Standard Practice for Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Plastic Pipe Used for Culverts, Storm Sewers, and Other Buried Conduits

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
LCC analysis is an economic method to evaluate alternatives that are characterized by differing cash flows over the designated project design life. The method entails calculating the LCC of each alternative capable of satisfying the functional requirements of the project and comparing them to determine which have the lowest estimated LCC over the project design life.  
The LCC method is particularly suitable for determining whether the higher initial cost of an alternative is economically justified by reductions in future costs (for example, operating maintenance, rehabilitation, or replacement) when compared to an alternative with lower initial costs but higher future costs. If a design alternative has both a lower initial cost and lower future costs than other alternatives, an LCC analysis is not necessary to show the former is the economically preferable choice.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice establishes a procedure for using life cycle cost (LCC) analysis techniques to evaluate alternative drainage system designs, using plastic pipe that satisfy the same functional requirements.
1.2 The LCC technique measures the present value of all relevant costs to install, operate, and maintain alternative drainage systems such as engineering, construction, maintenance, rehabilitation, or replacement over a specified period of time. The practice also accommodates any remaining residual or salvage value.
1.3 The decision maker, using the results of the LCC analysis, can then identify the alternative(s) with the lowest estimated total cost based on the present value of all costs.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
09-Apr-2003
Technical Committee
Drafting Committee
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM F1675-03 - Standard Practice for Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Plastic Pipe Used for Culverts, Storm Sewers, and Other Buried Conduits
English language
5 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
An American National Standard
Designation:F 1675–03
Standard Practice for
Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Plastic Pipe Used for Culverts,
1
Storm Sewers, and Other Buried Conduits
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F 1675; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 3.1.1 common costs, n—costs that are common to all
alternatives in nature and amount, such as initial planning fees
1.1 This practice establishes a procedure for using life cycle
or future annual inspection costs.
cost (LCC) analysis techniques to evaluate alternative drainage
3.1.2 discount rate, n—the investor’s time value of money,
system designs, using plastic pipe that satisfy the same
expressed as a percent, used to convert costs occurring at
functional requirements.
different times, to equivalent costs at a common point in time.
1.2 The LCC technique measures the present value of all
3.1.3 drainage project, n—a project having a definable,
relevant costs to install, operate, and maintain alternative
functional drainage requirement that can be satisfied by two or
drainage systems such as engineering, construction, mainte-
more design or construction alternatives, or both.
nance, rehabilitation, or replacement over a specified period of
3.1.4 future costs, n—costs required to keep the system
time. The practice also accommodates any remaining residual
operating that are incurred after the project is placed in service,
or salvage value.
such as operation, maintenance, rehabilitation, or replacement
1.3 The decision maker, using the results of the LCC
costs.
analysis, can then identify the alternative(s) with the lowest
3.1.5 inflation, n—the general trend or rising prices that,
estimated total cost based on the present value of all costs.
over time, result in the reduction of the purchasing power of
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the
the dollar from year to year.
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
3.1.6 initial cost, n—the total of all costs; such as design
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
costs, material purchase costs, and construction/installation
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
costs, that are specific to each alternative and are incurred to
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
bring each alternative to a point of functional readiness.
2. Referenced Documents 3.1.7 maintenance cost, n—the annual or periodic costs,
such as inspection and cleaning to keep a drainage structure
2.1 ASTM Standards:
functioning for the project design life, but do not extend the
E 917 Practice for Measuring Life Cycle Costs of Building
2
material service life.
and Building Systems
3.1.8 material service life, n—the number of years of
2.2 Other Standards:
service a particular material, system, or structure will provide
TM-5-802-1 Ecomomic Studies for Military Construction
3
before rehabilitation or replacement is necessary.
Design Applications (12/86)
3.1.9 project design life, n—the planning horizon for the
Circular No. A-94 Guidelines and Discount Rates for
4
project,expressedasthenumberofyearsofusefulliferequired
Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs
of the drainage structure.
ASTM Adjuncts:
5
3.1.10 rehabilitation cost, n—the total of all costs incurred
E 917 Discount Factor Tables
to extend the material service life of a specific alternative.
3. Terminology
3.1.11 replacement cost, n—the total of all costs incurred to
replace a material before the end of the project design life.
3.1 Definitions:
3.1.12 terminal value, n—the remaining value of the drain-
age structure in place at the end of the project design life.
1
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F17 on Plastic
Piping Systems and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee F17.62 on Sewer.
4. Summary of Practice
Current edition approved April 10, 2003. Published May 2003.Originally
4.1 This practice outlines a procedure for conducting an
approved in 1996. Last previous edition approved in 1996 as F1675–96.
2
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 04.07.
LCC analysis of two or more drainage pipe alternatives using
3
Available from Headquarters, Department of the Army, Washington, DC.
plastic pipe over a specified project design life. This practice
4
Available from Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC.
5
Available from ASTM Headquarters. Order PCN 12-509179-10.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1

---------------------- Page: 1 --------------------
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.