ISO/TR 12031:2000
(Main)Micrographics — Inspection of silver-gelatin microforms for evidence of deterioration
Micrographics — Inspection of silver-gelatin microforms for evidence of deterioration
This Technical Report applies to all forms of silver-gelatin microfilm, whether in roll, aperture card, jacket or microfiche format. It describes the equipment and procedures necessary to identify and monitor deterioration. This information serves to identify the extent and nature of the problem and will ultimately provide a sound basis for any remedial action that may be required.
Micrographie — Inspection des microformes en argent-gélatine pour mise en évidence de détérioration
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
.
TECHNICAL ISO/TR
REPORT 12031
First edition
2000-04-01
Micrographics — Inspection of silver-
gelatin microforms for evidence of
deterioration
Micrographie — Inspection des microformes en argent-gélatine pour mise
en évidence de détérioration
Reference number
ISO/TR 12031:2000(E)
©
ISO 2000
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
ISO/TR 12031:2000(E)
PDF disclaimer
This PDF file may contain embedded typefaces. In accordance with Adobe's licensing policy, this file may be printed or viewed but shall not
be edited unless the typefaces which are embedded are licensed to and installed on the computer performing the editing. In downloading this
file, parties accept therein the responsibility of not infringing Adobe's licensing policy. The ISO Central Secretariat accepts no liability in this
area.
Adobe is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated.
Details of the software products used to create this PDF file can be found in the General Info relative to the file; the PDF-creation parameters
were optimized for printing. Every care has been taken to ensure that the file is suitable for use by ISO member bodies. In the unlikely event
that a problem relating to it is found, please inform the Central Secretariat at the address given below.
© ISO 2000
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic
or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from either ISO at the address below or ISO's member body
in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
Case postale 56 � CH-1211 Geneva 20
Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11
Fax + 41 22 734 10 79
E-mail copyright@iso.ch
Web www.iso.ch
Printed in Switzerland
ii © ISO 2000 – All rights reserved
---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
ISO/TR 12031:2000(E)
Contents Page
Foreword.v
Introduction.vi
1 Scope .1
2 References.1
3 Terms and definitions .1
4 Inspection conditions.2
5 Equipment and supplies .2
5.1 General.2
5.2 Light box and film rewinds for 16 mm and 35 mm film.2
5.3 Eye loupe (eye glass) .2
5.4 Microscope.2
5.5 Specular light source .2
5.6 Black velvet .2
5.7 Inspection gloves.2
6 Sampling method.3
6.1 General.3
6.2 Division into survey groups .3
7 Inspection procedures .3
7.1 General.3
7.2 Procedure for all microforms .3
7.3 Checks for all microforms .3
7.4 Additional checks for roll film .4
7.5 Additional checks for jackets.4
7.6 Additional checks for aperture cards .4
8 Inspection reporting .4
8.1 Classification.4
8.2 Data collection, general .5
8.3 History and description of group or collection .5
8.4 Individual microform inspection report.6
8.5 Data analysis (optional) .6
9 Types of defects.7
9.1 General.7
9.2 Microbiological growths .7
9.3 Redox blemishes .8
9.4 Residual processing chemicals .8
© ISO 2000 – All rights reserved iii
---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
ISO/TR 12031:2000(E)
9.5 Emulsion adhesion .9
9.6 Separation of the emulsion from the film base.9
9.7 Brittleness.9
9.8 Base shrinkage .9
10 Remedial action .9
10.1 General.9
10.2 Subsequent re-inspections.10
Annex A Determination of base type .11
Annex B Factors affecting deterioration .12
B.1 General.12
B.2 Inappropriate choice of film material.12
B.3 Processing.12
B.3.1 Improper fixing.12
B.3.2 Improper washing .12
B.3.3 Insufficient drying.12
B.4 Improper climatic conditions during storage .12
Annex C Examples of types of defects.13
C.1 Microbiological growths.13
C.2 Redox blemishes .14
C.2.1 Exposed leader .15
C.2.2 Silver sheen.15
C.3 Separation of the emulsion from the film base.16
iv © ISO 2000 – All rights reserved
---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
ISO/TR 12031:2000(E)
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies (ISO
member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO technical
committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been established has
the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in
liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical
Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 3.
The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International Standards adopted
by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an International
Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote.
In exceptional circumstances, when a technical committee has collected data of a different kind from that which is
normally published as an International Standard ("state of the art", for example), it may decide by a simple majority
vote of its participating members to publish a Technical Report. A Technical Report is entirely informative in nature
and does not have to be reviewed until the data it provides are considered to be no longer valid or useful.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this Technical Report may be the subject of patent
rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
ISO/TR 12031 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 171, Document imaging applications, Subcommittee
SC 1, Quality.
© ISO 2000 – All rights reserved v
---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
ISO/TR 12031:2000(E)
Introduction
The purpose of this Technical Report is to provide a uniform method of selecting and inspecting silver-gelatin
microforms for evidence of deterioration. Improper processing, handling, and storage conditions have long been
known to promote biological attack and various other kinds of image degradation. Examination of some large
collections of microfilmed records within the last decade has revealed a number of instances of spot blemishes.
This may be influenced by the number of years and by the number of different processing conditions used. These
instances serve to focus attention on the fact that, although film may be processed and stored in the best available
conditions, the only assurance that such records are being well maintained is a systematic programme of careful
inspection. Silver-gelatin microforms which have been manufactured, exposed, developed, and stored according to
existing standards and which have a long life expectancy may not require extensive inspection.
vi © ISO 2000 – All rights reserved
---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
TECHNICAL REPORT ISO/TR 12031:2000(E)
Micrographics — Inspection of silver-gelatin microforms for
evidence of deterioration
1 Scope
This Technical Report applies to all forms of silver-gelatin microfilm, whether in roll, aperture card, jacket or
microfiche format. It describes the equipment and procedures necessary to identify and monitor deterioration. This
information serves to identify the extent and nature of the problem and will ultimately provide a sound basis for any
remedial action that may be required.
2 References
ISO 417:1993, Photography — Determination of residual thiosulfate and other related chemicals in processed
photographic materials — Methods using iodine-amylose, methylene blue and silver sulfide.
ISO 543:1990, Photography — Photographic films — Specifications for safety film.
ISO 2859-0:1995, Sampling procedures for inspection by attributes — Part 0: Introduction to ISO 2895 attribute
sampling system.
ISO 2859-1:1999, Sampling procedures for inspection by attributes — Part 1: Sampling plans indexed by
acceptable quality level (AQL) for lot-by-lot inspection.
ISO 2859-2:1985, Sampling procedures for inspection by attributes — Part 2: Sampling plans indexed by limiting
quality (LQ) for isolated inspection.
ISO 2859-3:1991, Sampling procedures for inspection by attributes — Part 3: Skip-lot sampling procedures.
ISO 5466:1996, Photography — Processed safety photographic film — Storage practices.
ISO 6196-1:1980, Micrographics — Vocabulary — Part 01: General terms.
ISO 10602:1995, Photography — Processed silver-gelatin type black-and-white films — Specifications for stability.
3 Terms and definitions
For the purpose of this Technical Report, the terms and definitions given in ISO 6196-1 and the following apply.
3.1
frilling
separation of the emulsion from the film base during initial processing
© ISO 2000 – All rights reserved 1
---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
ISO/TR 12031:2000(E)
4 Inspection conditions
The inspection room or location selected for inspection should be clean with a relatively dust-free atmosphere and
the temperature should not exceed 23 °C and relative humidity should not exceed 50 %. The work-top area should
be clean and free of objects and substances that might damage the microfilm.
Changes in temperature and/or humidity during inspection or during transportation from the film storage facility to
inspection room should be avoided.
5 Equipment and supplies
5.1 General
The inspection equipment should be such that the film cannot be damaged during the inspection process.
5.2 Light box and film rewinds for 16 mm and 35 mm film
Light boxes of this nature usually are equipped with a light source covered by translucent glass or plastic.
Fluorescent lights can be used to minimize the heat build-up of the inspection station. Tungsten or tungsten-
halogen lights can also be used.
5.3 Eye loupe (eye glass)
Two eye loupes with magnification of approximately 5� and 15� should be used. The lower magnification will
provide a wider field of view, while the higher magnification will allow much closer inspection of specific defects.
5.4 Microscope
A microscope with a magnification capability of at least 25� and 50� will be required for occasional close
examination. A fairly intense substage illuminator is essential to penetrate the high density areas of the leader and
trailer. A microscope having a surface illuminator may be helpful in evaluating surface characteristics. A camera to
take photomicrographs of the defects may be helpful to record progression of any deterioration of the microfilm.
5.5 Specular light source
Another light source other than room ambient light should be available to inspect the film surface with and without
magnification for image degradation, scratches and other defects. This light source is necessary for microfiche,
jackets, aperture cards and roll film.
5.6 Black velvet
Placing a swatch of black velvet behind the film may be of help for detecting scratches, water spots, and abrasions.
5.7 Inspection gloves
Clean, lint-free white cotton or nylon gloves should be worn to avoid marking the film with fingerprints. These
gloves should be used exclusively for this purpose. It is highly recommended that the gloves be changed regularly.
2 © ISO 2000 – All rights reserved
---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
ISO/TR 12031:2000(E)
6 Sampling method
6.1 General
It is preferable that each film be inspected. If this is not possible, a suitable sampling procedure as given in
ISO 2859 should be used to provide representative data of the total population of the group or lot sample.
6.2 Division into survey groups
The collection should be divided into groups of similar types. Examples of such similarities are groups stored under
the same conditions; similar film sizes such as 16 mm and 35 mm; similar formats and film types, i.e. jackets,
aperture cards, polyester film, and acetate film; record series type; etc. As most types of deterioration seem to be
progressive with age, some form of separation by date may be significant. In a library or archives setting, an
ongoing collection of newspaper files or a series of books or private papers microfilmed over a specific period of
time could be considered a significant lot or group.
7 Inspection procedures
7.1 General
The microfilm inspector should be thoroughly familiar with the various types of ageing defects as well as defects
normally associated with film processing (see clause 9). The inspector should also be aware that older film should
be treated carefully until it has been established that normal handling will not damage the film.
7.2 Procedure for all microforms
Both sides of the film should be examined.
Rotate film so that the light reflects off the film surface.
Examine the reverse side of the film. Some forms of deterioration can be detected with the unaided eye at this
initial stage.
Some defects are more easily seen over the light boxes, without the aid of an eye loupe, while others need to be
viewed under stronger magnification. Inspection procedures for microforms having higher reduction ratios may
require more critical evaluation.
The inspector should carefully examine the film using both transmitted and reflected light. To detect scratches
inspection should be made through film illuminated from behind and toward black velvet.
7.3 Checks for all microforms
Verify that the base is not cellulose nitrate (see annex A.)
NOTE The base of some older collections may be cellulose nitrate.
Smell the film, the carrier, and inside the container for unusual odours. Check especially for acetic odour with
triacetate base film.
Check the constitution of the film surface, especially for scratches, coverings, fungus, or coating separation.
Check to see if storage containers, such as film boxes, storage cabinets, and other containers, show any signs of
deterioration.
© ISO 2000 – All rights reserved 3
---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
ISO/TR 12031:2000(E)
7.4 Additional checks for roll film
Holding the centre of the reel between thumb and index finger, turn the reel with the free hand so that the leader
falls free. If it does not fall free, carefully determine the reason. It is not unusual for film that has not been unwound
for a long time period to stick slightly. If the leader and following coil cannot be freed without damaging the film, the
inspector should consult a film specialist.
Holding the reel in one hand, unwind sufficient leader to examine the black area in the ambient room light for
evidence of a silver sheen on the emulsion side of the film.
Place the roll of film on the rewinds with the emulsion side facing up, and slowly advance the film over the light box.
At approximately every 3 m of film, stop the film to carefully examine the images with the aid of the eye loupe or
microscope, using both transmitted and reflected light for evidence of deterioration on the emulsion side of the film.
Check roll film for possible defective splices due to improper tape or splicing procedures, and for improper material
or adhesives that may cause defects.
7.5 Additional checks for jackets
Examine the carrier in ambient room light. The channel joiners may become separated and consequently unable to
retain the images in the proper channel.
Check the channel for dust and soiling. The channel and film should not stick together; sticking would indicate
improper drying, too-moist storage conditions or films that have been stored in very close contact between film
surface and jacket materials due to very flat surfaces, etc.
Pay particular attention to the image on the extreme right edge, next to the loading slot because this image is often
more exposed to the environment air.
7.6 Additional checks for aperture cards
Examine the carrier in ambient room light. Examine the card stock for evidence of deterioration. Some of the
adhesives used in older stock may have not aged well. In addition to the image quality, the edges of the film should
be checked for possible deterioration.
8 Inspection reporting
8.1 Classification
The inspector should complete the inspection report form. Subjective judgement is required to assess the overall
condition rating of the film, using the following categories:
a) Excellent, no deterioration detectable;
b) Acceptable, minor physical damage without impairment of the information;
c) Poor, film shows deterioration such as discoloration: if the information is not impaired, the film can be stored
again. The film should, however, be checked every two years for further deterioration;
d) Bad, information has been impaired and a replacement silver duplicate should be made to prevent further loss
of information.
NOTE Other films of the same series or manufacturing date should be checked for deterioration as well.
4 © ISO 2000 – All rights reserved
---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
ISO/TR 12031:2000(E)
8.2 Data collection, general
The most desirable kind of report may differ from organization to organization, and the factors of interest may
change as the inspection programme progresses. It is recommended, however, that at least two reporting forms be
used: the first to record the basic condition and history of a defined lot or group, and the second to record the
findings of the individual microform inspection.
8.3 History and description of group or collection
The following are considered to be the desirable data requirements to identify a group or collection:
a) name of organization. This will in all likelihood be included in the form title. However, in the case of records
centres or archives, it will be necessary to include a section for the department or agency involved;
b) record series, group, or collection identification;
c) film identification, sufficient information to retrieve the film series or collection again;
d) name of inspector and date of inspection;
e) film carrier if not roll
EXAMPLE jacket and manufacturer, aperture card and manufacturer;
f) year produced
EXAMPLE 1966, 1970, etc.;
g) film type
EXAMPLE camera negative, duplicate negative, duplicate positive;
h) film base
EXAMPLE polyester, acetate;
i) film size and thickness
EXAMPLE 16 mm, 35 mm, thin, thick;
j) film usage
EXAMPLE long term, intermediate master;
k) type of reel, spool, core
EXAMPLE plastic, metal.
Optional:
a) film format
EXAMPLE roll, jackets, aperture cards;
b) processed by
EXAMPLE in-house, vendor, unknown;
© ISO 2000 – All rights reserved 5
---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------
ISO/TR 12031:2000(E)
c) film container
EXAMPLE cardboard box, plastic box, metal can, etc.;
d) environmental conditions: describe heat and humidity ranges, impurities in the environment if known (see
ISO 5466).
8.4 Individual microform inspection report
The following are the desirable data requirements for the initial inspections and any subsequent inspections of
individual units within a group or collection:
a) record series, group, or collection identification;
b) film identification, sufficient information to retrieve the film again;
c) name of inspector and date of inspection;
d) type of leader
EXAMPLE fogged, clear, or spliced;
e) type of trailer
EXAMPLE fogged, clear, or spliced;
f) resolution
EXAMPLE 5,6 line pairs;
g) number and type of splices
EXAMPLE tape, glue, heat, etc.;
h) type of restrainer used to confine the film
EXAMPLE rubber band, tape, string, plastic clip, etc.
NOTE Any or all of these restrainers may damage film.
i) type of deterioration: mould, discoloration (silvering, yellowing, bluing, and mirroring), scratches, redox
blemishes, separation of emulsion, evidence of adhesion, etc.;
j) location of deterioration: leader, image area background, character area, first channel of jacket, upper left
corner of aperture card, first ten feet, whole roll, trailer, etc.;
k) severity of deterioration (see inspection classification);
l) remarks
EXAMPLE further sampling required, duplication required, examine all other microforms dated before 1965, examine
all microfilms generated in the city of Manassas, etc.;
m) overall assessment of physical condition (include inspector's comments, if desired) — excellent, acceptable,
etc.
8.5 Data analysis (optional)
Data analysis should include the following information:
6 © ISO 2000 – All rights reserved
---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------
ISO/TR 12031:2000(E)
a) name of lot, group, or collection;
b) inspection dates, beginning to end;
c) name of inspector(s);
d) number of units in lot — rolls, cards, jackets, microfiche;
e) number of samples inspected;
f) type(s) of deterioration detected;
g) percentage of microforms in sample affected by deterioration;
h) severity of deterioration;
i) remedial action:
1) further inspection of this lot at this time only;
2) change leader/trailer only at this time;
3) recommendation for changes to storage facility or container or packaging;
4) recommendation for copying;
5) referral to professional restoration;
6) recommendation for sulphiding treatments.
If no immediate action is recommended other than a second inspection at a later specified date, hard copy prints of
the defect should be taken and preserved for further comparison.
9 Types of defects
9.1 General
The following is a description of the more common types of defects usually associated with poor storage conditions
or defects which do not become apparent until after storage. For information regarding factors which can affect
deterioration, see annex B.
9.2 Microbiological growths
When photographic films are stored for any length of time in an atmosphere having a relative humidity generally
above 50 %, there is a tendency for fungus (often called mould or mildew) to grow on either the emulsion surface or
the back of the film or on the film reel. Fungus spores are found in the surrounding air and are usually quite
harmless in a dry, cool environment. However, under conditions of warmth, about 21 °C, and a relative humidity
above 50 %, they become very active, multiplying rapidly and attacking the organic gelatin of the film.
Damage to the film usually takes the form of distortion of the emulsion, perhaps best described as an etching
action, similar to a printer's engraving process, and eventually causes chemical breakdown so that the gelatin
becomes sticky and readily soluble in water (see Figures C.1, C.2, C.3, and C.4). Water or water solutions should
not be used for removal of fungus growth because either may lead to disintegration of the image. Damage to the
emulsion is usually permanent. Most minor surface fungus can be removed by gently wiping with soft plush cotton
moistened with an approved film cleaning liquid. Refer to manufacturers' w
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.