Standard Test Method for Fatigue of Tire Cords (Disc Fatigue Test)

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
This test method is not recommended for acceptance testing of commercial shipments in the absence of reliable information on between-laboratory precision.
If there are differences of practical significance between the reported test results for two laboratories (or more), a comparative test should be performed to determine if there is a statistical bias between them, using competent statistical assistance. As a minimum, test samples should be used that are as homogeneous as possible, that are drawn from a material from which the disparate test results were obtained, and that are randomly assigned in equal numbers to each laboratory for testing. Other fabrics with established test values may be used for this purpose. The test results from the two laboratories should be compared using a statistical test for unpaired data, at a probability level chosen prior to the testing series. If a bias is found, either its cause must be found and corrected, or future test results must be adjusted in consideration of the known bias.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the determination of fatigue of tire cords in rubber due to compression or extension, or both, using a disc fatigue tester. The fatigue is measured as a loss in strength.
1.2 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in non-conformance with the standard.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices to determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
31-Dec-2009
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM D6588/D6588M-10 - Standard Test Method for Fatigue of Tire Cords (Disc Fatigue Test)
English language
6 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview
Standard
REDLINE ASTM D6588/D6588M-10 - Standard Test Method for Fatigue of Tire Cords (Disc Fatigue Test)
English language
6 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Please contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information.
Designation:D6588/D6588M–10
Standard Test Method for
1
Fatigue of Tire Cords (Disc Fatigue Test)
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D6588/D6588M; the number immediately following the designation indicates the
year of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last
reapproval. A superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 3.1.1 For definitions of terms relating to tire cord and
fabrics, see Terminology D6477.
1.1 This test method covers the determination of fatigue of
3.1.1.1 The following terms are relevant to this standard:
tire cords in rubber due to compression or extension, or both,
cord, tire, and tire cord.
using a disc fatigue tester. The fatigue is measured as a loss in
3.1.2 For definitions of other terms related to textiles, see
strength.
Terminology D123.
1.2 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units
are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in
4. Summary of Test Method
each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each
4.1 Disc fatigue is a measure of the strength loss of a tire
system shall be used independently of the other. Combining
cord, which is subjected to repeated stresses. The stresses are
values from the two systems may result in non-conformance
accomplished by subjecting the tire cords, after being cured in
with the standard.
rubber, to repeated cycles of compression and extension.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the
4.2 The specimen of interest is the cord after it has been
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
stressed and later removed from the rubber in which it was
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
imbedded. Cord specimens are placed between strips of rubber
priatesafetyandhealthpracticestodeterminetheapplicability
compound and molded into blocks.The specimen block is then
of regulatory limitations prior to use.
mounted between two rotating discs that are positioned in such
2. Referenced Documents a way that the specimen will undergo compression or exten-
2
sion, or both, as the discs rotate. After a specified number of
2.1 ASTM Standards:
cycles, the cords are removed from the blocks and their
D76 Specification for Tensile Testing Machines for Textiles
breaking force measured on a tensile testing machine. The
D123 Terminology Relating to Textiles
fatigue, based on the unfatigued specimen strength, is ex-
D885 Test Methods for Tire Cords, Tire Cord Fabrics, and
pressed as a percent strength loss in fatigued specimens.
Industrial Filament Yarns Made from Manufactured
Organic-Base Fibers
5. Significance and Use
D1776 Practice for Conditioning and Testing Textiles
5.1 This test method is not recommended for acceptance
D6477 Terminology Relating to Tire Cord, Bead Wire,
testing of commercial shipments in the absence of reliable
Hose Reinforcing Wire, and Fabrics
information on between-laboratory precision.
3. Terminology 5.1.1 If there are differences of practical significance be-
tween the reported test results for two laboratories (or more), a
3.1 Definitions:
comparative test should be performed to determine if there is a
statistical bias between them, using competent statistical assis-
tance. As a minimum, test samples should be used that are as
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee D13 onTextiles
homogeneous as possible, that are drawn from a material from
and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D13.19 on Tire Cord and Fabrics
which the disparate test results were obtained, and that are
Current edition approved Jan. 1, 2010. Published January 2010. Originally
randomly assigned in equal numbers to each laboratory for
approved in 2000. Last previous edition approved in 2002 as D6588 – 02. DOI:
10.1520/D6588-02.
testing. Other fabrics with established test values may be used
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
for this purpose. The test results from the two laboratories
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
should be compared using a statistical test for unpaired data, at
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
the ASTM website. a probability level chosen prior to the testing series. If a bias is
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Please contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information.
D6588/D6588M–10
found, either its cause must be found and corrected, or future 6
...

This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation:D6588–02 Designation:D6588/D6588M–10
Standard Test Method for
1
Fatigue of Tire Cords (Disc Fatigue Test)
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D6588/D6588M; the number immediately following the designation indicates the
year of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last
reapproval. A superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope
1.1 This test method covers the determination of fatigue of tire cords in rubber due to compression or extension, or both, using
a disc fatigue tester. The fatigue is measured as a loss in strength.
1.2The values stated in either SI units or other units (in parentheses) are to be regarded separately as standard.The values stated
in each system are not exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other.
1.2 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each
system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the
two systems may result in non-conformance with the standard.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices to determine the applicability of regulatory
limitations prior to use.
2. Referenced Documents
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D76 Specification for Tensile Testing Machines for Textiles
D123 Terminology Relating to Textiles
D885 Test Methods for Tire Cords, Tire Cord Fabrics, and Industrial Filament Yarns Made from Manufactured Organic-Base
Fibers
D1776 Practice for Conditioning and Testing Textiles
D6477 Terminology Relating to Tire Cord, Bead Wire, Hose Reinforcing Wire, and Fabrics
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions:
3.1.1 For definitions of terms relating to tire cord and fabrics, see Terminology D6477.
3.1.1.1 The following terms are relevant to this standard: cord, tire, and tire cord.
3.1.2 For definitions of other terms related to textiles, see Terminology D123.
4. Summary of Test Method
4.1disc4.1 Disc fatigue is a measure of the strength loss of a tire cord, which is subjected to repeated stresses. The stresses are
accomplished by subjecting the tire cords, after being cured in rubber, to repeated cycles of compression and extension.
4.2 The specimen of interest is the cord after it has been stressed and later removed from the rubber in which it was imbedded.
Cord specimens are placed between strips of rubber compound and molded into blocks. The specimen block is then mounted
between two rotating discs that are positioned in such a way that the specimen will undergo compression or extension, or both,
as the discs rotate. After a specified number of cycles, the cords are removed from the blocks and their breaking force measured
on a tensile testing machine. The fatigue, based on the unfatigued specimen strength, is expressed as a percent strength loss in
fatigued specimens.
5. Significance and Use
5.1 This test method is not recommended for acceptance testing of commercial shipments in the absence of reliable information
on between-laboratory precision.
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D13 on Textiles and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D13.19 on Tire Cord and Fabrics
Current edition approved April 10, 2002. Published June 2002. Originally published as D6588–00. Last previous edition D6588–00. DOI: 10.1520/D6588-02.
Current edition approved Jan. 1, 2010. Published January 2010. Originally approved in 2000. Last previous edition approved in 2002 as D6588 – 02. DOI:
10.1520/D6588-02.
2
For referencedASTM standards, visit theASTM website, www.astm.org, or contactASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
D6588/D6588M–10
5.1.1 If there are differences of practical significance between the reported test results for two laboratories (or more), a
comparative test should be performed to determine if there is a statistical bias between them, using competent statistical assistance.
As a minimum, test samples should be used
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.