramic products (fitted in leaf or Test can be single or double
frame) leaf
---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------
prEN 15269-3:2005 (E)

Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence

on performance Required
h ti ti
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
E I W

A.1.10 non intumescent seals (draught / Add < = = not possible without additional test Additional test to include seal

smoke / acoustic etc.) – < Euroclass A1 fitted in the required position.
(fitted in leaf or frame) Test can be single or double
leaf

A.1.11 non intumescent seals (draught / Remove < = = not possible without additional test Additional test to include seal

smoke / acoustic etc. – < Euroclass A1 fitted in the required position.
(fitted in leaf or frame) Test can be single or double
leaf

A.1.12 Louvres in door leaf or panel Add < = = not possible without additional test Additional test to include louvre

fitted in the required position.
Test can be single or double
leaf

A.1.13 Louvres in door leaf or panel Remove => = = Possible providing tested louvre size is 25 % or less of Test can be single or double

the tested leaf area (per leaf), or for up to 30% of leaf area leaf
for low distortion doors, otherwise not possible without
additional test

A.1.4 Louvres in door leaf or panel tested Fitting higher or lower in the < = = Tested positions will define the maximum and minimum Additional test to include louvre

with louvre leaf fitting positions, subject to the rules given in A1.17 and fitted in the required position.

A1.18, otherwise not possible without additional test Test can be single or double

leaf

A.1.15 Louvres in door leaf or panel Fitting to the side of the tested => = = Possible providing the minimum distance between the Test can be single or double

tested with louvre position edge of the leaf and the aperture is not reduced, otherwise leaf

not possible without additional test
---------------------- Page: 13 ----------------------
prEN 15269-3:2005 (E)

Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence

on performance Required
h ti ti
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
E I W
Test to include louvre at 25% of

A.1.16 Louvres in door leaf or panel smaller size or remove => = = Possible to reduce the size of the louvre by 50 % and

tested with louvre – See Figure 3 possible to remove the louvre if the size is 25 % or less leaf area. Test can be single or

than the leaf area and minimum distance between the double leaf
edge of the leaf and the aperture is not reduced, otherwise
a separate test is required and then sizes between the 2
tested louvre sizes are acceptable

A.1.17 Louvres in door leaf or panel larger size (for area or < = = Possible up to a maximum 15 % increase in height and/or Further test required with

tested with louvre dimensions) width or 20 % in area for louvre tested in a door which maximum louvre required. Test

achieved category B overrun time and providing the can be single or double leaf
distance between the edge of louvre and the perimeter of
the door leaf / panel is not decreased otherwise not
possible without an additional test.

A.1.18 Louvre tested in double leaf Change louvre from one leaf to >=< = = Possible to change tested louvre from the active leaf to the To enable complete

doorset the opposite leaf inactive leaf but not vice versa and providing louvre is not interchangability it is suggested

greater than 25% of the leaf area, otherwise not possible that both door leaves are active

without additional test or the louvres are tested in
active leaves only.
---------------------- Page: 14 ----------------------
prEN 15269-3:2005 (E)

Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence

on performance Required
h ti ti
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
E I W
Add (added material shown ≥ = ≥ Drawings 4a, 4b & 4c
A.1.19 Leaf edge rebate (to door leaf or

panel – not at the meeting edges. See shaded in drawings) Possible, with a maximum of 30mm overlap, for timber

section A2 for meeting edge parameters) based materials or for drawing 4b, materials with a melting Additional test to include the

- See Figure 4 point <450ºC if the leaf thickness is increased by the required rebate and leaf detail .

addition of a ‘panel’ or ‘astragal’ to create the rebate and Test can be single or double

the hinges, locking devices, intumescent seals, pivots and leaf
any protective (sub)facings remain as tested e.g. not cut.
Also providing the symmetry of the leaf construction is
maintained. For double leaf doorsets, both leaves will
include the same rebate detail.
Otherwise the required rebate and leaf detail shall be
tested

A.1.20 Leaf edge rebate (to door leaf or Remove >=< = = Possible for over-rebated and under-rebated door leaves The required detail must be

panel – not at the meeting edges. See providing the leaf thickness is maintained and therefore tested. Test can be single or

section A2 for meeting edge parameters) the rebate depth increased and the position of the double leaf

lock/latch, hinges or pivots and intumescent seal is
maintained For double leaf doorsets, both leaves will
include the same rebate detail otherwise not possible
without additional test

A.1.21 Change in mode of operation Alternative <= <= = Not possible to provide a double acting doorset from a Test to be on the required

single or vice versa mode of operation.

A.1.22 Latched condition for single leaf Change in latching condition >=< = = Possible in line with the following relationship: Additional test to include the

doorsets required latching condition.
tested tested with a tested with a
without a latch/lock but latch/lock
latch/lock unlatched latched
---------------------- Page: 15 ----------------------
prEN 15269-3:2005 (E)

Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence

on performance Required
h ti ti
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
E I W
extension to: possible not possible
without a
lock/latch
extension to: not not possible
with possible
lock/latch but
unlatched
extension to: not possible
with a possible
lock/latch,
latched

A.1.23 Latched condition for double leaf Change in latching condition >=< = = Possible in line with the following relationship and Additional test to include the

doorsets – see Figure 5 (see also C1.10 providing the latch and bolt have been included in the required latching condition.

tested doorsets
Tested Tested Testedlatched
unlatched unlatched and bolted
and but bolted
unbolted
Extension to not possible not possible
unlatched
and unbolted
Extension to possible not possible
unlatched
but bolted
---------------------- Page: 16 ----------------------
prEN 15269-3:2005 (E)

Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence

on performance Required
h ti ti
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
E I W
Extension to Possible Possible for
latched and for low low distortion
bolted distortion door leaves
door only
leaves
only
A.2 Meeting edge detail

A.2.1 Rebated, or plain meeting edge Change in edge detail >=< >=< = Possible to add a rebate up to 30mm maximum overlap Test must be double leaf

detail – see Figure 6 per rebate if the rebate is created by the addition of extra

leaf thickness which may be by applied ‘panels’ for timber
based materials or fo
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.