Standard Practice for Strain-Controlled Axial-Torsional Fatigue Testing with Thin-Walled Tubular Specimens

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Multiaxial forces often tend to introduce deformation and damage mechanisms that are unique and quite different from those induced under a simple uniaxial loading condition. Since most engineering components are subjected to cyclic multiaxial forces it is necessary to characterize the deformation and fatigue behaviors of materials in this mode. Such a characterization enables reliable prediction of the fatigue lives of many engineering components. Axial-torsional loading is one of several possible types of multiaxial force systems and is essentially a biaxial type of loading. Thin-walled tubular specimens subjected to axial-torsional loading can be used to explore behavior of materials in two of the four quadrants in principal stress or strain spaces. Axial-torsional loading is more convenient than in-plane biaxial loading because the stress state in the thin-walled tubular specimens is constant over the entire test section and is well-known. This practice is useful for generating fatigue life and cyclic deformation data on homogeneous materials under axial, torsional, and combined in- and out-of-phase axial-torsional loading conditions.
SCOPE
1.1 The standard deals with strain-controlled, axial, torsional, and combined in- and out-of-phase axial torsional fatigue testing with thin-walled, circular cross-section, tubular specimens at isothermal, ambient and elevated temperatures. This standard is limited to symmetric, completely-reversed strains (zero mean strains) and axial and torsional waveforms with the same frequency in combined axial-torsional fatigue testing. This standard is also limited to characterization of homogeneous materials with thin-walled tubular specimens and does not cover testing of either large-scale components or structural elements.  
1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.3 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
31-May-2021
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM E2207-15(2021) - Standard Practice for Strain-Controlled Axial-Torsional Fatigue Testing with Thin-Walled Tubular Specimens
English language
9 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: E2207 − 15 (Reapproved 2021)
Standard Practice for
Strain-Controlled Axial-Torsional Fatigue Testing with Thin-
Walled Tubular Specimens
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E2207; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope rials at Room Temperature
E83 Practice for Verification and Classification of Exten-
1.1 The standard deals with strain-controlled, axial,
someter Systems
torsional, and combined in- and out-of-phase axial torsional
E111 Test Method for Young’s Modulus, Tangent Modulus,
fatigue testing with thin-walled, circular cross-section, tubular
and Chord Modulus
specimens at isothermal, ambient and elevated temperatures.
E112 Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size
This standard is limited to symmetric, completely-reversed
E143 Test Method for Shear Modulus at Room Temperature
strains (zero mean strains) and axial and torsional waveforms
E209 PracticeforCompressionTestsofMetallicMaterialsat
with the same frequency in combined axial-torsional fatigue
Elevated Temperatures with Conventional or Rapid Heat-
testing. This standard is also limited to characterization of
ing Rates and Strain Rates
homogeneous materials with thin-walled tubular specimens
E467 Practice for Verification of Constant Amplitude Dy-
and does not cover testing of either large-scale components or
namic Forces in an Axial Fatigue Testing System
structural elements.
E606/E606M Test Method for Strain-Controlled Fatigue
1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the
Testing
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
E1012 Practice for Verification of Testing Frame and Speci-
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
men Alignment Under Tensile and Compressive Axial
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
Force Application
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
E1417/E1417M Practice for Liquid Penetrant Testing
1.3 This international standard was developed in accor-
E1444/E1444M Practice for Magnetic Particle Testing
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
E1823 TerminologyRelatingtoFatigueandFractureTesting
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
E2624 Practice for Torque Calibration of Testing Machines
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
3. Terminology
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
3.1 Definitions—The terms specific to this practice are
defined in this section.All other terms used in this practice are
2. Referenced Documents
in accordance with Terminologies E6 and E1823.
2.1 ASTM Standards:
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
E3 Guide for Preparation of Metallographic Specimens
3.2.1 axial strain—refers to engineering axial strain, ε, and
E4 Practices for Force Verification of Testing Machines
is defined as change in length divided by the original length
E6 Terminology Relating to Methods of Mechanical Testing
(∆L /L ).
E8/E8M Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Ma- g g
terials
3.2.2 shear strain—refers to engineering shear strain, γ,
E9 Test Methods of Compression Testing of Metallic Mate- resulting from the application of a torsional moment to a
cylindrical specimen. Such a torsional shear strain is simple
shear and is defined similar to axial strain with the exception
This practice is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee E08 on Fatigue and
that the shearing displacement, ∆L is perpendicular to rather
s
Fracture and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E08.05 on Cyclic
thanparalleltothegagelength, L ,thatis,γ=∆L/L (seeFig.
g s g
Deformation and Fatigue Crack Formation.
1).
Current edition approved June 1, 2021. Published June 2021. Originally
3.2.2.1 Discussion—γ= is related to the angles of twist, θ
approved in 2002. Last previous edition approved in 2015 as E2207–15. DOI:
10.1520/E2207-15R21.
and Ψ as follows:
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
γ = tan Ψ, where Ψ is the angle of twist along the gage
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
length of the cylindrical specimen. For small angles ex-
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
the ASTM website. pressed in radians, tan Ψ approaches Ψ and γ approaches Ψ.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E2207 − 15 (2021)
FIG. 1 Twisted Gage Section of a Cylindrical Specimen Due to a Torsional Moment
γ=(d/2)θ/L , where θ expressed in radians is the angle of 3.2.4 phasing between axial and shear strains—in an axial-
g
twist between the planes defining the gage length of the torsional fatigue test, phasing is defined as the phase angle, φ,
cylindrical specimen and d is the diameter of the cylindrical between the axial strain waveform and the shear strain wave-
specimen.
form. The two waveforms must be of the same type, for
3.2.2.2 Discussion—∆L is measurable directly as displace-
example, both must either be triangular or both must be
s
ment using specially calibrated torsional extensometers or as
sinusoidal.
the arc length ∆L =(d/2)θ, where θ is measured directly with
s
3.2.4.1 in-phase axial-torsional fatigue test—for
a rotary variable differential transformer.
completely-reversed axial and shear strain waveforms, if the
3.2.2.3 Discussion—The shear strain varies linearly through
maximum value of the axial strain waveform occurs at the
the thin wall of the specimen, with the smallest and largest
same time as that of the shear strain waveform, then the phase
values occurring at the inner and outer diameters of the
angle, φ = 0° and the test is defined as an “in-phase”
specimen, respectively. The value of shear strain on the outer
axial-torsional fatigue test (Fig. 2(a)).At every instant in time,
surface,innersurface,andmeandiameterofthespecimenshall
the shear strain is proportional to the axial strain.
be reported. The shear strain determined at the outer diameter
of the tubular specimen is recommended for strain-controlled
NOTE 1—Proportional loading is the commonly used terminology in
torsional tests, since cracks typically initiate at the outer
plasticity literature for the in-phase axial-torsional loading described in
this practice.
surfaces.
3.2.3 biaxial strain amplitude ratio—in an axial-torsional 3.2.4.2 out-of-phase axial-torsional fatigue test—for
completely-reversed axial and shear strain waveforms, if the
fatigue test, the biaxial strain amplitude ratio, λ is defined as
the ratio of the shear strain amplitude (γ ) to the axial strain maximum value of the axial strain waveform leads or lags the
a
maximum value of the shear strain waveform by a phase angle
amplitude (ε ), that is, γ /ε .
a a a
FIG. 2 Schematics of Axial and Shear Strain Waveforms for In- and Out-of-Phase Axial-Torsional Tests
E2207 − 15 (2021)
φ≠ 0° then the test is defined as an “out-of-phase” axial- (see Ref (1)).
torsional fatigue test. Unlike in the in-phase loading, the shear Under elastic loading conditions, shear stress, τ(d)ata
diameter, d in the gage section of the tubular specimen can
strain is not proportional to the axial strain at every instant in
time. An example of out-of-phase axial-torsional fatigue test be calculated as follows:
with φ = 75° is shown in Fig. 2(b). Typically, for an
16Td
τ~d! 5 (2)
4 4
out-of-phase axial-torsional fatigue test, the range of φ (≠ 0°)
~π~d 2 d !!
o i
is from -90° (axial waveform lagging the shear waveform) to +
In order to establish the cyclic shear stress-strain curve for
90° (axial waveform leading the shear waveform).
a material, both the shear strain and shear stress shall be
NOTE 2—In plasticity literature, nonproportional loading is the generic
determined at the same location within the thin wall of the
terminology for the out-of-phase loading described in this practice.
tubular test specimen.
3.2.5 shear stress—refers to engineering shear stress, τ,
4. Significance and Use
acting in the orthogonal tangential and axial directions of the
gage section and is a result of the applied torsional moment,
4.1 Multiaxial forces often tend to introduce deformation
(Torque) T, to the thin-walled tubular specimen. The shear
and damage mechanisms that are unique and quite different
stress, like the shear strain, is always the greatest at the outer
from those induced under a simple uniaxial loading condition.
diameter. Under elastic loading conditions, shear stress also
Since most engineering components are subjected to cyclic
varies linearly through the thin wall of the tubular specimen.
multiaxialforcesitisnecessarytocharacterizethedeformation
However, under elasto-plastic loading conditions, shear stress and fatigue behaviors of materials in this mode. Such a
tends to vary in a nonlinear fashion. Most strain-controlled
characterization enables reliable prediction of the fatigue lives
axial-torsional fatigue tests are conducted under elasto-plastic of many engineering components. Axial-torsional loading is
loading conditions. Therefore, assumption of a uniformly one of several possible types of multiaxial force systems and is
distributed shear stress is recommended. The relationship essentially a biaxial type of loading. Thin-walled tubular
specimens subjected to axial-torsional loading can be used to
between such a shear stress applied at the mean diameter of the
gage section and the torsional moment, T,is explore behavior of materials in two of the four quadrants in
principalstressorstrainspaces.Axial-torsionalloadingismore
16T
τ 5 (1)
convenient than in-plane biaxial loading because the stress
2 2
π d 2 d d 1d
~ ~ !~ !!
o i o i
state in the thin-walled tubular specimens is constant over the
Where, τ is the shear stress, d and d are the outer and
o i
inner diameters of the tubular test specimen, respectively.
However, if necessary, shear stresses in specimens not meet- 3
The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to the list of references at the end of
ing the criteria for thin-walled tubes can also be evaluated this standard.
FIG. 2 Schematics of Axial and Shear Strain Waveforms for In- and Out-of-Phase Axial-Torsional Tests (continued)
E2207 − 15 (2021)
entiretestsectionandiswell-known.Thispracticeisusefulfor 6.3 Force and Torque Transducers—Axial force and torque
generating fatigue life and cyclic deformation data on homo- must be measured with either separate transducers or a
geneous materials under axial, torsional, and combined in- and combined transducer. The transducer(s) must be placed in
out-of-phase axial-torsional loading conditions. series with the force train and must comply with the specifi-
cations in Practices E4, E467 and E2624. The cross-talk
5. Empirical Relationships between the axial force and the torque shall not exceed 1 % of
full scale reading, whether a single transducer or multiple
5.1 Axial and Shear Cyclic Stress-Strain Curves—Under
transducers are used for these measurements. Specifically,
elasto-plastic loading conditions, axial and shear strains are
application of the rated axial force (alone) shall not produce a
composed of both elastic and plastic components. The math-
torque output greater than 1 % of the rated torque and
ematical functions commonly used to characterize the cyclic
application of the rated torque (alone) shall not produce an
axial and shear stress-strain curves are shown in Appendix X1.
axial force output greater than 1 % of the rated axial force. In
Note that constants in these empirical relationships are depen-
other words, the cross-talk between the axial force and the
dent on the phasing between the axial and shear strain
torque shall not exceed 1 %, whether a single transducer or
waveforms.
multiple transducers are used for these measurements.
NOTE 3—For combined axial-torsional loading conditions, analysis and
interpretation of cyclic deformation behavior can be performed by using
6.4 Extensometers—Axial deformation in the gage section
the techniques described in Ref (2).
of the tubular specimen shall be measured with an extensom-
5.2 Axial and Shear Strain Range-Fatigue Life
eter such as, a strain-gaged extensometer, a Linear Variable
Relationships—The total axial and shear strain ranges can be
Differential Transformer (LVDT), or a non-contacting (optical
separated into their elastic and plastic parts by using the
or capacitance type) extensometer. Procedures for verification
respective stress ranges and elastic moduli. The fatigue life
and classification of extensometers are available in Practice
relationships to characterize cyclic lives under axial (no
E83. Twist in the gage section of the tubular specimen shall be
torsion) and torsional (no axial loading) conditions are also
measured with a troptometer such as, a strain-gaged external
shown in Appendix X1. These axial and torsional fatigue life
extensometer, internal Rotary Variable Differential Trans-
relationships can be used either separately or together to
former (RVDT), or a non-contacting (optical or capacitance
estimate fatigue life under combined axial-torsional loading
type) troptometer (Refs (6, 7)). Strain-gaged axial-torsional
conditions.
extensometers that measure both the axial deformation and
NOTE 4—Details on some fatigue life estimation procedures under
twist in the gage section of the specimen may also be used
combined in- and out-of-phase axial-torsional loading conditions are
provided the cross-talk is less than 1 % of full scale reading
given in Refs (3-5). Currently, no single life prediction method has been
(Ref (8)). Specifically, application of the rated extensometer
showntobeeithereffectiveorsuperiortoothermethodsforestimatingthe
fatigue lives of materials under combined axial-torsional loading condi-
axial strain (alone) shall not produce a torsional output greater
tions.
than 1 % the rated total torsional strain and application of the
rated extensometer torsional strain (alone) shall not produce an
6. Test Apparatus
axial output greater than 1 % of the rated total axial strain. In
6.1 Testing Machine—Alltestsshouldbeperformedinatest other words, the cross-talk between the axial displacement and
the torsional twist shall
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.