Standard Test Method for Flatwise Tensile Strength of Sandwich Constructions

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
In a sandwich panel, core-to-facing bond integrity is necessary to maintain facing stability and permit load transfer between the facings and core. This test method can be used to provide information on the strength and quality of core-to-facing bonds. It can also be used to produce flatwise tensile strength data for the core material. While it is primarily used as a quality control test for bonded sandwich panels, it can also be used to produce flatwise tensile strength data for structural design properties, material specifications, and research and development applications.
Factors that influence the flatwise tensile strength and shall therefore be reported include the following: facing material, core material, adhesive material, methods of material fabrication, facing stacking sequence and overall thickness, core geometry (cell size), core density, adhesive thickness, specimen geometry, specimen preparation, specimen conditioning, environment of testing, specimen alignment, loading procedure, speed of testing, facing void content, adhesive void content, and facing volume percent reinforcement. Properties that may be derived from this test method include flatwise tensile strength.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the determination of the core flatwise tension strength, or the bond between core and facings of an assembled sandwich panel. The test consists of subjecting a sandwich construction to a tensile load normal to the plane of the sandwich, such load being transmitted to the sandwich through thick loading blocks bonded to the sandwich facings or directly to the core.  
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The inch-pound units given may be approximate.  
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
30-Apr-2004
Technical Committee
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM C297/C297M-04 - Standard Test Method for Flatwise Tensile Strength of Sandwich Constructions
English language
6 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation:C297/C297M–04
Standard Test Method for
1
Flatwise Tensile Strength of Sandwich Constructions
This standard is issued under the fixed designation C297/C297M; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year
of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.
A superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the Department of Defense.
1. Scope D2734 Test Methods for Void Content of Reinforced Plas-
tics
1.1 This test method determines the flatwise tensile strength
D3039/D3039M Test Method for Tensile Properties of
of the core, the core-to-facing bond, or the facing of an
Polymer Matrix Composite Materials
assembled sandwich panel. Permissible core material forms
D3171 Test Methods for Constituent Content of Composite
include those with continuous bonding surfaces (such as balsa
Materials
wood and foams) as well as those with discontinuous bonding
D3878 Terminology for Composite Materials
surfaces (such as honeycomb).
D5229/D5229M Test Method for Moisture Absorption
1.2 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units
Properties and Equilibrium Conditioning of Polymer Ma-
are to be regarded separately as standard. Within the text the
trix Composite Materials
inch-pound units are shown in brackets. The values stated in
E4 Practices for Force Verification of Testing Machines
each system are not exact equivalents; therefore, each system
E6 TerminologyRelatingtoMethodsofMechanicalTesting
must be used independently of the other. Combining values
E122 Practice for Calculating Sample Size to Estimate,
from the two systems may result in nonconformance with the
With Specified Precision, the Average for a Characteristic
standard.
of a Lot or Process
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the
E177 Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
ASTM Test Methods
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
E456 Terminology Relating to Quality and Statistics
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
E1309 Guide for Identification of Fiber-Reinforced
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
Polymer-Matrix Composite Materials in Databases
2. Referenced Documents E1434 Guide for Recording Mechanical Test Data of Fiber-
2
Reinforced Composite Materials in Databases
2.1 ASTM Standards:
E1471 Guide for Identification of Fibers, Fillers, and Core
C274 Terminology of Structural Sandwich Constructions
Materials in Computerized Material Property Databases
D792 Test Methods for Density and Specific Gravity (Rela-
tive Density) of Plastics by Displacement
3. Terminology
D883 Terminology Relating to Plastics
3.1 Definitions—Terminology D3878 defines terms relating
D2584 Test Method for Ignition Loss of Cured Reinforced
to high-modulus fibers and their composites. Terminology
Resins
C274 defines terms relating to structural sandwich construc-
tions. Terminology D883 defines terms relating to plastics.
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D30 on
Terminology E6 defines terms relating to mechanical testing.
Composite Materials and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D30.09 on
Terminology E456 and Practice E177 define terms relating to
Sandwich Construction.
statistics.Intheeventofaconflictbetweenterms,Terminology
Current edition approved May 1, 2004. Published May 2004. Originally
D3878 shall have precedence over the other terminologies.
approved in 1952. Last previous edition approved in 1999 as C297 – 94 (1999).
DOI: 10.1520/C0297_C0297M-04.
3.2 Symbols:
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
A = cross-sectional area of a test specimen
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
CV = coefficient of variation statistic of a sample population
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
the ASTM website. for a given property (in percent)
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
C297/C297M–04
ftu
F = ultimate flatwise tensile strength 6.2 System Alignment—Excessive bending will cause pre-
z
P = maximum force carried by test specimen before maturefailure.Everyeffortshouldbemadetoeliminateexcess
max
failure bending from the test system. Bending may occur as a result of
S = standard deviation statistic of a sample population for misaligned grips, poor specimen preparation, or poor align-
n-1
a given property ment of the bonding blocks and loading fixture. If there is any
x = test result for
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.