ASTM D6708-05
(Practice)Standard Practice for Statistical Assessment and Improvement of the Expected Agreement Between Two Test Methods that Purport to Measure the Same Property of a Material
Standard Practice for Statistical Assessment and Improvement of the Expected Agreement Between Two Test Methods that Purport to Measure the Same Property of a Material
SCOPE
1.1 This practice covers statistical methodology for assessing the expected agreement between two standard test methods that purport to measure the same property of a material, and deciding if a simple linear bias correction can further improve the expected agreement. It is intended for use with results collected from an interlaboratory study meeting the requirement of Practice D 6300 or equivalent (for example, ISO 4259). The interlaboratory study must be conducted on at least ten materials that span the intersecting scopes of the test methods, and results must be obtained from at least six laboratories using each method.Note 1
Examples of standard test methods are those developed by voluntary consensus standards bodies such as ASTM, IP/BSI, DIN, AFNOR, CGSB.
1.2 The statistical methodology is based on the premise that a bias correction will not be needed. In the absence of strong statistical evidence that a bias correction would result in better agreement between the two methods, a bias correction is not made. If a bias correction is required, then the parsimony principle is followed whereby a simple correction is to be favored over a more complex one.Note 2
Failure to adhere to the parsimony principle generally results in models that are over-fitted and do not perform well in practice.
1.3 The bias corrections of this practice are limited to a constant correction, proportional correction or a linear (proportional + constant) correction.
1.4 The bias-correction methods of this practice are method symmetric, in the sense that equivalent corrections are obtained regardless of which method is bias-corrected to match the other.
1.5 A methodology is presented for establishing the 95 % confidence limit (designated by this practice as the cross-method reproducibility) for the difference between two results where each result is obtained by a different operator using different apparatus and each applying one of the two methods X and Y on identical material, where one of the methods has been appropriately bias-corrected in accordance with this practice.Note 3
Users are cautioned against applying the cross-method reproducibility as calculated from this practice to materials that are significantly different in composition from those actually studied, as the ability of this practice to detect and address sample-specific biases (see ) is dependent on the materials selected for the interlaboratory study. When sample-specific biases are present, the types and ranges of samples may need to be expanded significantly from the minimum of ten as specified in this practice in order to obtain a more comprehensive and reliable 95 % confidence limits for cross method reproducibility that adequately cover the range of sample specific biases for different types of materials.
1.6 This practice is intended for test methods which measure quantitative (numerical) properties of petroleum or petroleum products.
1.7 Software program CompTM Version 1.0.21 (ADJ6708) performs the necessary computations prescribed by this practice.
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
An American National Standard
Designation: D 6708 – 05
Standard Practice for
Statistical Assessment and Improvement of the Expected
Agreement Between Two Test Methods that Purport to
1
Measure the Same Property of a Material
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D6708; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.A
superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope different apparatus and each applying one of the two methods
X and Y on identical material, where one of the methods has
1.1 This practice covers statistical methodology for assess-
been appropriately bias-corrected in accordance with this
ingtheexpectedagreementbetweentwostandardtestmethods
practice.
that purport to measure the same property of a material, and
deciding if a simple linear bias correction can further improve
NOTE 3—Users are cautioned against applying the cross-method repro-
the expected agreement. It is intended for use with results
ducibilityascalculatedfromthispracticetomaterialsthataresignificantly
different in composition from those actually studied, as the ability of this
collected from an interlaboratory study meeting the require-
practicetodetectandaddresssample-specificbiases(see6.8)isdependent
ment of Practice D 6300 or equivalent (for example,
on the materials selected for the interlaboratory study. When sample-
ISO4259). The interlaboratory study must be conducted on at
specific biases are present, the types and ranges of samples may need to
least ten materials that span the intersecting scopes of the test
be expanded significantly from the minimum of ten as specified in this
methods, and results must be obtained from at least six
practice in order to obtain a more comprehensive and reliable 95%
laboratories using each method.
confidence limits for cross method reproducibility that adequately cover
the range of sample specific biases for different types of materials.
NOTE 1—Examples of standard test methods are those developed by
voluntary consensus standards bodies such as ASTM, IP/BSI, DIN, 1.6 This practice is intended for test methods which mea-
AFNOR, CGSB.
sure quantitative (numerical) properties of petroleum or petro-
leum products.
1.2 Thestatisticalmethodologyisbasedonthepremisethat
1.7 Software program CompTM Version 1.0.21 (ADJ6708)
a bias correction will not be needed. In the absence of strong
performs the necessary computations prescribed by this prac-
statistical evidence that a bias correction would result in better
tice.
agreement between the two methods, a bias correction is not
made. If a bias correction is required, then the parsimony
2. Referenced Documents
principle is followed whereby a simple correction is to be
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
favored over a more complex one.
D5580 Test Method for Determination of Benzene, Tolu-
NOTE 2—Failure to adhere to the parsimony principle generally results
ene, Ethylbenzene, p/m-Xylene, o-Xylene, C and Heavier
9
in models that are over-fitted and do not perform well in practice.
Aromatics, and Total Aromatics in Finished Gasoline by
1.3 The bias corrections of this practice are limited to a
Gas Chromatography
constantcorrection,proportionalcorrectionoralinear(propor-
D5769 Test Method for Determination of Benzene, Tolu-
tional + constant) correction.
ene, and Total Aromatics in Finished Gasolines by Gas
1.4 The bias-correction methods of this practice are method
Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
symmetric,inthesensethatequivalentcorrectionsareobtained
D6299 Practice forApplying Statistical QualityAssurance
regardless of which method is bias-corrected to match the
Techniques to Evaluate Analytical Measurement System
other.
Performance
1.5 A methodology is presented for establishing the 95%
D6300 Practice for Determination of Precision and Bias
confidence limit (designated by this practice as the cross-
Data for Use in Test Methods for Petroleum Products and
method reproducibility) for the difference between two results
Lubricants
where each result is obtained by a different operator using
1
This practice is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee D02 on Petroleum
2
ProductsandLubricantsandisthedirectresponsibilityofSubcommitteeD02.94on For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Quality Assurance and Statistics. contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Current edition approved Nov. 1, 2005. Published February 2006. Originally Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
approved in 2001. Last previous edition approved in 2004 as D6708–04. the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbo
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.