ASTM D2487-10
(Classification)Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System)
Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System)
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
This standard classifies soils from any geographic location into categories representing the results of prescribed laboratory tests to determine the particle-size characteristics, the liquid limit, and the plasticity index.
The assigning of a group name and symbol(s) along with the descriptive information required in Practice D2488 can be used to describe a soil to aid in the evaluation of its significant properties for engineering use.
The various groupings of this classification system have been devised to correlate in a general way with the engineering behavior of soils. This standard provides a useful first step in any field or laboratory investigation for geotechnical engineering purposes.
This standard may also be used as an aid in training personnel in the use of Practice D2488.
This standard may be used in combination with Practice D4083 when working with frozen soils.
Note 5—Notwithstanding the statements on precision and bias contained in this standard: The precision of this test method is dependent on the competence of the personnel performing it and the suitability of the equipment and facilities used. Agencies that meet the criteria of Practice D3740 are generally considered capable of competent and objective testing. Users of this test method are cautioned that compliance with Practice D3740 does not in itself assure reliable testing. Reliable testing depends on several factors; Practice D3740 provides a means for evaluating some of those factors.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice describes a system for classifying mineral and organo-mineral soils for engineering purposes based on laboratory determination of particle-size characteristics, liquid limit, and plasticity index and shall be used when precise classification is required.
Note 1—Use of this standard will result in a single classification group symbol and group name except when a soil contains 5 to 12 % fines or when the plot of the liquid limit and plasticity index values falls into the crosshatched area of the plasticity chart. In these two cases, a dual symbol is used, for example, GP-GM, CL-ML. When the laboratory test results indicate that the soil is close to another soil classification group, the borderline condition can be indicated with two symbols separated by a slash. The first symbol should be the one based on this standard, for example, CL/CH, GM/SM, SC/CL. Borderline symbols are particularly useful when the liquid limit value of clayey soils is close to 50. These soils can have expansive characteristics and the use of a borderline symbol (CL/CH, CH/CL) will alert the user of the assigned classifications of expansive potential.
1.2 The group symbol portion of this system is based on laboratory tests performed on the portion of a soil sample passing the 3-in. (75-mm) sieve (see Specification E11).
1.3 As a classification system, this standard is limited to naturally occurring soils.
Note 2—The group names and symbols used in this test method may be used as a descriptive system applied to such materials as shale, claystone, shells, crushed rock, etc. See Appendix X2.
1.4 This standard is for qualitative application only.
Note 3—When quantitative information is required for detailed designs of important structures, this test method must be supplemented by laboratory tests or other quantitative data to determine performance characteristics under expected field conditions.
1.5 This standard is the ASTM version of the Unified Soil Classification System. The basis for the classification scheme is the Airfield Classification System developed by A. Casagrande in the early 1940s. It became known as the Unified Soil Classification System when several U.S. Government Agencies adopted a modified version of the Airfield System in 1952.
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this sta...
General Information
Relations
Buy Standard
Standards Content (Sample)
NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: D2487 – 10
Standard Practice for
Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified
1
Soil Classification System)
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D2487; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the Department of Defense.
2
1. Scope* grande in the early 1940s. It became known as the Unified
Soil Classification System when several U.S. Government
1.1 This practice describes a system for classifying mineral
Agencies adopted a modified version of theAirfield System in
and organo-mineral soils for engineering purposes based on
1952.
laboratory determination of particle-size characteristics, liquid
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the
limit, and plasticity index and shall be used when precise
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
classification is required.
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
NOTE 1—Use of this standard will result in a single classification group
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
symbol and group name except when a soil contains 5 to 12 % fines or
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
when the plot of the liquid limit and plasticity index values falls into the
1.7 This practice offers a set of instructions for performing
crosshatched area of the plasticity chart. In these two cases, a dual symbol
one or more specific operations. This document cannot replace
is used, for example, GP-GM, CL-ML. When the laboratory test results
education or experience and should be used in conjunction
indicate that the soil is close to another soil classification group, the
borderline condition can be indicated with two symbols separated by a
with professional judgment. Not all aspects of this practice may
slash. The first symbol should be the one based on this standard, for
be applicable in all circumstances. This ASTM standard is not
example, CL/CH, GM/SM, SC/CL. Borderline symbols are particularly
intended to represent or replace the standard of care by which
usefulwhentheliquidlimitvalueofclayeysoilsiscloseto50.Thesesoils
the adequacy of a given professional service must be judged,
can have expansive characteristics and the use of a borderline symbol
nor should this document be applied without consideration of
(CL/CH, CH/CL) will alert the user of the assigned classifications of
a project’s many unique aspects. The word “Standard” in the
expansive potential.
title of this document means only that the document has been
1.2 The group symbol portion of this system is based on
approved through the ASTM consensus process.
laboratory tests performed on the portion of a soil sample
passing the 3-in. (75-mm) sieve (see Specification E11).
2. Referenced Documents
1.3 As a classification system, this standard is limited to
3
2.1 ASTM Standards:
naturally occurring soils.
C117 TestMethodforMaterialsFinerthan75-µm(No.200)
NOTE 2—The group names and symbols used in this test method may
Sieve in Mineral Aggregates by Washing
be used as a descriptive system applied to such materials as shale,
C136 Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse
claystone, shells, crushed rock, etc. See Appendix X2.
Aggregates
1.4 This standard is for qualitative application only. C702 Practice for Reducing Samples of Aggregate to Test-
ing Size
NOTE 3—When quantitative information is required for detailed de-
D420 Guide to Site Characterization for Engineering De-
signs of important structures, this test method must be supplemented by
sign and Construction Purposes
laboratory tests or other quantitative data to determine performance
characteristics under expected field conditions. D422 Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils
D653 Terminology Relating to Soil, Rock, and Contained
1.5 This standard is the ASTM version of the Unified Soil
Fluids
Classification System. The basis for the classification scheme
D1140 Test Methods for Amount of Material in Soils Finer
is the Airfield Classification System developed by A. Casa-
1 2
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D18 on Soil and Casagrande, A., “Classification and Identification of Soils,” Transactions,
Rock and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D18.07 on Identification and ASCE, 1948, p. 901.
3
Classification of Soils. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Current edition approved Jan. 1, 2010. Published March 2010. Originally contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
´1
approved in 1966. Last previo
...
This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
´1
Designation:D2487–06 Designation: D2487 – 10
Standard Practice for
Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified
1
Soil Classification System)
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D2487; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the Department of Defense.
1
´ NOTE—Table 1 was editorially reformatted in August 2008.
1. Scope*
1.1 This practice describes a system for classifying mineral and organo-mineral soils for engineering purposes based on
laboratory determination of particle-size characteristics, liquid limit, and plasticity index and shall be used when precise
classification is required.
NOTE 1—Use of this standard will result in a single classification group symbol and group name except when a soil contains 5 to 12 % fines or when
the plot of the liquid limit and plasticity index values falls into the crosshatched area of the plasticity chart. In these two cases, a dual symbol is used,
for example, GP-GM, CL-ML. When the laboratory test results indicate that the soil is close to another soil classification group, the borderline condition
can be indicated with two symbols separated by a slash.The first symbol should be the one based on this standard, for example, CL/CH, GM/SM, SC/CL.
Borderline symbols are particularly useful when the liquid limit value of clayey soils is close to 50. These soils can have expansive characteristics and
the use of a borderline symbol (CL/CH, CH/CL) will alert the user of the assigned classifications of expansive potential.
1.2 The group symbol portion of this system is based on laboratory tests performed on the portion of a soil sample passing the
3-in. (75-mm) sieve (see Specification E11).
1.3 As a classification system, this standard is limited to naturally occurring soils.
NOTE 2—The group names and symbols used in this test method may be used as a descriptive system applied to such materials as shale, claystone,
shells, crushed rock, etc. See Appendix X2.
1.4 This standard is for qualitative application only.
NOTE 3—When quantitative information is required for detailed designs of important structures, this test method must be supplemented by laboratory
tests or other quantitative data to determine performance characteristics under expected field conditions.
1.5 This standard is theASTM version of the Unified Soil Classification System. The basis for the classification scheme is the
2
Airfield Classification System developed by A. Casagrande in the early 1940’s.1940s. It became known as the Unified Soil
Classification System when several U.S. Government Agencies adopted a modified version of the Airfield System in 1952.
1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory
limitations prior to use.
1.7 This practice offers a set of instructions for performing one or more specific operations. This document cannot replace
education or experience and should be used in conjunction with professional judgment. Not all aspects of this practice may be
applicable in all circumstances. This ASTM standard is not intended to represent or replace the standard of care by which the
adequacy of a given professional service must be judged, nor should this document be applied without consideration of a project’s
many unique aspects. The word “Standard” in the title of this document means only that the document has been approved through
the ASTM consensus process.
1
This standardpractice is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee D18 on Soil and Rock and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D18.07 on Identification and
Classification of Soils.
Current edition approved May 1, 2006. Published June 2006. Originally approved in 1966. Last previous edition approved in 2000 as D2487–00. DOI:
10.1520/D2487-06E01.
´1
Current edition approved Jan. 1, 2010. Published March 2010. Originally approved in 1966. Last previous edition approved in 2006 as D2487 – 06 . DOI:
10.1520/D2487-10.
2
Casagrande, A., “Classification and Identification of Soils,” Transactions, ASCE, 1948, p. 901.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this st
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.