SIST EN 419251-3:2013
(Main)Security requirements for device for authentication - Part 3: Additional functionality for security targets
Security requirements for device for authentication - Part 3: Additional functionality for security targets
This draft European Standard contains packages that define security requirements for an authentication device. This document is the Part3. Part1 and Part2 are Protections Profiles -PP- based on the packages defined in this document. Packages contained in this document can be added in a Security Target -STclaiming PP of Part 1 or Part 2.
Sicherheitsanforderungen für Geräte zur Authentifizierung - Teil 3: zusätzliche Funktionalitäten für Sicherheitsziele
Diese Europäische Norm enthält Pakete, die Sicherheitsanforderungen an ein Gerät zur Authentisierung definieren. Bei dem vorliegenden Dokument handelt es sich um Teil 3. Teil 1 und Teil 2 sind Schutzprofile (PP), die auf den hier definierten Paketen basieren. Die im vorliegenden Dokument enthaltenen Pakete können in einem Sicherheitsziel (ST) hinzugefügt werden, das Konformität mit dem Schutzprofil nach Teil 1 oder Teil 2 beansprucht.
Profils de protection pour support d'authentification - Partie 3: Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Le présent document contient des paquets qui définissent les exigences de sécurité pour un dispositif d’authentification. Le présent document est la Partie 3. La Partie 1 et la Partie 2 sont des Profils de Protection (PP) fondés sur les paquets définis dans le présent document. Les paquets contenus dans le présent document peuvent être ajoutés dans une cible de sécurité (ST) demandant des PP de la Partie 1 ou de la Partie 2.
Varnostne zahteve naprav za overjanje - 3. del: Dodatna funkcionalnost za varnostne cilje
Ta osnutek evropskega standarda vsebuje pakete, ki določajo varnostne zahteve naprav za overjanje. Ta dokument je 3. del. 1. del in 2. del sta profila zaščite, ki temeljita na paketih, opredeljenih v tem dokumentu. Paket iz tega dokumenta je mogoče dodati v varnostni cilj, povezan s profilom zaščite iz 1. dela ali 2. dela.
General Information
Standards Content (Sample)
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.Varnostne zahteve naprav za overjanje - 3. del: Dodatna funkcionalnost za varnostne ciljeSicherheitsanforderungen für
Geräte zur Authentifizierung - Teil 3: zusätzliche Funktionalitäten für SicherheitszieleProfils de protection pour support d'authentification - Partie 3: Fonctionnalités additionnellesSecurity requirements for device for authentication - Part 3: Additional functionality for security targets35.240.15Identifikacijske kartice in sorodne napraveIdentification cards and related devicesICS:Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z:EN 419251-3:2013SIST EN 419251-3:2013en01-maj-2013SIST EN 419251-3:2013SLOVENSKI
STANDARD
SIST EN 419251-3:2013
EUROPEAN STANDARD NORME EUROPÉENNE EUROPÄISCHE NORM
EN 419251-3
March 2013 ICS 35.240.15 English Version
Security requirements for device for authentication - Part 3: Additional functionality for security targets
Profils de protection pour dispositif d'authentification - Partie 3: Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Sicherheitsanforderungen für Geräte zur Authentisierung - Teil 3: Zusätzliche Funktionalitäten für Sicherheitsziele This European Standard was approved by CEN on 7 December 2012.
CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN member.
This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre has the same status as the official versions.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
Management Centre:
Avenue Marnix 17,
B-1000 Brussels © 2013 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members. Ref. No. EN 419251-3:2013: ESIST EN 419251-3:2013
EN 419251-3:2013 (E) 2 Contents Page Foreword . 5 1 Scope . 6 2 Normative references . 6 3 Conformance . 6 3.1 CC Conformance Claim . 6 3.2 PP Claim . 6 3.3 Package Claim . 6 3.4 Conformance Rationale . 6 3.5 Conformance Statement . 7 4 Terms and definitions . 7 5 Symbols and abbreviations . 9 6 Overview of the target of evaluation . 9 6.1 TOE Type . 9 6.2 TOE Usage . 9 6.3 Security Features of the TOE . 10 6.4 Required non-TOE Hardware and Software . 10 6.5 Protection Profile Usage . 10 6.6 Groups . 10 6.6.1 General . 10 6.6.2 Main groups . 10 6.6.3 Environment groups . 11 6.7 Configurations. 13 6.7.1 General . 13 6.7.2 Rules . 13 6.7.3 Possible Configurations . 14 6.8 TOE Environment . 15 6.8.1 Overall view . 15 6.8.2 Personalisation application . 16 6.8.3 Administration application . 17 6.8.4 Authentication application . 18 6.8.5 Verifier . 19 6.8.6 Key Generator . 19 6.8.7 Certification Authority . 20 6.8.8 Examples of applications. 20 6.9 Life Cycle . 22 6.9.1 Overview . 22 6.9.2 Pre-Personalisation phase . 23 6.9.3 Personalisation phase . 23 6.9.4 Usage phase . 24 7 Security problem definition . 26 7.1 Assets . 26 7.1.1 General . 26 7.1.2 Core group. 26 7.1.3 KeyGen group . 26 7.1.4 Admin group . 27 7.2 Users . 27 7.2.1 Core group. 27 7.2.2 KeyImp group . 28 SIST EN 419251-3:2013
EN 419251-3:2013 (E) 3 7.2.3 KeyGen group . 28 7.2.4 Admin group . 28 7.3 Threats . 28 7.3.1 General . 28 7.3.2 Core group . 29 7.3.3 KeyGen group . 30 7.3.4 Admin group . 30 7.4 Organisational security policies . 30 7.4.1 Core group . 30 7.4.2 KeyGen group . 31 7.4.3 Admin group . 31 7.5 Assumptions . 31 7.5.1 Core group . 31 7.5.2 KeyGen group . 32 7.5.3 Admin group . 32 8 Security objectives . 32 8.1 General − Transfer of sensitive data . 32 8.2 Security objectives for the TOE . 33 8.2.1 Core group . 33 8.2.2 KeyImp group . 34 8.2.3 KeyGen group . 34 8.2.4 Admin group . 34 8.2.5 Untrusted PersoAppli . 35 8.2.6 Untrusted AuthAppli . 35 8.2.7 Untrusted Verifier . 35 8.2.8 Untrusted CA . 35 8.2.9 Untrusted AdminAppli . 35 8.3 Security objectives for the operational environment. 36 8.3.1 Core group . 36 8.3.2 KeyImp group . 36 8.3.3 Admin group . 37 8.3.4 Trusted PersoAppli . 37 8.3.5 Trusted AuthAppli . 37 8.3.6 Trusted Verifier . 37 8.3.7 Trusted CA . 37 8.3.8 Trusted AdminAppli . 37 8.4 Rationale for Security objectives . 38 9 Extended component definition – Definition of the Family FCS_RNG . 43 10 Security requirements . 43 10.1 General . 43 10.2 Introduction . 44 10.2.1 Subjects Objects and security attributes . 44 10.2.2 Operations . 45 10.3 Security functional requirements . 46 10.3.1 General . 46 10.3.2 Core group . 47 10.3.3 KeyImp group . 55 10.3.4 KeyGen group . 58 10.3.5 Admin group . 61 10.3.6 Untrusted PersoAppli . 65 10.3.7 Untrusted AuthAppli . 66 10.3.8 Untrusted Verifier . 66 10.3.9 Untrusted CA . 67 10.3.10 Untrusted AdminAppli . 68 10.4 Security assurance requirements . 68 10.5 SFR / Security objectives . 69 10.6 SFR Dependencies . 74 10.7 Rationale for the Assurance Requirements . 76 SIST EN 419251-3:2013
EN 419251-3:2013 (E) 4 Bibliography. 78 Index . 79
Figures Figure 1 — TOE Security Features . 15 Figure 2 — Personalisation application environment . 16 Figure 3 — Administration application environment . 17 Figure 4 — Authentication application environment . 18 Figure 5 — TOE Life Cycle . 22
Tables Table 1 — Basic configurations . 14 Table 2 — IdTrusted configurations . 14 Table 3 — Protection of sensitive data . 33 Table 4 — Security objectives vs problem definition rationale . 38 Table 5 — Security attributes . 45 Table 6 — Core security attributes . 50 Table 7 — Core operations . 50 Table 8 — Core security attributes − Operation . 51 Table 9 — Core security attributes - initial value . 52 Table 10 — Core security attributes – Updates . 53 Table 11 — TSF data – updates . 53 Table 12 — KeyImp security attributes . 55 Table 13 — KeyImp security attributes - operations . 56 Table 14 — KeyImp security attributes – update authorised roles . 57 Table 15 — KeyImp security attributes – update values . 58 Table 16 — KeyGen operations . 59 Table 17 — KeyGen security attributes . 59 Table 18 — KeyGen operation rules . 60 Table 19 — KeyGen security attributes – update authorised roles . 60 Table 20 — KeyGen security attributes – initial values . 61 Table 21 — KeyGen security attributes – update values . 61 Table 22 — Admin security attributes – update authorised roles . 64 Table 23 — Admin security attributes – initial values . 64 Table 24 — Admin security attributes – update values . 64 Table 25 — Admin TSF data – operations . 65 Table 26 — SFR vs Security objectives retionale . 69 Table 27 — SFR dependencies . 74
SIST EN 419251-3:2013
EN 419251-3:2013 (E) 5 Foreword This document (EN 419251-3:2013) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 224 “Personal identification, electronic signature and cards and their related systems and operations”, the secretariat of which is held by AFNOR. This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by September 2013, and conflicting national standards shall be withdrawn at the latest by September 2013. Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. CEN [and/or CENELEC] shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. EN 419251 contains the following parts: EN 419251-1, Security requirements for device for authentication — Part 1: Protection profile for core functionality; EN 419251-2, Security requirements for device for authentication — Part 2: Protection profile for extension for trusted channel to certificate generation application; EN 419251-3, Security requirements for device for authentication — Part 3: Additional functionality for security targets (the present document). The present document was submitted to the Enquiry under the reference prEN 16248-3. According to the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organisations of the following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom. SIST EN 419251-3:2013
EN 419251-3:2013 (E) 6 1 Scope This European Standard contains packages that define security requirements for an authentication device. This document is Part 3. Part 1 and Part 2 are Protections Profiles – PP– based on the packages defined in this document. Packages contained in this document can be added in a Security Target –ST- claiming PP of Part 1 or Part 2. 2 Normative references The following documents, in whole or in part, are normatively referenced in this document and are indispensable for its application. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies. ISO/IEC 10181-2:1996, Information technology — Open Systems Interconnection — Security frameworks for open systems: Authentication framework ISO/IEC 15408-1:20091), Information technology — Security techniques — Evaluation criteria for IT security — Part 1: Introduction and general model
ISO/IEC 15408-21), Information technology — Security techniques — Evaluation criteria for IT security — Part 2: Security functional components ISO/IEC 15408-31), Information technology — Security techniques — Evaluation criteria for IT security — Part 3: Security assurance components ISO/IEC 18045, Information technology — Security techniques — Methodology for IT security evaluation 3 Conformance 3.1 CC Conformance Claim These packages are CC Part 2 extended and CC Part 3 conformant and written according to ISO/IEC 15408-1, -2, -3 and ISO/IEC 18045. 3.2 PP Claim These packages do not claim conformance to any other Protection Profile. 3.3 Package Claim The evaluation assurance level for these packages is EAL4-augmented with the assurance components AVA_VAN.5 and ALC_DVS.2. 3.4 Conformance Rationale Since these packages do not claim conformance to any other protection profile, no rationale is necessary here.
1) ISO/IEC 15408-1, -2 and -3 respectively correspond to Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Parts 1, 2 and 3. SIST EN 419251-3:2013
EN 419251-3:2013 (E) 7 3.5 Conformance Statement The conformance required by these packages is the demonstrable-PP conformance. This would facilitate conformance claim to both the PP “Authentication device” and other PPs for Security Target (ST) authors. 4 Terms and definitions For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply. 4.1 Administrator person who is allowed administration operations on the authentication device
Note 1 to entry: See 7.2 for more details. 4.2 Authentication Protocol sensitive data data used in the process of authentication of the TOE by the external entity Note 1 to entry: These data are linked to the Authentication private key, e.g. Authentication Certificate or APuK. Note 2 to entry: Authentication Protocol sensitive data may be empty if the environment is trusted, and the holder public key known to the system. 4.3 Certificate attestation, which links the APuK to a person and confirms the identity of that person (as defined in the Directive [8], article 2, Clause 9) 4.4 Certificate Info information associated with an Authentication key pair that consists either: a signer's public key certificate; or
one or more hash values of a signer's public key certificate together the identifier of the hash function used to compute these hash values, and some information which allows the signer to disambiguate between several signers certificates 4.5 Configuration set of groups Note 1 to entry: Each configuration corresponds to one PP. It has its own rationale. See the rest of the document. 4.6 Group set Assets, threats, objectives, and Requirements, addressing a specific function Note 1 to entry: See the rest of the document. 4.7 Holder legitimate holder of the authentication device
Note 1 to entry: See 7.2 for more details. SIST EN 419251-3:2013
EN 419251-3:2013 (E) 8 4.8 Issuer user of the authentication device during personalisation Note 1 to entry: See 7.2 for more details. 4.9 Protection Profile PP implementation-independent statement of security needs for a TOE [SOURCE: ISO/IEC 15408-1:2009, Clause 4 "Terms and definitions", modified in ISO/IEC 15408-1, the protection profile refers to a TOE type instead of a TOE in this document] 4.10 PP collection document defining groups and configurations 4.11 Reference Authentication Data usually called RAD, data stored inside the TOE and used as a reference to which the VAD will be compared Note 1 to entry: This RAD can be biometrics data, a PIN, or a symmetric key. It can al
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.