Standard Practice for Presentation of Constant Amplitude Fatigue Test Results for Metallic Materials

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
Fatigue test results may be significantly influenced by the properties and history of the parent material, the operations performed during the preparation of the fatigue specimens, and the testing machine and test procedures used during the generation of the data. The presentation of fatigue test results should include citation of basic information on the material, specimens, and testing to increase the utility of the results and to reduce to a minimum the possibility of misinterpretation or improper application of those results.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice covers the desirable and minimum information to be communicated between the originator and the user of data derived from constant-force amplitude axial, bending, or torsion fatigue tests of metallic materials tested in air and at room temperature.
Note 1—Practice E466, although not directly referenced in the text, is considered important enough to be listed in this standard.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
30-Sep-2011
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM E468-11 - Standard Practice for Presentation of Constant Amplitude Fatigue Test Results for Metallic Materials
English language
6 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview
Standard
REDLINE ASTM E468-11 - Standard Practice for Presentation of Constant Amplitude Fatigue Test Results for Metallic Materials
English language
6 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: E468 − 11
Standard Practice for
Presentation of Constant Amplitude Fatigue Test Results for
1
Metallic Materials
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E468; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 3.2 criterion of failure—complete separation, or the pres-
ence of a crack of specified length visible at a specified
1.1 This practice covers the desirable and minimum infor-
magnification.Othercriteriamaybeusedbutshouldbeclearly
mationtobecommunicatedbetweentheoriginatorandtheuser
defined.
of data derived from constant-force amplitude axial, bending,
3.3 run-out—no failure at a specified number of loading
or torsion fatigue tests of metallic materials tested in air and at
cycles.
room temperature.
NOTE 1—Practice E466, although not directly referenced in the text, is
4. Significance and Use
considered important enough to be listed in this standard.
4.1 Fatigue test results may be significantly influenced by
2. Referenced Documents
thepropertiesandhistoryoftheparentmaterial,theoperations
2
performedduringthepreparationofthefatiguespecimens,and
2.1 ASTM Standards:
the testing machine and test procedures used during the
E6Terminology Relating to Methods of MechanicalTesting
generation of the data. The presentation of fatigue test results
E8/E8MTest Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Ma-
should include citation of basic information on the material,
terials
specimens, and testing to increase the utility of the results and
E466Practice for Conducting Force Controlled Constant
to reduce to a minimum the possibility of misinterpretation or
Amplitude Axial Fatigue Tests of Metallic Materials
improper application of those results.
E467Practice for Verification of Constant Amplitude Dy-
namic Forces in an Axial Fatigue Testing System
5. Listing of Basic Information About Fatigue Test
E1823TerminologyRelatingtoFatigueandFractureTesting
Specimen
2.2 Special Technical Publications:
STP91 A Guide for Fatigue Testing and the Statistical 5.1 Specification and Properties of Material:
3
Analysis of Fatigue Data
5.1.1 Material Prior to Fatigue Test Specimen
4
STP588 Manual on Statistical Planning and Analysis Preparation—The minimum information to be presented
should include the designation or specification (for example,
3. Terminology Definitions and Nomenclature
A441, SAE 1070, and so forth) or proprietary grade; form of
product (for example, plate, bar, casting, and so forth); heat
3.1 The terms and abbreviations used in this practice are
number; melting practice; last mechanical working and last
defined in Terminology E6 and in Terminology E1823.In
heat treatment that produced the material in the “as-received”
addition, the following nomenclature is used:
condition (for example, cold-worked and aged, annealed and
rolled, and so forth); chemical composition; and surface
1
ThispracticeisunderthejurisdictionofASTMCommitteeE08onFatigueand condition (for example, rolled and descaled, ground, and so
Fracture and is the direct responsibility of E08.05 E08.05 on Cyclic Deformation
forth).
and Fatigue Crack Formation.
5.1.1.1 It is desirable but not required (unless by mutual
Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2011. Published October 2011. Originally
ε1
consent of the originator and user of the data) to list the raw
approvedin1972.Lastpreviouseditionapprovedin2004asE468—909(2004) .
DOI: 10.1520/E0468-11.
material production sequence, billet preparation, results of
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
cleanliness analysis, or a combination thereof, when appli-
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
cable.
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
5.1.2 Material in the Fatigue Test Specimen:
the ASTM website.
3
A Guide for Fatigue Testing and the Statistical Analysis of Fatigue Data, ASTM
5.1.2.1 Mechanical Properties—The minimum data on the
STP 91 A,ASTMInternational,1963.Outofprint;availablefromUniversityMicro-
mechanicalpropertiesofthematerialinaconditionidenticalto
films, Inc., 300 N. Zeeb Rd., Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
4
that of the fatigue test specimen should include the tensile
Manual on Statistical Planning and Analysis, ASTM STP 588, ASTM
International, 1975. strength, yield point or yield strength at a specified onset;
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
E468 − 11
elongation in a specified gage length; reduction of area when 6.1.1 Ifstatisticaltechniq
...

This document is not anASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of anASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
´1
Designation:E468–90(Reapproved 2004) Designation: E468 – 11
Standard Practice for
Presentation of Constant Amplitude Fatigue Test Results for
1
Metallic Materials
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E468; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1
´ NOTE—Editorial changes were made throughout in October 2004.
1. Scope
1.1 Thispracticecoversthedesirableandminimuminformationtobecommunicatedbetweentheoriginatorandtheuserofdata
derived from constant-force amplitude axial, bending, or torsion fatigue tests of metallic materials tested in air and at room
temperature.
NOTE 1—Practice E466, although not directly referenced in the text, is considered important enough to be listed in this standard.
2. Referenced Documents
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
E6 Terminology Relating to Methods of Mechanical Testing
E8/E8M Test Methods forTensionTesting of Metallic Materials E206Definitions ofTerms Relating to FatigueTesting and the
Statistical Analysis of Fatigue Data
E466 Practice for Conducting Force Controlled Constant Amplitude Axial Fatigue Tests of Metallic Materials
E467 Practice for Verification of Constant Amplitude Dynamic Forces in an Axial Fatigue Testing System Practice for
Verification of Constant Amplitude Dynamic Forces in an Axial Fatigue Testing System
E1823 Terminology Relating to Fatigue and Fracture Testing
2.2 Special Technical Publications:
3
STP91 A Guide for Fatigue Testing and the Statistical Analysis of Fatigue Data
4
STP588 Manual on Statistical Planning and Analysis
3. Terminology Definitions and Nomenclature
3.1 ThetermsandabbreviationsusedinthispracticearedefinedinTerminologyE6andinDefinitionsE206andinTerminology
E1823. In addition, the following nomenclature is used:
3.2 criterion of failure—complete separation, or the presence of a crack of specified length visible at a specified magnification.
Other criteria may be used but should be clearly defined.
3.3 run-out—no failure at a specified number of loading cycles.
4. Significance and Use
4.1 Fatigue test results may be significantly influenced by the properties and history of the parent material, the operations
performedduringthepreparationofthefatiguespecimens,andthetestingmachineandtestproceduresusedduringthegeneration
of the data. The presentation of fatigue test results should include citation of basic information on the material, specimens, and
1
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E08 on Fatigue and Fracture and is the direct responsibility of SubcommitteeE08.05 E08.05 on Cyclic
Deformation and Fatigue Crack Formation.
Current edition approved May 1, 2004. Published June 2004. Originally approved in 1972. Last previous edition approved in 1998 as E468—90 (1998). DOI:
10.1520/E0468-90R04E01.
´1
Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2011. Published October 2011. Originally approved in 1972. Last previous edition approved in 2004 as E468—909(2004) . DOI:
10.1520/E0468-11.
2
ForreferencedASTMstandards,visittheASTMwebsite,www.astm.org,orcontactASTMCustomerServiceatservice@astm.org.For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
3
Withdrawn. The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on www.astm.org.
3
A Guide for Fatigue Testing and the Statistical Analysis of Fatigue Data, ASTM STP 91 A, ASTM International, 1963. Out of print; available from University Micro-
films, Inc., 300 N. Zeeb Rd., Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
4
A Guide for Fatigue Testing and the Statistical Analysis of Fatigue Data, ASTM STP 91 A, ASTM International, 1963. Out of print; available from University Micro-
films, Inc., 300 N. Zeeb Rd., Ann Arbor, MI 48106.Manual on Statistical Planning and Analysis, ASTM STP 588, ASTM International, 1975.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
E468 – 11
testingtoincreasetheutilityoftheresultsandtoreducetoaminimumthepossibilityofmisinterpretationorimproperapplication
of those results.
5. Listing of Basic Information About Fatigue Test Specimen
5.1 Specification and Properties of Material:
5.1.1 Material Prior to Fatigue Test Specimen Preparation—The minimum information to be presented should include the
designationors
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.