Standard Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Textile Fabrics (Martindale Abrasion Tester Method)

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
Acceptance Testing—this test method is not considered satisfactory for acceptance testing of commercial shipments of fabric. The between-laboratory precision of this test method is poor and, because of the nature of abrasion testing itself, technicians frequently fail to obtain results in agreement on the same type of testing instrument, both within and between laboratories. Although this test method is not recommended for acceptance testing, it is useful because it is used widely, especially outside the United States.
In case of a dispute arising from differences in reported test results when using this test method for acceptance testing of commercial shipments, the purchaser and the supplier should conduct comparative tests to determine if there is a statistical bias between their laboratories. Competent statistical assistance is recommended for the investigation of bias. As a minimum, the two parties should take a group of test specimens that are as homogeneous as possible and that are from a lot of material of the type in question. The test specimens then should be assigned randomly in equal numbers to each laboratory for testing. The average results from the two laboratories should be compared using Students t-test for unpaired data and an acceptable probability level chosen by the two parties before the testing is begun. If a bias is found, either its cause must be found and corrected or the purchaser and the supplier must agree to interpret future test results in light of the known bias.
The resistance to abrasion also is affected greatly by the conditions of the tests, such as the nature of abradant; variable action of the abradant over the area of specimen abraded, the tension on the specimen, the pressure between the specimen and abradant, and the dimensional changes in the specimen.
Abrasion tests are all subject to variation due to changes in the abradant during specific tests. The abradant must be changed accordingly at frequent intervals or check...
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the determination of the abrasion resistance of textile fabrics using the Martindale abrasion tester. Fabrics of all types may be tested by this method but difficulties may arise with fabrics with a pile depth greater than 0.08 in. (2 mm).
1.2 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
30-Sep-2010
Technical Committee
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM D4966-10 - Standard Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Textile Fabrics (Martindale Abrasion Tester Method)
English language
4 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview
Standard
REDLINE ASTM D4966-10 - Standard Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Textile Fabrics (Martindale Abrasion Tester Method)
English language
4 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: D4966 – 10
Standard Test Method for
Abrasion Resistance of Textile Fabrics (Martindale Abrasion
1
Tester Method)
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D4966; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope D4850 Terminology Relating to Fabrics and Fabric Test
Methods
1.1 This test method covers the determination of the abra-
2.2 AATCC Methods and Procedures:
sion resistance of textile fabrics using the Martindale abrasion
3
Evaluation Procedure 1 Gray Scale for Color Change
tester. Fabrics of all types may be tested by this method but
TestMethod 93 AbrasionResistanceofFabrics:Accelerator
difficulties may arise with fabrics with a pile depth greater than
3
Method
0.08 in. (2 mm).
1.2 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded
3. Terminology
as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical
3.1 For all terminology relating to D13.60, Fabric Test
conversions to SI units that are provided for information only
Methods, Specific, refer to Terminology D4850.
and are not considered standard.
3.1.1 The following terms are relevant to this standard:
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the
abrasion, abrasion cycle, Lissajous figure, rub, standard atmo-
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
sphere for preconditioning textiles, standard atmosphere for
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
testing, in textiles.
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
3.2 For all other terms related to textiles, refer to Terminol-
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
ogy D123.
NOTE 1—For other current test methods of testing the abrasion resis-
tance of textiles refer to Test Methods D3884, D3885, D3886, D4157,
4. Summary of Test Method
D4158, and AATCC Test Method 93.
4.1 Abrasion resistance is measured by subjecting the speci-
men to rubbing motion in the form of a geometric figure, that
2. Referenced Documents
is, a straight line, which becomes a gradually widening ellipse,
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
until it forms another straight line in the opposite direction and
D123 Terminology Relating to Textiles
traces the same figure again under known conditions of
D1776 Practice for Conditioning and Testing Textiles
pressure and abrasive action. Resistance to abrasion is evalu-
D3884 Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Textile
ated by various means which are described in Section 11.
Fabrics (Rotary Platform, Double-Head Method)
D3885 Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Textile
5. Significance and Use
Fabrics (Flexing and Abrasion Method)
5.1 Acceptance Testing—this test method is not considered
D3886 Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Textile
satisfactory for acceptance testing of commercial shipments of
Fabrics (Inflated Diaphragm Apparatus)
fabric. The between-laboratory precision of this test method is
D4157 Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Textile
poor and, because of the nature of abrasion testing itself,
Fabrics (Oscillatory Cylinder Method)
technicians frequently fail to obtain results in agreement on the
D4158 Guide for Abrasion Resistance of Textile Fabrics
same type of testing instrument, both within and between
(Uniform Abrasion)
laboratories.Although this test method is not recommended for
acceptance testing, it is useful because it is used widely,
especially outside the United States.
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee D13 onTextiles
5.1.1 In case of a dispute arising from differences in
and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D13.60 on Fabric Test Methods,
reported test results when using this test method for acceptance
Specific.
Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2010. Published November 2010. Originally testing of commercial shipments, the purchaser and the sup-
´1
approved in 1989. Last previous edition approved in 2007 as D4966 – 98(2007)
plier should conduct comparative tests to determine if there is
. DOI: 10.1520/D4966-10.
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
3
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on Available from the American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists,
the ASTM website. P.O. Box 12215, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
D4966 – 10
number of cycles on a specified machine, using a
...

This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
´1
Designation:D4966–98 (Reapproved 2007) Designation: D4966 – 10
Standard Test Method for
Abrasion Resistance of Textile Fabrics (Martindale Abrasion
1
Tester Method)
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D4966; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1
´ NOTE—Editorial changes were made in August 2007.
1. Scope
1.1 This test method covers the determination of the abrasion resistance of textile fabrics using the Martindale abrasion tester.
Fabrics of all types may be tested by this method but difficulties may arise with fabrics with a pile depth greater than 0.08 in. (2
mm).
1.2The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard; the values in SI units are provided as information only.
1.2 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical
conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory
limitations prior to use.
NOTE 1—For other current test methods of testing the abrasion resistance of textiles refer to Test Methods D3884, D3885, D3886, D4157, D4158, and
AATCC Test Method 93.
2. Referenced Documents
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D123 Terminology Relating to Textiles
D1776 Practice for Conditioning and Testing Textiles
D3884 Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Textile Fabrics (Rotary Platform, Double-Head Method)
D3885 Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Textile Fabrics (Flexing and Abrasion Method)
D3886 Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Textile Fabrics (Inflated Diaphragm Apparatus)
D4157 Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Textile Fabrics (Oscillatory Cylinder Method)
D4158 Guide forAbrasion Resistance of Textile Fabrics (UniformAbrasion) Guide forAbrasion Resistance of Textile Fabrics
(Uniform Abrasion)
D4850 Terminology Relating to Fabrics and Fabric Test Methods
2.2 AATCC Methods and Procedures:
3
Evaluation Procedure 1 Gray Scale for Color Change
3
Test Method 93 Abrasion Resistance of Fabrics: Accelerator Method
3. Terminology
3.1Definitions—For definitions of other textile terms used in this test method, refer to Terminology
3.1 For all terminology relating to D13.60, Fabric Test Methods, Specific, refer to Terminology D4850.
3.1.1 The following terms are relevant to this standard: abrasion, abrasion cycle, Lissajous figure, rub, standard atmosphere for
preconditioning textiles, standard atmosphere for testing, in textiles.
3.2 For all other terms related to textiles, refer to Terminology D123.
3.2Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee D13 onTextiles and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D13.60 on FabricTest Methods, Specific.
Current edition approved July 1, 2007. Published August 2007. Originally approved in 1989. Last previous edition approved in 2004 as D4966–98(2004). DOI:
10.1520/D4966-98R07E01.
´1
Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2010. Published November 2010. Originally approved in 1989. Last previous edition approved in 2007 as D4966 – 98(2007) . DOI:
10.1520/D4966-10.
2
For referencedASTM standards, visit theASTM website, www.astm.org, or contactASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
3
Available from the American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, P.O. Box 12215, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
D4966 – 10
3.2.1abrasion, n—the wearing away of any part of a material by rubbing against another surface.
3.2.2abrasion cycle, n—total number of movements required to complete a geometric shape in a Martindale abrasion tester.
3.2.3cycle, n—16 movements required for the completion of one Lissajous figure on a Martindale tester.
3.2.4lissajous figure, n—a geometric figure that starts as a straight line, then becomes a wide
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.