ASTM D8298/D8298M-20
(Test Method)Standard Test Method for Determination of Erosion Control Products (ECP) Performance in Protecting Slopes from Continuous Rainfall-Induced Erosion Using a Tilted Bed Slope
Standard Test Method for Determination of Erosion Control Products (ECP) Performance in Protecting Slopes from Continuous Rainfall-Induced Erosion Using a Tilted Bed Slope
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This test method utilizes large-scale testing equipment and procedures established at a variety of testing laboratories over the last 30 years.
5.2 This method is useful in evaluating ECPs and their installation to reduce soil loss and sediment concentrations when exposed to defined rainfall conditions and improving water quality exiting the area disturbed by earthwork activity by reducing suspended solids and turbidity.
5.3 This test method is a performance test, but can also be used for acceptance testing to determine product conformance to project specifications. For project-specific conformance, unique project-specific conditions should be considered. Caution is advised since information regarding laboratory specific precision is incomplete at this time, and differences in soil and other environmental and geotechnical conditions may affect ECP performance.
5.4 This standard can also be used as a comparative tool for evaluating the erosion control characteristics of different ECPs and can also be used to gain agency approvals.
Note 1: The quality of the result produced by this standard is dependent on the competence of the personnel performing it, and the suitability of the equipment and facilities used. Agencies that meet the criteria of Practice D3740 are generally considered capable of competent and objective testing/sampling/inspection/etc. Users of this standard are cautioned that compliance with Practice D3740 does not in itself assure reliable results. Reliable results depend on many factors; Practice D3740 provides a means of evaluating some of those factors.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method is used to evaluate the ability of erosion control products (ECP) to protect slopes from rainfall-induced erosion using an adjustable tilting bed slope. The standard slopes range from 2.5:1 to 4:1 (H:V) having target rainfall intensities between 4.0 and 5.0 in./h [100 and 125 mm/h].
1.2 There are three main elements the ECPs must have the ability to perform: 1. Absorb the impact force of raindrops, thereby reducing soil particle loosening and detachment through “splash” mechanisms; 2. Slow runoff and encourage infiltration, thereby reducing soil particle displacement and transport through “overland flow” mechanisms; and 3. Trap soil particles beneath the ECP. When comparing data from different ECPs under consideration, it is important to keep the test conditions the same for the ECPs being evaluated, for example, the rainfall intensity rate and the slope.
1.3 The results of this test method can be used to evaluate performance and acceptability, and can be used to compare the effectiveness of different ECPs. This method provides a comparative evaluation of an ECP to baseline bare soil conditions under controlled and documented conditions. This test method can provide information about a product that is under consideration for a specific application where no performance information currently exists.
1.4 This test method covers the use of three different soil types, ECP installation: sprayed, rolled, or dry applied, and a runoff collection procedure. This test is typically performed indoors, but may be performed outside as long as certain requirements are met. Partially enclosed facilities are acceptable providing the environmental conditions are met.
1.5 Units—The values stated in either inch-pound units or SI units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in nonconformance with the standard. Reporting of test results in units other than inch-pound shall not be regarded as nonconformance with this standard.
1.5.1 The gravitational system of inch-pound units is used when dealing with inch-pound units. In the system, the pound (lbf) represents a unit of force (weight), while the units for mass is s...
General Information
Relations
Buy Standard
Standards Content (Sample)
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: D8298/D8298M − 20
Standard Test Method for
Determination of Erosion Control Products (ECP)
Performance in Protecting Slopes from Continuous Rainfall-
1
Induced Erosion Using a Tilted Bed Slope
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D8298/D8298M; the number immediately following the designation indicates the
year of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last
reapproval. A superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope each system shall be used independently of the other. Combin-
ingvaluesfromthetwosystemsmayresultinnonconformance
1.1 This test method is used to evaluate the ability of
with the standard. Reporting of test results in units other than
erosion control products (ECP) to protect slopes from rainfall-
inch-pound shall not be regarded as nonconformance with this
induced erosion using an adjustable tilting bed slope. The
standard.
standard slopes range from 2.5:1 to 4:1 (H:V) having target
1.5.1 The gravitational system of inch-pound units is used
rainfall intensities between 4.0 and 5.0 in./h [100 and 125
when dealing with inch-pound units. In the system, the pound
mm/h].
(lbf) represents a unit of force (weight), while the units for
1.2 There are three main elements the ECPs must have the
mass is slugs. The slug unit is not given, unless dynamic (F =
ability to perform: 1. Absorb the impact force of raindrops,
ma) calculations are involved.
thereby reducing soil particle loosening and detachment
1.5.2 It is common practice in the engineering/construction
through “splash” mechanisms; 2. Slow runoff and encourage
profession to concurrently use pounds to represent both a unit
infiltration, thereby reducing soil particle displacement and
of mass (lbm) and of force (lbf). This practice implicitly
transport through “overland flow” mechanisms; and 3. Trap
combines two separate systems of units; the absolute and the
soil particles beneath the ECP. When comparing data from
gravitational systems. It is scientifically undesirable to com-
different ECPs under consideration, it is important to keep the
bine the use of two separate sets of inch-pound units within a
test conditions the same for the ECPs being evaluated, for
single standard. As stated, this standard includes the gravita-
example, the rainfall intensity rate and the slope.
tional system of inch-pound units and does not use/present the
1.3 The results of this test method can be used to evaluate
slug unit of mass. However, the use of balances and scales
performance and acceptability, and can be used to compare the
3
recordingpoundsofmass(lbm)orrecordingdensityinlbm/ft
effectiveness of different ECPs. This method provides a com-
shall not be regarded as nonconformance with this standard.
parative evaluation of an ECP to baseline bare soil conditions
1.5.3 Calculations are done using only one set of units;
under controlled and documented conditions. This test method
either gravitational inch-pound or SI. Other units are permis-
can provide information about a product that is under consid-
sible provided appropriate conversion factors are used to
eration for a specific application where no performance infor-
maintain consistency of units throughout the calculations, and
mation currently exists.
similar significant digits or resolution, or both are maintained.
1.4 This test method covers the use of three different soil
1.6 All observed and calculated values shall conform to the
types, ECP installation: sprayed, rolled, or dry applied, and a
guidelines for significant digits and rounding established in
runoff collection procedure. This test is typically performed
Practice D6026, unless superseded by this test method.
indoors, but may be performed outside as long as certain
requirements are met. Partially enclosed facilities are accept-
1.6.1 Theproceduresusedtospecifyhowdataarecollected/
able providing the environmental conditions are met.
recorded and calculated in the standard are regarded as the
industry standard. In addition, they are representative of the
1.5 Units—The values stated in either inch-pound units or
significant digits that generally should be retained. The proce-
SI units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values
dures used do not consider material variation, purpose for
stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore,
obtaining the data, special purpose studies, or any consider-
ations for the user’s objectives; and it is common practice to
1
ThistestmethodisunderthejurisdictionofASTMCommitteeD18onSoiland
increase or reduce significant digits of
...
NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: D8298/D8298M − 20
Standard Test Method for
Determination of Erosion Control Products (ECP)
Performance in Protecting Slopes from Continuous Rainfall-
1
Induced Erosion Using a Tilted Bed Slope
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D8298/D8298M; the number immediately following the designation indicates the
year of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last
reapproval. A superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope each system shall be used independently of the other. Combin-
ing values from the two systems may result in nonconformance
1.1 This test method is used to evaluate the ability of
with the standard. Reporting of test results in units other than
erosion control products (ECP) to protect slopes from rainfall-
inch-pound shall not be regarded as nonconformance with this
induced erosion using an adjustable tilting bed slope. The
standard.
standard slopes range from 2.5:1 to 4:1 (H:V) having target
1.5.1 The gravitational system of inch-pound units is used
rainfall intensities between 4.0 and 5.0 in./h [100 and 125
when dealing with inch-pound units. In the system, the pound
mm/h].
(lbf) represents a unit of force (weight), while the units for
1.2 There are three main elements the ECPs must have the
mass is slugs. The slug unit is not given, unless dynamic (F =
ability to perform: 1. Absorb the impact force of raindrops,
ma) calculations are involved.
thereby reducing soil particle loosening and detachment
1.5.2 It is common practice in the engineering/construction
through “splash” mechanisms; 2. Slow runoff and encourage
profession to concurrently use pounds to represent both a unit
infiltration, thereby reducing soil particle displacement and
of mass (lbm) and of force (lbf). This practice implicitly
transport through “overland flow” mechanisms; and 3. Trap
combines two separate systems of units; the absolute and the
soil particles beneath the ECP. When comparing data from
gravitational systems. It is scientifically undesirable to com-
different ECPs under consideration, it is important to keep the
bine the use of two separate sets of inch-pound units within a
test conditions the same for the ECPs being evaluated, for
single standard. As stated, this standard includes the gravita-
example, the rainfall intensity rate and the slope.
tional system of inch-pound units and does not use/present the
1.3 The results of this test method can be used to evaluate
slug unit of mass. However, the use of balances and scales
performance and acceptability, and can be used to compare the
3
recording pounds of mass (lbm) or recording density in lbm/ft
effectiveness of different ECPs. This method provides a com-
shall not be regarded as nonconformance with this standard.
parative evaluation of an ECP to baseline bare soil conditions
1.5.3 Calculations are done using only one set of units;
under controlled and documented conditions. This test method
either gravitational inch-pound or SI. Other units are permis-
can provide information about a product that is under consid-
sible provided appropriate conversion factors are used to
eration for a specific application where no performance infor-
maintain consistency of units throughout the calculations, and
mation currently exists.
similar significant digits or resolution, or both are maintained.
1.4 This test method covers the use of three different soil
1.6 All observed and calculated values shall conform to the
types, ECP installation: sprayed, rolled, or dry applied, and a
guidelines for significant digits and rounding established in
runoff collection procedure. This test is typically performed
Practice D6026, unless superseded by this test method.
indoors, but may be performed outside as long as certain
requirements are met. Partially enclosed facilities are accept-
1.6.1 The procedures used to specify how data are collected/
able providing the environmental conditions are met.
recorded and calculated in the standard are regarded as the
industry standard. In addition, they are representative of the
1.5 Units—The values stated in either inch-pound units or
significant digits that generally should be retained. The proce-
SI units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values
dures used do not consider material variation, purpose for
stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore,
obtaining the data, special purpose studies, or any consider-
ations for the user’s objectives; and it is common practice to
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D18 on Soil and
increase or reduce significant digits of reported data to be
Rock and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D18.25 on Erosion and
commensurate
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.